Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AMPICILLIN TRIHYDRATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for AMPICILLIN TRIHYDRATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Federal University of São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for AMPICILLIN TRIHYDRATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for AMPICILLIN TRIHYDRATE
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for AMPICILLIN TRIHYDRATE
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for AMPICILLIN TRIHYDRATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for AMPICILLIN TRIHYDRATE
Location Trials
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for AMPICILLIN TRIHYDRATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for AMPICILLIN TRIHYDRATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for AMPICILLIN TRIHYDRATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for AMPICILLIN TRIHYDRATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for AMPICILLIN TRIHYDRATE
Sponsor Trials
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 1
Federal University of São Paulo 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for AMPICILLIN TRIHYDRATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Ampicillin Trihydrate (Drug, Clinical Trials Update and Market Outlook)

Last updated: April 26, 2026

Ampicillin trihydrate is an older, off-patent aminopenicillin antibiotic used for susceptible bacterial infections. Public clinical development activity is limited and largely shifted to formulation, combination products, pediatric/US labeling support, and bioequivalence work rather than brand-new mechanism programs. Near-term market growth is constrained by generics, price pressure, and antimicrobial stewardship rules. Outlook depends mainly on (1) acute-care antibiotic demand cycles, (2) procurement pricing in key regions, and (3) regulatory or payer-driven restrictions and stewardship targets.


What is the current clinical trials signal for ampicillin trihydrate?

Clinical trial activity for ampicillin itself is not consistently captured as “ampicillin trihydrate” as a separate active ingredient in registries. Studies are often logged as ampicillin (oral or injectable), or as fixed-dose combinations, with formulation and equivalence endpoints. The net signal for 2023-2026 is dominated by:

  • Bioequivalence and formulation studies (immediate-release oral forms and reconstitutable injectables)
  • Pediatric or special-population dosing studies
  • Stewardship-era observational trials that include ampicillin among comparator arms
  • Rare-company investment into new proprietary products using known chemistry

Practical read-through for R&D teams: The active ingredient is mature; the credible pipeline is typically localized and compliance-driven (quality, equivalence, labeling), not platform-driven. That lowers the probability of high-visibility Phase 3 launches.


What do clinical-trial registries show for “ampicillin” vs “ampicillin trihydrate”?

Public registries classify by active ingredient and intervention name; “ampicillin trihydrate” may not appear as a distinct intervention string. In practice, market and competitor monitoring should be based on:

  • Ampicillin” (interventions)
  • Ampicillin sodium” (injectable equivalents)
  • Ampicillin + sulbactam” and other combinations (where ampicillin is present)
  • Ampicillin” dosing, PK, and BE keywords (oral and IV)

Sources used for trial landscape and regulatory context include major registries and FDA/EMA regulatory data access portals (see references).


What is the market structure for ampicillin trihydrate?

Ampicillin is widely generic with global manufacturing footprint. The commercial market is shaped by:

Supply and pricing reality

  • Generic competition is the default. Pricing tracks procurement cycles, tender volume, and regional licensing.
  • Injectable market shares matter most in acute hospitals, while oral formulations serve community and step-down settings where susceptibility patterns support use.

Demand drivers

  • Respiratory and urinary infection management in settings where susceptibility and guidelines still support aminopenicillin use.
  • Neonatal and pediatric infection pathways in which dosing and susceptibility guidance can include ampicillin, subject to resistance patterns.
  • Institutional antibiotic formularies that decide whether ampicillin stays on contract lists.

Demand constraints

  • Antimicrobial stewardship reduces broad aminopenicillin use where resistance and stewardship targets tighten.
  • Resistance (notably beta-lactamase producing organisms) limits effectiveness and shifts practice toward beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor regimens or cephalosporins.

How does regulatory policy shape near-term sales?

Ampicillin use and availability remain governed by standard antimicrobial labeling, susceptibility cautions, and safety communications.

Key policy dimensions that affect demand:

  • FDA antibiotic labeling and safety language for penicillins
  • Stewardship programs in hospitals, which can down-rank older antibiotics when susceptibility falls below thresholds
  • Local guidance driven by resistance surveillance and antibiogram trends

Regulatory and safety framing does not remove use, but it increases scrutiny and decreases discretionary prescribing.


What is the competitive landscape?

For a mature, off-patent antibiotic, the competitive set typically includes:

  • Generic ampicillin manufacturers across multiple regions
  • Brand and generic combination products (where ampicillin is paired with beta-lactamase inhibitors)
  • Therapeutic alternatives (other beta-lactams and non-beta-lactams depending on infection type and susceptibility)

Commercial implication: Marketing differentiation is usually limited. Winning is procurement-based: contract pricing, supply reliability, dossier quality, and regulatory continuity.


What is the market projection for ampicillin trihydrate (2026-2031)?

Base-case outlook (directional)

Given generic saturation and antimicrobial stewardship pressure, the market is expected to show:

  • Low-to-mid single digit CAGR globally in revenue terms, driven more by:
    • price mix and tender dynamics
    • volume stability in supported indications
    • portfolio shifts within penicillins (packaging, injectable vs oral)
  • Volume growth likely modest, with periodic declines in usage where resistance or guideline tightening occurs

Segment expectations

  • Hospital injectable: more resilient in absolute volume but exposed to procurement switching toward preferred formulary options
  • Oral: more sensitive to outpatient prescribing patterns and payer formularies
  • Pediatric and special populations: stable demand support where guideline-concordant dosing remains relevant

Sensitivity points that change the trajectory

  • Resistance trends in key geographies
  • Changes in stewardship policies at payer and provider level
  • Supply disruptions or capacity expansions among key generic manufacturers

What is the likely R&D path and investment profile for new ampicillin trihydrate products?

For ampicillin trihydrate, credible product development typically looks like:

  • Bioequivalence / bridging studies for oral formulations
  • Reconstitution and stability work for injectables
  • Manufacturing scale-up and regulatory dossier harmonization
  • Fixed-dose or combination repositioning (where “ampicillin present” products compete more directly with beta-lactamase inhibitor regimens)

Investment fit: lower risk of clinical failure once equivalence and safety are established, but lower upside because clinical novelty is limited and pricing is commoditized.


How should companies benchmark the clinical and regulatory calendar?

A practical benchmarking approach for business teams:

  • Track trial activity under “ampicillin” and combinations, not only “ampicillin trihydrate.”
  • Track regulatory status for ANDA approvals and label updates tied to generic ampicillin products.
  • Monitor FDA safety communications and stewardship-related guideline changes.
  • Watch for BE/PK trials in pediatric and special populations that can enable broader positioning.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical development is limited for ampicillin trihydrate as a standalone new drug; activity is mainly BE, formulation, and special-population work logged under “ampicillin.”
  • Market growth is constrained by generic saturation, price compression, and antimicrobial stewardship.
  • Near-term revenue growth is likely low-to-mid single digits globally, driven by tender dynamics and portfolio mix rather than new clinical differentiation.
  • Best commercial lever remains execution in procurement (supply, pricing, dossier quality) and positioning in formulary-concordant indications.
  • R&D upside is capped; the most realistic investment pathways are regulatory and formulation programs with equivalence endpoints.

FAQs

1) Why do trials for ampicillin trihydrate show up under “ampicillin” in registries?

Registries index interventions by active ingredient naming conventions; “ampicillin trihydrate” can be represented as “ampicillin” or “ampicillin sodium,” with formulation details captured separately.

2) Is there meaningful Phase 3 innovation expected for ampicillin?

For ampicillin as an older antibiotic, meaningful Phase 3 innovation is less common. Most new studies are BE, dosing support, and formulation or combination repositioning.

3) What drives ampicillin demand more, resistance or stewardship?

Both. Resistance shifts susceptibility and drives regimen switching, while stewardship programs restrict broad or non-concordant prescribing and reduce discretionary use.

4) What product form has the most stable demand?

Hospital injectable is typically more stable due to established inpatient use patterns, while oral use depends more on outpatient prescribing and payer formularies.

5) What is the best indicator for near-term market changes?

Procurement and formulary updates plus resistance and antibiogram trends in major hospital systems and national guidance, which directly influence contract placement and utilization.


References (APA)

[1] U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug approval reports and related regulatory information. https://www.fda.gov/drugs
[2] U.S. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[3] European Medicines Agency. (n.d.). Medicines and regulatory information. https://www.ema.europa.eu/
[4] World Health Organization. (2015). Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241509763
[5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance resources. https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.