Last Updated: June 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ALTACE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ALTACE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00044265 ↗ Treatment of Pediatric Hypertension With Altace Trial Completed Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 4 2002-07-01 Ramipril is an ACE inhibitor that has been marketed in the US for the treatment of hypertension since 1991. It has been shown to be effective in reducing both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults when used once daily. ACE inhibitors are frequently used to treat hypertension in children, however ramipril has not been extensively tested in children, and information regarding the efficacy and safety would therefore be of benefit to children. This study is designed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of ramipril in the treatment of hypertension in children ages 6 through 16 years.
NCT00044265 ↗ Treatment of Pediatric Hypertension With Altace Trial Completed Pfizer Phase 4 2002-07-01 Ramipril is an ACE inhibitor that has been marketed in the US for the treatment of hypertension since 1991. It has been shown to be effective in reducing both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults when used once daily. ACE inhibitors are frequently used to treat hypertension in children, however ramipril has not been extensively tested in children, and information regarding the efficacy and safety would therefore be of benefit to children. This study is designed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of ramipril in the treatment of hypertension in children ages 6 through 16 years.
NCT00274599 ↗ PROBE Investigation of the Safety & Efficacy of Telmisartan (Micardis®) vs Ramipril (Altace®) Using ABPM in HTN Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 4 2002-10-01 Demonstrate that telmisartan 80mg was at least as effective and possibly superior to ramipril 5mg & 10mg in lowering mean ambulatory DBP and SBP during the last 6 hrs of the 24-hr dosing interval in mild-to-moderate hypertensives at the end of 8 and 14 week treatment phases.
NCT00281593 ↗ Telmisartan (Micardis) and Ramipril (Altace) - Factorial Design Study for the Treatment of Hypertension Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 3 2006-04-01 To identify dose combinations of telmisartan and ramipril that are more effective in reducing diastolic blood pressure than each of the respective monotherapies in patients with Stage I or II hypertension.
NCT00389519 ↗ A Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Ramipril in the Treatment of Hypertension in Children and Adolescents Terminated Pfizer Phase 3 2006-10-01 The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the blood pressure lowering effects of ramipril, an FDA-approved drug for the treatment of hypertension in adults, in children and adolescents aged 6 to 16 years with hypertension.
NCT00574834 ↗ Mechanisms of Ramipril Reduction in the Onset of Type 2 Diabetes Terminated King Pharmaceuticals is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Early Phase 1 2007-03-01 The study will be focused on determining the integrated in-vivo mechanisms responsible for Ramipril's effects on delaying type 2 diabetes and restoring normal (blood sugar levels) glycemia in patients with impaired glucose tolerance. Hypothesis - Ramipril effects will delay the onset of type 2 diabetes and restore normal glycemia in patients with impaired glucose tolerance.
NCT00574834 ↗ Mechanisms of Ramipril Reduction in the Onset of Type 2 Diabetes Terminated University of Maryland Early Phase 1 2007-03-01 The study will be focused on determining the integrated in-vivo mechanisms responsible for Ramipril's effects on delaying type 2 diabetes and restoring normal (blood sugar levels) glycemia in patients with impaired glucose tolerance. Hypothesis - Ramipril effects will delay the onset of type 2 diabetes and restore normal glycemia in patients with impaired glucose tolerance.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ALTACE

Condition Name

Condition Name for ALTACE
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 9
Healthy 7
Metabolic Syndrome 2
Diabetes 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ALTACE
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 8
Disease 2
Vascular Diseases 2
Metabolic Syndrome X 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ALTACE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ALTACE
Location Trials
United States 132
Canada 27
India 5
Chile 2
Argentina 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ALTACE
Location Trials
California 7
Illinois 6
Florida 5
Texas 5
Pennsylvania 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ALTACE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ALTACE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 6
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ALTACE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 18
Terminated 5
Unknown status 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ALTACE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ALTACE
Sponsor Trials
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA 3
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 2
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited 2
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ALTACE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 19
Other 18
NIH 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: April 27, 2026

ALTACE (ramipril): What the clinical-trials landscape and market outlook look like now

What is ALTACE and how is it positioned clinically?

ALTACE is a brand of ramipril, an ACE inhibitor. ALTACE is an established cardiovascular medicine with clinical evidence spanning secondary prevention and heart failure management, and it is marketed broadly via generic competition. Current “clinical trials” activity for ramipril is mostly incremental (formulation, comparative, and label-expansion studies) rather than new mechanism development, because the active ingredient is mature and patents have long expired.

Clinical trial reality check (practitioner view):

  • Outcome-defining trials for ramipril predate most modern registries and current “update” cycles.
  • Ongoing trials tend to be:
    • comparative studies (ACE inhibitor vs ACE inhibitor, or ramipril vs another antihypertensive/heart-failure comparator),
    • subgroup or real-world effectiveness studies,
    • formulation/bioequivalence studies rather than novel efficacy endpoints.

What are the key clinical evidence anchors for ramipril (ALTACE)?

The core clinical evidence for ramipril that shaped practice standards comes from large randomized outcome trials conducted years ago. The most cited anchors include:

Evidence anchor Clinical context Endpoint emphasis Role in practice
HOPE study High-risk patients without severe heart failure Reduced major cardiovascular events with ACE inhibition Reinforced ACE inhibition for high-risk prevention (ramipril dosing became a reference)
HOPE-TOO follow-up Continued observation of HOPE cohorts Durable risk reduction Supported long-term benefit beyond initial trial window
MICRO-HOPE Substudies within HOPE Diabetes and vascular risk subgroups Helped establish ACE inhibition in high-risk metabolic populations
AIRE / SAVE-type heart failure programs Heart failure populations Mortality or hospitalization outcomes Positioned ACE inhibitors, including ramipril, in heart failure standards

(These programs reflect the clinical foundation for ALTACE use; current trial updates typically do not rewrite these endpoints.)

What is happening in the trials pipeline right now (registries snapshot)?

A current “clinical trials update” for ramipril typically shows:

  • low volume of new mechanism trials,
  • small-to-mid size studies with primary endpoints like blood pressure lowering, renal biomarkers, tolerability, adherence, or pharmacokinetics (including switch studies).

Business implication: because ramipril is off-patent in most major markets, trial activity rarely translates into meaningful exclusivity extensions unless it targets a new indication and triggers a regulator-granted data protection period. For established cardiovascular drugs, most incremental studies end in label-maintenance rather than brand-protecting IP.

What endpoints and trial designs dominate for mature ACE inhibitors like ramipril?

Across contemporary trial reporting for ramipril and ACE inhibitors, common design patterns are:

  • Primary endpoint: change in systolic/diastolic blood pressure over fixed windows (often weeks 6-12).
  • Secondary endpoints: change in albuminuria/creatinine clearance, renal function markers, and safety (cough, hyperkalemia, angioedema).
  • Study design: randomized, open-label comparisons for practicality; or double-blind when feasible.
  • Populations: hypertension, post-MI risk, chronic kidney disease with albuminuria, and heart failure cohorts.

Because ALTACE’s commercial position depends on price and supply chain rather than new IP, trial activity is usually aimed at: 1) maintaining guideline fit for generics and branded supply, 2) supporting local label language (switching criteria, monitoring protocols), 3) meeting payer-driven evidence standards.


How large is the ALTACE market and what’s the commercial baseline?

Where does ALTACE sit in the ACE-inhibitor class by revenue and demand?

ACE inhibitors remain a high-volume cardiovascular class globally. Ramipril is among the most used agents because it has broad indication coverage and strong evidence pedigree.

Market baseline characteristics:

  • High generic penetration: ramipril has widespread low-cost supply.
  • Brand erosion: branded ALTACE competes mainly on formulary positioning, rebates, and managed-care contracting.
  • Category demand stability: hypertension and cardiovascular secondary prevention maintain steady incidence and treatment continuity, which supports ongoing unit demand even as pricing declines.

What drives demand for ALTACE specifically?

Ramipril demand is driven by three practical forces:

1) Indication durability

  • hypertension and cardiovascular risk reduction remain lifelong therapy categories for eligible patients.

2) Guideline alignment

  • ACE inhibitor recommendations for patients with diabetes, albuminuria, post-MI, or heart failure risk keep ramipril eligible for many prescribers and formularies.

3) Substitution economics

  • if payer preference tilts toward the lowest net-cost ACE inhibitor, ramipril competes primarily on price, not novelty.

What are the main competitive pressures?

  • Generic ramipril brands (multiple manufacturers).
  • Class competition from ARBs (often chosen when cough occurs or when ACE inhibition is not tolerated).
  • Direct competition from combination therapies (ACE inhibitor + diuretic or ACE inhibitor + calcium-channel blocker) that improve adherence and reduce pill burden.

What market projections are realistic for ALTACE (ramipril)?

Is growth possible for ALTACE vs generics?

For a mature, off-patent molecule, “growth” usually means one of:

  • volume retention via contracts,
  • margin improvement through lower cost-of-goods and rebate strategy,
  • share gains in specific payer tiers.

Market direction for ramipril overall (class-level):

  • Units: generally stable to modestly growing with population aging and persistence, offset by switching to lower-cost alternatives within the class.
  • Revenue: tends to decline over time as wholesale price and net prices compress under generic competition.

Projection framework for business planning

A pragmatic projection for ALTACE should be modeled as:

  • Volume trajectory: driven by incident cases of hypertension, cardiovascular risk cohorts, and adherence persistence.
  • Net price trajectory: driven by rebate pressure, generic price resets, and formulary tiering.

Because brand ALTACE sits inside a generic commodity market, upside scenarios require concrete commercial levers (exclusive distribution, payer-specific contracting, or differentiated packaging/formulation), not new clinical efficacy claims.


Patent and exclusivity: what matters for ALTACE now

Does ALTACE still have meaningful IP protection?

ALTACE (ramipril) is long past the primary patent era in major jurisdictions. The only ways to create later exclusivity typically involve:

  • new formulations with distinct regulatory protection (rare for ACE inhibitors given generic coverage),
  • new combination products with their own data exclusivity windows,
  • label-specific exclusivity where granted (jurisdiction-dependent and generally narrow).

For investor-grade forecasting, the baseline should treat ALTACE as IP-constrained on the molecule and commercially constrained by generics.


Actionable take: clinical-trials update to market implications

What should R&D and investment teams conclude from the current trial pattern?

  • No new mechanism moat: ramipril has a mature mechanism, so trials rarely create a step-change in clinical differentiation.
  • Regulatory wins are usually incremental: any trial success typically supports label maintenance or local positioning, not brand protection.
  • Market strategy dominates: the commercial outcome is determined by contracting, manufacturing scale, and net pricing.

Where should resources be focused if the goal is to sustain ALTACE performance?

  • Evidence-aligned contracting: use existing clinical evidence to meet payer criteria and step-therapy policies.
  • Operational excellence: lower net cost via supply chain and manufacturing efficiency.
  • Positioning for tolerability: support protocols for managing ACE-inhibitor adverse effects (monitoring and switching pathways), which affects real-world persistence.

Key Takeaways

  • ALTACE (ramipril) is a mature ACE inhibitor with clinical evidence anchored by large outcome programs from earlier eras.
  • Current “clinical trial updates” for ramipril are typically incremental (comparative effectiveness, renal/BP biomarker studies, real-world and tolerability), not mechanism-changing.
  • Commercially, ALTACE operates inside a high-generic-penetration market where net pricing, rebates, and formularies dominate outcomes.
  • Realistic projections for ALTACE require modeling volume persistence and payer-driven net price pressure, not IP-led growth.

FAQs

1) Are there any new clinical efficacy breakthroughs for ALTACE?

Trials for ramipril largely focus on incremental endpoints (BP, renal biomarkers, tolerability, and persistence) rather than new efficacy paradigms.

2) Does clinical trial activity translate into new exclusivity for ramipril?

Usually not for the base molecule; for ramipril, meaningful exclusivity is typically limited, and incremental studies rarely create brand-protecting periods.

3) What endpoints matter most for ongoing ramipril studies?

Common primary endpoints include change in blood pressure; secondary endpoints often include renal function and safety metrics.

4) How does class competition affect ALTACE demand?

ARBs and combination therapies can absorb patients who switch due to ACE-inhibitor tolerability or adherence considerations.

5) What drives ALTACE forecasts in practice?

Volume is driven by eligible patient populations and persistence; revenue depends on net price and formulary tiering under generic pressure.


References (APA)

  1. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study. (n.d.). NEJM / clinical trial publications.
  2. The HOPE-TOO Study. (n.d.). NEJM / follow-up publications.
  3. MICRO-HOPE Study. (n.d.). NEJM / subgroup publication.
  4. AIRE and SAVE ramipril-related heart failure programs. (n.d.). NEJM / trial publications.
  5. ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Search results for ramipril studies.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.