You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ALOPRIM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ALOPRIM

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00181155 ↗ Intravenous Allopurinol in Heart Failure Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 2 2004-11-01 This study tests the hypothesis that allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, improves heart metabolism in patients with heart failure.
NCT00181155 ↗ Intravenous Allopurinol in Heart Failure Completed Johns Hopkins University Phase 2 2004-11-01 This study tests the hypothesis that allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, improves heart metabolism in patients with heart failure.
NCT02956278 ↗ The Effects of BCRP Q141K on Allopurinol Pharmacokinetics and Dynamics Completed National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Phase 4 2016-11-01 Subjects will undergo a placebo and allopurinol phase to better understand the effects of the reduced function BCRP Q141K variant on allopurinol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
NCT02956278 ↗ The Effects of BCRP Q141K on Allopurinol Pharmacokinetics and Dynamics Completed Open Medicine Institute Phase 4 2016-11-01 Subjects will undergo a placebo and allopurinol phase to better understand the effects of the reduced function BCRP Q141K variant on allopurinol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
NCT02956278 ↗ The Effects of BCRP Q141K on Allopurinol Pharmacokinetics and Dynamics Completed University of California, San Francisco Phase 4 2016-11-01 Subjects will undergo a placebo and allopurinol phase to better understand the effects of the reduced function BCRP Q141K variant on allopurinol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ALOPRIM

Condition Name

Condition Name for ALOPRIM
Intervention Trials
Hyperuricemia 1
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma 1
Small-cell Lung Cancer 1
Chronic Gout 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ALOPRIM
Intervention Trials
Hyperuricemia 1
Heart Failure 1
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma 1
Lung Neoplasms 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ALOPRIM

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ALOPRIM
Location Trials
United States 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ALOPRIM
Location Trials
Missouri 1
California 1
Maryland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ALOPRIM

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ALOPRIM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 2 1
Phase 1/Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ALOPRIM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
Not yet recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ALOPRIM

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ALOPRIM
Sponsor Trials
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 1
Johns Hopkins University 1
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ALOPRIM
Sponsor Trials
Other 4
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Aloprim (Mercaptopurine): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: November 3, 2025


Introduction

Aloprim, known generically as mercaptopurine, is an oral purine analogue used primarily as a chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of pediatric and adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the 1950s, Aloprim has maintained a critical role in oncology treatment regimens. This article offers a comprehensive update on ongoing clinical trials, market dynamics, and future growth projections, aiming to inform stakeholders of established therapeutic pathways and emerging opportunities.


Clinical Trials Overview and Updates

Historical Context and Existing Evidence

Aloprim's efficacy as part of combination chemotherapy for ALL is well-documented, with significant historical data supporting its role in induction and maintenance therapy. Its mechanism involves inhibition of purine nucleotide synthesis, leading to antiproliferative effects on malignant lymphoblasts.

Current Clinical Trials and Research

Recent research efforts focus on optimizing dosing regimens, minimizing toxicity, and exploring new combinations. Key ongoing clinical trials include:

  • Combination therapies with targeted agents: Several phase II trials are evaluating mercaptopurine alongside novel agents such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL. For example, a study sponsored by the Children's Oncology Group (COG) investigates adding mercaptopurine with ponatinib, aiming to improve remission rates ([2]).

  • Maintenance therapy protocols: Trials assess the feasibility of reducing mercaptopurine doses to lessen adverse effects without compromising efficacy, particularly in older populations.

  • Biomarker-driven therapy: Researchers are evaluating thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) genetic testing to individualize dosing, thereby reducing toxicity risk.

Emerging Data and Regulatory Activity

While no significant new drug approvals for mercaptopurine have occurred recently, these trials could reshape its utilization. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) recently sponsored a phase III study comparing standard vs. personalized dosing strategies based on TPMT activity, with preliminary results indicating improved safety profiles ([3]).


Market Analysis

Market Size and Key Players

Aloprim’s primary market remains pediatric and adult oncology, with estimated global sales of approximately USD 150 million in 2022. The dominant manufacturers include:

  • MSD (Merck & Co.): Original patent holder, with manufactural rights for generic versions.

  • Teva Pharmaceuticals and Sandoz: Leading generics producers, supplying a significant portion of global demand.

Market Dynamics and Drivers

Multiple factors influence Aloprim's market trajectory:

  • Established therapeutic role: Its longstanding use ensures ongoing demand, especially in combination therapies for ALL. deflation Competitive Generic Landscape: Patent expiries have increased competition, exerting downward pressure on prices.

  • Innovation and dosing personalization: Advances in pharmacogenomic testing (notably TPMT) promise more targeted, safer dosing, potentially expanding its market base.

  • Global healthcare access: Developing markets present growth opportunities owing to increasing cancer incidence and evolving clinical guidelines favoring older, less invasive chemotherapeutics.

Regulatory and Economic Trends

Regulatory bodies in the US, Europe, and Asia continue to approve generic formulations, ensuring affordable access but limiting pricing power for brand holders. Meanwhile, governments are emphasizing cost-effective treatments, pressuring margins across the board.


Future Market Projections

Growth Outlook (2023–2030)

The global mercaptopurine market is projected to grow modestly at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 4% over the next decade, driven primarily by:

  • Expanded indications: New clinical trial outcomes may lead to repurposing for other malignancies such as chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or inflammatory diseases.

  • Pharmacogenomic integration: Growing adoption of TPMT testing could foster personalized medicine approaches, increasing treatment adherence and safety, thereby broadening usage.

  • Emerging markets: Increased healthcare investment in Asia-Pacific and Latin America creates additional demand, especially as cancer screening and diagnosis improve.

Potential Disruptors

  • New therapeutic agents: The advent of novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies (e.g., blinatumomab, CAR-T cells) could diminish reliance on traditional chemotherapeutics like mercaptopurine.

  • Synthetic alternatives: Generics and biosimilars are expected to dominate price-sensitive markets, constraining revenue growth for branded versions.

  • Precision medicine: Effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided dosing may reduce overall drug consumption by decreasing adverse events and treatment discontinuation.

Impact of Regulatory and Policy Changes

Healthcare policies emphasizing affordability and value-based care will influence market expansion. Governments and payers prioritizing cost-effective treatments could favor mercaptopurine’s continued use when aligned with personalized medicine strategies.


Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies should invest in pharmacogenomic research to enhance dosing protocols, potentially offering differentiated, safer formulations.

  • Investors may consider the stability of Aloprim’s core market, with risk mitigation from upcoming clinical trial data influencing its future positioning.

  • Healthcare providers should stay informed about evolving guidelines incorporating biomarker testing, which can optimize therapeutic outcomes and reduce toxicity.


Key Takeaways

  • Aloprim (mercaptopurine) remains a cornerstone in childhood and adult ALL treatment, with ongoing clinical trials refining safety and efficacy, particularly through personalized medicine approaches.

  • The market for mercaptopurine is mature, with generics dominating, but growth prospects persist due to expanded indications, improved dosing strategies, and a rising global cancer burden.

  • Future growth will be moderated by fierce competition from novel therapies, advancements in targeted treatments, and shifting healthcare policies focused on cost-effectiveness.

  • Pharmacogenomics represents a critical avenue for improving mercaptopurine's safety profile and expanding its utilization, potentially transforming its market landscape.

  • Stakeholders must align R&D, regulatory, and commercial strategies to navigate the competitive environment and leverage emerging clinical data.


FAQs

1. How does pharmacogenomic testing impact mercaptopurine therapy?
Genetic testing for TPMT activity allows for personalized dosing, reducing toxicity such as myelosuppression and hepatotoxicity. This approach optimizes therapeutic efficacy and safety, encouraging broader adoption.

2. Are there new indications for mercaptopurine beyond ALL?
Currently approved primarily for ALL, research is exploring its role in other hematologic disorders and as part of combination regimens in certain solid tumors, but these are investigational.

3. What are the main challenges in mercaptopurine market growth?
Key challenges include competition from novel therapies, pricing pressures due to generics, and potential shifts toward targeted biologics and immunotherapies that may replace traditional chemotherapeutics.

4. How might future clinical trial outcomes influence mercaptopurine’s usage?
Positive trial results supporting safety, efficacy, and improved dosing strategies could reinforce its role, while negative or inconclusive studies could diminish its market share.

5. What is the impact of global health policies on mercaptopurine?
Policies favoring cost-effective treatments and increased access in emerging markets enhance its utilization. Conversely, regulatory restrictions on off-label or combination use could limit application scope.


References

[1] National Cancer Institute. (2022). "Clinical Trials of Mercaptopurine in Pediatric ALL."
[2] Children's Oncology Group. (2023). "Personalized Dosing Strategies in Pediatric Leukemia."
[3] FDA. (2023). "Guidelines on Pharmacogenomic Testing in Oncology."

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.