Last Updated: June 28, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ASPIRIN; OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ASPIRIN; OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00771758 ↗ Tapentadol IR vs Oxycodone IR vs Placebo in Acute Pain From Vertebral Compression Fracture Associated With Osteoporosis Completed Grünenthal GmbH Phase 3 2008-09-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of tapentadol immediate release (IR) as compared with placebo and oxycodone IR in patients with acute pain caused by vertebral compression fractures (VCF) associated with assumed osteoporosis for whom treatment with oral opioid analgesics is appropriate.
NCT00771758 ↗ Tapentadol IR vs Oxycodone IR vs Placebo in Acute Pain From Vertebral Compression Fracture Associated With Osteoporosis Completed Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Phase 3 2008-09-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of tapentadol immediate release (IR) as compared with placebo and oxycodone IR in patients with acute pain caused by vertebral compression fractures (VCF) associated with assumed osteoporosis for whom treatment with oral opioid analgesics is appropriate.
NCT00814580 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of Tapentadol Immediate Release (IR) and Oxycodone IR for Treatment of Acute Post-op Pain Following Elective Arthroscopic (Surgery Using a Thin Flexible Scope) Shoulder Surgery Completed Grünenthal GmbH Phase 3 2008-12-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate how tapentadol immediate release (IR) and oxycodone IR treat moderate to severe post-operative pain after elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
NCT00814580 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of Tapentadol Immediate Release (IR) and Oxycodone IR for Treatment of Acute Post-op Pain Following Elective Arthroscopic (Surgery Using a Thin Flexible Scope) Shoulder Surgery Completed Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Phase 3 2008-12-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate how tapentadol immediate release (IR) and oxycodone IR treat moderate to severe post-operative pain after elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
NCT01080677 ↗ Caffeine/Propranolol Intervention for Acute Migraine Completed Stanford University Phase 2 2007-01-01 This is a research study to assess the safety of caffeine/propranolol at different dose levels. We want to find out what effects, good and/or bad, it has on patients and their migraines.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ASPIRIN; OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for ASPIRIN; OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Back Pain 1
Essential Thrombocythemia 1
Migraine Disorders 1
Polycythemia Vera 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ASPIRIN; OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 2
Osteoporosis 1
Thrombocytosis 1
Fractures, Compression 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ASPIRIN; OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ASPIRIN; OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
United States 24
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ASPIRIN; OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
North Carolina 3
New York 3
California 2
Arizona 2
Utah 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ASPIRIN; OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ASPIRIN; OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ASPIRIN; OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
Unknown status 1
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ASPIRIN; OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ASPIRIN; OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Grünenthal GmbH 2
Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC 2
Roche Pharma AG 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ASPIRIN; OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 6
Other 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Aspirin and Oxycodone Hydrochloride Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Revenue Projections (2024-2035)

Last updated: May 24, 2026

Aspirin and oxycodone hydrochloride are commercially mature products with active clinical development concentrated in (1) new use-cases and combinations for aspirin and (2) abuse-deterrent, extended-release, and non-opioid adjunct strategies for oxycodone. Market growth is driven by chronic disease prevalence, guideline alignment, and opioid lifecycle management tied to formulation and payer restrictions.


What clinical trials are active for aspirin and what do the latest results imply?

Featured snippet answer: Current clinical activity for aspirin clusters around cardiometabolic prevention, antiplatelet optimization, and select oncology and inflammatory indications. The impact on near-term revenue is indirect because aspirin is largely generic, with trial outcomes affecting uptake rates and guideline positioning more than patent-led exclusivity.

Aspirin trial themes by indication

  1. Cardiovascular secondary prevention

    • Trials evaluate aspirin dose, timing, and combinations with other antithrombotics in post-acute coronary syndrome and post-stroke settings.
    • Competitive effect: drives guideline adherence and refill persistence rather than new product launches.
  2. Primary prevention re-framing

    • Ongoing studies focus on risk stratification to balance bleeding risk versus benefit.
    • Competitive effect: can shift market volume among high-risk segments and reduce inappropriate use.
  3. Inflammation and colorectal cancer risk modulation

    • Ongoing work uses aspirin’s anti-inflammatory and COX-pathway effects to refine dosing schedules and responder subgroups.
    • Competitive effect: potential label expansion impact is long-cycle and typically modest in revenue unless dosing becomes standardized.
  4. Combination strategies

    • Trials evaluate aspirin with gastroprotection, lipid therapy, and other antiplatelet agents to maintain efficacy and reduce adverse events.
    • Competitive effect: supports market share stability for existing formulations and can favor brands with better tolerability profiles, even in generic-heavy classes.

What do late-stage aspirin outcomes change commercially?

  • Guideline uptake is the main transmission channel. Even with negative bleeding-signal outcomes, aspirin usage can remain high if risk-benefit is reaffirmed for secondary prevention.
  • Dose optimization can matter if outcomes support a “preferred regimen” that payers encourage. That tends to shift share across strengths and formulations more than total class demand.

What clinical trials are active for oxycodone hydrochloride and what is the latest direction of development?

Featured snippet answer: Oxycodone hydrochloride development is concentrated in abuse-deterrent and tamper-resistant formats, reformulated extended-release profiles, and trials testing opioid-sparing regimens (often with non-opioid adjuncts). The commercial implication is stronger lifecycle management even after generic entry, because formulary access increasingly depends on risk mitigation and dosing convenience.

Oxycodone trial themes

  1. Abuse-deterrent formulations (ADF)

    • Trials measure tamperability, pharmacokinetic integrity after manipulation, and opioid receptor activity profiles under challenge conditions.
    • Commercial effect: can protect share by meeting payer and policy requirements for “safer opioid” pathways.
  2. Extended-release lifecycle programs

    • Studies optimize release kinetics and patient adherence, often in chronic pain cohorts.
    • Commercial effect: supports persistence and can reduce switching to other ER opioids.
  3. Opioid-sparing and multimodal analgesia

    • Trials pair oxycodone with adjuncts (non-opioid analgesics, neuropathic pain agents, or anti-inflammatory strategies) to reduce total opioid burden.
    • Commercial effect: can support formulary acceptance in risk-aware settings, but volume effects depend on whether total “pill days” decline.
  4. Real-world evidence oriented designs

    • Studies increasingly incorporate outcomes tied to utilization management, including discontinuation rates, ER utilization, and adherence.
    • Commercial effect: impacts contracting decisions, not just clinical endpoints.

What do late-stage oxycodone outcomes imply for market sizing?

  • If ADF endpoints meet regulators and payers accept the risk mitigation, share retention improves even without patent exclusivity.
  • If opioid-sparing trials demonstrate meaningful reductions in discontinuation or misuse, formulary position strengthens, supporting class value stability.

How big are the current markets for aspirin and oxycodone hydrochloride and how are they splitting by region?

Featured snippet answer: Aspirin is a high-volume, low-unit-value class dominated by generics across North America, Europe, and emerging markets. Oxycodone hydrochloride is a value-sensitive opioid segment shaped by payer controls, controlled-substance regulations, and formulation policies. Geographic mix is driven by prescribing patterns, opioid stewardship intensity, and reimbursement rules.

Aspirin market structure

  • North America: large secondary prevention base; strong generic penetration.
  • Europe: high usage in established cardiology indications; reimbursement and guideline intensity affect volume.
  • Emerging markets: growth correlates with cardiovascular disease burden and healthcare access expansion.

Oxycodone market structure

  • North America: payer controls and opioid stewardship drive contracting; ADF and ER formulations influence access.
  • Europe: stricter opioid policies and prescribing oversight shift demand between strengths and formulations.
  • Rest of world: growth tied to expanding pain management services but constrained by regulatory controls and diversion risk.

When does aspirin lose exclusivity and what does that mean for revenue projection?

Featured snippet answer: Aspirin’s modern commercial footprint is largely governed by generic availability. Loss of exclusivity historically affected branded products, but current revenue expectations are driven by generic pricing, volume durability, and guideline-led persistence.

Revenue projection implication

  • Unit revenue growth is limited; volume growth in high-risk prevention and stable secondary prevention can lift revenue slowly.
  • Price compression offsets incremental volume gains.

When does oxycodone hydrochloride face the biggest generic entry and price pressure windows?

Featured snippet answer: Oxycodone’s revenue exposure is shaped less by “one date” and more by formulation-by-formulation lifecycle transitions tied to abuse-deterrent and ER platforms. Price pressure intensifies when payer contracts broaden to multiple AWP-to-NADAC-equivalent generics and when branded formulations lose preferred status.

Generic entry risk mechanics

  • Switching is driven by pharmacy benefit design, step therapy, and opioid safety policy acceptance.
  • Contracting determines whether ADF or ER retains premium pricing.

Which patents protect aspirin and oxycodone hydrochloride and how strong is the estate?

Featured snippet answer: Aspirin is not meaningfully protected in modern commercial product channels by enforceable exclusivity that constrains competition; oxycodone’s meaningful differentiation often rests on formulation patents for ER/ADF platforms rather than core active ingredient coverage.

Estate strength by practical business lens

  1. Aspirin

    • Competitive constraint from widespread generics.
    • Business leverage comes from supply reliability, packaging compliance, and contracting rather than enforceable IP.
  2. Oxycodone hydrochloride

    • Strongest protection typically maps to:
      • abuse-deterrent mechanisms,
      • ER matrix or release profiles,
      • manufacturing process constraints,
      • specific claims for resistance to manipulation and PK integrity after tampering.

Implications for strategy

  • Investors and licensees usually underwrite on:
    • ability to maintain formulary access under ADF policies,
    • litigation stability of platform claims (where applicable),
    • and the payer threshold for “preferred” opioid tiers.

What patent litigation affects oxycodone hydrochloride and aspirin commercialization?

Featured snippet answer: For aspirin, litigation impact is typically limited at the active ingredient level because of broad generic saturation. For oxycodone, litigation risk clusters around formulation patents, Orange Book listed claims, and Paragraph IV challenges for specific branded or ADF/ER products.

Where disputes matter commercially

  • Settlement-driven timing changes generic launch sequencing.
  • Injunction outcomes determine whether a brand retains preferred formulary status during the post-settlement gap.

What is the Orange Book status of aspirin and oxycodone hydrochloride?

Featured snippet answer: Aspirin is broadly available and the branded landscape is mostly historical; Orange Book relevance is limited to specific currently marketed dosage forms, strengths, or legacy listings. For oxycodone, Orange Book status is more consequential because ADF and ER products may have live listed patents tied to specific formulation or use claims.


How does aspirin dosing and formulation (enteric-coated vs immediate) affect trial outcomes and market performance?

Featured snippet answer: Formulation affects tolerability and GI safety profiles, which influence adherence. In aspirin, enteric-coated strategies reduce upper GI symptoms for some patients, which can improve persistence and reduce discontinuations.

Commercial drivers

  • Adherence and discontinuation: improved tolerability can support higher refill rates even within generic constraints.
  • Guideline adoption: dose recommendations drive strength-level demand.

How does oxycodone hydrochloride formulation (immediate-release vs extended-release vs abuse-deterrent) compare on market access?

Featured snippet answer: ER and ADF formulations tend to have better access under opioid stewardship frameworks that favor risk mitigation and stable plasma exposure.

Market access comparisons

  • Immediate-release: often faces tighter controls in some settings due to misuse/diversion optics.
  • Extended-release: generally preferred for chronic pain management when clinically appropriate; formulary acceptance can be stronger if ER reduces dosing frequency and improves adherence.
  • Abuse-deterrent: favored in payer policies that require tamper resistance and PK integrity.

What revenue projection scenarios apply for aspirin through 2035?

Featured snippet answer: Aspirin revenue growth through 2035 is primarily modest and volume-led. Pricing headwinds from generics and competitive supply remain the dominant limiter.

Projection framework (directional)

  • Base case: low single-digit CAGR supported by cardiovascular risk prevalence and secondary prevention durability; net growth moderated by price compression.
  • Downside: stronger bleeding-risk guideline tightening or substitution to alternative antiplatelet strategies reduces market share in primary prevention.
  • Upside: broader acceptance of optimized dosing regimens and expansion in select preventive or anti-inflammatory cohorts raises long-term persistence.

What revenue projection scenarios apply for oxycodone hydrochloride through 2035?

Featured snippet answer: Oxycodone revenue projections are more sensitive to (1) payer contracting outcomes, (2) opioid stewardship policy intensity, and (3) successful adoption of ADF/ER platforms that retain premium positioning.

Projection framework (directional)

  • Base case: mid to high single-digit value growth is possible even with unit declines if formulary placement for ADF/ER sustains or reduces switching losses.
  • Downside: accelerated preference for alternative opioids or tighter opioid limits reduce total “days of therapy,” compressing value.
  • Upside: higher adoption of risk-mitigated formulations plus stable chronic pain demand sustains premium pricing in preferred tiers.

What are the next commercialization catalysts for aspirin and oxycodone hydrochloride?

Aspirin catalysts

  • Updated cardiovascular guideline recommendations on dose and combination strategies.
  • Additional evidence refining bleeding-risk stratification in primary prevention.

Oxycodone catalysts

  • Completion and label-reinforcing data for abuse-deterrent and ER performance.
  • Evidence from payer and real-world utilization studies supporting lower misuse or discontinuation and better adherence.

Key Takeaways

  • Aspirin clinical development remains largely guideline and indication-refinement oriented; market impact flows through uptake and persistence more than exclusivity.
  • Oxycodone hydrochloride development focuses on abuse-deterrent, ER lifecycle programs, and opioid-sparing strategies; market impact flows through payer access and preferred-tier contracts.
  • Aspirin revenue growth is modest and constrained by generic price compression.
  • Oxycodone revenue is more volatile and policy-sensitive; ADF/ER acceptance is the key lever for value preservation.

FAQs

1) What indications are most likely to drive aspirin trial-related demand changes?

Secondary prevention and risk-stratified primary prevention where guideline changes translate into prescribing volume shifts.

2) How do opioid stewardship policies affect oxycodone prescribing in the U.S.?

They drive payer restrictions, preferred drug lists, and tighter utilization management, shifting demand toward risk-mitigated ER/ADF products.

3) Are abuse-deterrent formulations enough to sustain oxycodone value after generic entry?

They can preserve premium positioning if payers treat tamper resistance and PK integrity as required contracting criteria.

4) What matters more for aspirin market share: dosing changes or safety outcomes?

Safety outcomes tied to tolerability and adherence typically move persistence and refill behavior more than small dosing changes.

5) What is the biggest commercial risk for oxycodone hydrochloride through 2035?

Policy tightening that reduces total opioid days of therapy and accelerates substitution to alternative agents or formulations.


References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. FDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Drug Trials Snapshots. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/drug-trials-snapshots
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for aspirin and oxycodone hydrochloride trials. https://clinicaltrials.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.