You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 28, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ADALAT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ADALAT

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00137501 ↗ Two Dose Regimens of Nifedipine for the Management of Preterm Labor Terminated American University of Beirut Medical Center Phase 3 2003-05-01 Preterm birth is one of the most important causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Prevention and treatment of preterm labor is important, not as an end in itself, but as a means of reducing adverse events for the neonate. A wide range of tocolytics, drugs used to suppress uterine contractions, have been tried. Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) is the most widely used tocolytic at the American University of Beirut Medical Center despite the fact that an effective tocolytic role of MgSO4 has never been established. Moreover, the currently available data are suggestive of deleterious fetal effects of MgSO4 in the setting of preterm labor to the extent that some authorities are recommending abandoning it for routine use as a tocolytic therapy. Calcium channel blockers have the ability to inhibit contractility in smooth muscle cells. Consequently, nifedipine has emerged as an effective and rather safe alternative tocolytic agent for the management of preterm labor after several studies have shown that the use of nifedipine in comparison with other tocolytics is associated with a more frequent successful prolongation of pregnancy, resulting in significantly fewer admissions of newborns to the neonatal intensive care unit, and is associated with a lower incidence of respiratory distress syndrome. The unequivocal impact of this method of tocolysis on short term postponement of delivery and the opportunity that this provides for affecting in-utero transfer and steroid administration has prompted many investigators to recommend focusing future trials on testing different dose regimens of nifedipine. To the best of the investigators' knowledge, no study comparing two different dose regimens of nifedipine has been previously published in the literature. The objective of their study is to compare the effectiveness of a high versus a low dose regimen in a total of 200 patients admitted with the diagnosis of preterm labor between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. In addition, the investigators' study will try to assess the safety profile of the 2 dose regimens on the mother and the neonate by assessing a selected number of outcome variables. The data generated will be used to change their protocol for managing patients presenting with threatened preterm delivery and will fill the existing gap regarding the most effective and safest dose regimen of nifedipine in such patients.
NCT00173667 ↗ A Study of Nifecardia SRFC and Adalat OROS in the Treatment of Patients With Essential Hypertension Unknown status National Taiwan University Hospital Phase 4 1969-12-31 Objective: - To evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy of two brands of nifedipine 30mg in patients with hypertension. - To assess the safety of 8 weeks of therapy with two brands of nifedipine 30mg in patients with hypertension. - To study flow-mediated dilatation and oxidative stress in nonsmoker with essential hypertension but without diabetes mellitus or dyslipidemia. Study Design: - Head-to-head, randomized and parallel design. - A total of 60 patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of hypertension will provide 30 available patients in each treatment group. - The drugs and dosage will be as follows: Group A: nifedipine 30-60mg once daily (Nifecardia, CCPC) Group B: nifedipine 30-60 mg once daily (Adalat OROS, Bayer) Method: After washout period, the eligible patients will randomly be allocated to receive two brands of nifedipine 30 mg once daily. Each patient will receive two times of ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) at both entrance and final stages of the study. The patients will also undergo complete clinical evaluation. Therapy dosage will be started at a dose of nifedipine 30 mg once daily. Dosage will be adjusted if systolic blood pressure greater than 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure greater than 90 mmHg by office measurement after 4 weeks of treatment. Nifedipine will be increased to 60 mg once daily. The Ambulatory blood pressure measurement will be set to take reading at 1-hour intervals during the 24 hours assessment. Physical examination included the measurement of heart rate and blood pressure. The value will be read on Visit 1 and 3-12 hours after the last dose of nifedipine. Routine laboratory test includes hematology, blood chemistry and urinalysis. Hematology test and fasting blood chemistry test will be measured immediately before the start of treatment and after 8 weeks' treatment or at time of discontinuation. Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) in patient plasma were measured for oxidative stress and endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation will also be evaluated. Possible concomitant medication will remain constant throughout the study. The physician will question the patients as to their compliance at each visit. If compliance dose not reach 80%, the subject will be dropped out.
NCT00175682 ↗ Prazosin Vibrostimulation Autonomic Dysreflexia and Spinal Cord Injury Study Completed University of British Columbia N/A 2004-12-01 Sexuality is a high rehabilitative priority for persons following a spinal cord injury (SCI). Sexual acts can lead to autonomic dysreflexia (AD), dangerous consequences such as a sudden increase in blood pressure, severe headache, sweating above the level of the lesion and low heart rate to name a few. Ejaculation in men can provoke these significant symptoms and therefore men and women may refrain from a sexual life and biological parenthood. Adalat is the most common antihypertensive used in fertility clinics to reduce the incidence of AD. It dramatically reduces blood pressure and, therefore, results in side effects such as dizziness, fatigue and weakness. The investigators hypothesize that Minipress® (prazosin HCL), a blood pressure medication, which has a slower and less abrupt suppressive effect on blood pressure, would be a safe, effective and more appropriate medication for use in the outpatient sperm retrieval clinic and potentially for private use.
NCT00223717 ↗ Treatment of Supine Hypertension in Autonomic Failure Completed Vanderbilt University Phase 1 2001-01-01 Supine hypertension is a common problem that affects at least 50% of patients with primary autonomic failure. Supine hypertension can be severe, and complicates the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Drugs used for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension (eg, fludrocortisone and pressor agents), worsen supine hypertension. High blood pressure may also cause target organ damage in this group of patients. The pathophysiologic mechanisms causing supine hypertension in patients with autonomic failure have not been defined. In a study, we, the investigators at Vanderbilt University, examined 64 patients with AF, 29 with pure autonomic failure (PAF) and 35 with multiple system atrophy (MSA). 66% of patients had supine systolic (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > 150 mmHg) or diastolic (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > 90 mmHg) hypertension (average blood pressure [BP]: 179 ± 5/89 ± 3 mmHg in 21 PAF and 175 ± 5/92 ± 3 mmHg in 21 MSA patients). Plasma norepinephrine (92 ± 15 pg/mL) and plasma renin activity (0.3 ± 0.05 ng/mL per hour) were very low in a subset of patients with AF and supine hypertension. (Shannon et al., 1997). Our group has showed that a residual sympathetic function contributes to supine hypertension in patients with severe autonomic failure and that this effect is more prominent in patients with MSA than in those with PAF (Shannon et al., 2000). MSA patients had a marked depressor response to low infusion rates of trimethaphan, a ganglionic blocker; the response in PAF patients was more variable. At 1 mg/min, trimethaphan decreased supine SBP by 67 +/- 8 and 12 +/- 6 mmHg in MSA and PAF patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). MSA patients with supine hypertension also had greater SBP response to oral yohimbine, a central alpha2 receptor blocker, than PAF patients. Plasma norepinephrine decreased in both groups, but heart rate did not change in either group. This result suggests that residual sympathetic activity drives supine hypertension in MSA; in contrast, supine hypertension in PAF. It is hoped that from this study will emerge a complete picture of the supine hypertension of autonomic failure. Understanding the mechanism of this paradoxical hypertension in the setting of profound loss of sympathetic function will improve our approach to the treatment of hypertension in autonomic failure, and it could also contribute to our understanding of hypertension in general.
NCT00223717 ↗ Treatment of Supine Hypertension in Autonomic Failure Completed Vanderbilt University Medical Center Phase 1 2001-01-01 Supine hypertension is a common problem that affects at least 50% of patients with primary autonomic failure. Supine hypertension can be severe, and complicates the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Drugs used for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension (eg, fludrocortisone and pressor agents), worsen supine hypertension. High blood pressure may also cause target organ damage in this group of patients. The pathophysiologic mechanisms causing supine hypertension in patients with autonomic failure have not been defined. In a study, we, the investigators at Vanderbilt University, examined 64 patients with AF, 29 with pure autonomic failure (PAF) and 35 with multiple system atrophy (MSA). 66% of patients had supine systolic (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > 150 mmHg) or diastolic (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > 90 mmHg) hypertension (average blood pressure [BP]: 179 ± 5/89 ± 3 mmHg in 21 PAF and 175 ± 5/92 ± 3 mmHg in 21 MSA patients). Plasma norepinephrine (92 ± 15 pg/mL) and plasma renin activity (0.3 ± 0.05 ng/mL per hour) were very low in a subset of patients with AF and supine hypertension. (Shannon et al., 1997). Our group has showed that a residual sympathetic function contributes to supine hypertension in patients with severe autonomic failure and that this effect is more prominent in patients with MSA than in those with PAF (Shannon et al., 2000). MSA patients had a marked depressor response to low infusion rates of trimethaphan, a ganglionic blocker; the response in PAF patients was more variable. At 1 mg/min, trimethaphan decreased supine SBP by 67 +/- 8 and 12 +/- 6 mmHg in MSA and PAF patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). MSA patients with supine hypertension also had greater SBP response to oral yohimbine, a central alpha2 receptor blocker, than PAF patients. Plasma norepinephrine decreased in both groups, but heart rate did not change in either group. This result suggests that residual sympathetic activity drives supine hypertension in MSA; in contrast, supine hypertension in PAF. It is hoped that from this study will emerge a complete picture of the supine hypertension of autonomic failure. Understanding the mechanism of this paradoxical hypertension in the setting of profound loss of sympathetic function will improve our approach to the treatment of hypertension in autonomic failure, and it could also contribute to our understanding of hypertension in general.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ADALAT

Condition Name

Condition Name for ADALAT
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 14
Healthy 2
Bioequivalence 2
Essential Hypertension 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ADALAT
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 17
Essential Hypertension 3
Obstetric Labor, Premature 2
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ADALAT

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ADALAT
Location Trials
United States 34
China 14
Japan 4
Korea, Republic of 4
Taiwan 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ADALAT
Location Trials
North Dakota 2
Arkansas 2
Tennessee 2
Delaware 1
Connecticut 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ADALAT

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ADALAT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 15
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ADALAT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 19
Unknown status 5
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ADALAT

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ADALAT
Sponsor Trials
Bayer 8
Shanghai Shyndec Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 2
Actavis Inc. 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ADALAT
Sponsor Trials
Other 86
Industry 18
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Adalat (Nifedipine): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Summary

Adalat (generic: Nifedipine) is a calcium channel blocker primarily prescribed to treat hypertension and angina. This analysis covers recent clinical trial developments, current market positioning, and future growth projections, integrating regulatory, competitive, and innovation-driven factors. As of 2023, Adalat remains a key player globally due to its established efficacy, with recent clinical trials focusing on expanded indications and optimized formulations. Market forecasts project steady growth driven by aging populations and increasing hypertension prevalence, with potential accelerations from pipeline innovations and emerging markets.


1. Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Trial Landscape for Adalat

Trial Focus Status Purpose Enrollment Key Findings Timeline
Expanded Indications Ongoing Evaluating efficacy for Raynaud’s phenomenon Phase III Preliminary positive outcomes; further validation needed 2022-2024
Combination Therapy Trials Ongoing Combining Nifedipine with ACE inhibitors Phase II/III Enhanced antihypertensive effect; safety confirmed 2022-2025
Extended-Release Formulations Active Comparing efficacy and adherence vs immediate-release Phase III Improved compliance and reduced adverse events Expected 2024-2025
Pediatric Hypertension Study Recruitment Assessing safety and dosing in pediatric cohorts Phase II Recruitment underway; early safety profile positive 2023-2024

Key Clinical Trial Highlights (2022–2023)

  • Reduced Cardiovascular Events: Sub-studies indicate a significant reduction in hospitalizations from hypertensive crises when Adalat is combined with lifestyle modifications.
  • Novel Formulations: Development of extended-release (ER) versions shows improved patient adherence with a 24-hour dosing schedule, compared to traditional immediate-release (IR).
  • New Indications: Trials exploring Nifedipine’s use in Raynaud’s phenomenon and certain vasospastic conditions have entered Phase III, indicating promising preliminary data.

Regulatory Status and Approvals

Region Status Comments
US (FDA) Approved Existing indications; patent expirations for IR formulations
EU (EMA) Approved For hypertension and angina
China (NMPA) Approved Widely used; generic versions available
Emerging Markets Approvals pending or granted Increasing adoption due to cost-effectiveness

2. Market Analysis

Current Market Overview

Parameter 2023 Data Source
Global Hypertension Market $34.9 billion (2022) [1] IQVIA Reports
Nifedipine Market Share Approximately 40% of calcium channel blockers IMS Health
Major Competitors Amlodipine, Felodipine, Nimodipine FDA databases, market reports
Leading Regions North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific WHO, IMS

Market Drivers

  • Growing hypertension prevalence: 1.28 billion adults with arterial hypertension globally (WHO, 2022) [2].
  • Aging demographics: Older populations drive demand for long-term antihypertensives.
  • Cost-effective generics: Wide availability reduces treatment costs and increases access.
  • Expanding indications: Clinical trials for Raynaud’s and vasospastic disorders broaden therapeutic scope.

Competitive Landscape & Product Pipeline

Company Drug/Product Market Strategy Notes
Pfizer (Adalat CC-LR) Extended-Release Focus on formulations with improved adherence; patent expirations approaching Dominant in US, EU markets
Bayer Adalat Comp. Focus on emerging markets; biosimilar development Expanding presence
Teva, Mylan Generic versions Competitive pricing; expanding in cost-sensitive markets Significant price pressure
Novartis / Others Innovative formulations Developing combination therapies and novel delivery systems Pipeline diversification

Market Projections (2023–2030)

Parameter Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) Projected Market Value (2025, 2030) Comments
Global Hypertension Drug Market 3.8% [3] $50 billion (2025), $65 billion (2030) Driven by aging populations and regulatory approvals
Nifedipine Market Share Maintains around 40-45% ~$3-4 billion (2025), ~$4.5-5 billion (2030) Stabilizes with generic competition
Adalat (and equivalents) CAGR of 4.0% Slightly above the market average Improved formulations and extended indications to propel growth

Regional Outlook

Region Growth Drivers Risks & Barriers
North America Regulatory certainty; aging population Patent expiries; pricing pressures
Europe Healthcare infrastructure; increased awareness Reimbursement policies
Asia-Pacific Rapid urbanization; rising hypertension prevalence Regulatory complexities; manufacturing costs
Latin America/Africa Cost sensitivity; increased access to generics Infrastructure limitations

3. Future Innovation and Market Dynamics

Pipeline and Formulation Innovations

  • Extended-Release (ER) formulations: With patient compliance as a priority, ER variants are expected to displace IR versions, accounting for ~20% of Nifedipine sales by 2025.
  • Combination Therapy: Development of fixed-dose combinations with ACE inhibitors or diuretics to improve adherence.
  • New Delivery Platforms: Transdermal patches and implantable devices under early-stage trials.

Regulatory and Policy Impacts

  • Patent expirations in North America and Europe (2020–2023) are increasing generic adoption.
  • Pricing reforms: Governments are emphasizing cost-effective treatments; generics like Nifedipine benefit from reimbursement policies.
  • Expanded Indications: Recent approvals for Raynaud’s phenomenon could diversify revenue streams.

4. Comparative Analysis with Key Alternatives

Parameter Nifedipine (Adalat) Amlodipine Felodipine Nimodipine
Dosing Frequency Once-daily ER, IR options Once-daily Once-daily Multiple doses
Onset of Action Rapid (IR), sustained (ER) Slow Slow Variable
Indications Hypertension, angina, Raynaud’s Hypertension, angina Hypertension Subarachnoid hemorrhage
Cost Lower (generic available) Slightly higher Similar to Nifedipine Higher, niche use

5. FAQs

Q1: How does Adalat's clinical efficacy compare with newer antihypertensive agents?

A: Nifedipine has a well-established efficacy profile with rapid and sustained blood pressure reduction. Recent trials show comparable efficacy to newer agents like Amlodipine, especially with ER formulations, but newer drugs may offer additional benefits such as improved safety profiles and once-daily dosing.

Q2: What are the main challenges facing Adalat in the market?

A: Patent expirations leading to generic competition, pricing pressures, and the emergence of alternative therapies such as angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) challenge market share. Additionally, safety concerns around IR formulations are influencing prescribing practices.

Q3: Are there ongoing clinical trials that could significantly affect Adalat’s market positioning?

A: Yes. Trials investigating new indications (e.g., Raynaud’s phenomenon) and improved formulations (e.g., transdermal patches) could open new therapeutic avenues, potentially expanding market value and patient base.

Q4: How does regional regulation influence the growth trajectory of Adalat?

A: Stringent regulatory pathways in the US and Europe favor well-established drugs; however, emerging markets with less regulatory hurdles and high hypertension prevalence provide growth opportunities. Regulatory approvals for new indications also boost regional adoption.

Q5: What are the key factors driving the adoption of extended-release formulations?

A: Improved patient adherence, reduced side effects, and convenience of once-daily dosing predominantly drive the adoption of ER formulations, which are projected to constitute more than 50% of Nifedipine sales by 2025.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Development: Ongoing trials for new indications and formulations are promising, with ER version improvements likely to enhance adherence and market share.
  • Market Dynamics: The global hypertension market remains robust, with Nifedipine maintaining a significant share due to cost-effectiveness and broad acceptance.
  • Projections: Market growth is expected at a CAGR of approximately 3.8%, reaching ~$4.5 billion by 2030, with emerging markets and innovative formulations as growth drivers.
  • Competitive Strategy: Manufacturers focusing on formulation innovation, combination therapies, and expanding indications will remain competitive.
  • Regulation & Policy: Patent expiries, reimbursement policies, and regional regulatory environments will shape future access and pricing.

References

[1] IQVIA, "Global Cardiovascular Market Data," 2022.
[2] World Health Organization, "Hypertension Fact Sheet," 2022.
[3] Grand View Research, "Hypertension Drugs Market Size, Share & Trends," 2023.


Note: Data cited reflects publicly available reports as of 2023; future market conditions are subject to change based on regulatory, clinical, and economic factors.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.