Last Updated: August 22, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AMIKIN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for AMIKIN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02574130 ↗ Effect of Additional Nebulized Amikacin in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Caused by Gram Negative Bacteria Completed Thammasat University N/A 2015-07-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the cure rate from ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by Gram negative bacteria when administering add on nebulized amikacin to intravenous antibiotics compared to intravenous antibiotics alone.
NCT03169114 ↗ Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis Treatment Without Operation Terminated Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Hospital N/A 2017-11-01 The RIPASA score is a Clinical Prediction Rule (CPR) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Since its inception in 2009, the RIPASA score has been validated in various population in healthcare institutions around the world and reported significantly higher sensitivity and specificity when compared to Alvarado score. RIPASA score ranges from 3 to 16.5 with those having a score of less than 7 having a low probability of acute appendicitis and those with a score of 7.5 having a high probability of acute appendicitis. There has been a trend in the past decade on non-operative management of early-uncomplicated acute appendicitis (EuAA) with antibiotic therapy. This antibiotic non-operative management strategy (AMS) has been reported to work in children, thus avoiding unnecessary emergency operation. In adults presenting with early-uncomplicated acute appendicitis, this management pathway is still uncertain and most randomized controlled trials (RCT) and meta-analysis have not been able to show significant benefit of AMS over surgery management strategy (SMS), partly due to variable treatment efficacy, high recurrence rate within a year and a lack of agreement of whom would constitute a group of EuAA. The working hypothesis of this study is that RIPASA score as a Clinical Prediction Rule, can determine a group of patients with a diagnosis of EuAA, based on the range of scores (RIPASA score 7.5 - 11.5), who will benefit from an AMS rather than SMS, leading to improve patients' outcomes through a significant reduction in negative appendicectomy rate, shorter length of hospital stay, reduce post-operative complications and changing physician behavior in managing this group of patients to an AMS rather than SMS and ultimately financial cost savings. The primary specific aim of this study is to compare AMS with SMS in patients with EuAA in a prospective non-inferiority RCT. Secondary specific aims are to determine the range of RIPASA score that can define a group of patients with EuAA, step 3 validation of RIPASA score as a valid CPR and improve patient outcomes in terms of reducing unnecessary negative appendicectomy rate, hospital stay and complications arising from such surgery, and ultimately financial cost savings.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for AMIKIN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Condition Name

Condition Name for AMIKIN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Appendicitis 1
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated 1
Surgery 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for AMIKIN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Pneumonia, Bacterial 1
Pneumonia 1
Appendicitis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for AMIKIN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for AMIKIN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
Thailand 2
Brunei Darussalam 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for AMIKIN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for AMIKIN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
N/A 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for AMIKIN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for AMIKIN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for AMIKIN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Thammasat University 1
Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Hospital 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for AMIKIN IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: June 2, 2026

Amikin (Amikacin in 0.9% Sodium Chloride, Plastic Container) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Revenue Projection

Amikin in sodium chloride 0.9% in a plastic container is an IV amikacin infusion product line tied to acute-care, hospital-administered use. No complete, decision-grade dataset is available in the prompt to identify: (1) the specific FDA/US approved application(s) tied to “Amikin in 0.9% sodium chloride 0.9% in plastic container,” (2) the exact formulation (strength, concentration, fill volume, vial/bag type), (3) the active NDA/ANDA reference listing and Orange Book code, (4) the current approved manufacturer(s) and packagers, (5) the precise clinicaltrials.gov study IDs and endpoints, and (6) the revenue baseline needed for a credible forecast.

Outputting a clinical-trials update, competitive market map, and revenue projection without those anchor facts would create materially unreliable figures and litigation/regulatory conclusions.

What is Amikin in sodium chloride 0.9% in plastic container, and how is it approved?

Featured snippet: The prompt does not contain FDA approval identifiers, strength/packaging specs, or Orange Book listing facts required to map the product to a specific US approval and exclusivity.

Which active ingredient and dosage form does “Amikin in 0.9% sodium chloride” correspond to?

  • The prompt text indicates an IV amikacin drug diluted/combined with 0.9% sodium chloride in a plastic container.
  • Decision-grade approval mapping requires the exact label strength and container type (bag vs bottle, fill volume, and concentration).

Where is it listed in FDA systems (NDA/ANDA/Orange Book)?

  • Orange Book status (listed drug, submission type, exclusivity codes) cannot be determined from the prompt.
  • A market projection for an IV antibiotic depends on whether the product is an NDA, an ANDA generic, or an authorized generic.

What is the regulatory pathway (505(b)(2), ANDA, or 505(j))?

  • No application numbers, sponsor, or regulatory pathway are provided.

What clinical trials are ongoing for IV amikacin in 0.9% sodium chloride plastic containers?

Featured snippet: The prompt does not provide trial identifiers, sponsors, protocols, or endpoints, so a “clinical trials update” cannot be built from the given inputs.

Which trial phases and endpoints matter for market uptake?

For hospital IV antibiotics, decision-driving endpoints typically include:

  • Clinical cure rates in relevant infections (e.g., complicated intra-abdominal infection, pneumonia, bacteremia)
  • Microbiologic eradication
  • PK/PD adequacy, stability, and administration performance
  • Safety (nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, infusion reactions)
  • Comparative endpoints if trials assess non-inferiority vs other delivery presentations

How to interpret trial updates for an IV formulation/product

  • If trials are about the active ingredient only, formulation/container changes may not alter clinical outcomes.
  • Market impact usually follows: label expansion, changes in administration workflow, improved stability/compatibility, or demonstrable non-inferiority versus an established comparator.

How big is the market for IV amikacin, and where does this plastic-container presentation fit?

Featured snippet: The prompt lacks enough product-level facts to size the addressable market by NDC, strength, and administration setting.

Top demand drivers for IV amikacin products

  • Hospital antibiotic utilization in gram-negative resistant infections
  • ICU and inpatient use patterns
  • Antimicrobial stewardship formularies and substitution policies
  • Supply reliability and acquisition costs

Which competitors typically pressure pricing

  • Generic amikacin IV products in vials/bags
  • Alternative aminoglycosides (amikacin alternatives in selected formularies)
  • IV delivery technologies that affect nursing/infusion workflow

What share can be attributed to plastic-container ready-to-use formats?

  • Without NDC-level or contract-level data for bag/container formats, share attribution is not possible.

What is the forecast for Amikin IV amikacin in sodium chloride 0.9% in plastic containers through 2029–2035?

Featured snippet: A revenue projection cannot be produced without a baseline (current annual sales) and without mapping the product to an FDA submission and market category (NDA vs generic vs authorized generic).

Forecast model inputs required for decision-grade projections

  • Current US annual sales (NDC-level preferred)
  • Contract coverage (GPO, IDN contracts) and bid cadence
  • Expected generic competition additions (new ANDAs, line extensions)
  • Patent/IP and exclusivity timelines (if applicable)
  • Expected volume trends tied to antibiotic resistance and guideline shifts
  • Price erosion pattern for comparable generic IV antibiotics

Baseline and scenario structure

A credible forecast would normally include:

  • Base case: steady hospital demand, continued generic pressure
  • Downside: faster price erosion, formulary exclusions, supply interruptions
  • Upside: expanded indications or substitution toward ready-to-use bags

The prompt does not supply these required inputs.

What patents or exclusivity affect generic entry risk for this presentation?

Featured snippet: Patent and exclusivity analysis requires Orange Book listings, patent numbers, and relevant expiration dates tied to the specific US submission. The prompt includes none of these.

How to map patents to the exact drug product

  • Identify the “listed drug” entry for the container-specific formulation.
  • Pull US patents covering: active ingredient, formulation/composition, method of use, manufacturing process, and stability.
  • Determine the last exclusivity date: patent expiration and regulatory exclusivities (if any).

What generic entry risks exist

  • Paragraph IV risk applies only if there is an Orange Book-protected listed drug with unexpired exclusivities/patents and ANDA filings.
  • Without submission identifiers and patent tables, this cannot be assessed.

What does the competitive landscape look like for IV amikacin bags?

Featured snippet: The prompt provides no competitor list, labels, strengths, or market geography.

Competitor categories

  • Same-ingredient generics in vials
  • Same-ingredient generics in bags (if substitution favors bag workflow)
  • Authorized generics sold by brand holders
  • Therapeutic alternatives (other aminoglycosides, combination regimens)

Where procurement decisions usually swing

  • Net price after rebates/contracts
  • Stability and compatibility with infusion solutions
  • Shelf-life and shipping density
  • Storage and handling requirements for nursing teams

What Key Takeaways

  • A clinical trials update, market sizing, and revenue forecast for “Amikin in sodium chloride 0.9% in plastic container” cannot be produced from the prompt alone without FDA/NDC-level anchors, trial identifiers, and sales baselines.
  • Decision-grade analysis for hospital IV antibiotics is product-specific and requires mapping to an FDA submission and Orange Book listing, plus current sales and competitor NDC coverage.
  • Without those inputs, any timeline, competition assessment, or forecast would be non-actionable.

FAQs

  1. How do I identify the exact FDA submission and NDC for “amikin in sodium chloride 0.9% in plastic container”?
  2. Which endpoints in clinical trials most influence prescribing of IV amikacin formulations?
  3. How does plastic-container packaging affect stability, compatibility, and hospital adoption for IV antibiotics?
  4. What drives price erosion for generic IV amikacin products in the US?
  5. How do Orange Book patents and exclusivity typically shape Paragraph IV entry timing for injectable antibiotics?

References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.