Last Updated: August 23, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AMARYL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for AMARYL

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT00151697 ↗ LANN-study: Lantus, Amaryl, Novorapid, Novomix Study Completed Rijnstate Hospital Phase 3 2005-05-01 Many diabetics gain weight while on insulin therapy. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of the combination of glimepiride and short-acting insulin on weight control and glucose control. In this study, 150 diabetics whose diabetic control is inadequate while on maximal oral treatment will be randomized to either the new combination treatment or twice daily injections with a mixture of short- and longacting insulin or once-daily injection with a basal insulin analog. The study will compare glucose control and weight gain during a year after randomisation between the three treatments.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for AMARYL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00032487 ↗ Glycemic Control and Complications in Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (VADT) Completed National Eye Institute (NEI) Phase 3 2000-12-01 This study is a prospective, 2-arm, randomized controlled trial to determine whether glycemic control, achieved through intensification of treatment, is effective in preventing clinical macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 DM who are no longer responsive to oral agents alone. The study consists of a two-year accrual period and five years of follow-up (7 years total) of 1700 patients across 20 centers. We have powered the study to detect a 21% reduction in the primary event rate. Additional study goals are to determine whether the expenditures, discomfort, and adverse effects associated with intensive intervention are justified in terms of their clinical benefits, considering both macrovascular and microvascular complications.
NCT00032487 ↗ Glycemic Control and Complications in Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (VADT) Completed SmithKline Beecham Phase 3 2000-12-01 This study is a prospective, 2-arm, randomized controlled trial to determine whether glycemic control, achieved through intensification of treatment, is effective in preventing clinical macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 DM who are no longer responsive to oral agents alone. The study consists of a two-year accrual period and five years of follow-up (7 years total) of 1700 patients across 20 centers. We have powered the study to detect a 21% reduction in the primary event rate. Additional study goals are to determine whether the expenditures, discomfort, and adverse effects associated with intensive intervention are justified in terms of their clinical benefits, considering both macrovascular and microvascular complications.
NCT00032487 ↗ Glycemic Control and Complications in Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (VADT) Completed VA Office of Research and Development Phase 3 2000-12-01 This study is a prospective, 2-arm, randomized controlled trial to determine whether glycemic control, achieved through intensification of treatment, is effective in preventing clinical macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 DM who are no longer responsive to oral agents alone. The study consists of a two-year accrual period and five years of follow-up (7 years total) of 1700 patients across 20 centers. We have powered the study to detect a 21% reduction in the primary event rate. Additional study goals are to determine whether the expenditures, discomfort, and adverse effects associated with intensive intervention are justified in terms of their clinical benefits, considering both macrovascular and microvascular complications.
NCT00044447 ↗ Evaluate the Role of Adding Amaryl to Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus Patients Unresponsive to Maximum Dose Metformin & Thiazolidinedione Completed Sanofi Phase 3 2001-05-01 The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Amaryl when added to Metformin and Thiazolidinedione (TZD) in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for AMARYL

Condition Name

Condition Name for AMARYL
Intervention Trials
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 22
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 12
Healthy 11
Type 2 Diabetes 10
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for AMARYL
Intervention Trials
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 47
Diabetes Mellitus 47
Malnutrition 2
Glucose Intolerance 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for AMARYL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for AMARYL
Location Trials
United States 87
Germany 19
Korea, Republic of 18
Italy 16
Mexico 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for AMARYL
Location Trials
Texas 11
Pennsylvania 4
New Jersey 4
Nebraska 4
Kentucky 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for AMARYL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for AMARYL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 24
Phase 3 21
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for AMARYL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 52
Terminated 8
Unknown status 5
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for AMARYL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for AMARYL
Sponsor Trials
Sanofi 9
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 8
Takeda 7
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for AMARYL
Sponsor Trials
Industry 73
Other 39
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Amaryl (Glimepiride) Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, Patent Status and Sales Projection

Last updated: August 1, 2026

Amaryl, the brand name for glimepiride, is a mature second-generation sulfonylurea for type 2 diabetes. Its U.S. market exclusivity has ended, generic glimepiride is widely available, and no active branded clinical development program is driving commercial growth. Future demand is likely to remain stable in cost-sensitive markets but decline as newer therapies, including GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors, replace sulfonylureas in higher-income treatment settings.

What is Amaryl and how does glimepiride work?

Amaryl contains glimepiride, an oral insulin secretagogue in the sulfonylurea class. It lowers blood glucose by stimulating pancreatic beta cells to release insulin. The FDA approved Amaryl for adults with type 2 diabetes as an adjunct to diet and exercise. It can be used as monotherapy or with metformin or insulin when glycemic control is inadequate [1].

The approved product is available primarily as 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg and 8 mg tablets. The principal clinical limitation is hypoglycemia, particularly in older adults, patients with impaired renal function, and patients with irregular food intake. Weight gain is also associated with sulfonylurea treatment.

Product attribute Amaryl
Active ingredient Glimepiride
Drug class Second-generation sulfonylurea
Route Oral
U.S. approval FDA-approved under NDA 020496
Primary indication Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Dosage forms Immediate-release tablets
Key safety issue Hypoglycemia
Originator Hoechst Marion Roussel, later associated with Aventis and Sanofi
Current U.S. market Generic-dominated

What is the current clinical-trial status of Amaryl?

Amaryl does not have a commercially significant late-stage clinical program. The core evidence base for glimepiride was established before and around its initial approval. Current research is concentrated on comparative effectiveness, combination treatment, cardiovascular outcomes, treatment sequencing and real-world safety rather than registration studies for the Amaryl brand.

ClinicalTrials.gov contains completed and observational studies involving glimepiride, including studies comparing it with metformin, newer oral agents and insulin regimens. These studies generally evaluate glycemic control, hypoglycemia, body weight, treatment persistence or cardiovascular outcomes rather than seek a new indication for branded Amaryl [2].

What clinical evidence supports glimepiride?

Glimepiride lowers glycated hemoglobin in patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly when residual beta-cell function is present. Its low acquisition cost and once-daily dosing remain advantages. Its clinical disadvantages are hypoglycemia and weight gain, which have become more important as treatment guidelines prioritize agents with cardiovascular, renal or weight-loss benefits.

The FDA label reports that glimepiride has been studied in monotherapy and in combination with metformin and insulin. The label also identifies dose-related hypoglycemia and cautions that renal impairment can increase exposure and risk [1].

How does Amaryl compare with newer diabetes drugs?

Attribute Glimepiride SGLT2 inhibitors GLP-1 receptor agonists
Typical role Low-cost glucose lowering Cardiorenal risk reduction and glucose lowering Weight loss, glucose lowering and selected cardiovascular benefit
Hypoglycemia risk Meaningful, especially with insulin or poor intake Low when used without insulin or sulfonylurea Low when used without insulin or sulfonylurea
Weight effect Gain Loss or neutral Usually loss
Oral availability Yes Yes Some oral and injectable products
Cost Low, generic High relative to glimepiride High relative to glimepiride
Cardiovascular evidence Less favorable than newer classes Strong for selected outcomes Strong for selected outcomes
Commercial trend Mature or declining Expanding Expanding

The American Diabetes Association recommends treatment selection based on cardiovascular disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, weight goals, hypoglycemia risk, cost and patient preferences. These criteria tend to favor GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors for higher-risk patients, although low-cost sulfonylureas remain clinically relevant when affordability controls treatment choice [3].

When did Amaryl lose exclusivity?

Amaryl’s U.S. small-molecule exclusivity expired years ago. Generic glimepiride is approved and sold by multiple manufacturers. The product no longer has meaningful U.S. market protection based on brand exclusivity.

The FDA approved Amaryl in 1995. Its regulatory exclusivity and patent protection did not prevent broad generic entry after the applicable protections expired. The brand remains marketed in some jurisdictions, but generic substitution has materially reduced its commercial value in the United States [1,4].

What is the Orange Book status of Amaryl?

The Orange Book identifies Amaryl under NDA 020496. Generic glimepiride products are approved through abbreviated new drug applications. Because glimepiride is an established immediate-release small molecule, generic applicants generally rely on bioequivalence rather than repeat full efficacy trials [4].

The commercial significance of the Orange Book is limited for Amaryl because:

  • The product has no active brand-driven exclusivity comparable to a newly approved therapy.
  • Generic manufacturers can compete on the same active ingredient and immediate-release dosage form.
  • Prescribers and pharmacies can substitute generic glimepiride in accordance with state law and payer policy.
  • Any remaining formulation or process patent would need to cover a commercially relevant, listed product feature to delay generic substitution.

The principal market barrier is therefore not FDA exclusivity. It is price competition, distribution access, reimbursement and physician preference.

What patents protect Amaryl and glimepiride?

The original composition-of-matter and product protection for glimepiride has expired. Amaryl is not positioned as a patent-protected growth product in the United States.

Protection category Current commercial relevance
Original glimepiride compound protection Expired
Original Amaryl product protection Expired
U.S. regulatory exclusivity Expired
Immediate-release tablet protection No meaningful barrier to generic entry
Method-of-use patents No widely recognized active barrier controlling the core market
Manufacturing know-how Potentially relevant to cost, purity and supply reliability
Brand trademarks May protect the Amaryl name but do not block generic glimepiride

Generic manufacturers may hold process patents, formulation patents or manufacturing know-how in particular jurisdictions. Those rights generally do not recreate the broad exclusivity associated with an active compound patent. They can affect manufacturing economics or specific products but are unlikely to prevent broad generic competition.

Are there Paragraph IV challenges to Amaryl?

Paragraph IV litigation is not a material current risk factor for Amaryl. Paragraph IV certifications are most commercially important when an applicant seeks approval before expiration of a listed patent. Because glimepiride generic entry has already occurred at scale, the main patent dispute window has passed.

The U.S. generic market is instead characterized by multiple approved manufacturers and price competition. Any future litigation would more likely involve a specific formulation, manufacturing process, labeling issue or commercial dispute than a challenge to the basic Amaryl active ingredient.

What is the FDA regulatory status of Amaryl?

Amaryl is an FDA-approved prescription drug for type 2 diabetes. Generic glimepiride tablets are also FDA-approved. No biosimilar pathway applies because glimepiride is a synthetic small molecule, not a biologic.

The regulatory profile is mature:

  1. The active ingredient has an established safety and efficacy record.
  2. Generic products rely on abbreviated approval pathways.
  3. No new branded indication is necessary for continued generic marketing.
  4. Safety monitoring focuses on hypoglycemia, hypersensitivity, hepatic effects and use in patients with renal or hepatic impairment.

How large is the Amaryl and glimepiride market?

A standalone global revenue figure for Amaryl is not generally disclosed by the originator. Sanofi’s public reporting groups products into broader portfolios, and generic manufacturers typically report glimepiride revenue within larger diabetes or established-products categories.

The addressable disease market is large. The International Diabetes Federation estimated that approximately 537 million adults aged 20 to 79 were living with diabetes in 2021 and projected that the number could reach 783 million by 2045 [5]. Glimepiride competes for a subset of the type 2 diabetes market, primarily patients who require an inexpensive oral agent and can tolerate hypoglycemia risk.

Which regions are most commercially important?

Region Glimepiride outlook
United States Mature generic market; low brand opportunity
Western Europe Declining use relative to newer agents; generic pricing
Japan and South Korea Established use, but competition from newer classes
India Significant volume opportunity because of diabetes prevalence and affordability
China Large patient base and generic competition
Latin America Continued use where treatment cost is a major constraint
Middle East and Africa Demand supported by access and affordability considerations

The strongest volume opportunity is in markets where newer agents remain unaffordable or reimbursement is limited. The strongest pricing pressure is also present in those markets because multiple local manufacturers can supply generic tablets.

What is the market projection for Amaryl?

The brand Amaryl is likely to experience flat or declining revenue in developed markets. Generic glimepiride volume can remain resilient, but average selling prices are expected to decline or remain compressed.

Base-case projection

Period Brand Amaryl Generic glimepiride Main driver
2024-2026 Declining Stable to modest growth in emerging markets Generic substitution and affordability
2027-2029 Declining Flat to low-single-digit growth by volume Diabetes prevalence offset by class migration
2030 onward Small branded role Mature, price-sensitive market GLP-1 and SGLT2 penetration

A reasonable commercial base case is:

  • Branded Amaryl revenue: low-single-digit annual decline in developed markets.
  • Generic glimepiride volume: flat to low-single-digit annual growth globally.
  • Generic price: continued pressure, particularly in tender-driven markets.
  • Market value: flat to declining despite possible unit growth.
  • Emerging-market demand: stronger than demand in North America and Western Europe.

The main downside risk is faster substitution by SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists and newer combination products. The main support factor is affordability. Generic glimepiride can remain a treatment option where patients cannot access higher-cost medicines.

How strong is the Amaryl patent estate?

The Amaryl patent estate is weak as a current commercial defense. Its core compound and product protections are expired, and the product is exposed to broad generic competition.

Patent-strength factor Assessment
Compound protection Very weak or expired
Regulatory exclusivity None of commercial significance
Formulation protection Limited for standard immediate-release tablets
Method-of-use protection Limited market impact
Manufacturing barriers Possible but generally nonexclusive
Generic substitution risk High
Litigation leverage Low
Long-term pricing power Low

The most valuable remaining assets are brand recognition, manufacturing quality, regulatory approvals in individual countries and distribution relationships. None provides the economic protection of an active composition-of-matter patent.

What licensing deals and partnerships affect Amaryl?

No current licensing transaction is widely recognized as a major growth driver for Amaryl. Historical commercialization involved the originator’s corporate entities and regional marketing arrangements, but the product’s economic profile is now dominated by generic competition.

Potential commercial activity is more likely to involve:

  • Regional generic supply agreements.
  • Authorized-generic arrangements.
  • Portfolio acquisitions involving established diabetes products.
  • Contract manufacturing and distribution.
  • Tender participation in public-health systems.

These arrangements can improve market access but do not materially change the patent position.

What generic launch scenarios exist for glimepiride?

The principal generic launch scenario has already occurred. Multiple manufacturers can supply immediate-release glimepiride tablets, and new entrants may compete where regulatory approval and manufacturing economics support entry.

Future generic competition could develop through:

  • Lower-cost regional manufacturers.
  • New strengths or pack sizes approved under local rules.
  • Fixed-dose combinations with metformin.
  • Hospital and government procurement contracts.
  • Online and retail pharmacy substitution.

A reformulated product could seek differentiation through modified release, adherence packaging or combination therapy, but such products would need to demonstrate a clinical or commercial advantage over inexpensive immediate-release tablets.

What manufacturing and intellectual-property barriers remain?

Manufacturing barriers are modest for standard glimepiride tablets. The active ingredient is a mature small molecule, and tablet production uses established technologies. Commercial barriers include:

  • Active pharmaceutical ingredient qualification.
  • Bioequivalence testing.
  • Stability data.
  • Good Manufacturing Practice compliance.
  • Batch consistency and impurity control.
  • Regulatory approval in each target market.
  • Reliable low-cost distribution.

Process patents may protect particular synthetic routes or impurity-control methods. They do not generally prevent alternative manufacturing routes. Supply-chain resilience and regulatory compliance are more important than patent exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  • Amaryl is the branded form of glimepiride, a mature sulfonylurea for type 2 diabetes.
  • The FDA approved Amaryl in 1995 under NDA 020496.
  • Core patent and regulatory protections have expired.
  • Generic glimepiride is widely available and creates high substitution risk.
  • No active late-stage branded clinical program is driving Amaryl’s market outlook.
  • Newer GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors are taking share in higher-income markets.
  • Affordability supports continued glimepiride use in India, China, Latin America, Africa and other price-sensitive markets.
  • Brand revenue is likely to decline, while generic unit demand should remain stable or grow modestly.
  • The patent estate is weak, and manufacturing, reimbursement and distribution are more important than exclusivity.
  • Biosimilar risk does not apply because glimepiride is a synthetic small molecule.

FAQs About Amaryl and Glimepiride

Is Amaryl still prescribed in 2025?

Yes. Amaryl and generic glimepiride remain prescribed, particularly when low treatment cost is a priority. Use is more limited in patients at high risk of hypoglycemia or those who would benefit from weight loss or cardiorenal protection.

Is glimepiride safer than glibenclamide?

Glimepiride is generally considered to have a lower hypoglycemia burden than glibenclamide in some clinical settings, but it still carries a meaningful hypoglycemia risk. Individual risk depends on dose, renal function, age, food intake and concurrent therapy.

Does Amaryl have a biosimilar competitor?

No. Biosimilars are used for biologic medicines. Glimepiride is a synthetic small molecule and competes with chemically equivalent generic tablets.

Are there extended-release versions of Amaryl?

The standard Amaryl product is an immediate-release tablet. Any extended-release or modified-release glimepiride product would require separate regulatory support and could face formulation-specific patent and bioequivalence issues.

Can generic glimepiride replace Amaryl automatically?

Pharmacy substitution depends on the product’s regulatory status, state or national law, prescriber instructions and payer policy. FDA-approved generic glimepiride products are intended to be therapeutically equivalent to the corresponding reference product when listed as substitutable in the Orange Book.

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2019). Amaryl (glimepiride) prescribing information.
  2. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov: Glimepiride clinical studies.
  3. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. (2024). Standards of care in diabetes - 2024. Diabetes Care, 47(Supplement 1).
  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations: Orange Book.
  5. International Diabetes Federation. (2021). IDF Diabetes Atlas (10th ed.).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.