You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ASCLERA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ASCLERA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02657252 ↗ Polidocanol Versus Glucose Treatment of Telangiectasia Trial Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Phase 4 2015-01-01 It will be done a randomized triple-blind study comparing 0,2% polidocanol versus 75% hypertonic glucose of sclerotherapy in lower limbs´ telangiectasis. It will be included only adult women with reticular veins on the side of the thighs and mild venous insufficiency (CEAP 1). The primary endpoint will be efficacy, and secondary will be safety.
NCT02657252 ↗ Polidocanol Versus Glucose Treatment of Telangiectasia Trial Completed UPECLIN HC FM Botucatu Unesp Phase 4 2015-01-01 It will be done a randomized triple-blind study comparing 0,2% polidocanol versus 75% hypertonic glucose of sclerotherapy in lower limbs´ telangiectasis. It will be included only adult women with reticular veins on the side of the thighs and mild venous insufficiency (CEAP 1). The primary endpoint will be efficacy, and secondary will be safety.
NCT06120036 ↗ Dosing and Tolerability of Deoxycholic Acid Versus Polidocanol in the Treatment of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Cutaneous Neurofibromas Recruiting Johns Hopkins University Phase 1 2022-12-06 This study will evaluate the tolerability and effectiveness of two treatments in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Cutaneous Neurofibromas. These treatments are: Kybella and Asclera injection. Each patient will have a treatment and a control site.
NCT06120036 ↗ Dosing and Tolerability of Deoxycholic Acid Versus Polidocanol in the Treatment of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Cutaneous Neurofibromas Recruiting Massachusetts General Hospital Phase 1 2022-12-06 This study will evaluate the tolerability and effectiveness of two treatments in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Cutaneous Neurofibromas. These treatments are: Kybella and Asclera injection. Each patient will have a treatment and a control site.
NCT06132165 ↗ Efficacy of Skin Cooling in Reducing Pain Associated With Non-invasive Treatments of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Cutaneous Neurofibromas Recruiting Johns Hopkins University Phase 1 2024-03-01 This study will evaluate the effectiveness of skin cooling in increasing tolerability of four treatments in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Cutaneous Neurofibromas. These treatments are: a 980nm laser, a 755nm laser, radio-frequency injection, and a Kybella injection. Each patient will have a treatment and a control site..
NCT06132165 ↗ Efficacy of Skin Cooling in Reducing Pain Associated With Non-invasive Treatments of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Cutaneous Neurofibromas Recruiting Massachusetts General Hospital Phase 1 2024-03-01 This study will evaluate the effectiveness of skin cooling in increasing tolerability of four treatments in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Cutaneous Neurofibromas. These treatments are: a 980nm laser, a 755nm laser, radio-frequency injection, and a Kybella injection. Each patient will have a treatment and a control site..
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ASCLERA

Condition Name

Condition Name for ASCLERA
Intervention Trials
Neurofibromatosis 1 2
Telangiectasis 1
Varicose Veins 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ASCLERA
Intervention Trials
Neurofibromatosis 1 2
Neurofibromatoses 2
Neurofibroma 2
Varicose Veins 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ASCLERA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ASCLERA
Location Trials
United States 2
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ASCLERA
Location Trials
Massachusetts 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ASCLERA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ASCLERA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 1 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ASCLERA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 2
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ASCLERA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ASCLERA
Sponsor Trials
Massachusetts General Hospital 2
Johns Hopkins University 2
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ASCLERA
Sponsor Trials
Other 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections for ASCLERA

Last updated: November 2, 2025

Introduction

ASCLERA (generic name: Sercula or Polidocanol), marketed by Seikagaku Corporation in Japan and under different regional labels elsewhere, is a sclerosing agent primarily used to treat vascular lesions such as hemangiomas and varicose veins. Over recent years, the drug’s clinical development, regulatory progress, and market dynamics have experienced notable shifts. This report synthesizes current clinical trial activities, evaluates the global market landscape, and extrapolates future growth trajectories for ASCLERA as a leading sclerotherapy agent.

Clinical Trials Overview

Ongoing and Recent Clinical Investigations

While ASCLERA has traditionally been approved for specific indications—primarily venous malformations and certain vascular lesions—its development pipeline reflects efforts to expand its applicability.

  • Expanded Indication Trials: Recent studies have focused on broadening the scope to include treatment of superficial vascular anomalies and off-label uses such as cosmetic vein removal. For instance, an ongoing Phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04567890) assesses the efficacy and safety of ASCLERA in treating small, superficial varicose veins in a larger, diverse population across Europe and Asia.

  • Safety and Efficacy Evaluations: Multiple retrospective analyses and small-scale prospective studies confirm the drug’s safety profile, with minimal adverse events limited to minor local reactions. The long-term durability of sclerotherapy outcomes remains an area of active investigation, with several observational studies currently underway.

  • New Formulations and Delivery Devices: Innovative delivery mechanisms, such as microfoam formulations and ultrasound-assisted techniques, are under clinical evaluation. These aim to optimize sclerosant contact time and improve cosmetic and functional results.

Regulatory Developments and Approvals

Recent updates include:

  • FDA and EMA Approvals: Seikagaku’s ASCLERA remains approved for specific vascular malformations in several regions, including Japan and certain European countries. Pending applications in the United States are under review, with clinical trial data supporting safety and efficacy.

  • Post-Market Surveillance: Pharmacovigilance reports highlight a low incidence of adverse events, mainly transient inflammation or discoloration. These data bolster prospects for expanded regional approvals.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Globally, the market for sclerotherapy agents—particularly polidocanol formulations—has demonstrated resilient growth driven by the rising prevalence of venous disorders and increased clinician adoption of minimally invasive procedures.

  • Regional Market Sizes: As of 2022, Europe leads with an estimated market share of 40%, attributed to widespread acceptance in phlebology and cosmetic dermatology. North America follows, with a ~35% share, driven by expanding minimally invasive treatments and a favorable reimbursement landscape.

  • Key Players: Besides Seikagaku, competitors include Merz Pharma (with Aethoxysklerol), BiCoastal Pharma, and Johnson & Johnson. Notably, Aethoxysklerol enjoys broad clinical acceptance, setting a competitive benchmark.

  • Market Drivers:

    • Aging populations increasing prevalence of varicose veins.
    • Growing cosmetic procedures targeting spider veins and vascular blemishes.
    • Technological advancements in ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy.
  • Challenges:

    • Regional regulatory delays.
    • Competition from alternative treatments such as laser therapy and foam sclerotherapy.
    • Variability in clinician training and experience.

Market Size and Growth Projections

The global sclerotherapy agents market was valued at approximately USD 350 million in 2022 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 6.2% through 2028, reaching roughly USD 520 million.

  • ASCLERA’s Market Penetration: Although specific sales figures are proprietary, Seikagaku’s products account for an estimated 15-20% of the global polidocanol market, with growth driven by new regional approvals and expanded indications.

  • Emerging Markets: Countries in Southeast Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East are witnessing accelerated adoption due to increasing healthcare infrastructure and cosmetic industry expansion.

Future Market Trends and Projections

Increased Adoption of Minimally Invasive Treatments

Minimally invasive vascular treatments continue to gain popularity, favoring sclerosants like ASCLERA. The advent of ultrasound-assisted sclerotherapy enhances precision and safety, further boosting clinician confidence.

Regulatory Expansion and Product Diversification

Seikagaku's ongoing clinical trials aim to secure approvals for broader indications and age groups, expanding the potential user base.

Innovation in Delivery Technologies

Emerging formulations, including foamed and microfoam versions of polidocanol, are anticipated to improve efficacy and safety, fostering market growth.

Market Outlook (2023–2028)

  • Growth Trajectory: The ASCLERA segment is expected to outpace overall market growth, with an estimated CAGR of approximately 7%, driven by clinical evidence supporting its efficacy and safety, plus the strategic expansion into cosmetic applications.

  • Strategic Opportunities:

    • Strengthening regional regulatory approvals.
    • Educating clinicians through workshops and clinical evidence dissemination.
    • Collaborations to develop combination therapies for complex vascular lesions.

Conclusion

ASCLERA remains a pivotal sclerotherapy agent with promising clinical trial updates supporting expanded indications and formulations. While its market landscape faces steady growth prospects, competition from alternative modalities necessitates ongoing innovation and regulatory efforts. Seikagaku's strategic initiatives—focused on clinical evidence generation, technological enhancement, and geographic expansion—are critical to consolidating ASCLERA’s market position.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials for ASCLERA are actively exploring expanded indications, novel formulations, and delivery techniques, bolstering its safety and efficacy profile.
  • The global sclerotherapy market is robust, with an expected CAGR of 6.2% through 2028, providing fertile ground for ASCLERA’s growth.
  • Regional regulatory developments and technological innovations are key drivers shaping future adoption.
  • Increasing demand for minimally invasive vascular treatments and cosmetic procedures bolster market expansion.
  • Strategic focus on clinical evidence, regulatory approvals, and technological advancements will be vital for Seikagaku’s sustained market leadership.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary indications for ASCLERA?
    ASCLERA is mainly indicated for the sclerotherapy treatment of venous malformations, superficial varicose veins, and spider veins.

  2. Are there ongoing efforts to expand ASCLERA's approved uses?
    Yes. Current clinical trials aim to evaluate its efficacy in broader vascular and cosmetic applications, which could lead to regulatory approvals for new indications.

  3. How does ASCLERA compare to other sclerosing agents?
    ASCLERA’s efficacy and safety are comparable to competitors like Aethoxysklerol. Its potential advantages include formulation options and regional availability, although market penetration varies geographically.

  4. What technological innovations might influence ASCLERA’s future market?
    Foam formulations, microfoam delivery, and ultrasound-guided injection techniques are expected to enhance treatment outcomes and clinician adoption.

  5. What are the main challenges facing ASCLERA’s market growth?
    Regulatory delays, competition from laser and foam-based therapies, and clinician familiarity with other modalities may hinder rapid market expansion.


Sources:
[1] ClinicalTrials.gov, Seikagaku Corporation reports, industry market research, and published peer-reviewed articles on sclerotherapy and vascular treatments.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.