Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ANGIOMAX RTU


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ANGIOMAX RTU

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00043277 ↗ Study Of Angiomax In Infants Under Six Months With Thrombosis Completed The Medicines Company Phase 2 2002-08-01 The goals of this study are: 1. To assess the safety of bivalirudin in infants under six months with arterial or venous thrombosis; 2. To determine the dose of bivalirudin required to achieve adequate anticoagulation as measured by the activated clotting time (ACT) or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in Infants Under Six Months with arterial or venous thrombosis; 3. To determine the outcome of patients on bivalirudin with respect to thrombus resolution and bleeding complications compared to patients on unfractionated heparin (UH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH).
NCT00073580 ↗ Angiomax in Patients With HIT/HITTS Type II Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) (CHOOSE) Completed The Medicines Company Phase 3 2003-10-01 The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of Angiomax as an anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)/heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis syndrome (HITTS) undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery.
NCT00073593 ↗ Comparing Angiomax to Heparin With Protamine Reversal in Patients OPCAB Completed The Medicines Company Phase 3 2003-08-01 The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of Angiomax as an alternative anticoagulant to heparin with protamine reversal in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
NCT00079508 ↗ Angiomax in Patients With HIT/HITTS Type II Undergoing CPB Completed The Medicines Company Phase 3 2004-04-01 The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)/heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis syndrome (HITTS) Type II undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), Angiomax is a safe and effective anticoagulant.
NCT00079586 ↗ Comparing Angiomax to Heparin With Protamine in Patients Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB) Completed The Medicines Company Phase 3 2004-04-01 The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or CABG-Valve, or Isolated Cardiac Valve surgery on CPB (cardiac surgery), Angiomax is a safe and effective alternative anticoagulant to heparin with protamine reversal.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ANGIOMAX RTU

Condition Name

Condition Name for ANGIOMAX RTU
Intervention Trials
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery 4
Coronary Artery Disease 3
Myocardial Infarction 2
Cardiovascular Disease 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ANGIOMAX RTU
Intervention Trials
Coronary Artery Disease 5
Myocardial Ischemia 5
Coronary Disease 4
Acute Coronary Syndrome 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ANGIOMAX RTU

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ANGIOMAX RTU
Location Trials
United States 43
Canada 3
France 2
Netherlands 2
Czech Republic 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ANGIOMAX RTU
Location Trials
New York 6
Ohio 6
North Carolina 3
California 3
Texas 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ANGIOMAX RTU

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ANGIOMAX RTU
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 10
Phase 2 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ANGIOMAX RTU
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 12
Terminated 3
Unknown status 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ANGIOMAX RTU

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ANGIOMAX RTU
Sponsor Trials
The Medicines Company 11
NYU Langone Health 2
Children's Hospital Los Angeles 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ANGIOMAX RTU
Sponsor Trials
Other 17
Industry 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 22, 2026

Angiomax RTU (bivalirudin) clinical trials update, market analysis, and revenue projection

Angiomax RTU is the ready-to-use (RTU) liquid formulation of bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor used during PCI and for anticoagulation in cardiac surgery settings. Publicly available sources do not provide an identifiable, active “Angiomax RTU” clinical development program distinct from bivalirudin’s established label and earlier studies, so there is no basis for a current, drug-specific “trials update” beyond routine postmarketing surveillance and ongoing competitive dynamics.

What is Angiomax RTU and what indications generate revenue?

Angiomax (bivalirudin) is marketed for anticoagulation in patients undergoing PCI, and is also used in select peri-procedural settings. Angiomax RTU is the same active ingredient delivered as a ready-to-use formulation intended to reduce preparation steps versus earlier vial-based presentations. The revenue-driving commercial scope is therefore tied to bivalirudin’s approved indications and hospital purchasing behavior, not to a separate clinical development track.

Approved use cases that shape hospital demand

  • PCI anticoagulation in cath lab workflows
  • Peri-procedural anticoagulation protocols in interventional cardiology
  • Use patterns influenced by access route (RTU convenience), formulary decisions, and protocol preference

What clinical trials are ongoing for bivalirudin that could impact Angiomax RTU demand?

A “clinical trials update” for Angiomax RTU specifically cannot be separated from bivalirudin’s clinical footprint without evidence of a distinct RTU development program. In practice, demand changes come from:

  • New evidence comparing direct thrombin inhibitors versus alternative anticoagulation strategies (eg, heparins, heparin+adjuncts)
  • Guideline updates and payer formulary changes
  • Trial readouts for bivalirudin in specific subpopulations that shift guideline positioning

Because no Angiomax RTU-labeled, distinct current trials are identifiable from the sources cited here, the actionable view for an R&D or commercial team is protocol and competitive substitution risk, not trial pipeline upside.

How big is the Angiomax (bivalirudin) market and what segment drives spend?

Angiomax sales track the use of direct thrombin inhibition in cath labs and procedural anticoagulation. The market is constrained by:

  • Preferential use of alternatives such as unfractionated heparin and, in some settings, other anticoagulant protocols
  • Loss of exclusivity and generic entry risk over time
  • Hospital formulary consolidation around standardized PCI anticoagulation pathways

Demand drivers

  • Adoption of PCI pathways where bivalirudin is preferred
  • Convenience and workflow fit of RTU presentation versus preparation-intensive alternatives
  • Competitive contracting outcomes with hospital group purchasing organizations and IDNs

Key constraints

  • Substitution by heparin-based regimens in many protocols
  • Tight procedural pharmacy budgets and switch incentives for cheaper products
  • Availability of lower-cost direct thrombin inhibitor alternatives and/or generic bivalirudin where authorized

What market share and pricing dynamics apply to Angiomax RTU?

Pricing and share are determined less by RTU convenience in isolation and more by:

  • Contracted hospital pricing and rebate structures
  • Formulary access across IDNs and integrated delivery networks
  • Bid cycles for cath lab anticoagulation supply

RTU formats typically win incremental preference where preparation time, contamination risk, or staffing constraints are decision factors. That said, RTU convenience rarely overrides a major cost gap if competing products are available and protocol-compatible.

When does Angiomax RTU lose exclusivity, and when do generics become a real risk?

Exclusivity and generic entry timing for Angiomax RTU depends on the specific patent and regulatory reference listed for the product. A complete exclusivity and patent-expiration timeline cannot be produced from the information cited in the sources used for this update.

What patents protect bivalirudin and how do they affect Angiomax RTU competition?

A bivalirudin-specific patent estate assessment requires Orange Book listings and the linked patents for the RTU NDA/ANDA reference. No Orange Book patent table for Angiomax RTU is included in the cited materials in this update, so a defensible “what patents protect Angiomax RTU” mapping cannot be produced.

What is the Orange Book status of Angiomax RTU?

A current Orange Book status table with listed patents, expiration dates, and exclusivity codes is not included in the cited sources available for this update. As a result, a clean Orange Book-derived status snapshot cannot be provided here.

Are there Paragraph IV challenges or ANDA filings for Angiomax RTU?

A litigation-style assessment requires:

  • ANDA application numbers
  • Patent carve-outs and Paragraph IV certifications
  • Court dockets and FDA approval/notice letters

No such Orange Book-and-court record dataset is included in the sourced materials used for this update, so no Paragraph IV challenge timeline can be stated.

How strong is the patent estate for bivalirudin in the US, and what does it mean for launch timing?

Without Orange Book-linked patents and their expiration dates for the Angiomax RTU presentation, there is no auditable way to grade patent strength or estimate launch windows.

How does Angiomax RTU compare with generic bivalirudin and alternative anticoagulants for PCI?

Commercially, RTU competes against:

  • Generic bivalirudin products (where approved and contracted)
  • Workflow-embedded heparin regimens and competing anticoagulation protocols

Competitive comparison that matters to procurement

  • Total cost per procedure after rebates and discard factors
  • Preparation labor and time to first dose
  • Stability and handling compatibility with cath lab workflow
  • Protocol inclusion in cath lab order sets and standardized pathways

What biosimilar risk exists for Angiomax RTU?

None. Bivalirudin is a small molecule. Biosimilar pathways do not apply.

What clinical endpoints and trial evidence drive guideline preference for bivalirudin?

For anticoagulation in PCI, relevant decision points include:

  • Ischemic outcomes and bleeding risk tradeoffs
  • Procedural complications and access-site bleeding
  • Operational feasibility and protocol adherence

This evidence is label-level and historically established for bivalirudin, not tied specifically to Angiomax RTU as a separate clinical entity.

Revenue projection for Angiomax RTU: base, downside, and upside scenarios

A quantitative projection requires at least one of:

  • Product-level historical sales (from a database or public company reporting)
  • Current net price/contract terms
  • Unit volume and procedure incidence assumptions for the addressable PCI segment

Those inputs are not present in the sourced materials available for this update. Therefore, a numeric revenue projection cannot be provided without fabricating business-critical numbers.

What commercial levers could change Angiomax RTU growth fastest?

Even without a quantitative forecast, the highest-impact levers are:

  • Contracting cycles with cath lab distributors and IDN formularies
  • Protocol inclusion in PCI order sets that specify bivalirudin as default or conditional
  • RTU adoption tied to nursing and pharmacy workflow KPIs

Key Takeaways

  • Angiomax RTU is a ready-to-use presentation of bivalirudin; commercial demand tracks bivalirudin’s established PCI and peri-procedural use patterns.
  • A distinct Angiomax RTU clinical trial pipeline update cannot be substantiated from publicly accessible sources used in this update.
  • Market and exclusivity/generic risk analysis requires Orange Book and litigation datasets for the specific RTU presentation; those are not included here, so patent expiration and generic timing cannot be stated.
  • Actionable commercial analysis should focus on contracting, formulary access, and cath lab protocol inclusion rather than pipeline-driven upside.

FAQs

  1. Is Angiomax RTU the same active ingredient as bivalirudin vials?
  2. How do cath lab anticoagulation protocols shift between bivalirudin and heparin-based regimens?
  3. Does RTU packaging materially change pharmacy handling and procurement decisions?
  4. Can generic bivalirudin enter if patents expire for the underlying bivalirudin product?
  5. What FDA pathway status applies to Angiomax RTU compared with generic bivalirudin products?

References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. FDA. Label information and prescribing information for bivalirudin-containing products (Angiomax). U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies on bivalirudin and related direct thrombin inhibitor PCI anticoagulation trials. U.S. National Library of Medicine.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.