Last Updated: November 5, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ADDERALL XR 30


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for ADDERALL XR 30

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT00746733 ↗ Vyvanse and Adderall XR Given Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC Completed Shire Phase 1 2008-09-08 The purpose of this study is to determine if taking Vyvanse with Prilosec OTC or Adderall XR with Prilosec OTC changes how quickly the drug is absorbed into the body and/or changes how much of the drug is absorbed into the body.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for ADDERALL XR 30

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00069927 ↗ Adderall XR Compared With Concerta in Treating Young Cancer Patients With Memory, Attention, and Depression Terminated National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2003-08-01 RATIONALE: Stimulant drugs such as dextroamphetamine-amphetamine and methylphenidate may help improve memory, attention, and thinking problems caused by central nervous system (CNS) treatment for cancer, and may help decrease depression. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying dextroamphetamine-amphetamine to see how well it works compared to methylphenidate in treating depression and problems with memory, attention, and thinking in children who have undergone CNS treatment for cancer. This trial will also study how often depression is seen and if these medications might help.
NCT00069927 ↗ Adderall XR Compared With Concerta in Treating Young Cancer Patients With Memory, Attention, and Depression Terminated University of South Florida Phase 2 2003-08-01 RATIONALE: Stimulant drugs such as dextroamphetamine-amphetamine and methylphenidate may help improve memory, attention, and thinking problems caused by central nervous system (CNS) treatment for cancer, and may help decrease depression. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying dextroamphetamine-amphetamine to see how well it works compared to methylphenidate in treating depression and problems with memory, attention, and thinking in children who have undergone CNS treatment for cancer. This trial will also study how often depression is seen and if these medications might help.
NCT00247572 ↗ Safety, Tolerability and Abuse Liability Study of Intravenous NRP104 in Adults With Stimulant Abuse Histories Completed New River Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 2005-09-01 This research is being done to evaluate if NRP 104 is a safe drug. The other purpose is to learn if NRP104, when injected into a vein, produces a high and any other effects like amphetamine and other stimulant drugs that are abused. This information will give some indication if NRP104 can be abused. Healthy people, between the ages of 18 and 55 with histories of substance abuse that include stimulant drugs, may join. Amphetamines are drugs that are used most often to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, to treat narcolepsy (excessive sleepiness) and for weight loss.
NCT00248092 ↗ Study to Evaluate the Likeability, Safety, and Abuse Potential of NRP 104 in Adults With Histories of Stimulant Abuse Completed New River Pharmaceuticals Phase 1/Phase 2 2006-01-01 This research is being done to evaluate if NRP104 is a safe drug. The other purpose is to learn if NRP104 produces a high and any other effects like amphetamine and other stimulant drugs that are abused. This information will give some indication if NRP104 can be abused. NRP104 is an investigational drug. This means that it has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Healthy people, between the ages of 18 and 55 with histories of substance abuse that include stimulant drugs, may join. Amphetamines are drugs that are used most often to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, to treat narcolepsy (excessive sleepiness) and for weight loss.
NCT00279409 ↗ Treatment of Children With ADHD Who do Not Fully Respond to Stimulants Terminated Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 2 2006-07-01 The purpose of this pilot is to initiate a program of research into the development of effective medication techniques to treat those children with ADHD who are referred because they are "partial" or "non-responders" to standard stimulant treatment.
NCT00279409 ↗ Treatment of Children With ADHD Who do Not Fully Respond to Stimulants Terminated National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Phase 2 2006-07-01 The purpose of this pilot is to initiate a program of research into the development of effective medication techniques to treat those children with ADHD who are referred because they are "partial" or "non-responders" to standard stimulant treatment.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ADDERALL XR 30

Condition Name

Condition Name for ADDERALL XR 30
Intervention Trials
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 10
Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity 6
ADHD 3
Cocaine Dependence 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ADDERALL XR 30
Intervention Trials
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity 23
Hyperkinesis 16
Disease 8
Depressive Disorder 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ADDERALL XR 30

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ADDERALL XR 30
Location Trials
United States 39
Canada 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ADDERALL XR 30
Location Trials
New York 9
Massachusetts 7
Alabama 2
Pennsylvania 2
Minnesota 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ADDERALL XR 30

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ADDERALL XR 30
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 13
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 15
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ADDERALL XR 30
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 21
Recruiting 7
Terminated 4
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ADDERALL XR 30

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ADDERALL XR 30
Sponsor Trials
Shire 7
New York State Psychiatric Institute 5
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 5
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ADDERALL XR 30
Sponsor Trials
Other 45
Industry 13
NIH 8
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 28, 2026

Adderall XR 30 mg Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and 2026–2035 Projection

Adderall XR 30 mg is the 30 mg extended-release (XR) formulation of mixed amphetamine salts (MAS). Clinical development activity for the specific 30 mg strength is limited because the product is already marketed; the practical update is driven by FDA lifecycle management, generic/biosimilar entry risks (mostly ANDA), and litigation/settlement dynamics affecting supply and pricing. Commercial outlook through 2035 is most sensitive to (1) generic erosion risk by branded life-cycle patents and (2) reimbursement and prescribing behavior shifts in ADHD and adult attention indications.


What is Adderall XR 30 mg and how is it positioned commercially?

Drug identity. Adderall XR is a branded extended-release product containing mixed amphetamine salts. The “30” strength refers to the 30 mg total daily dose per capsule strength, used in titration from lower strengths.

Therapeutic role. Indicated for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The broader market includes pediatric and adult ADHD treatment. Market sizing and projections typically track the stimulant class and MAS segment rather than a single strength, because payers and prescribers manage dosing through strength selection within the same branded product family.

Commercial linkage to strength. The 30 mg strength is not a distinct product line in regulatory or patent terms; it is a dosage form/strength within the same branded ANDA-referential category. Sales mix by strength can materially affect unit economics, but patent and exclusivity risk generally spans the product regardless of the specific mg strength.


What clinical trial updates matter for Adderall XR since the product is already approved?

Featured answer. For already-approved Adderall XR, “clinical trials updates” relevant to investment and licensing usually come from label expansion, formulation durability, comparative PK/BE, abuse-deterrence or misuse studies, and postmarketing safety cohorts. For a specific strength like 30 mg, PK/BE studies often support strength-level labeling rather than new therapeutic claims.

Where do new data typically come from?

  • Bioequivalence (BE) and pharmacokinetic (PK) bridging tied to formulation scale-up or manufacturing changes.
  • Postmarketing safety including cardiovascular signals, psychiatric events, growth-related monitoring in pediatrics, and substance misuse surveillance.
  • Real-world evidence cohorts from claims databases or observational registries that track discontinuation, dose changes, and adverse event utilization.
  • Comparative effectiveness in stimulant sequencing or switch studies. These are not usually “Adderall XR-only” but influence clinician behavior.

Why “trial updates” are not the main driver vs. IP and regulation

Adderall XR is in a mature lifecycle. The dominant commercial drivers are:

  • patent fence and ANDA timing,
  • litigation outcomes and settlements,
  • supply stability (manufacturing capacity and FDA compliance status),
  • payer formulary placement and prior authorization rules,
  • competitive dynamics within MAS XR vs methylphenidate XR vs other amphetamine XR products.

How big is the ADHD stimulant market and where does Adderall XR 30 mg fit?

Featured answer. Adderall XR’s addressable market is the ADHD stimulant segment across pediatric and adult patients. The “XR” and “amphetamine” subsegments carry premium pricing and formulary persistence relative to some immediate-release options.

Market segmentation used for projections

Investors usually model:

  • total ADHD-treated population (growth and persistence),
  • stimulant adoption rates,
  • mix between amphetamine vs methylphenidate,
  • mix between IR vs XR,
  • share of MAS XR brands,
  • pricing and reimbursement trends,
  • generic penetration and branded premium compression.

Strength-level vs product-level modeling

Most forecasting uses product-level MAS XR revenues and then applies strength-mix assumptions. “30 mg” is treated as:

  • a dosage-shift variable (titration progression),
  • a payer utilization driver (step edits or dose bands),
  • a compliance driver (capsule convenience and adherence).

What patents protect Adderall XR (including 30 mg) and how strong is the estate?

Featured answer. Patent protection for Adderall XR generally spans composition-of-matter, formulation, manufacturing, and specific lifecycle improvements (including polymorph/impurity profiles, manufacturing controls, and extended-release layering approaches). The strength of the estate matters for ANDA timing and launch carve-outs.

How to assess strength for a strength-specific forecast

Even if sales sensitivity is strength-specific, ANDA paragraph IV strategies usually target the branded product as a whole:

  • validity and infringement positions typically cover the active ingredient and XR delivery system,
  • generic labels often include multiple strengths,
  • settlement agreements can limit “launchable strengths” or specify design-around formulations.

What to watch in the Orange Book

For each relevant listed patent:

  • listing type (drug substance, drug product, method of use),
  • expiration date,
  • whether any pediatric exclusivity extends protection,
  • whether patents have been recently asserted or are subject to terminal disclaimer behavior.

When does Adderall XR lose exclusivity and what are the key expiration milestones?

Featured answer. Exclusivity loss for Adderall XR is determined by the latest controlling patent expiration plus any FDA exclusivity extensions (including pediatric exclusivity). For a 30 mg forecast, the practical launch window is driven by the latest-expiring listed patent or settlement-triggered entry date.

Timeline logic used in ANDA forecasts

  1. Identify the earliest ANDA filing and whether it includes paragraph IV certifications.
  2. Identify controlling patents by listing type and expiration.
  3. Model 30-month stay outcomes and any court/settlement changes.
  4. Apply FTC Act and Hatch-Waxman rules that can affect timing.

Strength-specific implication

Settlement terms can delay specific strengths if the generic’s manufacturing design does not support certain dose presentations, but this is less common than product-level timing. For Adderall XR 30 mg, the forecast sensitivity is primarily whether a generic can launch the full strength portfolio on the same effective date.


How do paragraph IV challenges and patent litigation affect Adderall XR 30 mg generic entry risk?

Featured answer. The competitive risk for Adderall XR 30 mg is dominated by ANDA paragraph IV litigation over listed patents covering the XR formulation and/or manufacturing process. Successful generic challenges or settlement-driven carve-outs can compress brand pricing and reduce persistence.

What litigation signals drive forecast probability

  • Court rulings on validity or non-infringement
  • Claims construction affecting whether the generic’s process meets the brand patent
  • Settlement agreements that specify:
    • permitted launch date,
    • strength carve-outs,
    • exclusivity or revenue-sharing arrangements,
    • supply obligations and transition periods.

Commercial translation

If multiple ANDAs are ready to launch, the brand typically faces:

  • faster price erosion,
  • formulary downgrades,
  • increased prior authorization and quantity limits,
  • pharmacy switching once gap coverage is available.

What is the Orange Book status of Adderall XR and how many patents cover it?

Featured answer. The Orange Book lists patents for Adderall XR that include drug substance/drug product/method-of-use categories. The number of listed patents and which expire last governs the effective exclusivity corridor.

What matters for investors

  • Patent count alone is less informative than:
    • the controlling set expiring last,
    • whether the listed patents are in force or appear to have been bypassed by settlement,
    • whether the brand has recently added patents through lifecycle amendments.

What formulations and dosage forms are protected for Adderall XR (strength and release profile)?

Featured answer. Protection for Adderall XR generally maps to the extended-release capsule technology and its manufacturing. The 30 mg strength is protected through product labeling and manufacturing, not by a separate “30 mg-only” patent stack.

Strength mapping approach

Forecasts typically apply:

  • brand mix curves by strength over the year,
  • dosing behavior shifts after generic entry,
  • substitution dynamics between XR strengths.

How does Adderall XR compare with competing amphetamine XR products and methylphenidate XR?

Featured answer. In real-world ADHD treatment, Adderall XR competes with other stimulant XR formulations including other amphetamine XR products and methylphenidate XR options. Generic erosion patterns differ by active ingredient and by the maturity of each brand’s patent estate.

Competitive comparison dimensions

  • FDA label coverage scope (pediatric vs adult emphasis)
  • perceived tolerability and titration ease
  • payer formulary positioning
  • availability and drug shortage history
  • generic entry timing and settlement pace

What generic entry risks exist for Adderall XR 30 mg and what launch scenarios are realistic?

Featured answer. Generic entry is primarily an ANDA story where the launch date is set by the last controlling patent and any settlement terms. Strength-level launch is expected unless carve-outs apply.

Launch scenario framework used in revenue models

  • Base case: delayed entry until the post-stay/settlement or latest-expiring patent window.
  • Upside for brand: delayed or blocked launch due to patent success or settlement extension.
  • Downside: earlier-than-expected launch if controlling patents are invalidated or settlements compress the corridor.

What to model post-launch

  • time-to-substitution (weeks to months),
  • pharmacy fill behavior,
  • rebate and net price compression,
  • patient persistence and switch rates.

What FDA status updates affect Adderall XR supply, labeling, and commercial continuity?

Featured answer. For Adderall XR, FDA-impacting events that matter commercially are:

  • manufacturing site approvals and compliance actions,
  • FDA inspections affecting supply continuity,
  • label updates tied to safety communications,
  • changes in REMS-like programs (if applicable) or controlled substance handling that affects distribution.

Regulatory milestones to monitor

  • new manufacturing approvals,
  • supplier quality updates,
  • adverse event safety communications (class-level),
  • controlled substance compliance and distribution changes.

How do settlement agreements and licensing deals change the forecast?

Featured answer. Settlement agreements are the main mechanism by which generic entry timing changes. They can move launch dates by years or allow earlier strength launches while keeping other strengths delayed.

Commercial effects

  • brand pricing pressure timing,
  • pharmacy switching ramp,
  • payer formulary updates and rebate changes,
  • margin pressure and marketing spend increases by remaining branded competitors.

Revenue exposure: what percentage of Adderall XR sales is sensitive to the 30 mg strength?

Featured answer. Strength mix sensitivity is usually moderate at the product level but can be high at the tablet/capsule unit economics level. The 30 mg strength tends to sit in maintenance and higher-dose regimens after titration, which makes it sensitive to prescriber continuity and payer dose limits.

Modeling approach

  • apply strength-mix share of units,
  • apply net price per strength,
  • simulate substitution after generic entry by strength.

What is the most likely 2026–2035 commercial trajectory for Adderall XR (30 mg)?

Featured answer. The 2026–2035 path is driven by the timing of generic launches and the extent of net price erosion after entry. If the branded patent fence remains intact through the end of the decade, Adderall XR maintains premium pricing and persistence. If multiple ANDA launches occur earlier, brand volumes shift and net price erodes faster.

Projection structure (what typically drives the curve)

  1. Pre-generic corridor: stable or slow decline due to normal erosion, plus pediatric/adult growth.
  2. Generic entry inflection: sharp net price compression and volume substitution.
  3. Post-entry equilibrium: stabilization at a lower net price with intermittent shortages or supply constraints.

Key timelines investors should map for Adderall XR 30 mg

Lifecycle and exclusivity timeline (forecast template)

  • Patent controlling expiration: determine latest expiration among Orange Book-listed patents.
  • 30-month stay triggers: map from earliest paragraph IV ANDA filing.
  • Settlement override: identify if a settlement sets a specific launch date.
  • Post-entry substitution curve: estimate ramp based on pharmacy switching and rebate structure.

(A complete dated timeline requires Orange Book and litigation docket extraction specific to Adderall XR, which is not provided in the prompt.)


Key Takeaways

  • Adderall XR 30 mg is a strength within a mature branded extended-release mixed amphetamine salts franchise; “clinical trial updates” are secondary to IP and regulatory lifecycle events.
  • The commercial outcome is dominated by ANDA paragraph IV outcomes, settlements, and controlling Orange Book patents rather than strength-specific clinical studies.
  • The 2026–2035 revenue trajectory hinges on whether generic launches occur and how quickly payers and pharmacies shift substitution after entry.

FAQs

  1. How do ANDA paragraph IV settlements usually affect the timing of generic Adderall XR launch?
  2. Which Orange Book “drug product” patents tend to be the controlling barriers for extended-release stimulant capsules?
  3. Do generic entrants often launch all Adderall XR strengths on day one, including 30 mg?
  4. What postmarketing safety monitoring trends most influence clinician prescribing for amphetamine XR?
  5. How does stimulant class switching (amphetamine XR to methylphenidate XR) alter branded Adderall XR net revenue after generic entry?

References

  1. FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Hatch-Waxman). U.S. Congress.
  3. U.S. FDA Controlled Substances Act and related regulations for prescription stimulants. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.