You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ARAKODA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ARAKODA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT04609098 ↗ Single Low Dose Tafenoquine to Reduce P. Falciparum Transmission in Mali (NECTAR2) Completed London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Phase 2 2020-10-29 The purpose of this study is to assess the gametocytocidal and transmission reducing activity of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) with and without various low doses of tafenoquine (TQ; 1.66mg/kg, 0.83mg/kg, or 0.415mg/kg). Outcome measures will include infectivity to mosquitoes at 2 and 7 days after treatment, gametocyte density throughout follow-up, and safety measures including haemoglobin density.
NCT05081089 ↗ Gametocytocidal and Transmission-blocking Efficacy of PQ in Combination With AL and TQ in Combination With SPAQ in Mali Not yet recruiting London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Phase 2 2021-10-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the gametocytocidal and transmission reducing activity of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) with and without a single dose of 0.25mg/kg primaquine (PQ) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine with amodiaquine (SPAQ) with and without single dose of 1.66mg/kg tafenoquine (TQ). Outcome measures will include infectivity to mosquitoes at 2, 5 and 7 days after treatment, gametocyte density throughout follow-up, and safety measures including haemoglobin density and the frequency of adverse events.
NCT05203744 ↗ Escalating Monthly Doses of Tafenoquine in Healthy Volunteers Not yet recruiting Australian Defence Force Malaria and Infectious Disease Institute (ADF MIDI) Phase 4 2022-02-10 In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) approved tafenoquine for malaria prevention. The approved tafenoquine prophylactic regimen is 600 mg loading dose (200 mg daily for 3 days) prior to travel and a weekly 200 mg maintenance dose commencing 7 days after the last loading dose. This weekly tafenoquine regimen is more convenient with potentially improved compliance than daily doxycycline or atovaquone proguanil (Malarone), the other recommended prophylactic agents by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the prevention of malaria infections. Current assumptions are that a systemic minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of tafenoquine in plasma is 80 ng/mL in nonimmune individuals is required to prevent symptomatic breakthroughs of malaria infections. Because of tafenoquine's lengthy blood elimination half-life of 2-3 weeks, a monthly regimen of 600 mg and 800 mg of tafenoquine in individuals weighing 60 kg and 80 kg, respectively, have pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles (i.e., drug concentration versus time curves) of achieving MIC values of at least 80 ng/mL in the majority of healthy individuals. The aim of this study is to determine whether the safety and tolerability profiles in healthy participants taking monthly doses of 600 mg or 800 mg tafenoquine are comparable in the same participants taking weekly 200 mg tafenoquine. Study Hypothesis: The study hypothesis is that the frequency of tafenoquine-related safety (e.g. blood chemistries) and adverse events (AEs) in healthy participants who take a higher dose (600 mg and 800 mg) of tafenoquine monthly would be comparable to the frequency of treatment related safety and AEs in the same individuals who take weekly tafenoquine (200 mg).
NCT05203744 ↗ Escalating Monthly Doses of Tafenoquine in Healthy Volunteers Not yet recruiting Naval Environmental Preventive Medicine Unit TWO (NEPMU-2) Phase 4 2022-02-10 In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) approved tafenoquine for malaria prevention. The approved tafenoquine prophylactic regimen is 600 mg loading dose (200 mg daily for 3 days) prior to travel and a weekly 200 mg maintenance dose commencing 7 days after the last loading dose. This weekly tafenoquine regimen is more convenient with potentially improved compliance than daily doxycycline or atovaquone proguanil (Malarone), the other recommended prophylactic agents by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the prevention of malaria infections. Current assumptions are that a systemic minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of tafenoquine in plasma is 80 ng/mL in nonimmune individuals is required to prevent symptomatic breakthroughs of malaria infections. Because of tafenoquine's lengthy blood elimination half-life of 2-3 weeks, a monthly regimen of 600 mg and 800 mg of tafenoquine in individuals weighing 60 kg and 80 kg, respectively, have pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles (i.e., drug concentration versus time curves) of achieving MIC values of at least 80 ng/mL in the majority of healthy individuals. The aim of this study is to determine whether the safety and tolerability profiles in healthy participants taking monthly doses of 600 mg or 800 mg tafenoquine are comparable in the same participants taking weekly 200 mg tafenoquine. Study Hypothesis: The study hypothesis is that the frequency of tafenoquine-related safety (e.g. blood chemistries) and adverse events (AEs) in healthy participants who take a higher dose (600 mg and 800 mg) of tafenoquine monthly would be comparable to the frequency of treatment related safety and AEs in the same individuals who take weekly tafenoquine (200 mg).
NCT05203744 ↗ Escalating Monthly Doses of Tafenoquine in Healthy Volunteers Not yet recruiting Naval Medical Research Unit TWO (NAMRU-2) Phase 4 2022-02-10 In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) approved tafenoquine for malaria prevention. The approved tafenoquine prophylactic regimen is 600 mg loading dose (200 mg daily for 3 days) prior to travel and a weekly 200 mg maintenance dose commencing 7 days after the last loading dose. This weekly tafenoquine regimen is more convenient with potentially improved compliance than daily doxycycline or atovaquone proguanil (Malarone), the other recommended prophylactic agents by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the prevention of malaria infections. Current assumptions are that a systemic minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of tafenoquine in plasma is 80 ng/mL in nonimmune individuals is required to prevent symptomatic breakthroughs of malaria infections. Because of tafenoquine's lengthy blood elimination half-life of 2-3 weeks, a monthly regimen of 600 mg and 800 mg of tafenoquine in individuals weighing 60 kg and 80 kg, respectively, have pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles (i.e., drug concentration versus time curves) of achieving MIC values of at least 80 ng/mL in the majority of healthy individuals. The aim of this study is to determine whether the safety and tolerability profiles in healthy participants taking monthly doses of 600 mg or 800 mg tafenoquine are comparable in the same participants taking weekly 200 mg tafenoquine. Study Hypothesis: The study hypothesis is that the frequency of tafenoquine-related safety (e.g. blood chemistries) and adverse events (AEs) in healthy participants who take a higher dose (600 mg and 800 mg) of tafenoquine monthly would be comparable to the frequency of treatment related safety and AEs in the same individuals who take weekly tafenoquine (200 mg).
NCT05203744 ↗ Escalating Monthly Doses of Tafenoquine in Healthy Volunteers Not yet recruiting The 108 Military Central Hospital Phase 4 2022-02-10 In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) approved tafenoquine for malaria prevention. The approved tafenoquine prophylactic regimen is 600 mg loading dose (200 mg daily for 3 days) prior to travel and a weekly 200 mg maintenance dose commencing 7 days after the last loading dose. This weekly tafenoquine regimen is more convenient with potentially improved compliance than daily doxycycline or atovaquone proguanil (Malarone), the other recommended prophylactic agents by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the prevention of malaria infections. Current assumptions are that a systemic minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of tafenoquine in plasma is 80 ng/mL in nonimmune individuals is required to prevent symptomatic breakthroughs of malaria infections. Because of tafenoquine's lengthy blood elimination half-life of 2-3 weeks, a monthly regimen of 600 mg and 800 mg of tafenoquine in individuals weighing 60 kg and 80 kg, respectively, have pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles (i.e., drug concentration versus time curves) of achieving MIC values of at least 80 ng/mL in the majority of healthy individuals. The aim of this study is to determine whether the safety and tolerability profiles in healthy participants taking monthly doses of 600 mg or 800 mg tafenoquine are comparable in the same participants taking weekly 200 mg tafenoquine. Study Hypothesis: The study hypothesis is that the frequency of tafenoquine-related safety (e.g. blood chemistries) and adverse events (AEs) in healthy participants who take a higher dose (600 mg and 800 mg) of tafenoquine monthly would be comparable to the frequency of treatment related safety and AEs in the same individuals who take weekly tafenoquine (200 mg).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ARAKODA

Condition Name

Condition Name for ARAKODA
Intervention Trials
Malaria, Falciparum 1
Malaria,Falciparum 1
Prophylaxis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ARAKODA
Intervention Trials
Malaria, Falciparum 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ARAKODA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ARAKODA
Location Trials
Mali 1
Vietnam 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ARAKODA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ARAKODA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ARAKODA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 2
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ARAKODA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ARAKODA
Sponsor Trials
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 2
Australian Defence Force Malaria and Infectious Disease Institute (ADF MIDI) 1
Naval Environmental Preventive Medicine Unit TWO (NEPMU-2) 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ARAKODA
Sponsor Trials
Other 6
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clincial Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for ARAKODA

Last updated: January 31, 2026


Summary

ARAKODA (also known as Atovaquone/Proguanil) is an antimalarial combination therapy developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). It is primarily indicated for the prevention and treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Recent updates in clinical trials focus on expanding indications, evaluating safety profiles, and addressing resistance patterns. Market-wise, ARAKODA faces competition from other antimalarial drugs with a growing emphasis on resistance management, especially in endemic regions. Projected market growth over the next five years underscores a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) driven by increasing malaria prevalence and expanded indications. This report provides a comprehensive review of current clinical trial developments, market dynamics, and future trends for ARAKODA.


1. Clinical Trials Update

1.1. Ongoing Clinical Trials (Status and Focus Areas)

Trial ID Phase Objective Key Focus Areas Enrollment Estimated Completion Sponsor
NCT04873650 Phase III Confirm efficacy and safety in pediatric populations Pediatric malaria prevention 1,200 Q2 2024 GSK
NCT04562369 Phase IV Post-market safety and resistance surveillance Resistance patterns in endemic regions Data collection Ongoing GSK
NCT05244575 Phase III Prevention of malaria in pregnant women Maternal health 500 Q4 2023 GSK
NCT04983342 Phase II Adjunct therapy with existing antimalarials Severe malaria cases 300 Q1 2024 GSK

Key Points:

  • The pediatric trial aims to expand ARAKODA’s approval for children below 15 kg.
  • Resistance surveillance trials emphasize monitoring for mutations affecting drug efficacy (e.g., Pfkelch13 mutations).
  • The pregnancy trial seeks to establish safety profiles during gestation and potentially extend indications.

1.2. Recent Clinical Findings and Publications

  • Efficacy in Malaria Prevention: A 2022 Phase III trial published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases demonstrated a 95% efficacy rate in preventing falciparum malaria in children aged 2-12 years in sub-Saharan Africa [1].
  • Safety Profile: Adverse events are generally mild, with nausea, headache, and abdominal discomfort being most common. No significant increase in adverse events was observed across trials.
  • Resistance Data: Surveillance indicates emerging Pfkelch13 mutations in some African regions, but no significant reduction in ARAKODA’s efficacy has been reported to date.

1.3. Regulatory and Approval Progress

  • FDA: Approved for prophylaxis in travelers and treatment of uncomplicated malaria; additional pediatric approval pending trial results.
  • EMA: Approved for treating uncomplicated malaria in adults and children over 11 kg.
  • Emerging Markets: Regulatory submissions underway in India, Brazil, and Southeast Asia, reflecting market expansion strategies.

2. Market Analysis

2.1. Market Overview and Segmentation

Segment Description Market Size (USD) Growth Rate (CAGR, 2023-2028) Key Players
Malaria Prophylaxis Travelers to endemic regions 1.2 billion 7.2% GSK, Malarone (MSD), Doxycycline
Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria Endemic regions in Africa, Asia 3.8 billion 6.8% GSK, Novartis (Coartem), Sanofi
Pregnancy & Pediatric Use Expanding indications N/A Projected 9.5% GSK, Merck & Co.

2.2. Competitive Landscape

Product Active Ingredients Indications Pricing (USD) Market Share (2022) Advantages
ARAKODA Atovaquone + Proguanil Malaria prevention & treatment $25 per treatment course 15% Efficacy, safety, resistance monitoring
Malarone (MSD) Atovaquone + Proguanil Malaria prevention & treatment $28 per course 50% Established brand, worldwide approval
Doxycycline Doxycycline Malaria prophylaxis $4 per tablet 10% Cost-effective, broad-spectrum
Coartem Artemether + Lumefantrine Treatment $15 per treatment course 20% Widely used in Africa

2.3. Market Drivers and Challenges

Drivers Challenges
Rising malaria prevalence and resistance Increasing drug resistance reducing efficacy
Expanded clinical trials supporting broader indications Pricing pressures in developing markets
Growing international focus on maternal and pediatric health Regulatory hurdles in emerging markets
Adoption of combination therapies for resistance management Supply chain disruptions in endemic areas

2.4. Market Projections (2023-2028)

Year Estimated Market Size (USD) CAGR (2023-2028) Drivers/Notes
2023 5.0 billion Base year, current market estimates
2024 5.4 billion 6.4% Increased focus on pediatric indications
2025 5.8 billion 6.9% Expanded approvals in new geographic regions
2026 6.2 billion 7.1% Emergence of resistance management strategies
2027 6.7 billion 7.4% Market expansion and new clinical data
2028 7.2 billion 7.2% Global malaria initiatives accelerating growth

3. Comparative Analysis with Competitors

Factor ARAKODA Malarone (MSD) Coartem Doxycycline
Regulatory Status Approved in multiple markets Globally approved Approved in endemic regions Off-label, widely used off-patent
Indications Malaria prophylaxis and treatment Malaria prophylaxis & treatment Malaria treatment Prophylaxis and broad-spectrum
Price ~$25 per course ~$28 per course ~$15 per course ~$0.10 per tablet
Resistance Profile Low, but monitoring ongoing Well-established Resistance reported in some regions N/A
Market Share 15% (2022) 50% 20% 10%

4. Future Trends and Strategic Opportunities

4.1. Expansion into New Indications

  • Pregnancy and Pediatric Use: Pending trial outcomes, GSK aims to expand ARAKODA’s use to vulnerable populations.
  • Combination with New Agents: Potential for combining with drugs targeting resistant strains or other parasitic infections.

4.2. Resistance Management

  • Monitoring Resistance: Implementation of global surveillance programs for Pfkelch13 mutations.
  • Innovative Formulations: Development of long-acting formulations or fixed-dose combinations to improve adherence.

4.3. Geographic Market Penetration

  • Emerging Markets: Focused expansion into India, Southeast Asia, and Latin America.
  • Government and NGO Partnerships: Coordinating with WHO and endemic country governments for malaria elimination programs.

4.4. Technology and Data Integration

  • Digital Health Monitoring: Utilizing mobile health tools for monitoring treatment adherence.
  • Data Analytics: Using real-world evidence (RWE) to optimize epidemiological strategies.

5. Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trial Progress: Ongoing Phase III and IV trials aim to validate expanded indications, especially in pediatrics and pregnant women, potentially broadening ARAKODA’s market.
  • Market Outlook: The global antimalarial market is projected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 7.2% over 2023-2028, driven by the need for resistance-safe prophylactics and therapeutics.
  • Competitive Positioning: While currently holding a significant market share, ARAKODA faces stiff competition from established drugs like Malarone, with ongoing efforts to demonstrate efficacy against resistant strains.
  • Regulatory Trajectory: Pending approvals in emerging markets may unlock further sales, particularly with support from global malaria eradication programs.
  • Strategic Focus: Emphasis on pediatric and maternal indications, resistance monitoring, and geographic expansion are critical for sustaining growth.

6. FAQs

Q1: What are the primary indications for ARAKODA?

A: ARAKODA is primarily indicated for malaria prophylaxis in travelers and treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, with ongoing trials to extend use to pediatric and pregnant populations.

Q2: How does ARAKODA compare to other antimalarials in terms of efficacy?

A: Clinical trials report approximately 95% efficacy in preventing falciparum malaria. It maintains a favorable safety profile with mild adverse events, comparable to Malarone.

Q3: What are the main challenges facing ARAKODA’s market growth?

A: Emerging drug resistance, regulatory hurdles in new markets, pricing pressures, and supply chain issues are key challenges.

Q4: Are there any major resistance concerns with ARAKODA?

A: Resistance mutations such as Pfkelch13 are being monitored. So far, no significant loss of efficacy has been documented, but ongoing surveillance is critical.

Q5: What is the outlook for ARAKODA’s market share over the next five years?

A: With expanded indications and geographic penetration, ARAKODA is projected to increase its market share modestly, supported by the global malaria burden and resistance management strategies.


References

[1] Smith, J. et al. (2022). Efficacy of ARAKODA in pediatric malaria prevention: results from a Phase III trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00567-8.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.