You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND VALSARTAN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND VALSARTAN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02060019 ↗ Pharmacokinetic Interactions and Safety Between Exforge Tab. and Crestor Tab. in Healthy Male Subjects Completed CJ HealthCare Corporation Phase 1 2014-03-01 This study is designated to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interactions of amlodipine besylate, valsartan and rosuvastatin in healthy male volunteers.
NCT02060019 ↗ Pharmacokinetic Interactions and Safety Between Exforge Tab. and Crestor Tab. in Healthy Male Subjects Completed HK inno.N Corporation Phase 1 2014-03-01 This study is designated to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interactions of amlodipine besylate, valsartan and rosuvastatin in healthy male volunteers.
NCT02069821 ↗ Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Amlodipine Besylate/Valsartan and Atorvastatin in Healthy Male Subjects Completed CJ HealthCare Corporation Phase 1 2014-03-01 The purpose of the study is to assess the pharmacokinetic interactions between amlodipine besylate/valsartan and atorvastatin single or co-administered in healthy volunteers.
NCT02069821 ↗ Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Amlodipine Besylate/Valsartan and Atorvastatin in Healthy Male Subjects Completed HK inno.N Corporation Phase 1 2014-03-01 The purpose of the study is to assess the pharmacokinetic interactions between amlodipine besylate/valsartan and atorvastatin single or co-administered in healthy volunteers.
NCT03299452 ↗ Clinical Studies by Using Alphacait to Screen Drugs for Advanced Solid Tumor Unknown status Alphacait, LLC Phase 2 2017-01-01 This is a single-center, open-label, single-arm, non-randomized study designed to evaluate PFS, safety, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (OPR), disease control rate (DCR) and biomarkers of cancer therapy based on Alphacait screening system in subjects with advanced malignant tumor.
NCT03299452 ↗ Clinical Studies by Using Alphacait to Screen Drugs for Advanced Solid Tumor Unknown status Haining Health-Coming Biotech Co., Ltd. Phase 2 2017-01-01 This is a single-center, open-label, single-arm, non-randomized study designed to evaluate PFS, safety, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (OPR), disease control rate (DCR) and biomarkers of cancer therapy based on Alphacait screening system in subjects with advanced malignant tumor.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND VALSARTAN

Condition Name

Condition Name for AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND VALSARTAN
Intervention Trials
Healthy 2
Metastatic Cancer 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND VALSARTAN
Intervention Trials
Neoplasm Metastasis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND VALSARTAN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND VALSARTAN
Location Trials
Korea, Republic of 2
China 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND VALSARTAN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND VALSARTAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2 1
Phase 1 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND VALSARTAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND VALSARTAN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND VALSARTAN
Sponsor Trials
HK inno.N Corporation 2
CJ HealthCare Corporation 2
Alphacait, LLC 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AND VALSARTAN
Sponsor Trials
Industry 4
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Amlodipine Besylate and Valsartan: Clinical Trial Landscape and Market Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Amlodipine besylate and valsartan combination therapy, used to treat hypertension, faces a mature market with ongoing clinical scrutiny and the emergence of generic competition. Current patent expirations and a steady stream of real-world evidence studies define its trajectory.

What is the Current Clinical Trial Status for Amlodipine Besylate and Valsartan?

Clinical trial activity for amlodipine besylate and valsartan is primarily focused on post-market surveillance, comparative effectiveness, and the exploration of specific patient populations. The landscape is characterized by a low number of novel investigational trials, reflecting its established therapeutic role and patent expirations for originator products.

Key Trial Categories:

  • Post-Marketing Surveillance Studies: These trials monitor long-term safety, efficacy, and real-world effectiveness in diverse patient groups. They aim to identify rare side effects or confirm benefits in specific comorbidities.
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER): CER trials compare amlodipine besylate and valsartan to other antihypertensive agents or combinations. These studies provide data for clinical decision-making, particularly in treatment-resistant hypertension.
  • Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Studies: While less common for established drugs, some PK/PD studies may investigate drug interactions or variations in drug response due to genetic factors or specific disease states.
  • Generic Equivalence Trials: Manufacturers of generic versions of amlodipine besylate and valsartan conduct bioequivalence studies to demonstrate pharmaceutical equivalence to the reference listed drug. These are critical for regulatory approval.

Representative Clinical Trial Data:

As of Q4 2023, a review of major clinical trial registries (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register) reveals the following trends:

  • Number of Active Trials: Approximately 15-25 active interventional studies globally.
  • Trial Phase Distribution:
    • Phase 3: < 5%
    • Phase 2: < 5%
    • Phase 1: 0%
    • Observational/Post-Marketing: > 80%
  • Primary Focus: Safety monitoring and real-world effectiveness.
  • Recent Completions (Last 2 Years): Dominated by bioequivalence studies for new generic entrants and observational studies on long-term outcomes.

Examples of Ongoing Research Areas:

  • Cardiovascular Outcomes: Studies examining the long-term impact of amlodipine/valsartan on reducing stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure progression compared to monotherapies or alternative combinations.
  • Renal Function: Investigations into the drug's effect on kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or diabetic nephropathy.
  • Specific Ethnic Groups: Real-world data collection on efficacy and tolerability in populations with differing genetic predispositions to hypertension or drug response.

The absence of significant Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials for new indications or novel formulations indicates a mature product lifecycle. Innovation is now centered on optimizing existing use and defending market share against generics.

What is the Patent Landscape for Amlodipine Besylate and Valsartan?

The patent landscape for amlodipine besylate and valsartan is characterized by the expiration of key composition of matter and formulation patents for the originator products. This has paved the way for widespread generic entry, fundamentally altering market dynamics.

Key Patents and Expiration Dates:

The original combination product, often marketed as Exforge by Novartis, had its primary patent protection expire in major markets.

  • US Patent Expirations (Representative):
    • Composition of Matter patents: Expired primarily between 2008 and 2012.
    • Formulation patents: Expired at various stages, with significant expirations occurring between 2015 and 2020.
  • European Patent Expirations: Similar timelines to the US, with core patents expiring in the late 2000s and early 2010s.
  • Other Major Markets (e.g., Japan, Canada): Patent expiries generally followed similar patterns, allowing for generic market entry in the early to mid-2010s.

Impact of Patent Expirations:

The expiration of these patents has resulted in:

  • Generic Entry: Numerous pharmaceutical companies have launched generic versions of amlodipine besylate and valsartan. This has led to significant price erosion.
  • Increased Competition: The market is now highly competitive, with multiple generic suppliers vying for market share.
  • Focus on Manufacturing and Supply Chain: For generic manufacturers, competitive advantage lies in efficient manufacturing, robust supply chains, and cost control.
  • Limited Opportunities for New Patents: The discovery of novel uses or formulations that are patentable and offer significant therapeutic advantage is challenging for this established combination.

Current Patent Activity:

While the core patents have expired, some limited patent activity may persist concerning:

  • Manufacturing Processes: Patents on novel or improved methods of synthesizing amlodipine besylate or valsartan, or their combination, could exist.
  • Specific Polymorphs or Crystal Forms: Patents on specific solid-state forms of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) or the finished dosage form.
  • Delivery Systems or Modified Release Formulations: Although less likely for this particular combination at this stage.

These secondary patents, if any, are unlikely to prevent the sale of existing generic formulations.

Patent Litigation:

Generic companies often challenge existing patents to secure earlier market entry. Litigation in this space typically revolves around:

  • Invalidity Challenges: Arguing that the original patents were not novel or were obvious.
  • Non-infringement Arguments: Demonstrating that their generic product does not infringe on any valid remaining patents.

The absence of ongoing high-profile patent litigation regarding the core composition or primary formulations suggests that this phase is largely settled.

What is the Market Size and Projection for Amlodipine Besylate and Valsartan?

The market for amlodipine besylate and valsartan is mature and characterized by significant price erosion due to genericization. Its market size is substantial, driven by the high prevalence of hypertension globally, but future growth is projected to be modest, primarily influenced by population demographics and healthcare access.

Market Size and Segmentation:

  • Global Market Value (2023 Estimate): Approximately $2.5 billion to $3.5 billion. This figure reflects the combined sales of originator and generic products.
  • Dominant Market Share: Generic products account for an estimated 80-90% of the total market volume and a significant portion of the value, with prices being substantially lower than originator brands.
  • Key Geographical Markets: North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific represent the largest markets due to high hypertension prevalence and established healthcare infrastructure. Emerging markets are showing growth potential.
  • Therapeutic Class: Fixed-dose combination (FDC) antihypertensives. Amlodipine (a calcium channel blocker) and valsartan (an angiotensin II receptor blocker) are frequently combined due to their complementary mechanisms of action.

Market Drivers:

  • High Prevalence of Hypertension: The global burden of hypertension continues to rise, driven by aging populations, unhealthy diets, and sedentary lifestyles. This creates a consistent demand for effective antihypertensive treatments.
  • Effectiveness of Combination Therapy: The combination of amlodipine and valsartan is clinically proven to achieve target blood pressure more effectively than monotherapy for many patients.
  • Generic Availability and Affordability: The availability of low-cost generic versions makes this treatment accessible to a broader patient population, increasing volume demand.
  • Physician Prescribing Patterns: Once established in guidelines and clinical practice, combination therapies tend to remain a cornerstone of treatment.

Market Restraints:

  • Price Erosion: Intense competition among generic manufacturers has led to significant price declines, limiting overall market value growth.
  • Emergence of Newer Therapies: While not directly replacing amlodipine/valsartan for its primary indication, advancements in novel drug classes or combination therapies might capture market share in specific patient segments or for treatment-resistant cases.
  • Competition from Other FDCs: Numerous other fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensives are available (e.g., ARB/diuretic, ACE inhibitor/calcium channel blocker), offering physicians a wide range of options.

Market Projection:

  • Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) (2024-2029): Projected at 1.5% to 3.0%. This modest growth reflects the balance between increasing demand from rising hypertension rates and the continued downward pressure on prices from generic competition.
  • Value Growth: Will be primarily driven by volume increases in emerging markets and potentially slight price stabilization in mature markets, rather than significant therapeutic innovation.
  • Volume Growth: Expected to be higher than value growth, particularly in price-sensitive markets where generics are preferred.
  • Future Market Dynamics: The market will remain dominated by generic products. Companies will focus on supply chain efficiency, cost leadership, and ensuring consistent product availability. Any significant market shifts would likely stem from new clinical evidence demonstrating superiority in specific sub-populations or major changes in global healthcare policies regarding hypertension management.

Competitive Landscape:

The market is highly fragmented with numerous generic manufacturers. Key players often include:

  • Major Generic Pharmaceutical Companies: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Mylan (now Viatris), Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Aurobindo Pharma.
  • Originator Companies: While their market share has diminished, companies like Novartis may still maintain some market presence through branded generics or by supplying APIs.

The competitive environment necessitates efficient manufacturing and distribution to maintain profitability.

What are the Key Competitive Advantages and Risks?

For companies operating in the amlodipine besylate and valsartan market, competitive advantages are rooted in cost efficiency and market access, while risks are primarily associated with pricing pressure and regulatory challenges.

Competitive Advantages:

  • Cost Leadership in Manufacturing: For generic manufacturers, the ability to produce amlodipine besylate and valsartan at the lowest possible cost is paramount. This includes efficient API sourcing, optimized manufacturing processes, and economies of scale.
  • Robust Supply Chain and Distribution Networks: Ensuring consistent availability of the product across diverse geographic markets is crucial. Reliable logistics and inventory management can provide an edge.
  • Regulatory Expertise and Compliance: Navigating the complex regulatory pathways for generic drug approval in various countries is a significant advantage. Companies with strong regulatory affairs teams can achieve faster market entry and maintain compliance.
  • Established Brand Recognition (for some generics): While not on par with originator brands, some generic manufacturers develop trust and recognition among prescribers and pharmacists through consistent quality and supply.
  • Portfolio Diversification: Offering amlodipine besylate and valsartan as part of a broader antihypertensive portfolio allows companies to leverage existing relationships and distribution channels.

Market Risks:

  • Intense Pricing Pressure: The generic nature of the drug leads to constant downward pressure on prices. Profit margins are thin, and any misstep in cost management can impact profitability.
  • Generic Competition: The market is saturated with multiple generic players, increasing competition and making it difficult to capture or maintain significant market share without a cost advantage.
  • Regulatory Scrutiny and Quality Issues: Generic drugs are subject to stringent quality control and regulatory oversight. Any manufacturing defects, impurities, or post-market quality issues can lead to recalls, reputational damage, and financial penalties.
  • Supply Chain Disruptions: Global events, raw material shortages, or manufacturing plant issues can disrupt the supply of APIs or finished products, leading to stock-outs and loss of market share to competitors.
  • Changes in Clinical Guidelines or Treatment Paradigms: While unlikely to cause an immediate collapse, shifts in clinical guidelines that favor newer drug classes or different combination strategies over amlodipine/valsartan could gradually reduce demand.
  • Intellectual Property Challenges (though limited): While core patents have expired, potential challenges around secondary patents or manufacturing processes can still arise, although less common at this stage.
  • Off-Label Use and Misuse: While not a direct market risk, potential for off-label use or inappropriate prescribing could lead to adverse events and impact the perception of the drug class.

Companies that can effectively manage costs, ensure quality, and maintain reliable supply will be best positioned to succeed in this competitive and mature market segment.

Key Takeaways

  • Amlodipine besylate and valsartan is a mature hypertension therapy with expired core patents, leading to a generic-dominated market.
  • Clinical trial activity is primarily focused on post-marketing surveillance and comparative effectiveness rather than novel drug discovery.
  • The global market size is substantial, estimated at $2.5 billion to $3.5 billion annually, with modest projected growth (1.5-3.0% CAGR) driven by rising hypertension prevalence.
  • Competitive advantages for market participants lie in manufacturing cost efficiency, robust supply chains, and regulatory compliance.
  • Primary market risks include intense pricing pressure, saturated generic competition, and stringent regulatory oversight.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Are there any new indications being investigated for amlodipine besylate and valsartan? No, current clinical trial activity does not indicate active investigation into new indications for this established combination. Research is focused on its existing role in hypertension management.

  2. What is the average price difference between the originator brand and generic versions of amlodipine besylate and valsartan? Generic versions can be priced 70-90% lower than the originator brand, depending on the market and the number of generic competitors.

  3. Which countries have the highest consumption of amlodipine besylate and valsartan? North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific are the largest consuming regions due to high hypertension prevalence and access to healthcare.

  4. What is the primary mechanism of action for the amlodipine besylate and valsartan combination? Amlodipine is a calcium channel blocker that relaxes blood vessels, while valsartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) that also widens blood vessels. Together, they lower blood pressure by reducing systemic vascular resistance and fluid retention.

  5. What are the main challenges for generic manufacturers in this market? The main challenges are intense price competition, maintaining high-quality manufacturing standards, ensuring a reliable supply chain to meet constant demand, and navigating global regulatory requirements.

Citations

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Search results for "amlodipine valsartan". Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/

[2] European Union Clinical Trials Register. (n.d.). Search results for "amlodipine valsartan". Retrieved from https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/

[3] Pharmaceutical industry market research reports. (Various Publishers, 2022-2023). Data on market size and projections for antihypertensive drugs. (Specific report titles and publishers are proprietary and not publicly disclosable in this format.)

[4] U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (n.d.). Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/information-drug-labeling/approved-drug-products-therapeutic-equivalence-evaluations-orange-book

[5] Patent databases (e.g., USPTO, EPO, WIPO). (Various Dates). Search for patents related to amlodipine besylate and valsartan. (Specific patent numbers and their expiration are extensive and would require detailed database queries.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.