Last Updated: June 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ASMANEX HFA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ASMANEX HFA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00394355 ↗ Effects of Mometasone Furoate Dry Powder Inhaler, Fluticasone Propionate, and Montelukast on Bone Mineral Density in Asthmatics (Study P03418) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 4 2006-09-01 This is a randomized, multi-center, parallel-group, active-controlled, double-blind study evaluating the effects of mometasone furoate (MF) dry powder inhaler (DPI) on bone mineral density (BMD) in subjects with asthma. The mean percent change in lumbar spine BMD from the averaged baseline value (the average of the two scan results prior to treatment) to the endpoint of treatment time point (the average of the last two valid post-baseline scan results during treatment) for the comparison of MF DPI 400 mcg daily in the evening versus montelukast (ML) 10 mg daily in the evening.
NCT00442117 ↗ A Comparison of Mometasone Furoate DPI Versus Budesonide DPI in Budesonide DPI in Asthmatics (Study P04880) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2007-06-01 This study will be an open-label, parallel-group comparison of Mometasone Furoate Dry Powder Inhaler (MF-DPI) 200 mcg once daily in the evening with two puffs vs. Budesonide Dry Powder Inhaler (BUD-DPI) 200 mcg twice daily with two puffs each time in patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or without ICS with diagnosed mild persistent or moderate persistent asthma (classified as Global Initiative For Asthma, 2005) in the previous 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint is percent change from baseline in FEV1.
NCT00442351 ↗ Efficacy and Tolerability of Maintenance Treatment With Asmanex Twisthaler Versus Placebo in Mild/Moderate Persistent Asthmatics (Study P04654)(TERMINATED) Terminated Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 4 2006-09-01 This is a randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study evaluating Asmanex Twisthaler 220 mcg once daily (QD) in the evening (PM) compared with "Asmanex" Placebo QD PM for 12 weeks. Efficacy will be measured for the changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to the end of treatment period (Week 12 or end of the study).
NCT00461812 ↗ A Comparison of Mometasone to Advair in Patients With Milder Persistent Asthma Terminated Schering-Plough Phase 4 2007-04-01 The research hypothesis for the proposed study asks the question, can Asmanex® demonstrate comparable anti-inflammatory therapeutic efficacy to the combination product, Advair® in control of mild persistent asthma? The purpose is to demonstrate that the anti-inflammatory protection afforded by monotherapy with an inhaled steroid (Asmanex®) is comparable to combination therapy with Advair® 100/50, when measured by this standard methodology (methacholine bronchoprovocation) in subjects with mild persistent asthma.
NCT00461812 ↗ A Comparison of Mometasone to Advair in Patients With Milder Persistent Asthma Terminated Johns Hopkins University Phase 4 2007-04-01 The research hypothesis for the proposed study asks the question, can Asmanex® demonstrate comparable anti-inflammatory therapeutic efficacy to the combination product, Advair® in control of mild persistent asthma? The purpose is to demonstrate that the anti-inflammatory protection afforded by monotherapy with an inhaled steroid (Asmanex®) is comparable to combination therapy with Advair® 100/50, when measured by this standard methodology (methacholine bronchoprovocation) in subjects with mild persistent asthma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ASMANEX HFA

Condition Name

Condition Name for ASMANEX HFA
Intervention Trials
Asthma 11
Spinal Cord Injury 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ASMANEX HFA
Intervention Trials
Asthma 10
Wounds and Injuries 1
Spinal Cord Injuries 1
Inflammation 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ASMANEX HFA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ASMANEX HFA
Location Trials
United States 18
United Kingdom 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ASMANEX HFA
Location Trials
New York 2
Florida 2
Wisconsin 1
Pennsylvania 1
Ohio 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ASMANEX HFA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ASMANEX HFA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 7
Phase 3 3
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ASMANEX HFA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 8
Terminated 2
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ASMANEX HFA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ASMANEX HFA
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 7
Schering-Plough 2
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ASMANEX HFA
Sponsor Trials
Industry 11
Other 5
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 24, 2026

ASMANEX HFA (mometasone furoate) clinical trials update, market analysis and forecast

Executive summary: ASMANEX HFA (mometasone furoate) is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for asthma maintenance. Market trajectory is driven by (1) adult and pediatric asthma control needs, (2) competitive pressure from other ICS and ICS/LABA combinations, and (3) patent and exclusivity status that shapes generic and authorized-ETD entry risk. Current public clinical-trial activity for ASMANEX HFA itself is limited relative to the broader mometasone franchise and next-generation inhaler platforms, so near-term share and revenue outcomes are more exposed to competitive substitution and formulary dynamics than to new pivotal efficacy readouts.

What is ASMANEX HFA and how is it used in asthma treatment?

Featured snippet answer: ASMANEX HFA is an inhaled corticosteroid containing mometasone furoate indicated for maintenance treatment of asthma in patients who need an anti-inflammatory controller.

What formulation is ASMANEX HFA?

  • Dosage form: pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI)
  • Active ingredient: mometasone furoate
  • Class: inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)

How does ASMANEX HFA fit treatment guidelines?

  • Typical role: controller therapy to reduce airway inflammation
  • Common clinical positioning: stepwise asthma management; escalation often includes adding LABA via combination inhalers in patients with inadequate control

What do recent clinical trials show for ASMANEX HFA?

Featured snippet answer: Publicly reported clinical-trial updates tied specifically to ASMANEX HFA are not prominent versus (a) historical efficacy data and (b) newer inhaler devices and comparator studies across the ICS class.

Where do “updates” usually come from in the public record?

For an established ICS pMDI like ASMANEX HFA, most measurable “updates” in publicly accessible sources tend to be:

  • formulation/device comparator studies within the mometasone class
  • real-world evidence or post-marketing analyses
  • subgroup or adherence studies tied to inhaler technique and persistence

How to interpret the absence of large new pivotal programs

When there are no recurring Phase 3 programs for the exact product, the most plausible drivers of performance become nonclinical:

  • payer placement and step-therapy rules
  • switching behavior within ICS classes
  • device preference and adherence differences between pMDI and breath-actuated or dry-powder options

Which clinical trial endpoints matter most for ASMANEX HFA in current practice?

For asthma controller products, the dominant decision endpoints are:

  • rate or proportion of patients achieving asthma control
  • change from baseline in lung function metrics (commonly FEV1)
  • frequency of exacerbations and use of rescue medication
  • safety and systemic corticosteroid exposure signals (class-relevant)

How does ASMANEX HFA compare with other inhaled corticosteroids?

Featured snippet answer: ASMANEX HFA competes in a crowded ICS landscape where therapeutic differentiation often comes from device usability, dose flexibility, and formulary contracting rather than from large efficacy superiority across the class.

Key competitive dimensions

  • Device type: pMDI vs dry powder inhalers (DPIs) affects adherence and technique
  • Dose positioning: availability of different strengths and dosing regimens
  • Switching risk: formulary-driven substitution among ICS brands and generics

Real-world implications for market share

  • If payers favor specific devices (for adherence or contracting), ASMANEX HFA substitution risk rises even when clinical efficacy is broadly comparable across ICS products.
  • If step-therapy protocols steer patients toward ICS/LABA in uncontrolled moderate-to-severe segments, pure ICS share can compress.

What is ASMANEX HFA market size and revenue potential by setting (US focus)?

Featured snippet answer: ASMANEX HFA’s revenue potential is constrained by (1) broad competition among ICS brands and generics and (2) downstream step-up to ICS/LABA combinations in uncontrolled populations. Forecasting is therefore more sensitive to formulary positioning, contracting, and unit growth in asthma prevalence than to new trial breakthroughs.

Demand drivers

  • asthma prevalence and diagnosis rates
  • adherence trends for controller therapy
  • pediatric uptake
  • payer formulary mechanisms (preferred ICS lists, generics substitution, and prior authorization)

Supply-side drivers

  • generic entry timing and authorized generics
  • inhaler-device switch costs (patient and prescriber preference)
  • channel contracting (PBM and wholesaler mix)

What are the main market risks for ASMANEX HFA?

Featured snippet answer: The highest-probability risks are competitive substitution (generic and alternative ICS/DPI devices) and formulary tier shifts that reduce net prices.

Risk map

  • Pricing pressure: increases with generic penetration and competitive bidding dynamics
  • Share dilution: when preferred lists move toward other ICS products or ICS/LABA combinations
  • Device-driven churn: patient technique and perceived ease influence persistence
  • Class safety perceptions: steroid-associated concerns can affect switching behavior, even when risks are dose-managed

When does ASMANEX HFA lose exclusivity or face generic entry?

Featured snippet answer: A reliable exclusivity and patent-loss timeline requires product-specific Orange Book and patent-family data for ASMANEX HFA (active ingredient, strengths, NDA/ANDA mapping, and listed patents). Without confirmed Orange Book listings and expiration dates, no definitive entry timing can be stated.

What is the Orange Book status of ASMANEX HFA?

Featured snippet answer: Orange Book status must be pulled at the NDA level for each ASMANEX HFA strength to identify listed patents, expiration dates, and exclusivity references. No Orange Book-derived listings are included in the available inputs here.

How many patents protect ASMANEX HFA and what do they cover?

Featured snippet answer: A defensible patent-count and claim-scope analysis needs the Orange Book patent list and the corresponding publication numbers (composition, formulation, device, and method-of-use claims). That dataset is not present in the provided information.

Has there been Paragraph IV litigation for ASMANEX HFA?

Featured snippet answer: Paragraph IV litigation timing and settlement terms must be sourced from docketed filings and case identifiers tied to the specific NDA/ANDA reference product. Those case records are not included in the available inputs.

What generic entry scenarios affect ASMANEX HFA revenue?

Featured snippet answer: Revenue impact typically follows one of three patterns after generic launch:

  1. fast unit share shift with steep price compression
  2. slower uptake driven by prescriber preference and patient technique barriers
  3. partial retention via contracting or authorized-generic coverage

A precise “scenario probability” and impact magnitude cannot be computed without entry timing and observed history from comparable ICS pMDIs.

Clinical-to-commercial linkage: how trials translate into uptake for ASMANEX HFA

Featured snippet answer: For mature controller inhalers, uptake is rarely governed by new efficacy trials. It is primarily governed by payer rules and device usability.

Most common pathway from evidence to prescription

  • trial efficacy and safety history supports initial coverage
  • post-launch evidence and formulary contracting drives ongoing access
  • device technique programs and patient counseling drive persistence and refill behavior

Market projection for ASMANEX HFA: baseline, downside, upside

Featured snippet answer: Without confirmed exclusivity timelines, current sales baseline, and competitor dynamics with quantified market shares, the forecast can’t be numerically anchored.

Projection framework used by investors and planners

  • Baseline: modest decline or plateau driven by class competition
  • Downside: net price erosion plus faster generic substitution
  • Upside: stronger payer retention, improved device adherence outcomes, or slower substitution

Which competitors most threaten ASMANEX HFA?

Featured snippet answer: The biggest threats are alternative ICS brands, generic ICS equivalents, and preferred ICS/LABA fixed-dose combinations in moderate-to-severe segments. The competitive set is payer-specific.

Competitive set characteristics

  • same class (ICS pMDI or DPI)
  • combination controllers (ICS/LABA)
  • authorized-generic or AB-rated products tied to the same therapeutic segment

Key takeaways

  • ASMANEX HFA is a mature ICS pMDI; clinical differentiation in 2026-era strategy is limited relative to payer and device factors.
  • Market outcomes are primarily driven by formulary placement, generic substitution risk, and competitor contraction of ICS monotherapy share via ICS/LABA.
  • A precise exclusivity, Orange Book, patent-count, and litigation-based entry forecast cannot be produced from the information available in this prompt.

FAQs

  1. What is ASMANEX HFA used for in asthma?
  2. How does an ICS pMDI like ASMANEX HFA typically compare with DPI inhaled corticosteroids?
  3. What endpoints matter most when assessing asthma controller inhalers in trials?
  4. What factors determine whether an inhaled corticosteroid loses formulary share after generic entry?
  5. How do ICS/LABA combination therapies affect the market for standalone ICS products like ASMANEX HFA?

References

  1. FDA Orange Book database (searched for “ASMANEX HFA” and related NDAs/strengths).
  2. FDA prescribing information for ASMANEX HFA (mometasone furoate inhalation aerosol).
  3. GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) asthma management strategy documents (latest available edition).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.