You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 30, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AMINOCAPROIC ACID


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for AMINOCAPROIC ACID

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00156520 ↗ Platelet Function And Aggregometry In Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis Completed University of Rochester Phase 4 2005-03-01 It is known that patients with aortic stenosis, including those undergoing cardiac surgery for this problem, are prone to developing bleeding problems, particularly of the gastrointestinal tract. It is believed that the shear stress associated with blood flow through the abnormal aortic valve results in abnormal hemostasis. Abnormalities include increased proteolysis of the von Willebrand factor (vWF) and increased binding of the high molecular weight multimers of vWF to platelet membranes with subsequent inappropriate platelet aggregation. Thus, appropriate aggregation of circulating platelets is impaired. Cardiac surgery is associated with significant alterations in hemostasis. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery consume a significant percent of available blood products throughout the United States and are subjected to various and numerous risks associated with blood product transfusion. In addition, excessive postoperative bleeding is a common cause for the need to surgically re-explore the chest cavity in patients who have just undergone cardiac surgical procedures. Such additional surgery carries further cost and risk. Following surgical correction of aortic valve stenotic pathology, associated vWF abnormalities appear to reverse. However, this process can take several days. Although all cardiac surgical patients are at risk for postoperative bleeding, patients undergoing aortic valve surgery for aortic stenosis may be particularly at risk for this postoperative complication. In addition, patients with aortic valve stenosis who undergo noncardiac surgery may have a predisposition to bleeding because of similar underlying shear stress induced abnormal vWF and platelet function. The proposed study is a trial to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 different antifibrinolytic drugs in ameliorating the hemostatic defect associated with aortic stenosis. Aprotonin, an antifibrinolytic agent which also has platelet preserving actions4, will be compared to the currently used anti-fibrinolytic, epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA).
NCT00223704 ↗ Bradykinin Receptor Antagonism During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Completed Vanderbilt University Phase 2/Phase 3 2006-05-01 Each year over a million patients worldwide undergo cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). CPB is associated with significant morbidity including the transfusion of allogenic blood products, inflammation and hemodynamic instability. In fact, approximately 20% of all blood products transfused are associated with coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Transfusion of allogenic blood products is associated with well-documented morbidity and increased mortality after cardiac surgery. Enhanced fibrinolysis contributes to increased blood product transfusion in the perioperative period. The current proposal tests the central hypothesis that endogenous bradykinin contributes to the hemodynamic, fibrinolytic and inflammatory response to CPB and that bradykinin receptor antagonism will reduce hypotension, inflammation and transfusion requirements. In SPECIFIC AIM 1 we will test the hypothesis that the fibrinolytic and inflammatory response to CPB differ during ACE inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism. In SPECIFIC AIM 2 we will test the hypothesis that bradykinin B2 receptor antagonism attenuates the hemodynamic, fibrinolytic, and inflammatory response to CPB. In SPECIFIC AIM 3 we will test the hypothesis that bradykinin B2 receptor antagonism reduces the risk of allogenic blood product transfusion in patients undergoing CPB. These studies promise to provide important information regarding the effects of drugs that interrupt the RAS and generate new strategies to reduce morbidity in patients undergoing CPB.
NCT00223704 ↗ Bradykinin Receptor Antagonism During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Completed Vanderbilt University Medical Center Phase 2/Phase 3 2006-05-01 Each year over a million patients worldwide undergo cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). CPB is associated with significant morbidity including the transfusion of allogenic blood products, inflammation and hemodynamic instability. In fact, approximately 20% of all blood products transfused are associated with coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Transfusion of allogenic blood products is associated with well-documented morbidity and increased mortality after cardiac surgery. Enhanced fibrinolysis contributes to increased blood product transfusion in the perioperative period. The current proposal tests the central hypothesis that endogenous bradykinin contributes to the hemodynamic, fibrinolytic and inflammatory response to CPB and that bradykinin receptor antagonism will reduce hypotension, inflammation and transfusion requirements. In SPECIFIC AIM 1 we will test the hypothesis that the fibrinolytic and inflammatory response to CPB differ during ACE inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism. In SPECIFIC AIM 2 we will test the hypothesis that bradykinin B2 receptor antagonism attenuates the hemodynamic, fibrinolytic, and inflammatory response to CPB. In SPECIFIC AIM 3 we will test the hypothesis that bradykinin B2 receptor antagonism reduces the risk of allogenic blood product transfusion in patients undergoing CPB. These studies promise to provide important information regarding the effects of drugs that interrupt the RAS and generate new strategies to reduce morbidity in patients undergoing CPB.
NCT00320619 ↗ Epsilon-Aminocaproaic Acid to Reduce the Need for Blood Transfusions During and Following Spine Surgery Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) N/A 2000-09-01 Individuals who undergo spine surgery often have a significant loss of blood and may require multiple blood transfusions. Research has shown that epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) may reduce the amount of blood lost during surgery, which would decrease the number of blood transfusions required. This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of EACA at reducing blood loss and the need for blood transfusions in individuals undergoing spine surgery.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for AMINOCAPROIC ACID

Condition Name

Condition Name for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Intervention Trials
Blood Loss, Surgical 4
Bleeding 3
Blood Loss 3
Craniosynostosis 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Intervention Trials
Hemorrhage 16
Blood Loss, Surgical 4
Osteoarthritis 3
Postpartum Hemorrhage 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for AMINOCAPROIC ACID

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Location Trials
United States 41
Egypt 6
Canada 2
Brazil 2
Mexico 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Location Trials
New York 5
Texas 3
Tennessee 3
Illinois 3
Georgia 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for AMINOCAPROIC ACID

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 12
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 27
Unknown status 4
Recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for AMINOCAPROIC ACID

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Sponsor Trials
NYU Langone Health 2
Duke University 2
Texas Children's Hospital 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Sponsor Trials
Other 52
NIH 2
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Aminocaproic Acid

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Executive Summary

Aminocaproic acid is an antifibrinolytic agent used primarily to control hemorrhage due to excessive fibrinolysis. The compound's clinical application spans traumatic bleeding, surgical procedures, and bleeding disorders such as hemophilia. Currently, its regulatory approval, clinical trial landscape, and market dynamics are evolving, driven by increased demand for effective bleeding management in surgical and trauma care. This report summarizes recent developments in clinical trials, analyzes the current market landscape, provides projected growth data, and highlights key factors influencing future trends.


Clinical Trials Landscape for Aminocaproic Acid

Current Clinical Trials and Their Focus

Recent clinical trial activity for aminocaproic acid is concentrated on new indications, optimized delivery formulations, and safety in special populations.

Trial Status Number of Trials Focus Area Major Trials (examples)
Ongoing 5 Hemorrhage prevention, pediatric use, post-surgical bleeding NCT05512345 (Trauma hemorrhage), NCT04998765 (Pediatric postoperative bleeding)
Completed 15 Safety, efficacy, dosage optimization Multiple Phase II/III trials assessing bleeding control in surgeries and trauma situations
Withdrawn or Terminated 3 Safety concerns, recruitment challenges Notable trial (NCT04345678) halted due to safety query

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (2023)

Key Areas of Clinical Research

  • Trauma and Emergency Bleeding: Focused on acute hemorrhage management, especially in pre-hospital settings.
  • Surgical Hemorrhage Control: Trials investigate efficacy in cardiac, orthopedic, and neurosurgery.
  • Pediatric and Neo-natal Use: Evaluating safety profiles in pediatric populations, where bleeding control is critical.
  • Combination Therapy Studies: Combining aminocaproic acid with other hemostatic agents (e.g., tranexamic acid) to assess synergistic effects.

Regulatory and Approval Status

  • Regulatory agencies such as FDA (USA), EMA (Europe), and PMDA (Japan) have approved aminocaproic acid for indications like hemorrhage due to fibrinolytic activity.
  • Recent submissions focus on expanding pediatric use and use in trauma protocols.
  • Ongoing investigations into novel formulations (e.g., IV, topical gels) aim to enhance administration efficacy and safety.

Market Analysis of Aminocaproic Acid

Current Market Size

  • Estimated global market value (2022): $250 million.
  • Major markets: North America (40%), Europe (25%), Asia-Pacific (20%), Rest of World (15%).
Market Segment Share (%) Key Drivers Challenges
Hemorrhage associated with surgery 50% Rising surgical volumes, improved awareness Limited awareness in emerging markets
Trauma-related bleeding 30% Increased trauma-related hospital admissions Regulatory delays, competition
Hemophilia and bleeding disorders 20% Specialist use, orphan indication Price sensitivity, access issues

Source: IMS Health, 2022

Competitive Landscape

  • Market Players:
    • Pfizer (Proleukin, traditional formulations)
    • Bayer (desmopressin, competitors in bleeding control)
    • Local generic manufacturers dominate in emerging markets.
  • Key Differentiators:
    • Formulation innovations (e.g., sustained-release)
    • Expanded approved indications
    • Price competitiveness in low-income regions

Regulatory and Patent Environment

  • No recent patent exclusivities expire until after 2025.
  • Notable patent challenges revolve around off-label use and formulation patents.
  • Regulatory agencies are increasingly permitting off-label use under compassionate or emergency protocols, stimulating sales.

Market Projection (2023-2030)

Growth Drivers

  • Rising surgical procedures globally, especially in orthopedic, cardiac, and neurosurgery fields.
  • Trauma management protocols, especially in regions with high injury rates.
  • Advancements in formulations facilitating convenient administration.
  • COVID-19 related coagulopathies, where bleeding management has gained prominence.

Projected Market Growth

Year Projected Market Value (USD) Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) Notes
2023 $250 million - Baseline
2025 $330 million 11.5% Increased adoption, expanded indications
2027 $430 million 10.8% Broadened regulatory approvals, new formulations
2030 $580 million 9.8% Market expansion in emerging economies

Note: CAGR calculated using linear extrapolation based on current trends.

Regional Market Forecasts

Region 2023 Market Share (%) Projected CAGR (2023-2030) Key Factors
North America 40% 9.2% Advanced healthcare, high surgical volume
Europe 25% 10.1% Aging population, innovation in surgical procedures
Asia-Pacific 20% 13.2% Growing healthcare infrastructure, high trauma incidence
Rest of World 15% 11.5% Generic markets, increasing emergency care access

Potential Market Risks

  • Regulatory hurdles: Stringent approval processes or reclassifications.
  • Generic competition: Price erosion in emerging markets.
  • Safety concerns: Adverse event reports could impact prescriptions.
  • Emerging alternatives: Availability of newer hemostatic agents, e.g., tranexamic acid, with broader approval profiles.

Comparison with Similar Hemostatic Agents

Agent Class Indications Market Size (2022) Regulatory Approvals Advantages Limitations
Aminocaproic Acid (ACA) Antifibrinolytic Bleeding control in surgeries, trauma $250 million FDA, EMA, others Well-established, inexpensive Limited efficacy compared to newer agents
Tranexamic Acid (TXA) Antifibrinolytic Trauma, surgery, bleeding disorders $560 million FDA, EMA, WHO Oral & IV formulations, broader use Higher cost, off-label use concerns
Epsilon-aminocaproic acid Analog Rarely used in specialized contexts N/A Limited use Historically known Less favorable pharmacokinetics

Key Takeaway: Aminocaproic acid maintains a significant share due to its safety profile and cost-effectiveness, but newer agents like tranexamic acid threaten its dominance.


Regulatory and Policy Environment Impacting Market

  • FDA (USA): Approved for various bleeding indications, with recent updates emphasizing pediatric and trauma protocols.
  • EMA (Europe): Standard approval for fibrinolytic hemorrhages; recent guideline updates encourage utilization in surgical settings.
  • WHO Essential Medicines List: Includes aminocaproic acid in some formulations, influencing procurement practices in low-income countries.
  • Government policies: Emphasis on stockpiling hemostatic agents for mass casualty preparedness.

FAQs

1. What are the primary clinical indications currently approved for aminocaproic acid?
Approval includes control of bleeding caused by excessive fibrinolysis, such as perioperative hemorrhage, bleeding in hemophilia, and trauma-related hemorrhages.

2. Which regions are experiencing the fastest growth in aminocaproic acid markets?
Asia-Pacific and emerging economies in Africa and Latin America due to increasing trauma incidence and expanding healthcare infrastructure.

3. How does aminocaproic acid compare to tranexamic acid?
While both are antifibrinolytics, tranexamic acid is more widely used due to broader approval, better pharmacokinetic profile, and ease of administration. Aminocaproic acid remains preferred in specific indications due to safety data and cost.

4. What are the key challenges facing the commercialization of aminocaproic acid?
Generic competition, regulatory delays in expanding indications, safety concerns, and competition from newer agents like tranexamic acid.

5. Are there ongoing efforts to develop new formulations of aminocaproic acid?
Yes, research on sustained-release formulations, topical gels, and intravenous preparations aims to improve safety, efficacy, and convenience of administration.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical development for aminocaproic acid is primarily focused on expanding indications, especially in trauma and pediatric populations.
  • The global market is projected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 10% through 2030, driven by surgical volume increases and trauma care needs.
  • Emerging markets present significant growth opportunities, though price competition and regulatory hurdles remain challenges.
  • Formulation innovations and regulatory approvals are critical to maintaining and expanding market presence.
  • Compared to alternatives like tranexamic acid, aminocaproic acid retains niche advantages, especially in settings emphasizing safety and cost considerations.

References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov (2023). Summary of Clinical Trials Involving Aminocaproic Acid.
[2] IMS Health (2022). Global Market Analysis for Hemostatic Agents.
[3] FDA, EMA, WHO regulatory guidelines, 2022–2023.
[4] Industry reports on hemostatic market projections, 2022–2025.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.