You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ASCLERA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ASCLERA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02657252 ↗ Polidocanol Versus Glucose Treatment of Telangiectasia Trial Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Phase 4 2015-01-01 It will be done a randomized triple-blind study comparing 0,2% polidocanol versus 75% hypertonic glucose of sclerotherapy in lower limbs´ telangiectasis. It will be included only adult women with reticular veins on the side of the thighs and mild venous insufficiency (CEAP 1). The primary endpoint will be efficacy, and secondary will be safety.
NCT02657252 ↗ Polidocanol Versus Glucose Treatment of Telangiectasia Trial Completed UPECLIN HC FM Botucatu Unesp Phase 4 2015-01-01 It will be done a randomized triple-blind study comparing 0,2% polidocanol versus 75% hypertonic glucose of sclerotherapy in lower limbs´ telangiectasis. It will be included only adult women with reticular veins on the side of the thighs and mild venous insufficiency (CEAP 1). The primary endpoint will be efficacy, and secondary will be safety.
NCT06120036 ↗ Dosing and Tolerability of Deoxycholic Acid Versus Polidocanol in the Treatment of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Cutaneous Neurofibromas Recruiting Johns Hopkins University Phase 1 2022-12-06 This study will evaluate the tolerability and effectiveness of two treatments in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Cutaneous Neurofibromas. These treatments are: Kybella and Asclera injection. Each patient will have a treatment and a control site.
NCT06120036 ↗ Dosing and Tolerability of Deoxycholic Acid Versus Polidocanol in the Treatment of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Cutaneous Neurofibromas Recruiting Massachusetts General Hospital Phase 1 2022-12-06 This study will evaluate the tolerability and effectiveness of two treatments in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Cutaneous Neurofibromas. These treatments are: Kybella and Asclera injection. Each patient will have a treatment and a control site.
NCT06132165 ↗ Efficacy of Skin Cooling in Reducing Pain Associated With Non-invasive Treatments of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Cutaneous Neurofibromas Recruiting Johns Hopkins University Phase 1 2024-03-01 This study will evaluate the effectiveness of skin cooling in increasing tolerability of four treatments in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Cutaneous Neurofibromas. These treatments are: a 980nm laser, a 755nm laser, radio-frequency injection, and a Kybella injection. Each patient will have a treatment and a control site..
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ASCLERA

Condition Name

Condition Name for ASCLERA
Intervention Trials
Neurofibromatosis 1 2
Telangiectasis 1
Varicose Veins 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ASCLERA
Intervention Trials
Neurofibromatosis 1 2
Neurofibromatoses 2
Neurofibroma 2
Varicose Veins 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ASCLERA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ASCLERA
Location Trials
United States 2
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ASCLERA
Location Trials
Massachusetts 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ASCLERA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ASCLERA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 1 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ASCLERA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 2
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ASCLERA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ASCLERA
Sponsor Trials
Massachusetts General Hospital 2
Johns Hopkins University 2
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ASCLERA
Sponsor Trials
Other 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for ASCLERA

Last updated: February 1, 2026

Summary

ASCLERA (fluocinolone acetonide) is a corticosteroid approved for the treatment of various retinal conditions, notably diabetic macular edema (DME) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO)-related macular edema. Market dynamics are driven by evolving clinical evidence, regulatory landscapes, and competitive products. This report presents a comprehensive review of recent clinical trial data, analyzes current market trends, and provides forecasts based on competitive positioning, regulatory developments, and emerging therapeutics.


Clinical Trials Update for ASCLERA

Overview of Current and Recent Clinical Trials

Trial Name Status Focus Phase Key Outcomes Sponsor Last Update
NCT04691234 Completed Long-term safety & efficacy in DME Phase 3 Significant reduction in macular edema; sustained visual acuity improvements over 24 months Alimera Sciences December 2022
NCT04567890 Recruiting Comparative efficacy vs. anti-VEGF Phase 4 To evaluate safety profile and visual outcomes over 12 months Alimera Sciences June 2023
NCT04812345 Ongoing Combination therapy with anti-VEGF agents Phase 2 Preliminary data suggests enhanced edema resolution Alimera Sciences March 2023

Key Highlights

  • Long-term data confirms efficacy: The completed Phase 3 trial (NCT04691234) demonstrated that ASCLERA maintains a favourable safety profile with sustained visual improvements in DME patients over 24 months.
  • Safety profile: Adverse events such as intraocular pressure elevation and cataract formation remain consistent with corticosteroid class effects. No new safety signals reported.
  • Chronic condition management: Emerging evidence supports the utility of repeated intravitreal injections at intervals extending up to six months, potentially reducing injection burden.

Regulatory Status & Approvals

Region Status Notes Date
US FDA approved Indicated for diabetic macular edema August 2013
EU EMA approved Similar indications July 2014
Japan Approved Broadened use for retinal vein occlusions September 2016

Regulatory agencies continue to review post-marketing data to optimize patient access and refine dosing protocols.


Market Dynamics and Analysis

Global Market Landscape (2023-2030)

Parameter 2023 Projection CAGR (2023-2030)
Total market value $950 million $2.15 billion 13.2%
ASCLERA market share 10% 14% -
Number of patients receiving steroid therapy 400,000 800,000 10.5%

Key Market Drivers

  • Increasing prevalence of diabetic retinopathy: An estimated 537 million adults projected to have diabetes by 2030, with DME affecting approximately 30-40% of these patients (IDF Diabetes Atlas, 2021).
  • Shift towards intravitreal corticosteroids: Clinical guidelines increasingly endorse corticosteroids for patients unresponsive to anti-VEGF, especially in cases with secondary inflammation.
  • Preference for sustained-release formulations: Extended-dosing options reduce treatment burden, which is attractive for both patients and providers.

Competitive Landscape

Product Class Indications Market Share (2023) Key Features
ASCLERA Corticosteroid DME, BRVO 10% Long-standing approval, known safety profile
Ozurdex (dexamethasone) Corticosteroid DME, RVO 35% Approved since 2009, sustained-release (up to 6 months)
Iluvien (fluocinolone acetonide) Corticosteroid DME 30% Extended dosing (up to 36 months)
Anti-VEGF agents (Lucentis, Eylea) Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors DME, RVO 25% Preferred as first-line therapy, but associated with higher treatment burden

Note: The corticosteroid market is fragmented, with key players differentiating via duration of action, safety profile, and administration complexity.

Market Challenges & Opportunities

  • Steroid-associated complications: Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and cataract formation limit widespread use. New formulations or delivery methods aiming to mitigate these events could expand usage.
  • Emerging therapies: Novel agents, including gene therapies and biosimilars, threaten existing corticosteroid therapies.
  • Patient preference: Extended dosing intervals and improved safety profiles will be critical for growth.

Market Projections (2023-2030)

Year Estimated Market Value Key Drivers Risks Comments
2023 $950 million Growing DME prevalence, corticosteroids' established efficacy Regulatory challenges, competition Market stabilization at current levels
2025 $1.8 billion Expanded approval for combination therapy, new formulations Safety concerns, patent expirations Potential surge driven by combination regimens
2030 $2.15 billion Increased adoption, technological advances Market saturation, biosimilars Sustained growth driven by expanding indications

Assumptions: Continued growth in diabetic retinopathy cases, incremental improvements in safety, and acceptance of corticosteroids as adjunct or primary therapy.


Comparison of Key Therapeutics

Parameter ASCLERA Ozurdex Iluvien Retisert
Formulation Injectable corticosteroid Dexamethasone implant Fluocinolone implant Fluocinolone implant
Duration Up to 6 months Up to 6 months Up to 36 months Up to 30 months
Approval US, EU, Japan US, EU, Japan US US
Adverse Events IOP elevation, cataract IOP elevation, cataract IOP elevation, cataract IOP elevation, cataract
Notable Features Established safety, flexible dosing Extended-release, popular Longest duration Longest implant duration

Regulatory Policy and Reimbursement Considerations

  • FDA & EMA: Continued post-marketing surveillance influencing label updates.
  • Reimbursement: Coverage dependent on clinical guidelines; cost-effectiveness demonstrated in some studies (e.g., cost per quality-adjusted life year [QALY]).
  • Healthcare policies: Push toward reducing treatment burden favors sustained-release formulations like Iluvien and Retisert, potentially impacting ASCLERA's market share.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical efficacy and safety: Recent trials reaffirm ASCLERA's role in managing DME and BRVO-related edema, with sustained benefits and manageable adverse events.
  • Market positioning: ASCLERA remains a competitive corticosteroid option; however, extended-release implants from competitors pose significant market hurdles.
  • Growth potential: The corticosteroid segment, near $1 billion in 2023, is expected to grow at ~13% CAGR, driven by rising disease prevalence and desire for less frequent dosing.
  • Innovation pathways: Focus on reducing steroid-associated side effects and combination therapies to enhance clinical outcomes.
  • Regulatory landscape: Post-marketing data continue to shape approval and usage guidelines, affecting market penetration.

FAQs

Q1: How does ASCLERA compare to other corticosteroid implants in terms of duration and safety?
A1: ASCLERA provides symptomatic relief with dosing intervals up to 6 months but has a safety profile consistent with corticosteroids. Longer-duration implants like Iluvien (up to 36 months) offer fewer injections but may have increased adverse risks, especially IOP elevation. Choice depends on balancing efficacy, safety, and patient-specific factors.

Q2: What is the impact of emerging anti-VEGF therapies on ASCLERA's market?
A2: Anti-VEGF agents remain first-line treatments; however, corticosteroids like ASCLERA are preferred in cases of resistance or inflammation. Rising anti-VEGF use could limit corticosteroid adoption unless safety and convenience are improved.

Q3: Are there upcoming regulatory filings that could expand ASCLERA's indications?
A3: Currently, no major pending submissions. Future approvals could depend on data from ongoing trials, including combination approaches and extended safety assessments.

Q4: What patient populations are most suitable for ASCLERA therapy?
A4: Patients with DME or BRVO who are unresponsive or intolerant to anti-VEGF therapy, especially those with inflammatory components or steroid-responsive edema.

Q5: What strategic actions should manufacturers consider for the ASCLERA franchise?
A5: Focus on demonstrating long-term safety, developing extended-release formulations with minimal adverse events, and positioning the product within combination regimens to differentiate from competitors.


References

[1] International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas, 9th Edition, 2021.
[2] Alimera Sciences. Clinical trial data disclosures, 2022-2023.
[3] Market analysis reports, Global Data, 2023.
[4] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Approvals & Label Updates, 2013-2023.
[5] European Medicines Agency. Summary of Product Characteristics, 2014.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.