Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AMPHETAMINE SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for AMPHETAMINE SULFATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00218348 ↗ Treatment of Cocaine Dependence: Comparison of Three Doses of Dextro-Amphetamine Sulfate and Placebo Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 2 2003-09-01 Dextro-amphetamine sulfate is a central nervous system stimulant that increases the release of the neurotransmitter dopamine in the brain. The purpose of this study is to further examine dose ranges of dextro-amphetamine sulfate as a treatment for cocaine dependence.
NCT00218348 ↗ Treatment of Cocaine Dependence: Comparison of Three Doses of Dextro-Amphetamine Sulfate and Placebo Completed The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston Phase 2 2003-09-01 Dextro-amphetamine sulfate is a central nervous system stimulant that increases the release of the neurotransmitter dopamine in the brain. The purpose of this study is to further examine dose ranges of dextro-amphetamine sulfate as a treatment for cocaine dependence.
NCT00248092 ↗ Study to Evaluate the Likeability, Safety, and Abuse Potential of NRP 104 in Adults With Histories of Stimulant Abuse Completed New River Pharmaceuticals Phase 1/Phase 2 2006-01-01 This research is being done to evaluate if NRP104 is a safe drug. The other purpose is to learn if NRP104 produces a high and any other effects like amphetamine and other stimulant drugs that are abused. This information will give some indication if NRP104 can be abused. NRP104 is an investigational drug. This means that it has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Healthy people, between the ages of 18 and 55 with histories of substance abuse that include stimulant drugs, may join. Amphetamines are drugs that are used most often to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, to treat narcolepsy (excessive sleepiness) and for weight loss.
NCT00715520 ↗ Neurobiological Principles Applied to the Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients Completed National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) N/A 2007-04-01 The purpose of this study is to use (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) TMS or drugs to improve learning of movement skills and the adaptation processes in patients after stroke. Once investigators have determined the improving effect of TMS and the drugs on learning of movement skills, the study team may be able to provide information that improves rehabilitative treatment and helps to improve recovery after stroke.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for AMPHETAMINE SULFATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for AMPHETAMINE SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Narcolepsy 2
ADHD 2
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 1
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for AMPHETAMINE SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Hyperkinesis 3
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity 3
Narcolepsy 2
Disease 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for AMPHETAMINE SULFATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for AMPHETAMINE SULFATE
Location Trials
United States 24
Canada 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for AMPHETAMINE SULFATE
Location Trials
Texas 3
Utah 2
Nevada 2
Florida 2
Georgia 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for AMPHETAMINE SULFATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for AMPHETAMINE SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 1
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for AMPHETAMINE SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for AMPHETAMINE SULFATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for AMPHETAMINE SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2
Vallon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for AMPHETAMINE SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 5
NIH 4
Other 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Amphetamine Sulfate Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Revenue Projection (2026-2036)

Last updated: July 26, 2026

What is the latest clinical trials pipeline for amphetamine sulfate?

No complete, up-to-date, source-grounded clinical-trials dataset is available in the provided information to compile an accurate “latest” status by trial phase, sponsor, site, or readout date. Without that dataset, a trials update would risk mixing current and stale listings, and would not support litigation-grade precision.

Which trial designs dominate amphetamine sulfate studies?

No trial-specific information is available here to map designs (randomized, crossover, bioequivalence, dose-ranging, pediatric extrapolation), endpoints (ADHD symptom scales, functioning outcomes, appetite/weight, cardiovascular parameters), or regulatory endpoints (BE/bridging vs efficacy).

Are new formulations driving new studies?

No formulation-specific or developer-specific pipeline detail is available here to confirm sustained-release, prodrug, new salt form, or alternative delivery routes for amphetamine sulfate.


How big is the amphetamine sulfate market today and what segment drives demand?

No market sizing inputs, geography splits, pack pricing, share breakdown across strengths, or payer mix are provided here. A credible market analysis requires at least one anchored dataset (IQVIA, Symphony Health, SSR Health, company filings, NDC-level retail and/or channel data), which is not included.

Which indication dominates: ADHD vs off-label uses

No indication split, utilization-weighted prescribing data, or claims-based breakdown is available here to attribute demand to ADHD versus off-label or comorbidity-related use.

What channel mix matters most (retail vs institutional vs specialty)?

No distribution or channel data is available here to quantify retail vs institutional pull-through for amphetamine sulfate.


When does amphetamine sulfate face exclusivity loss and generic entry risk?

No Orange Book listing data, patent-by-patent expiration dates, pediatric exclusivity terms, or 180-day exclusivity status is included here. Without those, any exclusivity and generic-entry assessment would be incomplete.

What patents typically cover amphetamine sulfate products?

No product-specific patent estate is provided here to enumerate active ingredient, formulation, polymorph, process, or method-of-use protection.

How do Paragraph IV filings affect future pricing?

No Orange Book Paragraph IV history or settlement terms are included here to model entry timing, share capture, or erosion.


What is the FDA regulatory status of amphetamine sulfate products (Orange Book, approvals, labels)?

No product-level FDA data is provided here to confirm approval type (NDA vs ANDA), reference product, label version, strengths, dosage forms, pediatric labeling status, or REMS (if any).

Which FDA review pathway is used for generics of amphetamine sulfate?

No ANDA/505(j) or NDA history is included here to characterize typical regulatory posture.

How do shortages and supply constraints affect access and revenue?

No supply or shortage indicators are provided here to map QRF/controlled substance scheduling impacts, distributor inventory cycles, or backorder durations.


How strong is the patent estate for amphetamine sulfate generics and what litigation exists?

No litigation docket, PTAB history, settlement dates, or asserted patents are provided. A patent-strength assessment requires actual patent numbers, claims, jurisdiction, and case posture.

What companies are challenging amphetamine sulfate products?

No ANDA filers, applicant names, or challenger identities are included.

What settlement terms determine launch dates or “authorized generic” timing?

No settlement agreement terms are provided.


What formulation patents cover amphetamine sulfate and do they change the competitive landscape?

No formulation-specific assets are included in the provided information. Without patent identifiers tied to specific dosage forms or release profiles, formulation protection cannot be mapped.

Immediate-release vs extended-release: what is protected?

No product-level mapping exists here to connect dosage form to patent claims.

Manufacturing-process barriers: are there any process patents?

No process patent information is available here.


How does amphetamine sulfate compare with lisdexamfetamine, mixed amphetamine salts, and methylphenidate on market trajectory?

No head-to-head market data, relative pricing, share shifts, switching rates, or cohort-level persistence is provided here. A comparison requires consistent market-series data and payer/segment splits.

Switching dynamics: do patients move from amphetamine sulfate to lisdexamfetamine?

No switching or persistence data is available here.

Managed care controls: formulary access and step edits

No formulary and utilization-control information is included here.


Revenue projection for amphetamine sulfate: base, bull, and bear cases (2026-2036)

No data inputs are provided to anchor projections: current unit volumes, average wholesale price or net price, reimbursement rates, generic erosion assumptions, or entry timing. Without those, any numerical projection would be fabricated.

Projection drivers used in modeling (what must be sourced)

No source-grounded inputs exist here to populate:

  • Current market size and growth rate by geography and dose form
  • Generic penetration trajectory and 180-day exclusivity events
  • Net price erosion curve post-first ANDA entry
  • Estimated controlled-substance supply constraints and shortage adjustments
  • Indication mix and pediatric prescribing trends
  • Competitive dynamics versus lisdexamfetamine and methylphenidate

Key Takeaways

  • A source-grounded clinical-trials update, exclusivity/generic-entry timeline, and revenue projection for amphetamine sulfate cannot be produced from the information provided.
  • Market analysis requires anchored datasets (claims, NDC sales, pricing, market share by payer and channel).
  • Patent and regulatory assessment requires Orange Book, patent-by-patent expirations, ANDA history, litigation, and any settlements.

FAQs

  1. What clinical trial registry entries exist for amphetamine sulfate in ADHD and related indications?
  2. Which amphetamine sulfate NDCs have the most near-term generic entry risk?
  3. How many Paragraph IV certifications have been filed for amphetamine sulfate products?
  4. What is the typical net pricing and erosion pattern for generic amphetamine sulfate after first ANDA launch?
  5. How do formulary controls in Medicaid and commercial plans affect amphetamine sulfate utilization?

References

No sources were provided in the prompt, and no cited materials are available to compile an APA reference list.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.