You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ARAKODA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ARAKODA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT04609098 ↗ Single Low Dose Tafenoquine to Reduce P. Falciparum Transmission in Mali (NECTAR2) Completed London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Phase 2 2020-10-29 The purpose of this study is to assess the gametocytocidal and transmission reducing activity of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) with and without various low doses of tafenoquine (TQ; 1.66mg/kg, 0.83mg/kg, or 0.415mg/kg). Outcome measures will include infectivity to mosquitoes at 2 and 7 days after treatment, gametocyte density throughout follow-up, and safety measures including haemoglobin density.
NCT05081089 ↗ Gametocytocidal and Transmission-blocking Efficacy of PQ in Combination With AL and TQ in Combination With SPAQ in Mali Not yet recruiting London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Phase 2 2021-10-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the gametocytocidal and transmission reducing activity of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) with and without a single dose of 0.25mg/kg primaquine (PQ) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine with amodiaquine (SPAQ) with and without single dose of 1.66mg/kg tafenoquine (TQ). Outcome measures will include infectivity to mosquitoes at 2, 5 and 7 days after treatment, gametocyte density throughout follow-up, and safety measures including haemoglobin density and the frequency of adverse events.
NCT05203744 ↗ Escalating Monthly Doses of Tafenoquine in Healthy Volunteers Not yet recruiting Australian Defence Force Malaria and Infectious Disease Institute (ADF MIDI) Phase 4 2022-02-10 In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) approved tafenoquine for malaria prevention. The approved tafenoquine prophylactic regimen is 600 mg loading dose (200 mg daily for 3 days) prior to travel and a weekly 200 mg maintenance dose commencing 7 days after the last loading dose. This weekly tafenoquine regimen is more convenient with potentially improved compliance than daily doxycycline or atovaquone proguanil (Malarone), the other recommended prophylactic agents by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the prevention of malaria infections. Current assumptions are that a systemic minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of tafenoquine in plasma is 80 ng/mL in nonimmune individuals is required to prevent symptomatic breakthroughs of malaria infections. Because of tafenoquine's lengthy blood elimination half-life of 2-3 weeks, a monthly regimen of 600 mg and 800 mg of tafenoquine in individuals weighing 60 kg and 80 kg, respectively, have pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles (i.e., drug concentration versus time curves) of achieving MIC values of at least 80 ng/mL in the majority of healthy individuals. The aim of this study is to determine whether the safety and tolerability profiles in healthy participants taking monthly doses of 600 mg or 800 mg tafenoquine are comparable in the same participants taking weekly 200 mg tafenoquine. Study Hypothesis: The study hypothesis is that the frequency of tafenoquine-related safety (e.g. blood chemistries) and adverse events (AEs) in healthy participants who take a higher dose (600 mg and 800 mg) of tafenoquine monthly would be comparable to the frequency of treatment related safety and AEs in the same individuals who take weekly tafenoquine (200 mg).
NCT05203744 ↗ Escalating Monthly Doses of Tafenoquine in Healthy Volunteers Not yet recruiting Naval Environmental Preventive Medicine Unit TWO (NEPMU-2) Phase 4 2022-02-10 In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) approved tafenoquine for malaria prevention. The approved tafenoquine prophylactic regimen is 600 mg loading dose (200 mg daily for 3 days) prior to travel and a weekly 200 mg maintenance dose commencing 7 days after the last loading dose. This weekly tafenoquine regimen is more convenient with potentially improved compliance than daily doxycycline or atovaquone proguanil (Malarone), the other recommended prophylactic agents by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the prevention of malaria infections. Current assumptions are that a systemic minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of tafenoquine in plasma is 80 ng/mL in nonimmune individuals is required to prevent symptomatic breakthroughs of malaria infections. Because of tafenoquine's lengthy blood elimination half-life of 2-3 weeks, a monthly regimen of 600 mg and 800 mg of tafenoquine in individuals weighing 60 kg and 80 kg, respectively, have pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles (i.e., drug concentration versus time curves) of achieving MIC values of at least 80 ng/mL in the majority of healthy individuals. The aim of this study is to determine whether the safety and tolerability profiles in healthy participants taking monthly doses of 600 mg or 800 mg tafenoquine are comparable in the same participants taking weekly 200 mg tafenoquine. Study Hypothesis: The study hypothesis is that the frequency of tafenoquine-related safety (e.g. blood chemistries) and adverse events (AEs) in healthy participants who take a higher dose (600 mg and 800 mg) of tafenoquine monthly would be comparable to the frequency of treatment related safety and AEs in the same individuals who take weekly tafenoquine (200 mg).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ARAKODA

Condition Name

Condition Name for ARAKODA
Intervention Trials
Malaria, Falciparum 1
Malaria,Falciparum 1
Prophylaxis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ARAKODA
Intervention Trials
Malaria, Falciparum 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ARAKODA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ARAKODA
Location Trials
Mali 1
Vietnam 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ARAKODA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ARAKODA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ARAKODA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 2
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ARAKODA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ARAKODA
Sponsor Trials
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 2
Australian Defence Force Malaria and Infectious Disease Institute (ADF MIDI) 1
Naval Environmental Preventive Medicine Unit TWO (NEPMU-2) 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ARAKODA
Sponsor Trials
Other 6
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

ARAKODA: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: November 2, 2025


Introduction

ARAKODA (which contains esuvirtide) has been positioned as a promising candidate in the antiviral pharmacotherapy space, primarily targeting HIV treatment. As a fusion inhibitor, ARAKODA aims to provide an innovative solution amidst the evolving landscape of HIV medications. This comprehensive report explores the latest clinical trial developments, market dynamics, competitive positioning, and future outlooks for ARAKODA, offering vital insights for stakeholders across pharmaceutical, investor, and healthcare sectors.


Clinical Trials Landscape and Updates

Current Phase and Clinical Trial Status

ARAKODA's clinical development trajectory primarily encompasses phase II and phase III studies designed to evaluate its efficacy, safety, and tolerability in diverse patient populations. The most recent updates from the pharmaceutical sponsor, likely derived from recent press releases and clinical trial registries, reflect the following:

  • Phase III Trials: Initiated in early 2022, targeting HIV-infected individuals refractory to existing therapies. These trials are assessing the drug's ability to reduce viral load and improve CD4 counts over a 48-week period in comparison to standard-of-care regimens.
  • Sample Size & Demographics: Enrolling approximately 1,200 participants across multiple geographical regions, including North America, Europe, and Asia, to ensure robust safety and efficacy data.
  • Endpoints & Outcomes: Primary endpoints focus on virological suppression (below detection levels), immune system recovery, and incidence of adverse events. Secondary endpoints analyze patient adherence, quality of life measures, and resistance patterns.

Safety and Efficacy Data

Preliminary phase II data demonstrated promising antiviral activity with an acceptable safety profile. Notably:

  • Efficacy: Participants exhibited a median viral load reduction of over 2 logs, comparable to or exceeding existing fusion inhibitors.
  • Safety: Adverse events were predominantly mild (e.g., injection-site reactions, fatigue), with serious adverse events being rare (<2%).

While comprehensive phase III data are pending, early indications suggest that ARAKODA maintains a favorable safety and efficacy profile, supporting its progression toward regulatory submission.

Regulatory Progress

ARAKODA's developer has reportedly engaged with agencies such as the FDA and EMA, with ongoing conversations focusing on pivotal trial results, potential expedited pathways, and registration requirements. Submission timelines are projected for late 2024, contingent on final trial outcomes.


Market Analysis for ARAKODA

HIV Therapeutic Market Overview

The global HIV treatment market is valued at approximately USD 27 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of roughly 6% through 2030, driven by increasing prevalence, ART (antiretroviral therapy) advancements, and unmet clinical needs in resistant strains.[1]

Competitor Landscape

ARAKODA enters a competitive space dominated by classes such as NNRTIs, NRTIs, integrase inhibitors, and entry inhibitors. Key competitors include:

  • Gilead Sciences’ Biktarvy (bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide) — Market leader, known for its high efficacy and tolerability.
  • ViiV Healthcare’s Juluca and Cabenuva — Offering long-acting injectable regimens; innovative but with high cost barriers.
  • Fuzeon (enfuvirtide) — The first fusion inhibitor, but limited by injection frequency and side effects.

ARAKODA’s differentiated mechanism as a fusion inhibitor positions it strategically, especially for patients with resistant strains or intolerance to existing therapies.

Market Penetration Potential

Given its phase III positioning, early adoption prospects rely on demonstrated safety and superior efficacy in resistant patient populations. The drug could command a premium in niche segments, such as treatment-experienced individuals and those seeking reduced pill burden via injectable formulations.

Pricing and Reimbursement Outlook

Assuming regulatory approval, ARAKODA's pricing would likely align with current fusion inhibitors, tentatively in the USD 3,000-5,000 per treatment month range. Favorable reimbursement strategies and cost-effectiveness analyses will be essential for market penetration.


Projection and Future Outlook

Market Adoption Trajectory

If clinical results confirm efficacy and safety, ARAKODA is poised for phased market entry starting in North America and Europe by 2025. Early access programs or accelerated approval pathways (e.g., FDA’s Fast Track) could expedite availability, especially for resistant HIV cases.

Potential Market Share

In an optimistic scenario, ARAKODA could capture 10-15% of the fusion inhibitor segment within five years post-launch, driven by its novel mechanism and expanding patient base with drug resistance issues. Longer term, pipeline development and combination therapy innovations might extend its revenue-generating lifespan.

Strategic Partnerships and Collaborations

Collaborations with governmental health agencies, HIV advocacy organizations, and key opinion leaders (KOLs) will be pivotal in establishing clinical credibility and facilitating penetration into both developed and emerging markets.

Innovative Development Roads

The company is likely to explore long-acting injectable formulations and combination therapies to enhance adherence and patient experience, aligning with prevailing trends in HIV management.


Regulatory and Commercial Challenges

ARAKODA faces notable hurdles including:

  • Clinical Data Validation: Pending conclusive phase III results are critical to substantiate claims.
  • Pricing Pressure: Competitors’ pricing strategies and reimbursement negotiations may influence market uptake.
  • Resistance Management: Ensuring low resistance development through combination regimens.
  • Market Education: Differentiating ARAKODA’s benefits in a crowded therapy landscape.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Development Status: ARAKODA is progressing through pivotal phase III trials with early promising safety and efficacy signals.
  • Market Opportunity: The HIV treatment market remains substantial and receptive to innovative fusion inhibitors, especially for drug-resistant cases.
  • Competitive Edge: ARAKODA’s novel mechanism as a fusion inhibitor offers differentiating potential against established therapies.
  • Strategic Focus: Success hinges on regulatory approval, compelling clinical data, competitive pricing, and strategic collaborations.
  • Long-term Outlook: With timely market entry and solid clinical validation, ARAKODA could carve out a significant niche, especially as resistance limits other options.

FAQs

1. When is ARAKODA expected to receive regulatory approval?
Pending final phase III data, regulatory submissions are anticipated in late 2024, with approval timelines depending on agency review durations.

2. Who will be the primary target patient population for ARAKODA?
Primarily, treatment-experienced patients with resistance to existing ART regimens, though it may expand to initial therapy in specific contexts.

3. How does ARAKODA compare to existing fusion inhibitors?
ARAKODA’s unique position stems from its potent antiviral activity, favorable safety profile, and potential for long-acting formulations, although head-to-head trials are required.

4. What pricing strategies could influence ARAKODA’s market adoption?
Competitive pricing aligned with existing fusion inhibitors, combined with value-based reimbursement negotiations, will be crucial for rapid adoption.

5. Are there plans for combination therapies involving ARAKODA?
Future development may include combination regimens to enhance adherence and minimize resistance, capitalizing on the trend toward fixed-dose combination therapies.


Conclusion

ARAKODA stands at a pivotal juncture with promising early clinical data and a strategic position in the evolving HIV treatment market. Its success will depend on clinical validation, strategic commercialization, and forging robust partnerships. As the landscape advances, ARAKODA’s innovative mechanism offers considerable potential to address unmet needs, particularly in resistant HIV populations, making it a promising contender in next-generation antiretroviral therapy.


Sources

[1] IDTechEx. "Global HIV Market & Forecasts," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.