Last Updated: June 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ARISTOSPAN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ARISTOSPAN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01770912 ↗ Efficacy of Steroid Supplementation After TMJ Rinsing for Pain Management Completed University of Florida Phase 2 2013-03-01 The hypothesis to be tested is temporomandibular joint (TMJ) rinsing followed by steroid injection is more efficacious than a placebo injection based on standard pain and physical measures that are recorded before and after treatment. All procedures will be the same as if following normal TMJ arthrocentesis (rinsing) clinical care except that the patient will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) TMJ rinsing followed by the injection of 1 cc (about ¼ of a teaspoon) of the same rinsing solution (this is the placebo) into the jaw joint; or (2) TMJ rinsing followed by the injection of 1 cc (about ¼ teaspoon) of a steroid (5 mg of triamcinolone hexacetonide) into the jaw joint. A pregnancy test (urine test) will be conducted on all women of child-bearing age to verify that the patient is not pregnant before the rinsing procedure. The patient will fill out a short questionnaire and have a short exam of the TMJ and jaw muscles at each appointment.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ARISTOSPAN

Condition Name

Condition Name for ARISTOSPAN
Intervention Trials
Pain 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ARISTOSPAN
Intervention Trials
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ARISTOSPAN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ARISTOSPAN
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ARISTOSPAN
Location Trials
Florida 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ARISTOSPAN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ARISTOSPAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ARISTOSPAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ARISTOSPAN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ARISTOSPAN
Sponsor Trials
University of Florida 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ARISTOSPAN
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 1, 2026

Aristospan (triamcinolone acetonide) — Clinical Trials Update and Market Outlook

Aristospan is a branded formulation of triamcinolone acetonide (a corticosteroid) delivered as an injectable suspension. The drug is used for anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive indications across musculoskeletal, dermatologic, and other corticosteroid-responsive conditions depending on jurisdiction and label.

What is Aristospan and what is the therapeutic class?

Aristospan

  • Active ingredient: Triamcinolone acetonide
  • Dosage form: Injectable suspension (intramuscular and/or intra-articular and other routes by label, depending on country-specific approval)
  • Pharmacologic class: Corticosteroid (anti-inflammatory/immunosuppressive)

What are the key approved uses that anchor market adoption?

Aristospan’s commercial adoption is driven by standard corticosteroid use cases: rapid reduction of pain and inflammation in steroid-responsive disorders, including

  • Joint and periarticular inflammatory conditions (e.g., arthritis flares and bursitis/tendinitis categories depending on label)
  • Dermatologic and other inflammatory conditions where long-acting steroid injections are used in local practice (jurisdiction-dependent)

Market reality: Aristospan operates in a segment dominated by generic and multi-brand triamcinolone acetonide injections, with competitive differentiation largely tied to formulation, supply reliability, tender pricing, administration convenience, and local regulatory posture rather than new pharmacology.


Clinical Trials Update: What does the current evidence base show?

Are there new Phase 2/3 trials for Aristospan specifically?

No complete, claim-ready clinical trials update for Aristospan-branded product can be produced from the information provided in this prompt. A standards-compliant “clinical trials update” requires verifiable, product-specific entries (trial registry IDs, phase, dates, endpoints, recruiting status) for Aristospan itself.

What can be concluded for clinical development activity in the ingredient class?

Triamcinolone acetonide is a mature corticosteroid. For mature molecules, the current pipeline typically shifts to:

  • Label expansions in specific jurisdictions
  • Bioequivalence/supporting studies tied to generics and branded supplements
  • Formulation and manufacturing updates rather than first-in-class R&D

Actionable implication for investors/BD: For Aristospan, “pipeline value” is usually lower than for novel drugs; the competitive edge is usually commercial execution and supply position, not next-gen clinical differentiation.


Market Analysis: Who buys Aristospan and how does competition shape pricing?

What is the competitive landscape?

Aristospan competes within:

  • Generic triamcinolone acetonide injection products
  • Multi-source brands of triamcinolone acetonide suspensions
  • Alternative corticosteroid injections in the same care pathways (e.g., other depot steroids used for joint and inflammatory indications by clinician preference)

Key market mechanics:

  • Tender and hospital formularies dominate purchasing in many markets
  • Interchangeability with other triamcinolone brands reduces pricing power
  • Stock availability and lot-to-lot consistency matter in substitution decisions

Where does demand concentrate?

Demand concentrates where long-acting steroid injections are used frequently:

  • Orthopedics and rheumatology outpatient settings
  • Primary care and pain management pathways where quick symptom control is required
  • Hospital formularies for acute flare management (varies by reimbursement model)

What are the drivers and constraints?

Drivers

  • Established clinical familiarity with corticosteroid injections
  • Short time-to-effect relative to some non-steroid anti-inflammatory strategies
  • Broad clinician acceptance in steroid-responsive conditions

Constraints

  • Ongoing sensitivity to steroid safety messaging and administration guidelines
  • Regulatory controls around steroid use, especially repeated dosing
  • Substitution by lower-priced generics

Market Projection: What should business models assume over 3 to 7 years?

Base-case commercial trajectory for Aristospan

A realistic projection for a branded, mature corticosteroid injection in multi-source environments typically assumes:

  • Low to mid single-digit value growth driven by unit growth from population and utilization, offset by pricing pressure
  • Share volatility tied to tender cycles and payer formulary decisions
  • Margin compression risk from generic erosion

Scenario framework (decision-useful)

Use this framework for planning, budgeting, and BD diligence:

  • Bull case: Sustained formulary position in key accounts plus steady manufacturing supply reduces substitution and protects pricing.
  • Base case: Gradual share leakage to generics with periodic tender wins.
  • Bear case: Contract pricing resets force deeper discounts and substitution accelerates.

Critical modeling note: For depot corticosteroids, volume elasticity tends to be clinician-practice driven rather than strongly indication-reframing driven. The biggest upside lever is usually access and supply, not new efficacy.


Patent and Exclusivity Signals: What matters for investment timing?

No patent or exclusivity specifics for Aristospan can be provided from this prompt alone in a way that meets the “high-stakes” bar for diligence (product, jurisdiction, filing/publication numbers, claim scope, expiry dates, and status are required). A complete patent landscape is not derivable here.

Business takeaway: For mature branded injections, residual value is typically governed by local IP and regulatory exclusivity, if any, plus branding and contracting. Without verifiable legal data, investment conclusions cannot be made on exclusivity strength.


Key Takeaways

  • Aristospan is a triamcinolone acetonide corticosteroid injection; commercial demand is anchored in steroid-responsive inflammatory conditions and clinician familiarity.
  • The market is multi-source and competition is driven by tender pricing, interchangeability, and supply reliability, not clinical differentiation.
  • A credible product-specific clinical trials update (registry-verified phases, dates, endpoints, and results) cannot be produced from the provided prompt.
  • Market projections should assume pricing pressure and share drift toward generics, with upside largely from formulary access and contract execution.

FAQs

1) What is Aristospan used for?

It is used for inflammatory conditions responsive to corticosteroids, including musculoskeletal and joint-related indications and other label-defined steroid-responsive disorders (jurisdiction dependent).

2) Is Aristospan a novel or differentiated drug?

No. It is a mature corticosteroid active ingredient in a category with extensive multi-source availability.

3) What drives Aristospan sales most strongly?

Formulary access, tender outcomes, and physician prescribing habits under substitution pressure from generics.

4) Does Aristospan have major late-stage pipeline value?

For branded triamcinolone injections, late-stage value is typically limited; pipeline activity usually reflects label support or formulation/manufacturing changes, not major new clinical programs.

5) How should investors model risk for Aristospan?

Model risk around generic erosion, contract price resets, and supply continuity, since those are typically the dominant determinants in mature depot steroid injection markets.


References

[1] No sources were provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.