Last Updated: May 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ANUSOL HC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ANUSOL HC

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT05157711 ↗ Clinical Trial of Anusol Ointment for Symptom Relief in Patients With Haemorrhoids Recruiting Church & Dwight Company, Inc. Phase 3 2021-11-25 The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Anusol topical ointment for the relief of internal and external haemorrhoid symptoms in people with Grades I-III haemorrhoids compared to a placebo (the study medication without the active ingredients) and a benchmark product.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ANUSOL HC

Condition Name

Condition Name for ANUSOL HC
Intervention Trials
Hemorrhoids 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ANUSOL HC
Intervention Trials
Hemorrhoids 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ANUSOL HC

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ANUSOL HC
Location Trials
Armenia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ANUSOL HC

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ANUSOL HC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ANUSOL HC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ANUSOL HC

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ANUSOL HC
Sponsor Trials
Church & Dwight Company, Inc. 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ANUSOL HC
Sponsor Trials
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

ANUSOL HC Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Forecast (2030): Patents, Generics, and FDA/Regulatory Risk

Last updated: May 22, 2026

Executive summary

  • ANUSOL HC (hydrocortisone topical) is an older, low–systemic-exposure OTC/proprietary topical product line with a limited modern clinical-trial footprint compared with late-stage branded drugs.
  • Market growth is driven mainly by hemorrhoid self-care demand, private label replacement cycles, and switching among topical hydrocortisone hemorrhoid products, not by new molecular development.
  • Near-term revenue outlook is constrained by generic and private label penetration, channel inventory cycles, and tender/private-label pricing in pharmacies and mass retailers.
  • Exclusivity and patent barriers are expected to be modest for any current brand labeling of hydrocortisone hemorrhoid creams, since the active ingredient is long out of primary composition patent life; remaining protection is typically formulation/packaging or method-of-use, where applicable.

What is ANUSOL HC and where does it sit in hemorrhoid treatment?

ANUSOL HC is a hemorrhoid therapy marketed for relief of itching, swelling, and discomfort associated with hemorrhoids. The product uses hydrocortisone as the anti-inflammatory component, in a topical hemorrhoid regimen.

What is the active ingredient and typical indication scope?

  • Active ingredient: hydrocortisone (topical anti-inflammatory)
  • Indication: symptom relief in hemorrhoids (pruritus, inflammation, discomfort)

What dosage forms are commonly sold?

  • Topical hemorrhoid creams/ointments (hydrocortisone-containing)

What clinical trials have been conducted for ANUSOL HC recently?

No high-signal, newly published late-stage pivotal trials for ANUSOL HC are typically surfaced relative to newer prescription brands. For an OTC topical active ingredient like hydrocortisone in hemorrhoid formulations, clinical evidence tends to cluster in:

  • older phase 2/3 hemorrhoid symptom relief studies (often pre-OTC modernization),
  • bioequivalence / bridging for label changes or formulation shifts,
  • and post-marketing pharmacovigilance rather than randomized phase 3 programs.

What trial types are most likely for an older topical hemorrhoid product?

  • Randomized symptom-relief studies in hemorrhoids (itching, pain, swelling)
  • Comparisons vs placebo or comparator topical hydrocortisone products
  • Short-duration studies aligned to OTC self-care endpoints

How does ANUSOL HC market performance compare with other hemorrhoid and topical hydrocortisone products?

Market performance for ANUSOL HC is shaped by category growth and share capture from private label and competitors rather than differentiation by novel clinical data.

Competitive set likely affecting ANUSOL HC share

  • Other hydrocortisone hemorrhoid creams/ointments
  • Combination hemorrhoid products (when positioned for stronger symptom relief)
  • Non-steroidal hemorrhoid symptomatic products (when patients switch for steroid-avoidance)

What drives brand vs private label switching?

  • Price and promotional cadence in pharmacy and mass retail
  • Perceived “works faster” messaging across competitor SKUs
  • Packaging, tube size, and local distribution footprint
  • Availability during seasonal hemorrhoid demand spikes

When does ANUSOL HC lose exclusivity and can generics enter?

Because the active ingredient is hydrocortisone, the core exclusivity landscape is typically driven by:

  • composition-of-matter (usually long expired for old actives),
  • formulation and packaging patents (limited, jurisdiction-specific),
  • and any brand-label exclusivity that may exist for specific NDA/ANDA labeling (less common for classic OTC legacy products).

Patent estate: what matters commercially?

  • If any remaining patents cover a specific formulation or delivery system, they mainly affect:
    • product sameness for “brand-labeled” copies,
    • ANDA labeling carve-outs,
    • settlement terms for branded-to-generic competition.
  • If no enforceable patents remain, entry is primarily an ANDA/market authorization and labeling exercise.

What patents protect ANUSOL HC and which are likely still in force?

A definitive, jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction patent mapping requires a complete Orange Book/patent listing and assignment-by-assignee review for the exact marketed ANUSOL HC versions. Without that dataset in-hand here, the only actionable, business-level statement is:

  • For legacy topical hydrocortisone hemorrhoid products, the “must win” patent coverage typically ends with expired active-ingredient composition and any enduring value comes from formulation/packaging or specific labeling claims, which tend to expire faster than the underlying active.

What is the Orange Book status of ANUSOL HC?

ANUSOL HC is generally treated as an older hemorrhoid OTC topical product line; such products are often not the kind that have modern, actively referenced Orange Book-listed ANDAs like prescription systems do. Where an OTC drug is approved via an NDA and still listed, the Orange Book would show active listings with expiration dates and patent numbers tied to the specific listed application.

Why Orange Book listings matter for launch timing

If Orange Book patents are listed for a specific ANUSOL HC application:

  • Paragraph IV challenges become the mechanism for generic launch at risk.
  • Without Orange Book listings, entry often proceeds through labeling and manufacturing compliance rather than patent litigation.

What generic entry risks exist for ANUSOL HC?

Main entry risks for an ANUSOL HC brand-like product come from:

  • private label genericization under store brands,
  • competitor hydrocortisone hemorrhoid products entering at lower price points,
  • and product line dilution where retailers favor lower net cost SKUs.

What “at-risk” behavior would look like in this category

  • Rapid substitution after any settlement or patent status change
  • Promotional spend targeting brand switching
  • Multi-SKU bundling (tube size and multipacks)

How strong is the patent estate for hydrocortisone hemorrhoid creams?

For hydrocortisone topical actives:

  • Primary patents are usually long expired.
  • Residual patent strength, if any, is commonly limited to specific formulation attributes, manufacturing methods, or container closure components.

Commercial impact: weak patent estates in legacy topical categories usually translate into high generic immediacy once any specific shelf-life or labeling constraints are overcome.

What patent litigation affects ANUSOL HC or comparable hemorrhoid products?

For legacy topical hydrocortisone hemorrhoid products, litigation tends to be intermittent and usually reflects:

  • disputes over whether a generic formulation infringes a specific formulation or packaging patent, or
  • challenges tied to Orange Book listing mechanics if present.

Commercial impact: settlements, where they occur, usually result in limited design-around requirements and short-to-mid duration launch windows rather than long exclusivity hold-ups.

How does ANUSOL HC compare with other hemorrhoid therapies (steroid vs non-steroid)?

Clinical and commercial differentiation is typically driven by:

  • perception of steroid efficacy for inflammation-driven symptoms,
  • steroid-avoidance preference among some patients,
  • adjunct use patterns (hygiene, stool softening, sitz baths).

Likely patient segmentation influencing brand retention

  • Patients seeking fast relief of inflammation symptoms: higher steroid acceptance
  • Patients concerned about steroid exposure: may shift to non-steroid or “witch hazel” style OTC options

Market projection for ANUSOL HC through 2030: base case, upside, downside

Because the request is for “market analysis and projection” and the product is a legacy OTC topical, a defensible projection framework is built on category drivers rather than clinical pipeline value.

Base case (most likely)

  • Low-to-mid single digit category growth with steady brand share pressure from generics/private label
  • ANUSOL HC revenue growth tracks largely with units and price erosion offset
  • Margin compresses with promotional intensity

Upside case

  • Stronger retail execution and pack-size strategy
  • Formulation improvements with improved user preference (taste- or irritation-related claims for topical products, where permitted)
  • Limited competitive entry in a few distribution lanes

Downside case

  • Intensified private label price competition
  • Channel delisting or planogram losses
  • Regulatory or labeling enforcement changes that reduce permissible claim language

What to watch for as leading indicators

  • Retail scanner trends by pack size and concentration (hydrocortisone strength and base formulation)
  • Planogram share in pharmacy chains and mass retail
  • Promotion frequency and depth versus competitor steroid suppository/cream lines

Regulatory timeline: what FDA actions could matter to ANUSOL HC?

For legacy topical OTC hemorrhoid products, the most common regulatory sensitivities are:

  • labeling compliance and claim substantiation,
  • monograph or drug product requirements depending on approval status,
  • adverse event reporting and risk communication for steroid use.

What would trigger shelf-impact risk?

  • Labeling enforcement that forces claim removal or reformulation
  • Supply chain constraints affecting ability to meet demand
  • Manufacturing compliance actions leading to temporary shortages

Commercial strategy implications: how brands defend share when patents are weak

With likely limited exclusivity:

  • Defense relies on distribution, promotion optimization, and SKU management.
  • “Legal moat” is usually narrower than for novel Rx launches.
  • R&D investment typically focuses on stability, tolerability, user experience, and regulatory-friendly labeling updates.

Key Takeaways

  • ANUSOL HC is a legacy hydrocortisone topical hemorrhoid product with limited high-signal modern late-stage clinical development value.
  • Market outlook through 2030 is driven by category demand and price competition, not by new exclusivity.
  • Patent/exclusivity constraints are likely modest, with remaining protection, if any, focused on formulation or specific product presentation.
  • Generic/private label pressure is the dominant commercial risk, making distribution and promotion execution the primary levers.

FAQs

  1. Is ANUSOL HC prescription-only or available OTC?
  2. How does hydrocortisone hemorrhoid cream efficacy compare with non-steroid hemorrhoid products?
  3. What shelf-life and storage conditions matter for hydrocortisone topical hemorrhoid creams?
  4. Can a generic hydrocortisone hemorrhoid cream be substituted at the pharmacy without prior authorization?
  5. What labeling claims about hemorrhoids are typically scrutinized for OTC steroid products?

References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. FDA. Prescription Drug Product Labeling; and Over-the-Counter Drug Labeling regulations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  3. FDA. OTC Drug Guidance and Labeling resources. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.