Last Updated: November 5, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ADDERALL 10


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for ADDERALL 10

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT00746733 ↗ Vyvanse and Adderall XR Given Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC Completed Shire Phase 1 2008-09-08 The purpose of this study is to determine if taking Vyvanse with Prilosec OTC or Adderall XR with Prilosec OTC changes how quickly the drug is absorbed into the body and/or changes how much of the drug is absorbed into the body.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for ADDERALL 10

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00069927 ↗ Adderall XR Compared With Concerta in Treating Young Cancer Patients With Memory, Attention, and Depression Terminated National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2003-08-01 RATIONALE: Stimulant drugs such as dextroamphetamine-amphetamine and methylphenidate may help improve memory, attention, and thinking problems caused by central nervous system (CNS) treatment for cancer, and may help decrease depression. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying dextroamphetamine-amphetamine to see how well it works compared to methylphenidate in treating depression and problems with memory, attention, and thinking in children who have undergone CNS treatment for cancer. This trial will also study how often depression is seen and if these medications might help.
NCT00069927 ↗ Adderall XR Compared With Concerta in Treating Young Cancer Patients With Memory, Attention, and Depression Terminated University of South Florida Phase 2 2003-08-01 RATIONALE: Stimulant drugs such as dextroamphetamine-amphetamine and methylphenidate may help improve memory, attention, and thinking problems caused by central nervous system (CNS) treatment for cancer, and may help decrease depression. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying dextroamphetamine-amphetamine to see how well it works compared to methylphenidate in treating depression and problems with memory, attention, and thinking in children who have undergone CNS treatment for cancer. This trial will also study how often depression is seen and if these medications might help.
NCT00247572 ↗ Safety, Tolerability and Abuse Liability Study of Intravenous NRP104 in Adults With Stimulant Abuse Histories Completed New River Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 2005-09-01 This research is being done to evaluate if NRP 104 is a safe drug. The other purpose is to learn if NRP104, when injected into a vein, produces a high and any other effects like amphetamine and other stimulant drugs that are abused. This information will give some indication if NRP104 can be abused. Healthy people, between the ages of 18 and 55 with histories of substance abuse that include stimulant drugs, may join. Amphetamines are drugs that are used most often to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, to treat narcolepsy (excessive sleepiness) and for weight loss.
NCT00248092 ↗ Study to Evaluate the Likeability, Safety, and Abuse Potential of NRP 104 in Adults With Histories of Stimulant Abuse Completed New River Pharmaceuticals Phase 1/Phase 2 2006-01-01 This research is being done to evaluate if NRP104 is a safe drug. The other purpose is to learn if NRP104 produces a high and any other effects like amphetamine and other stimulant drugs that are abused. This information will give some indication if NRP104 can be abused. NRP104 is an investigational drug. This means that it has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Healthy people, between the ages of 18 and 55 with histories of substance abuse that include stimulant drugs, may join. Amphetamines are drugs that are used most often to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, to treat narcolepsy (excessive sleepiness) and for weight loss.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ADDERALL 10

Condition Name

Condition Name for ADDERALL 10
Intervention Trials
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 10
Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity 6
Major Depressive Disorder 3
ADHD 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ADDERALL 10
Intervention Trials
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity 23
Hyperkinesis 16
Disease 8
Depressive Disorder 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ADDERALL 10

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ADDERALL 10
Location Trials
United States 39
Canada 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ADDERALL 10
Location Trials
New York 9
Massachusetts 7
Pennsylvania 2
Minnesota 2
Illinois 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ADDERALL 10

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ADDERALL 10
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 13
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ADDERALL 10
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 21
Recruiting 7
Terminated 4
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ADDERALL 10

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ADDERALL 10
Sponsor Trials
Shire 7
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 5
New York State Psychiatric Institute 5
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ADDERALL 10
Sponsor Trials
Other 45
Industry 13
NIH 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 28, 2026

Adderall 10 (mixed amphetamine salts) clinical trials update, market analysis, and launch-projection

Executive summary: Adderall 10 mg (mixed amphetamine salts immediate-release, “Adderall” brand) faces near-term supply and pricing pressure from ongoing generic availability, while branded revenue growth is limited by mature market penetration. Clinical-trial activity is mostly incremental (reformulation, abuse-deterrent or alternative delivery, pediatric/label-expansion studies) rather than a new pivotal new-drug program. Commercial projections depend primarily on (1) continued generic share stability, (2) Adderall pricing actions in response to payer pressure, (3) seasonal and ADHD prevalence trends, and (4) any FDA/therapeutic-class policy shifts affecting stimulant prescribing and shortages.


What is Adderall 10 and what is its current FDA status (Orange Book and labeling)?

Adderall 10 refers to the 10 mg strength of mixed amphetamine salts immediate-release tablets (amphetamine mixture salts). The product is marketed for ADHD and narcolepsy. The immediate-release tablet is typically used for ADHD titration and daily symptom control.

How does FDA labeling define Adderall 10 use

  • Indications: ADHD (pediatric and adult subsets depending on label), and narcolepsy.
  • Dosing model: titration based on response and tolerability; immediate-release schedules vary by prescriber and age.
  • Safety constraints shaping commercial use: stimulant cardiovascular monitoring, risk mitigation around misuse, and monitoring for psychiatric adverse reactions.

What does “Orange Book status” typically look like for Adderall branded strengths

For mature stimulants like Adderall, the branded product is usually listed with:

  • Drug substance and drug product patents (some expired; some may remain for specific formulations/manufacturing)
  • Exclusivity entries (often expired after initial approvals)
  • Multiple generic MAAs and ANDAs for immediate-release mixed amphetamine salts tablets

Practical implication: commercial dynamics are driven more by generic competition and supply than by a protected branded mechanism of action.


Which clinical trials are updating the Adderall 10 landscape right now?

Featured snippet answer: Recent activity around Adderall tends to cluster in incremental clinical studies (bioavailability, switching, pediatric support, and formulation performance) rather than a replacement for mixed amphetamine salts. Trial updates largely affect trial readiness for labeling changes and market share stability through supply and product performance.

What trial categories matter for Adderall immediate-release

  1. Bioequivalence and switching studies

    • Often include adult ADHD cohorts and sometimes pediatric subgroups.
    • Used to support manufacturing changes, new strengths, or consistent performance across sites.
  2. Pediatric or dosing-titration studies

    • ADHD labeling maintenance and refinement.
    • Focus on growth parameters, tolerability, and adherence to dosing schedules.
  3. Abuse-deterrent or misuse-relevant designs

    • For stimulants, developers commonly pursue properties that reduce the impact of crushing or alternative routes of administration.
    • Mixed amphetamine salts immediate-release has historically faced fewer “abuse-deterrent” redesigns than newer stimulant delivery systems, so trial presence is usually opportunistic and incremental.
  4. Comparative effectiveness

    • Head-to-head designs versus other immediate-release stimulants, or versus extended-release stimulant comparators.
    • These studies influence payer preference and formulary positioning more than they change brand approval status.

How to interpret “clinical trials update” for a mature brand

A clinical-trials update for Adderall 10 usually signals one of these:

  • a manufacturer is maintaining regulatory compliance for product performance,
  • a label support study is being run for a specific subgroup,
  • or a lifecycle/formulation modification is moving through development.

Business takeaway: If trials are mainly bioequivalence and lifecycle maintenance, market share impact comes through availability and contracting more than from new clinical differentiation.


How does Adderall 10 market performance compare with other ADHD stimulant brands and generics?

Featured snippet answer: Adderall 10 is competing in a category where generics of mixed amphetamine salts are the default choice for many payers. Brand advantage is mainly managed through contracting, rebates, and supply reliability rather than protected exclusivity.

Competitive set for ADHD immediate-release stimulants

  • Brand comparators: other ADHD stimulants (including methylphenidate-based products and extended-release stimulant brands).
  • Generic competitors: generic mixed amphetamine salts immediate-release tablets.
  • Payer switching pattern: many plans prefer generics for cost control and place branded Adderall mainly on PA (prior authorization) or higher tier co-pays unless contracted.

Key competitive levers

  • Net price and rebate structures
  • Formulary placement
  • Shortage risk management
  • Titration flexibility and dose availability
  • Manufacturing continuity for immediate-release tablet supply

When does Adderall lose exclusivity and what does that mean for Adderall 10 revenue?

Featured snippet answer: For a long-established product like Adderall, most core exclusivities for initial approval and many primary patents are already expired in practice. Any remaining patent or exclusivity impact is typically limited to specific manufacturing methods, formulations, or product line details, so revenue risk is dominated by generic competition rather than a single blockbuster exclusivity cliff.

Revenue timeline logic used in projections

  • Base: persistent generic presence across strengths
  • Layer 1 risk: branded contract repricing due to generic price benchmarking
  • Layer 2 risk: supply interruptions that can temporarily shift demand back to brands
  • Layer 3 upside: payer exceptions, PA denials, or brand-preferred continuity during shortages

What patents protect Adderall 10 (mixed amphetamine salts immediate-release) and how strong is the estate?

Featured snippet answer: The effective patent “shield” for Adderall 10 in many markets is limited because the active ingredient class is established and multiple generic ANDAs exist. Patent estates, when remaining, usually relate to product-specific lifecycle changes rather than the fundamental active ingredient.

Patent estate structure typically seen for mature Adderall

  • Composition-of-matter: often expired
  • Formulation: can include tablet manufacturing or specific compositions
  • Method-of-use: historically used less frequently for stimulants in ways that block generic composition, but can exist for certain dosing approaches
  • Process patents: can affect manufacturing routes and site qualification

How patent strength affects generic entry probability

For immediate-release tablets:

  • Even with some patents, generic entry is often enabled by either licensing or successful paragraph IV positions for relevant claims.
  • Litigation and settlements determine timing, but the category’s economics tend to support earlier generic market penetration.

Are there any Paragraph IV challenges or generic entry risks for Adderall 10?

Featured snippet answer: The principal risk pattern for Adderall 10 is recurring generic ANDA submissions and entry timing shaped by Orange Book claim disputes and manufacturing/site qualification rather than a single pending paragraph IV that controls the category.

What drives entry timing in Adderall immediate-release

  • Approval and labeling for immediate-release mixed amphetamine salts strengths
  • Patent dispute resolution timing
  • Settlement terms that delay or restrict launch
  • FDA manufacturing inspection outcomes impacting readiness

How settlement outcomes usually show up in projections

  • temporary branded price relief during delayed generic entry,
  • then rapid normalization after generic entry widens competition.

What litigation has affected Adderall 10 supply, labeling, or market access?

Featured snippet answer: For mature stimulant brands, litigation and patent disputes typically influence:

  • launch timing of certain generics,
  • product availability if manufacturing sites or distribution are affected,
  • and sometimes payer access via contract adjustments after market events.

Litigation categories relevant to projections

  1. Patent infringement suits vs ANDA filers
  2. ANDA procedural challenges
  3. Settlement-induced launch delays
  4. Product quality or manufacturing-related enforcement

What is the market size for Adderall 10 and how do you project demand?

Featured snippet answer: Demand for Adderall 10 is driven by ADHD diagnosis prevalence, persistence/adherence, and prescribing patterns among neurologists and psychiatrists. Market size is constrained by generic substitution and step therapy in many payer formularies.

Projection model structure (used for commercial forecasting)

  • Diagnosed ADHD population trend
    • patient growth and diagnosis rate
  • Stimulant share
    • proportion of ADHD treated with stimulants vs non-stimulants
  • Immediate-release vs extended-release mix
    • prescriber preference, tolerability, and dosing schedule flexibility
  • Brand vs generic split
    • payer coverage and net price dynamics
  • Strength-level effects
    • 10 mg share within the IR tablet spectrum depends on titration patterns

Sensitivity drivers

  • Generic price benchmarks and rebate pressure
  • Shortage episodes that interrupt supply continuity
  • Regulatory or policy changes impacting controlled substance handling
  • Payer formulary redesigns (step edits, PA requirements)

What supply and manufacturing factors matter most for Adderall 10 pricing and availability?

Featured snippet answer: For immediate-release stimulants, availability is a primary determinant of effective demand. Supply constraints can shift short-term use from generics to brands and change quarterly net revenue patterns.

Manufacturing constraints that affect commercial outcomes

  • Active pharmaceutical ingredient supply continuity
  • Tablet manufacturing yield and site qualification
  • Bulk packaging and distribution capacity
  • Regulatory inspection outcomes
  • Quality events that trigger distribution holds

Why this matters for projections

If supply is constrained, branded Adderall 10 can temporarily outperform expectations even in mature categories. If supply normalizes, generic substitution resumes and branded share erodes.


How does Adderall 10 compare with extended-release ADHD products in growth prospects?

Featured snippet answer: Extended-release ADHD products generally have different growth dynamics because they can offer dosing convenience and may align with payer programs favoring once-daily adherence. Adderall 10’s growth is more limited because immediate-release strengths are vulnerable to generic substitution.

Cross-category substitution

  • Patients sometimes switch between IR and ER due to side effects, adherence, and school schedules.
  • Projections should include a “mix-shift” factor, where ER uptake can dampen IR demand unless IR is preferred for certain titration or breakthrough symptoms.

What commercial scenarios are most likely for Adderall 10 over the next 2–5 years?

Featured snippet answer: The most likely path is continued branded share compression offset by episodic pricing power during supply disruptions and contract exceptions. Upside requires supply stability and payer retention; downside requires intensifying generic pricing plus any branded supply issues.

Scenario framework

  1. Base case (most likely)

    • Generic competition stable; branded net revenue grows low single digits or declines modestly depending on pricing actions.
    • Mix shifts to ER offset some IR weakness.
  2. Upside scenario

    • Brand supply continuity improves; payer contracts retain Adderall on favored tiers.
    • Temporary shortage-driven demand reallocations persist longer than average.
  3. Downside scenario

    • Generic price resets lower net revenue quickly.
    • Any quality-related supply interruptions force demand to return to generics at higher net savings to payers once resolved.

Key Takeaways

  • Adderall 10 sits in a mature ADHD stimulant market where generic competition dominates long-run brand economics.
  • “Clinical trials updates” for Adderall are typically incremental and are more likely to support lifecycle maintenance, labeling support, or performance consistency than to create a new differentiation.
  • Commercial projections hinge on net price and supply reliability rather than exclusivity-driven growth.
  • Near-term upside or downside is most sensitive to manufacturing continuity, generic pricing resets, and payer formulary actions affecting brand coverage.

FAQs

  1. What factors most influence quarterly net sales for Adderall immediate-release strengths like 10 mg?
  2. How often do payers require prior authorization or step therapy for branded Adderall versus generics?
  3. Do shortage events for mixed amphetamine salts typically increase Adderall branded share, and for how long?
  4. What clinical endpoints do lifecycle or bioequivalence studies typically support for stimulant tablet products?
  5. How do ER-to-IR mix shifts affect demand forecasting for Adderall 10 specifically?

References (APA)

  1. FDA. (n.d.). Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Search results for “mixed amphetamine salts” and “Adderall”. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  3. FDA. (n.d.). Drug Approval Reports and Labeling (Drugs@FDA). U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.