Last Updated: May 3, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ALESSE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ALESSE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00315107 ↗ Estrogen Treatment in Acromegalic Women Unknown status Novartis Phase 2 2006-05-01 Oral estrogens may be an effective adjuvant treatment for control of acromegaly in patients with resistance to somatostatin analogs.
NCT00315107 ↗ Estrogen Treatment in Acromegalic Women Unknown status Université de Montréal Phase 2 2006-05-01 Oral estrogens may be an effective adjuvant treatment for control of acromegaly in patients with resistance to somatostatin analogs.
NCT00481650 ↗ Observational Trial With Leios/Alesse Completed Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer 2005-05-01 A prospective, observational study (Anwendungsbeobachtung [AWB]) of the prescribing and administration practices of German gynecologists with Leios® Dragées.
NCT00662454 ↗ Oral Contraceptive Efficacy and Body Weight Completed National Institutes of Health (NIH) Phase 4 2006-01-01 The purpose of the blood spot validation portion of the study is to test if measuring female hormone levels in the blood is as accurate through a finger stick, as it is by a blood draw from a vein. The purpose of the feasibility study is to evaluate ovulation occurrence in two populations of oral contraceptive users: heavier and lighter women.
NCT00662454 ↗ Oral Contraceptive Efficacy and Body Weight Completed Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute Phase 4 2006-01-01 The purpose of the blood spot validation portion of the study is to test if measuring female hormone levels in the blood is as accurate through a finger stick, as it is by a blood draw from a vein. The purpose of the feasibility study is to evaluate ovulation occurrence in two populations of oral contraceptive users: heavier and lighter women.
NCT00662454 ↗ Oral Contraceptive Efficacy and Body Weight Completed Oregon Health and Science University Phase 4 2006-01-01 The purpose of the blood spot validation portion of the study is to test if measuring female hormone levels in the blood is as accurate through a finger stick, as it is by a blood draw from a vein. The purpose of the feasibility study is to evaluate ovulation occurrence in two populations of oral contraceptive users: heavier and lighter women.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ALESSE

Condition Name

Condition Name for ALESSE
Intervention Trials
Acromegaly 1
Body Weight 1
Contraception 1
Contraceptives, Oral, Combined 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ALESSE
Intervention Trials
Acromegaly 1
Body Weight 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ALESSE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ALESSE
Location Trials
Canada 1
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ALESSE
Location Trials
Oregon 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ALESSE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ALESSE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ALESSE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ALESSE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ALESSE
Sponsor Trials
Novartis 1
Université de Montréal 1
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ALESSE
Sponsor Trials
Other 3
Industry 2
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Alesse: Clinical Trial Status, Market Dynamics, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Alesse, a combined oral contraceptive containing levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol, faces evolving market conditions driven by ongoing clinical research, competitor activity, and regulatory landscapes. Analysis of its current trial status and market trajectory is critical for strategic R&D and investment.

What is the current status of Alesse clinical trials?

The clinical trial landscape for Alesse primarily centers on post-market surveillance and comparative efficacy studies. While Alesse has established efficacy and safety profiles for its approved indications, ongoing research aims to further refine its use and compare it against emerging contraceptive options.

Ongoing and Completed Trials

Information on active, interventional clinical trials for Alesse is limited in public databases, suggesting a focus on observational studies or trials not seeking new indications. The majority of foundational efficacy and safety trials were completed prior to its initial market entry.

  • Past Trials: Pre-market approval trials established Alesse’s effectiveness in preventing pregnancy. These typically involved large, randomized, placebo-controlled studies designed to meet regulatory requirements.
  • Post-Market Surveillance: Alesse, like all marketed drugs, is subject to pharmacovigilance. This involves ongoing monitoring for adverse events and potential long-term effects. Data from these activities informs safety labeling updates.
  • Comparative Studies: Research continues to compare Alesse's performance, side effect profiles, and patient satisfaction against newer hormonal contraceptive formulations. These studies are often industry-sponsored or conducted by academic institutions. For example, studies may investigate head-to-head comparisons regarding cycle control, breakthrough bleeding, or patient tolerability.

How does Alesse perform in the oral contraceptive market?

Alesse occupies a segment of the oral contraceptive market characterized by established generics and a mature product lifecycle. Its market position is influenced by pricing, brand recognition, and the availability of newer formulations offering different hormonal combinations or delivery methods.

Market Share and Positioning

Alesse, marketed by Teva Pharmaceuticals (and formerly by Wyeth), has historically been a significant player in the combined oral contraceptive market. Its generic availability has contributed to its accessibility and price competitiveness.

  • Generic Penetration: As a long-established product, Alesse has a strong generic presence. This typically leads to price erosion and increased competition from multiple manufacturers.
  • Therapeutic Class: Alesse belongs to the class of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) that utilize a progestin (levonorgestrel) and an estrogen (ethinyl estradiol). This combination is well-understood and widely prescribed.
  • Competitive Landscape: The oral contraceptive market is highly competitive, featuring a broad range of products with varying hormonal components, dosages, and treatment regimens. Competitors include other low-dose COCs, progestin-only pills, and non-oral contraceptive methods.
  • Prescriber and Patient Preferences: Physician prescribing habits and patient preferences, influenced by factors such as efficacy, side effect profiles, cost, and ease of use, dictate market share. Alesse benefits from a long history of use and physician familiarity.

Key Market Drivers

The demand for Alesse and similar oral contraceptives is driven by several factors:

  • Unintended Pregnancy Prevention: The primary driver remains the desire for effective contraception.
  • Menstrual Cycle Regulation: COCs are often prescribed for managing irregular periods, dysmenorrhea, and premenstrual syndrome (PMS).
  • Acne Treatment: Some COCs, including those with ethinyl estradiol and specific progestins like drospirenone or norgestimate (though not levonorgestrel as the sole progestin in some formulations marketed for acne), are indicated for managing acne vulgaris. Alesse’s specific labeling for acne management should be verified.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Generic oral contraceptives, including Alesse, offer a cost-effective option, particularly for individuals without comprehensive insurance coverage.
  • Accessibility: Established manufacturing and distribution channels ensure broad availability.

What are the key patent considerations for Alesse?

The patent landscape for Alesse has largely expired, reflecting its status as an older, genericized drug. However, understanding the patent history and any potential for formulation or method-of-use patents is crucial for competitive analysis.

Patent Expiry and Generic Entry

Alesse's primary patents, which would have covered the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and initial formulations, have long since expired. This has paved the way for multiple generic manufacturers to produce and market the drug.

  • Original Patents: The original patents for the combination of levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol in oral contraceptive formulations have expired.
  • Generic Approvals: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved numerous generic versions of Alesse. Each generic product must demonstrate bioequivalence to the reference listed drug (RLD).
  • Exclusivity Periods: Any periods of market exclusivity granted to the innovator product have concluded.
  • Potential for New Patents: While the core patent is expired, there could theoretically be patents covering specific formulations (e.g., novel delivery systems, extended-release mechanisms), combinations with other active ingredients, or specific methods of use (e.g., for treating a particular condition not previously indicated). However, for a drug as mature as Alesse, the likelihood of significant new patentable innovations is low.

Regulatory Exclusivity

Beyond patent protection, regulatory exclusivities can also impact market entry for generic drugs.

  • Data Exclusivity: Upon FDA approval, innovator drugs are granted periods of data exclusivity, during which generic manufacturers cannot rely on the innovator's clinical trial data to support their own abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs). These periods are distinct from patent terms. For Alesse, these exclusivities have expired.
  • Orange Book: The FDA's Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the "Orange Book") lists drugs with their patent and exclusivity information. A review of the Orange Book entry for Alesse would confirm the status of relevant patents and exclusivities.

What is the projected market outlook for Alesse?

The future market outlook for Alesse is characterized by continued generic competition and a stable, albeit potentially declining, market share within the broader contraceptive landscape. Its role will likely be as a cost-effective, reliable option.

Market Trends and Forecasts

The global oral contraceptive market is influenced by demographic shifts, evolving healthcare policies, and the introduction of new contraceptive technologies.

  • Stable Demand: Demand for oral contraceptives is generally stable, driven by ongoing need for pregnancy prevention and menstrual management.
  • Intensifying Competition: The proliferation of generic oral contraceptives will continue to exert downward pressure on pricing and market share for established products like Alesse.
  • Innovation in Contraception: The development of novel contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) like IUDs and implants, and potentially new oral contraceptive formulations with improved side-effect profiles or novel mechanisms, may draw some market share away from traditional oral pills.
  • Emerging Markets: Growth in emerging markets may offer some expansion opportunities, though pricing will remain a critical factor.
  • Healthcare Policy: Changes in insurance coverage, formulary placement, and government reproductive health initiatives can impact prescribing patterns and accessibility.
  • Alesse's Role: Alesse is expected to maintain a position as a widely accessible, affordable, and physician-familiar generic oral contraceptive. Its market share may gradually decline as newer products gain traction, but its cost-effectiveness will ensure its continued use, particularly in cost-sensitive markets or for individuals who tolerate it well and find it suitable for their needs.

Factors Influencing Future Performance

  • Pricing Strategies: Manufacturers of generic Alesse will continue to compete aggressively on price.
  • Physician Prescribing Trends: The historical comfort and familiarity with levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol combinations will sustain some level of prescription volume.
  • Patient Adherence and Satisfaction: Long-term patient satisfaction and adherence will remain critical for retaining users.
  • Availability of Alternatives: The introduction and promotion of newer, potentially more appealing contraceptive options will be a key factor.

Key Takeaways

Alesse is a mature generic oral contraceptive with an established efficacy and safety profile. Its patent landscape is largely expired, allowing for significant generic competition. The market for Alesse is expected to remain stable in terms of demand for oral contraception but will face intensified price competition and a gradual shift in market share towards newer contraceptive technologies. Its primary value proposition will continue to be its cost-effectiveness and established track record.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary active ingredient combination in Alesse? Alesse contains the active ingredients levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol.

  2. Are there any active clinical trials seeking new indications for Alesse? Publicly available data does not indicate active clinical trials for Alesse seeking new indications; research primarily focuses on post-market surveillance and comparative studies.

  3. What is the impact of generic competition on Alesse's market? Generic competition has led to price erosion and increased market accessibility for Alesse, with multiple manufacturers producing the drug.

  4. What are the main factors driving demand for oral contraceptives like Alesse? Demand is driven by the need for unintended pregnancy prevention, management of menstrual cycle irregularities, and, in some formulations, treatment of acne.

  5. What is the long-term market projection for Alesse? Alesse is projected to maintain a stable, albeit potentially declining, market share as a cost-effective generic oral contraceptive, facing competition from newer contraceptive methods and continued price pressures.

Citations

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA. Retrieved from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/ (Note: Specific search query and date of access would be included in a live document for precise citation of drug approvals and patent information.) [2] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Search Results. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (Note: Specific search query and date of access would be included in a live document for precise citation of trial status.) [3] World Health Organization. (n.d.). Combined oral contraceptives. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/combined-oral-contraceptives (Note: General information on COC market context.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.