Last Updated: September 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ADDERALL XR 20


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for ADDERALL XR 20

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT00746733 ↗ Vyvanse and Adderall XR Given Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC Completed Shire Phase 1 2008-09-08 The purpose of this study is to determine if taking Vyvanse with Prilosec OTC or Adderall XR with Prilosec OTC changes how quickly the drug is absorbed into the body and/or changes how much of the drug is absorbed into the body.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for ADDERALL XR 20

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00069927 ↗ Adderall XR Compared With Concerta in Treating Young Cancer Patients With Memory, Attention, and Depression Terminated National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2003-08-01 RATIONALE: Stimulant drugs such as dextroamphetamine-amphetamine and methylphenidate may help improve memory, attention, and thinking problems caused by central nervous system (CNS) treatment for cancer, and may help decrease depression. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying dextroamphetamine-amphetamine to see how well it works compared to methylphenidate in treating depression and problems with memory, attention, and thinking in children who have undergone CNS treatment for cancer. This trial will also study how often depression is seen and if these medications might help.
NCT00069927 ↗ Adderall XR Compared With Concerta in Treating Young Cancer Patients With Memory, Attention, and Depression Terminated University of South Florida Phase 2 2003-08-01 RATIONALE: Stimulant drugs such as dextroamphetamine-amphetamine and methylphenidate may help improve memory, attention, and thinking problems caused by central nervous system (CNS) treatment for cancer, and may help decrease depression. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying dextroamphetamine-amphetamine to see how well it works compared to methylphenidate in treating depression and problems with memory, attention, and thinking in children who have undergone CNS treatment for cancer. This trial will also study how often depression is seen and if these medications might help.
NCT00247572 ↗ Safety, Tolerability and Abuse Liability Study of Intravenous NRP104 in Adults With Stimulant Abuse Histories Completed New River Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 2005-09-01 This research is being done to evaluate if NRP 104 is a safe drug. The other purpose is to learn if NRP104, when injected into a vein, produces a high and any other effects like amphetamine and other stimulant drugs that are abused. This information will give some indication if NRP104 can be abused. Healthy people, between the ages of 18 and 55 with histories of substance abuse that include stimulant drugs, may join. Amphetamines are drugs that are used most often to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, to treat narcolepsy (excessive sleepiness) and for weight loss.
NCT00248092 ↗ Study to Evaluate the Likeability, Safety, and Abuse Potential of NRP 104 in Adults With Histories of Stimulant Abuse Completed New River Pharmaceuticals Phase 1/Phase 2 2006-01-01 This research is being done to evaluate if NRP104 is a safe drug. The other purpose is to learn if NRP104 produces a high and any other effects like amphetamine and other stimulant drugs that are abused. This information will give some indication if NRP104 can be abused. NRP104 is an investigational drug. This means that it has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Healthy people, between the ages of 18 and 55 with histories of substance abuse that include stimulant drugs, may join. Amphetamines are drugs that are used most often to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, to treat narcolepsy (excessive sleepiness) and for weight loss.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ADDERALL XR 20

Condition Name

Condition Name for ADDERALL XR 20
Intervention Trials
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 10
Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity 6
ADHD 3
Cocaine Dependence 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ADDERALL XR 20
Intervention Trials
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity 23
Hyperkinesis 16
Disease 8
Depression 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ADDERALL XR 20

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ADDERALL XR 20
Location Trials
United States 39
Canada 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ADDERALL XR 20
Location Trials
New York 9
Massachusetts 7
Georgia 2
Florida 2
Alabama 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ADDERALL XR 20

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ADDERALL XR 20
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 13
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ADDERALL XR 20
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 21
Recruiting 7
Terminated 4
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ADDERALL XR 20

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ADDERALL XR 20
Sponsor Trials
Shire 7
New York State Psychiatric Institute 5
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 5
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ADDERALL XR 20
Sponsor Trials
Other 45
Industry 13
NIH 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Adderall XR 20 mg Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Revenue Projection (2026–2035)

Last updated: July 28, 2026

Adderall XR 20 mg is a long-established branded extended-release mixed amphetamine salts product with no active “new-drug” pivotal program driving label expansion in recent years. Market drivers are instead tied to ADHD diagnosis rates, stimulant prescribing norms, payer formulary access, and generic or authorized generic pressure in the US. Revenue outlook through 2035 is therefore primarily a function of generic penetration and price compression, not incremental clinical efficacy.

Which clinical trials still matter for Adderall XR 20 mg in ADHD—and what do they update?

Answer: There is no recent, publicly dominant Adderall XR 20 mg-specific late-stage trial redefining efficacy. The most relevant “updates” are postmarketing safety monitoring, label maintenance, and any incremental evidence that supports interchangeability of extended-release mixed amphetamine salts across pediatric and adult ADHD populations.

What endpoints are typically updated for Adderall XR in real-world and post-approval monitoring?

For stimulant ADHD products, the recurring evidence themes that maintain prescribing confidence are:

  • Cardiovascular monitoring practices (heart rate, blood pressure, syncope risk)
  • Growth effects in pediatric patients (weight and height velocity trends)
  • Sleep and appetite tolerability patterns
  • Abuse and diversion risk mitigation messaging and REMS-adjacent labeling practices (where applicable)
  • Compliance and exposure profiles for extended-release formulations

Does “20 mg” change the clinical story versus other XR strengths?

Answer: Strength changes dose titration and exposure, not the fundamental clinical evidence base. Mixed amphetamine salts XR products generally rely on pharmacokinetic bridging and established ADHD efficacy datasets rather than separate efficacy trials for each strength.

What trial data do payers and prescribers actually use for Adderall XR 20 mg switching?

Practically, clinicians use:

  • Comparative tolerance observations within the XR class (same active moiety family)
  • Days-to-dose-stability from titration protocols
  • Formulary preference among equivalent IR and XR amphetamine salts
  • Pharmacy availability and generic manufacturing consistency

What patents protect Adderall XR 20 mg, and how much exclusivity is left?

Answer: The original Adderall (IR) and Adderall XR (XR) drug products are off primary composition exclusivity; the US market is supplied primarily by authorized generics and multiple generic entrants. The practical IP focus is therefore on residual, formulation and manufacturing patents (if any still in force by claim), plus method-of-use and life-cycle patents that can delay specific generic pathways.

How should you think about patent estate risk for “Adderall XR 20”

  • If a generic is already launched with acceptable bioequivalence, the remaining risk to brand revenue shifts to price and channel competition rather than “hard” exclusivity blocks.
  • If additional generic applicants pursue 505(b)(2) or ANDA routes with specific labeling or process changes, the risk becomes claim-specific and tied to those filings and any Orange Book-listed patents.

Orange Book strategy for an investor view

For a brand with broad generic availability, revenue is typically driven by:

  • The number of AB-rated products on the label strength (including 20 mg)
  • Authorized generic supply decisions
  • Payer contracting mechanics (rebate competitiveness, net price erosion)

What is the Orange Book status of Adderall XR 20 mg—and what does it imply for generics?

Answer: Adderall XR is widely available in generic form in the US; the Orange Book for the specific strength reflects ongoing patent listings, but market reality is dominated by generic competition rather than exclusivity scarcity.

What generic entry risks exist for Adderall XR 20?

Answer: Risk is ongoing at the “net price” level. Even if incremental legal barriers remain for specific applicants, multiple suppliers already exist, which keeps substitution pressure high.

What would a new Paragraph IV scenario look like now?

For an established product, the newest legal risk usually comes from:

  • Patent carve-outs tied to specific manufacturing processes, coating technologies, or release profiles
  • Labeling-specific carve-outs (age groups, titration language) that can affect AB ratings
  • Any attempt to block a particular ANDA applicant rather than brand-wide launch prevention

How does Adderall XR 20 mg compare with IR amphetamine salts and other XR stimulants?

Answer: Adderall XR is one of the core extended-release stimulant options for ADHD. Compared with IR mixed amphetamine salts, XR reduces dosing frequency and can improve adherence, but it does not eliminate substitution pressure from other stimulant classes (e.g., methylphenidate XR products and prodrug systems such as lisdexamfetamine).

Comparative market mechanics that affect brand net revenue

  • Pharmacy stocking and substitution policies: XR is often interchangeable by therapeutic substitution rules within stimulant schedules.
  • Formulary tiers: rebates can shift high-volume usage from one XR brand to another or to generics.
  • Patient history: some patients “stay” on a stable XR product due to tolerability and perceived efficacy, while others switch with insurance changes.

What is the US market size for Adderall XR, and where does 20 mg fit?

Answer: Adderall XR sits within the broader US ADHD stimulant market, where the majority share is held by generic products or authorized generics. Strength-level granularity (like 20 mg) matters for forecasting but does not typically drive strategic decisions unless you are evaluating a specific contract or distribution bottleneck.

How to forecast strength-level share without a separate “20 mg” revenue engine

Strength mix is driven by:

  • Common titration endpoints in pediatric and adult practice
  • Prescriber dose stabilization patterns
  • Payer step edits and prior authorization thresholds that can channel patients toward particular strengths

How do clinical and regulatory signals affect prescribing of Adderall XR 20 mg?

Answer: Current regulatory signals for established stimulants tend to affect risk communication rather than efficacy adoption. Prescribing is primarily driven by safety perceptions, availability, and coverage.

FDA pathway relevance: why it still matters for an “old” drug

Even with longstanding clinical use, the FDA’s ongoing oversight influences:

  • Label updates related to cardiovascular warning language
  • Pediatric labeling maintenance updates
  • Postmarketing adverse event trend interpretation

Revenue projection: what growth or decline is most likely for Adderall XR 20 mg through 2035?

Answer: Expect a slow, structurally negative trajectory in net brand revenue through 2035 driven by persistent generic competition and continued price compression. Any absolute growth would likely come from overall ADHD stimulant demand growth, offset by declining net pricing and share erosion.

Projection framework (what drives the curve)

  1. Unit demand: ADHD diagnosis rates and adult ADHD recognition
  2. Net price: rebate pressure and competitive pricing from generics
  3. Share: substitution from competing stimulant products and within-class XR alternatives
  4. Supply stability: manufacturing capacity and disruptions can create temporary price spikes, but these are episodic

Market scenario ranges (US, brand-level economics)

Because Adderall XR is already heavily exposed to generics, the plausible outcomes are:

  • Base case: modest decline in net revenue after factoring in demand growth
  • Downside: accelerated rebate pressure if additional supply and aggressive contracting expands
  • Upside: temporary stabilization from contracting advantages or supply constraints, followed by normalization

What competitive landscape changes could alter Adderall XR 20 mg demand?

Answer: The largest structural changes are not new clinical trials but payer contracting shifts, manufacturing consolidation, and new entrants’ ability to offer aggressive pricing.

Key competitive vectors

  • Generic manufacturing expansions that increase rebate leverage for payers
  • Formulary shifts among XR stimulants
  • Substitution effects from non-amphetamine ADHD therapies (historically smaller, but can influence share at the margin)

What manufacturing and supply risks matter for Adderall XR 20?

Answer: For mature generics and brands, supply risk is a recurring driver of short-term net price volatility. Long-run projections assume normalization, but forecasting models should include contingency for episodic shortages.

How supply issues propagate into revenue

  • Shortages increase patient switching to whatever is available, including competing generics
  • Backorders can cause near-term lost script volume
  • Competitive rebalancing can permanently shift prescriber behavior even after supply recovers

Key Takeaways

  • Adderall XR 20 mg does not have a recent, strength-specific late-stage clinical trial narrative that is likely to change efficacy perception; the evidence is established and maintained via postmarketing oversight.
  • The near-to-mid-term business outlook is driven primarily by generic and authorized-generic competition, payer contracting, and supply stability, not new clinical endpoints.
  • Through 2035, brand-level net revenue is structurally pressured by price compression and substitution, with upside limited to demand growth or temporary supply/contract advantages.

FAQs

1) Is Adderall XR 20 mg still widely available in generic form in the US?
Yes. The US stimulant market for mixed amphetamine salts XR is supplied predominantly by generics/authorized generics, which limits brand net pricing power.

2) Do clinical trials for ADHD stimulants include separate data for each Adderall XR strength?
Typically, evidence supports the XR platform, with dose strength differences handled via titration and exposure considerations rather than separate pivotal efficacy trials per strength.

3) What matters most for payers when deciding coverage for Adderall XR 20 mg?
Net cost after rebates, AB-rated generic alternatives on the same strength, and pharmacy substitution rules.

4) How do shortages of Adderall XR affect long-term prescribing?
They can shift patients to alternative XR products or strengths; even after recovery, some of that switching can persist through formulary and prescriber inertia.

5) What are the biggest threats to brand revenue for Adderall XR in 2026–2030?
Ongoing rebate-driven price compression, sustained generic competition, and competitive contracting shifts among XR stimulant products.

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Approval Package and labeling resources for Adderall XR and related mixed amphetamine salts products. FDA website.
  2. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. FDA website.
  3. FDA. Postmarketing safety reporting and labeling updates for stimulant ADHD products. FDA website.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.