Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ANTIVERT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ANTIVERT

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00641797 ↗ Treating Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) in ED Patients Completed Lehigh Valley Hospital N/A 2006-11-01 Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) is a common complaint of emergency department patients. The importance of early diagnosis and treatment can lead to a much improved quality of life for patients afflicted by this ailment. It is the purpose of this study to evaluate and examine two methods of treatment. Patients will be randomized to receive the more common conventional medication therapy versus the canalith repositioning technique. All patients enrolled into this study are emergency department patients who have been diagnosed with BPPV via a positive Dix-Hallpike Maneuver. The hypothesis of this study is that vestibular rehabilitation will allow for resolution of symptoms without the use of conventional medication therapy in the acute management of BPPV in the emergency department patient.
NCT01443858 ↗ Meclizine as a Potential Smoking Cessation Treatment Completed Philip Morris USA, Inc. Phase 2 2011-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether meclizine, an antihistamine used to prevent or treat motion sickness, can help smokers quit smoking. This study will also investigate the potential relationship between genes you have inherited and success in quitting smoking.
NCT01443858 ↗ Meclizine as a Potential Smoking Cessation Treatment Completed Duke University Phase 2 2011-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether meclizine, an antihistamine used to prevent or treat motion sickness, can help smokers quit smoking. This study will also investigate the potential relationship between genes you have inherited and success in quitting smoking.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ANTIVERT

Condition Name

Condition Name for ANTIVERT
Intervention Trials
Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo 1
Smoking Cessation 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ANTIVERT
Intervention Trials
Vertigo 1
Dizziness 1
Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ANTIVERT

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ANTIVERT
Location Trials
United States 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ANTIVERT
Location Trials
North Carolina 1
Pennsylvania 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ANTIVERT

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ANTIVERT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2 1
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ANTIVERT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ANTIVERT

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ANTIVERT
Sponsor Trials
Lehigh Valley Hospital 1
Philip Morris USA, Inc. 1
Duke University 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ANTIVERT
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

ANTIVERT Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 23, 2026

ANTIVERT (meclizine): clinical-trial status, market analysis, and projection

What is ANTIVERT and which drug does it map to?

ANTIVERT is the brand name for meclizine (an antihistamine used for vertigo). Meclizine is an established, off-patent product in most jurisdictions, which shapes both the clinical-trial landscape and the commercial outlook. (Source: FDA label for meclizine products; see cited references [1]-[3].)


What do current clinical trials show for meclizine?

Meclizine is widely used for peripheral vertigo and motion sickness. Clinical activity in recent years is typically limited to:

  • Comparative or symptomatic studies (often in vestibular syndromes)
  • Formulation or protocol updates (for already marketed therapy)
  • Clinical practice data rather than late-stage registration trials

Trial intensity vs. registrational milestones

  • No dominant, late-stage (Phase 3/4) registration program is associated with a single “ANTIVERT” label expansion based on publicly indexed trial reporting.
  • The practical implication is that the market is supported by existing indications and chronic clinical demand, not by new Phase 3 launches tied to a novel regulatory pathway.

Are there meaningful Phase 3 programs for ANTIVERT/meclizine right now?

No single, clearly labeled Phase 3 program for a meclizine-led “ANTIVERT” expansion is evidenced in public registries at a level that typically precedes a major label change or new exclusivity grant. The evidence base for current use is largely post-approval clinical practice and earlier generation trials, not a current late-stage pipeline designed to create new patent-protected revenue streams. (Sources: FDA labeling and publicly available trial databases summarized in cited references [1]-[4].)


What is the clinical positioning that drives demand?

Meclizine’s label-based use supports steady utilization:

Common labeled use (US)

  • Vertigo (symptomatic treatment), including motion sickness-associated dizziness in typical clinical usage consistent with older labeling conventions. (Source: FDA meclizine drug labeling [1]-[3].)

Form factor

  • Oral tablets and similar dosage forms; ANTIVERT is commonly marketed in tablet form consistent with legacy product lines. (Source: FDA labeling [1]-[3].)

Market analysis: what is the demand profile for meclizine/ANTIVERT?

Because ANTIVERT is meclizine, the market analysis is best framed as an OTC-prescription crossover generic antihistamine market with:

  • Many authorized generics and multiple manufacturers
  • Price competition
  • Low likelihood of premium pricing unless differentiated by distribution, formulation, or channel strategy

Key commercial drivers

  1. Chronic indication pull: Vertigo and dizziness remain high-prevalence complaints in primary care, urgent care, and specialty ENT/neurology.
  2. Low switching cost: Meclizine competes against other vestibular symptom treatments (other antihistamines, antivertigo agents, supportive approaches). Patients and prescribers often treat symptom relief as the primary outcome.
  3. Generic-driven economics: Meclizine has long been established; cost-down dynamics dominate.

Key commercial constraints

  • Generic competition limits sustained premium pricing.
  • Regulatory path dependency: without a new patent-protectable reformulation or new label expansion, revenue typically stays constrained to share capture and contracting dynamics rather than innovation-led market growth.

How does ANTIVERT typically compete in a managed-care environment?

Managed care often narrows the formulary to lower net-cost options:

  • Multiple generic substitutes
  • Contracting/rebate mechanisms
  • Step edits or therapeutic interchange within antivertigo symptom categories, depending on payer policy

This puts brands like ANTIVERT under pressure to maintain net price vs. generics, and it favors market-share tactics over pipeline-led growth.


Market projection: where does revenue go from here?

Given meclizine’s off-patent status and the absence of a clearly evidenced current late-stage label expansion, the projection is that:

  • Volume growth is likely driven by population growth and stable prescribing patterns for vertigo symptom control.
  • Value growth is limited by generic price compression.

Projection framework (directional)

  • Base case: modest flat-to-low single digit value growth; low-to-moderate unit growth.
  • Downside: continued share erosion to lowest-cost generics and channel re-contracting.
  • Upside: if channel partners or a durable differentiation strategy (formulation, packaging, or distribution contract) lifts share without triggering price erosion.

This is consistent with the observed commercial characteristics of mature generic antihistamines, as supported by labeling stability and the absence of major new regulatory milestones. (Sources: FDA labeling and general generic-market pattern as evidenced by multiple authorized labeling/market products [1]-[3].)


What metrics should an investor or R&D lead track for ANTIVERT?

For an established brand built on meclizine, the actionable dashboard is not Phase 3 milestones. It is commercial and regulatory sustainment metrics:

Commercial KPIs

  • Net price vs. lowest-cost generic comparators
  • Pharmacy and wholesaler share by contract
  • Payer restriction tightening rate
  • Inventory replenishment cadence (legacy products are supply-chain sensitive)

Regulatory and label stability

  • Any safety communications or label revisions affecting dizziness/anticholinergic warnings
  • Pediatric/adult dosing updates, if any (usually stable for legacy antihistamines)

(Underlying regulatory stability is anchored in FDA labeling for meclizine products [1]-[3].)


Key takeaways

  • ANTIVERT is meclizine and is an established, off-patent product in most markets. (Source: FDA labeling [1]-[3].)
  • Clinical trial activity is not dominated by late-stage, registrational meclizine programs that would create a new exclusivity-backed growth engine for “ANTIVERT” specifically. (Sources: FDA labeling and publicly indexed trial summaries [1]-[4].)
  • Market growth is value-limited and volume-supported, with generic price compression as the main headwind.
  • Investment and R&D attention should shift to commercial share mechanics and differentiation levers (channel contracts, formulation strategy) rather than expecting near-term label expansion driven by a major new Phase 3 pathway.

FAQs

1) Is ANTIVERT still prescribed for vertigo in the US?

Yes. ANTIVERT is meclizine, and US labeling supports symptomatic treatment of vertigo. (Source: FDA label [1]-[3].)

2) Does meclizine face patent-driven competitive risk?

Patent-driven risk is limited for the core meclizine API because the product is mature and widely available as generic/authorized alternatives. Competitive risk is mainly cost and share driven. (Sources: FDA labeling and market product listings [1]-[3].)

3) Are there new Phase 3 trials that could expand the ANTIVERT label?

Publicly indexed evidence does not show a clear, single Phase 3 program tied to a new meclizine label expansion at this time. Trial activity is more consistent with limited or non-registrational work. (Sources: FDA labeling and trial registries overview [1]-[4].)

4) What is the biggest driver of ANTIVERT profitability?

Net pricing after payer contracts and generic substitution pressure, followed by unit demand stability. (Sources: FDA label context for use [1]-[3].)

5) What dosing and safety labeling considerations matter most for demand?

Dosing stability and safety communications tied to antihistamine side effects (sedation, anticholinergic effects) influence prescriber comfort and patient adherence, which in turn drives repeat use patterns. (Sources: FDA labeling [1]-[3].)


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Antivert (meclizine hydrochloride) Prescribing Information / Label. FDA.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Meclizine hydrochloride drug labels (tablet) under FDA review and listing. FDA.
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Meclizine hydrochloride: safety and dosing information in approved labeling. FDA.
[4] U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov: search results for meclizine (status and trial phase listings). ClinicalTrials.gov.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.