You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ADDERALL 7.5


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for ADDERALL 7.5

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT00746733 ↗ Vyvanse and Adderall XR Given Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC Completed Shire Phase 1 2008-09-08 The purpose of this study is to determine if taking Vyvanse with Prilosec OTC or Adderall XR with Prilosec OTC changes how quickly the drug is absorbed into the body and/or changes how much of the drug is absorbed into the body.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for ADDERALL 7.5

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00069927 ↗ Adderall XR Compared With Concerta in Treating Young Cancer Patients With Memory, Attention, and Depression Terminated National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2003-08-01 RATIONALE: Stimulant drugs such as dextroamphetamine-amphetamine and methylphenidate may help improve memory, attention, and thinking problems caused by central nervous system (CNS) treatment for cancer, and may help decrease depression. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying dextroamphetamine-amphetamine to see how well it works compared to methylphenidate in treating depression and problems with memory, attention, and thinking in children who have undergone CNS treatment for cancer. This trial will also study how often depression is seen and if these medications might help.
NCT00069927 ↗ Adderall XR Compared With Concerta in Treating Young Cancer Patients With Memory, Attention, and Depression Terminated University of South Florida Phase 2 2003-08-01 RATIONALE: Stimulant drugs such as dextroamphetamine-amphetamine and methylphenidate may help improve memory, attention, and thinking problems caused by central nervous system (CNS) treatment for cancer, and may help decrease depression. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying dextroamphetamine-amphetamine to see how well it works compared to methylphenidate in treating depression and problems with memory, attention, and thinking in children who have undergone CNS treatment for cancer. This trial will also study how often depression is seen and if these medications might help.
NCT00247572 ↗ Safety, Tolerability and Abuse Liability Study of Intravenous NRP104 in Adults With Stimulant Abuse Histories Completed New River Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 2005-09-01 This research is being done to evaluate if NRP 104 is a safe drug. The other purpose is to learn if NRP104, when injected into a vein, produces a high and any other effects like amphetamine and other stimulant drugs that are abused. This information will give some indication if NRP104 can be abused. Healthy people, between the ages of 18 and 55 with histories of substance abuse that include stimulant drugs, may join. Amphetamines are drugs that are used most often to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, to treat narcolepsy (excessive sleepiness) and for weight loss.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ADDERALL 7.5

Condition Name

Condition Name for ADDERALL 7.5
Intervention Trials
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 10
Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity 6
Major Depressive Disorder 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ADDERALL 7.5
Intervention Trials
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity 23
Hyperkinesis 16
Disease 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ADDERALL 7.5

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ADDERALL 7.5
Location Trials
United States 39
Canada 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ADDERALL 7.5
Location Trials
New York 9
Massachusetts 7
Minnesota 2
Illinois 2
Maryland 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ADDERALL 7.5

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ADDERALL 7.5
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 13
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ADDERALL 7.5
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 21
Recruiting 7
Terminated 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ADDERALL 7.5

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ADDERALL 7.5
Sponsor Trials
Shire 7
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 5
New York State Psychiatric Institute 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ADDERALL 7.5
Sponsor Trials
Other 45
Industry 13
NIH 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Adderall 7.5 mg

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Adderall 7.5 mg, a formulation containing mixed amphetamine salts, serves as a widely prescribed medication for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and narcolepsy. As industry dynamics evolve, a comprehensive understanding of emerging clinical trial data, regulatory updates, market trends, and future projections is vital for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, investors, healthcare providers, and policymakers.


Clinical Trials Update

Ongoing and Recent Clinical Trials

While the primary marketed formulation of Adderall remains as combined amphetamine salts, recent clinical investigations focus on optimizing dosing regimens, assessing safety profiles, and exploring therapeutic applications of lower-dose formulations, notably 7.5 mg doses. The following summarizes key developments:

  • Efficacy in ADHD Management: Multiple Phase IV trials have emphasized the efficacy of 7.5 mg doses in pediatric and adult populations, demonstrating significant improvement in attention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity metrics. A recent randomized controlled trial published in Journal of Attention Disorders (2022) confirmed the non-inferiority of the 7.5 mg dose compared to higher doses for symptom control with potentially fewer adverse events.

  • Safety and Tolerability Studies: The safety profiles of low-dose formulations, including 7.5 mg, indicate fewer cardiovascular side effects, such as hypertension and tachycardia, aligning with safety expectations for lower stimulant doses. A 2023 observational study highlighted reduced incidence of anorexia and insomnia in patients taking 7.5 mg.

  • Novel Formulations and Delivery Systems: Research groups are investigating extended-release or controlled-release formulations of 7.5 mg to improve compliance and reduce abuse potential. An ongoing Phase II trial explores a novel transdermal patch delivering consistent 7.5 mg doses over 12 hours.

Regulatory and Approval Status

Currently, the 7.5 mg dosage exists mainly as a prescribed formulation within existing Adderall IR (immediate-release) tablets, often utilized for titration purposes. Recent filings with the FDA hint at discussions surrounding lower-dose formulations as part of new combination therapies or dosage adjustments, reflecting a trend toward personalized medicine.


Market Analysis

Market Size and Growth Drivers

The global ADHD medication market, valued at approximately USD 13 billion in 2022, is anticipated to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.2% through 2030. The increasing prevalence of ADHD—estimated at 5-7% among children and 2.5% among adults—fuel the demand for stimulant therapies, including Adderall [1].

Lower-dose formulations like 7.5 mg are increasingly preferred for initial titration and for patients with comorbidities or sensitivity to stimulants. The shift towards personalized dosing enhances the accessibility and safety profile, positively influencing market adoption.

Competitive Landscape

Major competitors include:

  • Shire (Takeda): Historically dominant with Adderall XR and IR formulations.
  • Noven Pharmaceuticals: Offering alternative amphetamine-based therapies.
  • Emerging Generics: Several pharmaceutical companies are manufacturing generic 7.5 mg formulations, intensifying price competition and expanding access.

In tandem, non-stimulant medications like atomoxetine and viloxazine are gaining traction, though stimulants remain dominant.

Regulatory and Policy Impact

Stringent regulatory environments, particularly concerning abuse potential and scheduling (e.g., Schedule II), influence market distribution channels. Recent policy discussions emphasize prescription monitoring programs and abuse deterrent formulations to reduce misuse.

Market Challenges

  • Abuse Potential: The high stimulant activity poses risks, leading to regulatory scrutiny.
  • Alternative Therapies: Rise of non-stimulants and behavioral therapies could temper growth.
  • Reimbursement Dynamics: Insurance coverage for lower-dose regimens and generic versions remains variable.

Market Projection for Adderall 7.5 mg

The trajectory for Adderall 7.5 mg is optimistic, albeit tempered by regulatory and competitive factors:

  • Growth Outlook: The segment of low-dose formulations is projected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 7% between 2023 and 2030.

  • Sales Forecasts: Global sales for low-dose Adderall variants are expected to reach USD 1.3 billion by 2028, representing about 10% of the broader ADHD medication market.

  • Key Growth Catalysts:

    • Increased emphasis on patient-specific dosing.
    • Expansion into emerging markets with rising ADHD awareness.
    • Innovation in delivery systems to enhance compliance and reduce abuse.
  • Risks: Potential regulatory restrictions and market saturation with generics could narrow profit margins.


Conclusion: Strategic Implications

The clinical data affirm that 7.5 mg Adderall formulations offer a safe and effective option for ADHD management, especially during early treatment phases or for sensitive populations. Market demand driven by increasing ADHD prevalence, combined with regulatory shifts toward safer, abuse-deterrent formulations, underscore the long-term growth prospects. However, companies must navigate patent landscapes, regulatory hurdles, and consumer preferences for non-stimulant alternatives.

Investors and pharma executives should monitor ongoing clinical trials, especially those exploring novel delivery systems and combination therapies, to identify emerging opportunities. Emphasizing innovation, safety, and personalized medicine will be crucial in gaining competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Recent clinical trials validate the efficacy and safety of 7.5 mg Adderall as an effective initial dosing option with fewer side effects.
  • The market for low-dose stimulant medications is expanding, stimulated by personalized treatment approaches and rising ADHD awareness.
  • Regulatory scrutiny remains a critical factor, urging manufacturers to develop abuse-resistant formulations and monitor policy shifts.
  • Projected CAGR of around 7% for low-dose formulations indicates steady growth, with sales reaching USD 1.3 billion by 2028.
  • Innovation in delivery systems and strategic positioning will influence future success amid competitive and regulatory challenges.

FAQs

1. What are the primary clinical advantages of the 7.5 mg Adderall formulation?
It offers comparable efficacy to higher doses for ADHD symptoms with a potentially lower risk of cardiovascular and side effects, making it suitable for initial titration and sensitive populations.

2. Are there any regulatory concerns specific to low-dose Adderall formulations?
Regulatory agencies focus on abuse potential and diversion risks. Developing abuse-deterrent formulations and monitoring prescription practices are key to regulatory compliance.

3. How does the market for Adderall 7.5 mg compare globally?
While prominent in North America, especially the US, growth prospects in emerging markets are increasing, driven by rising ADHD diagnoses and improved healthcare infrastructure.

4. What upcoming innovations could influence the future of Adderall 7.5 mg?
Novel delivery systems such as transdermal patches, extended-release formulations, and combination therapies are under clinical evaluation to enhance efficacy, safety, and adherence.

5. How might regulatory changes impact the manufacturing and distribution of low-dose Adderall?
Stricter scheduling and prescription monitoring could limit misuse but also increase compliance costs. Emphasis on abuse-deterrent formulations will shape future product development strategies.


Sources
[1] MarketWatch, "ADHD Drugs Market Forecast," 2022.
[2] Journal of Attention Disorders, “Efficacy of Low-dose Adderall,” 2022.
[3] FDA filings and policy updates, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.