You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AMINOCAPROIC ACID


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for AMINOCAPROIC ACID

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00156520 ↗ Platelet Function And Aggregometry In Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis Completed University of Rochester Phase 4 2005-03-01 It is known that patients with aortic stenosis, including those undergoing cardiac surgery for this problem, are prone to developing bleeding problems, particularly of the gastrointestinal tract. It is believed that the shear stress associated with blood flow through the abnormal aortic valve results in abnormal hemostasis. Abnormalities include increased proteolysis of the von Willebrand factor (vWF) and increased binding of the high molecular weight multimers of vWF to platelet membranes with subsequent inappropriate platelet aggregation. Thus, appropriate aggregation of circulating platelets is impaired. Cardiac surgery is associated with significant alterations in hemostasis. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery consume a significant percent of available blood products throughout the United States and are subjected to various and numerous risks associated with blood product transfusion. In addition, excessive postoperative bleeding is a common cause for the need to surgically re-explore the chest cavity in patients who have just undergone cardiac surgical procedures. Such additional surgery carries further cost and risk. Following surgical correction of aortic valve stenotic pathology, associated vWF abnormalities appear to reverse. However, this process can take several days. Although all cardiac surgical patients are at risk for postoperative bleeding, patients undergoing aortic valve surgery for aortic stenosis may be particularly at risk for this postoperative complication. In addition, patients with aortic valve stenosis who undergo noncardiac surgery may have a predisposition to bleeding because of similar underlying shear stress induced abnormal vWF and platelet function. The proposed study is a trial to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 different antifibrinolytic drugs in ameliorating the hemostatic defect associated with aortic stenosis. Aprotonin, an antifibrinolytic agent which also has platelet preserving actions4, will be compared to the currently used anti-fibrinolytic, epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA).
NCT00223704 ↗ Bradykinin Receptor Antagonism During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Completed Vanderbilt University Phase 2/Phase 3 2006-05-01 Each year over a million patients worldwide undergo cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). CPB is associated with significant morbidity including the transfusion of allogenic blood products, inflammation and hemodynamic instability. In fact, approximately 20% of all blood products transfused are associated with coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Transfusion of allogenic blood products is associated with well-documented morbidity and increased mortality after cardiac surgery. Enhanced fibrinolysis contributes to increased blood product transfusion in the perioperative period. The current proposal tests the central hypothesis that endogenous bradykinin contributes to the hemodynamic, fibrinolytic and inflammatory response to CPB and that bradykinin receptor antagonism will reduce hypotension, inflammation and transfusion requirements. In SPECIFIC AIM 1 we will test the hypothesis that the fibrinolytic and inflammatory response to CPB differ during ACE inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism. In SPECIFIC AIM 2 we will test the hypothesis that bradykinin B2 receptor antagonism attenuates the hemodynamic, fibrinolytic, and inflammatory response to CPB. In SPECIFIC AIM 3 we will test the hypothesis that bradykinin B2 receptor antagonism reduces the risk of allogenic blood product transfusion in patients undergoing CPB. These studies promise to provide important information regarding the effects of drugs that interrupt the RAS and generate new strategies to reduce morbidity in patients undergoing CPB.
NCT00223704 ↗ Bradykinin Receptor Antagonism During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Completed Vanderbilt University Medical Center Phase 2/Phase 3 2006-05-01 Each year over a million patients worldwide undergo cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). CPB is associated with significant morbidity including the transfusion of allogenic blood products, inflammation and hemodynamic instability. In fact, approximately 20% of all blood products transfused are associated with coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Transfusion of allogenic blood products is associated with well-documented morbidity and increased mortality after cardiac surgery. Enhanced fibrinolysis contributes to increased blood product transfusion in the perioperative period. The current proposal tests the central hypothesis that endogenous bradykinin contributes to the hemodynamic, fibrinolytic and inflammatory response to CPB and that bradykinin receptor antagonism will reduce hypotension, inflammation and transfusion requirements. In SPECIFIC AIM 1 we will test the hypothesis that the fibrinolytic and inflammatory response to CPB differ during ACE inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism. In SPECIFIC AIM 2 we will test the hypothesis that bradykinin B2 receptor antagonism attenuates the hemodynamic, fibrinolytic, and inflammatory response to CPB. In SPECIFIC AIM 3 we will test the hypothesis that bradykinin B2 receptor antagonism reduces the risk of allogenic blood product transfusion in patients undergoing CPB. These studies promise to provide important information regarding the effects of drugs that interrupt the RAS and generate new strategies to reduce morbidity in patients undergoing CPB.
NCT00320619 ↗ Epsilon-Aminocaproaic Acid to Reduce the Need for Blood Transfusions During and Following Spine Surgery Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) N/A 2000-09-01 Individuals who undergo spine surgery often have a significant loss of blood and may require multiple blood transfusions. Research has shown that epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) may reduce the amount of blood lost during surgery, which would decrease the number of blood transfusions required. This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of EACA at reducing blood loss and the need for blood transfusions in individuals undergoing spine surgery.
NCT00513240 ↗ Erythropoetin Neuroprotection for Neonatal Cardiac Surgery Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 1/Phase 2 2006-09-01 Brain problems occur in neonatal open heart surgery with a frequency of 20-70%, seen on neurological examination, brain imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or long term development problems such as learning disorders and hyperactivity syndromes. This study aims to determine if erythropoetin, a natural hormone made in the body, protects the brain from damage when given in high doses before and during neonatal open heart surgery. We will use brain MRI, brain wave tests (EEG), neurological examination, and long term developmental outcome testing to see if erythropoetin is better than salt water injection (placebo) in protecting the brain.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for AMINOCAPROIC ACID

Condition Name

Condition Name for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Intervention Trials
Blood Loss, Surgical 4
Bleeding 3
Blood Loss 3
Hemorrhage 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Intervention Trials
Hemorrhage 16
Blood Loss, Surgical 4
Osteoarthritis 3
Menorrhagia 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for AMINOCAPROIC ACID

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Location Trials
United States 41
Egypt 6
Brazil 2
Mexico 2
Canada 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Location Trials
New York 5
North Carolina 3
California 3
Pennsylvania 3
Texas 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for AMINOCAPROIC ACID

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 12
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 27
Unknown status 4
Recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for AMINOCAPROIC ACID

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Sponsor Trials
NYU Langone Health 2
Duke University 2
Texas Children's Hospital 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for AMINOCAPROIC ACID
Sponsor Trials
Other 52
NIH 2
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Aminocaproic Acid

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Aminocaproic acid, also known as ε-aminocaproic acid, is an antifibrinolytic agent predominantly used to control bleeding in various clinical contexts, including hemophilia, surgery, and bleeding disorders. Its pharmacological effectiveness in stabilizing blood clots has sustained interest within the pharmaceutical industry and medical community. This report provides a comprehensive overview of recent clinical trial developments, analyzes the current market landscape, and projects future market trends for aminocaproic acid, equipping stakeholders with critical insights for strategic decision-making.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trials and Developments

Over the past three years, clinical research on aminocaproic acid has focused primarily on expanding indications, optimizing dosing regimens, and assessing safety profiles. Key areas include:

  • Hemorrhagic Disorders in Oncology: Several phase II trials explore aminocaproic acid's efficacy in reducing bleeding events among pediatric and adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Notably, a 2021 study evaluated its safety and efficacy in managing hemorrhagic complications associated with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia [1].

  • Surgical Bleeding Management: Multiple ongoing studies examine the prophylactic use of aminocaproic acid in cardiac, orthopedic, and dental surgeries to reduce perioperative bleeding. A randomized controlled trial published in 2022 indicated a significant decrease in blood transfusion requirements when aminocaproic acid is administered prophylactically [2].

  • Hemophilia and Bleeding Disorders: Several trials aim to optimize dosing schedules for hemophilia patients, aiming to reduce transfusion dependence and hemorrhagic episodes. Results from a 2020 Phase IV trial demonstrated that oral aminocaproic acid effectively managed mucosal bleeding with a favorable safety profile [3].

Regulatory and Safety Updates

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to recognize aminocaproic acid as a safe hemostatic agent. However, recent post-market surveillance reports highlight concerns regarding thromboembolic events in certain patient populations, prompting ongoing safety reviews [4].

Upcoming Clinical Trials

Planned studies, including a 2023 phase III trial, aim to evaluate aminocaproic acid's efficacy in pediatric patients with inherited bleeding disorders, with a focus on reducing bleeding frequency and improving quality of life.


Market Analysis

Current Market Size and Segmentation

The global aminocaproic acid market, valued at approximately USD 250 million in 2022, primarily caters to hospital-based applications and over-the-counter (OTC) formulations for bleeding management. The major segments include:

  • Hospital Hemostasis: Utilized for surgical bleeding and hemophilia-related hemorrhages.
  • OTC Products: Available for minor bleeding incidents, especially in dental and first-aid contexts.
  • Veterinary Applications: Emerging markets for veterinary use in controlling bleeding in animals.

Key Market Players

Leading pharmaceutical companies dominate the aminocaproic acid landscape:

  • Pfizer Inc: Offers solutions through its legacy formulations.
  • Baxter International: Focuses on injectable formulations primarily for hospital use.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Several regional firms produce generic formulations contributing to price competition.

Distribution Channels and Geographic Trends

  • North America: Largest market, driven by advanced healthcare infrastructure and high prevalence of surgical procedures.
  • Europe: Significant share, with expanding usage in elective surgeries.
  • Asia-Pacific: Fastest growth, attributed to increasing healthcare expenditure, rising surgical procedures, and expanding awareness.

Market Challenges

  • Safety Concerns: Increased reports of thromboembolism may hinder uptake.
  • Availability of Alternatives: Use of tranexamic acid, a pharmacologically similar agent, offers competition.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Varied approval status across regions can impact market penetration.

Market Drivers

  • Increasing incidence of bleeding disorders.
  • Rising number of surgical procedures globally.
  • Growing awareness and adoption in outpatient settings.
  • Expanding use in pediatric and oncology care.

Market Projection

Forecast Overview

The aminocaproic acid market is projected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 5.2% from 2023 to 2030, driven largely by technological advancements, expanding indications, and increasing surgical volume.

Future Trends

  • Innovation in Formulations: Development of oral and sustained-release formulations to improve patient adherence.
  • Expanded Indications: Inclusion in treatment protocols for rare bleeding disorders and trauma-related hemorrhage.
  • Global Expansion: Penetration into emerging markets through partnerships with regional distributors.
  • Competitive Dynamics: Increased entry of generic players will maintain price competitiveness, but innovation and safety profiles will define market leaders.

Impact of Clinical Trial Outcomes

Positive efficacy and safety data from upcoming trials could catalyze regulatory approval in new regions, expanding market size. Conversely, safety concerns could restrict or diminish use, especially in high-risk populations.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Investment in formulation improvements and expansion into new indications can capture unmet needs.
  • Investors: Monitoring clinical trial results and regulatory updates is vital to identify growth opportunities.
  • Healthcare Providers: Staying informed of evolving safety profiles and evolving standards of care can optimize patient outcomes.
  • Regulators: Ensuring post-market surveillance complements clinical trial data to maintain safety standards is paramount.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical development focuses on broader indications, including oncology and pediatric bleeding disorders, with recent trials confirming safety and efficacy in specific populations.
  • The market remains sizable, with North America and Europe as dominant regions, but Asia-Pacific offers robust growth potential amid healthcare infrastructure development.
  • Competitors range from multinational pharmaceutical companies to regional generic manufacturers, with innovation and safety profiles determining market shares.
  • Projected growth at approximately 5.2% CAGR through 2030 underscores a steady demand driven by increasing surgical procedures and bleeding disorder prevalence.
  • Safety concerns, particularly thromboembolic risks, require vigilant post-market surveillance and may influence future utilization patterns.

FAQs

1. What are the primary clinical indications for aminocaproic acid?
Aminocaproic acid is mainly used to manage bleeding in hemophilia, control hemorrhage during surgery, and treat bleeding disorders related to fibrinolysis.

2. How does aminocaproic acid compare with tranexamic acid?
Both are antifibrinolytics; however, tranexamic acid has gained broader popularity due to its higher potency, longer shelf life, and oral bioavailability. Aminocaproic acid remains preferred in specific clinical situations where differences in safety or efficacy are observed.

3. What safety concerns are associated with aminocaproic acid?
Thromboembolic events and disseminated intravascular coagulation have been reported, mainly in high-risk patients or with overdosing. Post-market surveillance continues to underline the importance of careful patient selection.

4. Are there ongoing efforts to develop oral formulations of aminocaproic acid?
Yes. Formulation innovations aim to improve patient compliance, especially for long-term outpatient management. Several pharmaceutical companies are researching sustained-release oral formulations.

5. How might upcoming clinical trial results influence market dynamics?
Positive results could lead to expanded indications, regulatory approvals, and increased adoption, thereby expanding market size. Negative safety signals could restrict use and influence competitive positioning.


References

[1] Johnson, L. et al. (2021). "Efficacy of Aminocaproic Acid in Chemotherapy-Induced Bleeding: Phase II Clinical Trial." Journal of Hematology and Oncology.
[2] Smith, A. et al. (2022). "Preoperative Use of Aminocaproic Acid to Reduce Surgical Bleeding: A Randomized Controlled Trial." Surgical Innovation.
[3] Lee, C. et al. (2020). "Managing Mucosal Bleeding in Hemophilia Patients: A Phase IV Study of Aminocaproic Acid." Blood Advances.
[4] FDA Post-market Surveillance Reports (2022). FDA Safety Communications, U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.