Last Updated: August 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ACULAR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ACULAR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00332774 ↗ Nevanac 3-Month Safety Study With QID Dosing Completed Alcon Research Phase 3 2006-02-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety of Nevanac 0.1% compared to Acular LS 0.4% and Vehicle in patients treated before cataract surgery and for approximately 90 days following surgery.
NCT00333255 ↗ Nepafenac Opthalmic Suspension 0.1% Compared to Acular LS for Treatment of Inflammation After Cataract Surgery Completed Alcon Research Phase 3 2005-09-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension, 0.1% eye drops to Acular LS eye drops, used before and after cataract surgery, for treating inflammation in the eye.
NCT00335439 ↗ Effect of Prophylactic Ketorolac on CME After Cataract Surgery Completed Queen's University N/A 2006-06-01 The study will evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic administration of the topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% (Acular®) on cystoid macular edema (CME) in patients having undergone cataract surgery. CME is the most frequent cause of decreased vision after uncomplicated cataract surgery and can result in irreversible sight reduction. The investigation will involve a comparison arm and a treatment arm with both sets of patient populations being evaluated for CME with ophthalmologic examinations and optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements. The objective is to elucidate the role of NSAID drops in preventing CME after cataract surgery.
NCT00347204 ↗ Comparison of Acular LS Versus Nevanac for Pain Control in Eyes Undergoing PRK Completed Allergan Phase 4 2006-01-01 To determine the ability of two topical Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory drops (Acular LS & Nevanac) to help control pain following Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK).
NCT00347204 ↗ Comparison of Acular LS Versus Nevanac for Pain Control in Eyes Undergoing PRK Completed Center For Excellence In Eye Care Phase 4 2006-01-01 To determine the ability of two topical Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory drops (Acular LS & Nevanac) to help control pain following Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ACULAR

Condition Name

Condition Name for ACULAR
Intervention Trials
Cataract 8
Kidney Stones 1
Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma 1
Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ACULAR
Intervention Trials
Cataract 10
Inflammation 3
Glaucoma, Open-Angle 2
Glaucoma 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ACULAR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ACULAR
Location Trials
United States 13
Canada 2
Croatia 2
Brazil 2
Greece 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ACULAR
Location Trials
Arizona 2
Massachusetts 2
Texas 2
Georgia 1
Minnesota 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ACULAR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ACULAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 13
Phase 3 3
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ACULAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 18
Terminated 2
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ACULAR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ACULAR
Sponsor Trials
Mayo Clinic 3
Innovative Medical 3
Alcon Research 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ACULAR
Sponsor Trials
Other 20
Industry 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Acular (ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Exclusivity/Generic Entry Outlook

Last updated: July 27, 2026

What is Acular (ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic) and what clinical trials are still active or recently completed?

Acular is a topical ophthalmic NSAID (ketorolac tromethamine) used for pain and inflammation associated with ocular surgery and other ocular inflammatory conditions. Commercial competitiveness is driven less by platform novelty and more by (1) lifecycle extensions for formulations and dosing regimens, (2) manufacturing continuity, and (3) generic supply and labeling competition.

What clinical trial activity matters most for market projection?

For a marketed topical NSAID like Acular, market outcomes are typically influenced by:

  • FDA labeling expansions or supplemental indications (rare, slow-moving)
  • formulation changes that create line extensions (new NDA or supplement vs generic-substitutable equivalence)
  • patent/litigation events that determine when 505(b)(2) or ANDA competitors can enter

For “clinical trials update” decision-making, the critical question is whether any trials translate into new labeling or meaningful differentiation versus generic substitutes already available.

Clinical trials update: data not provided

No specific source-backed details (trial IDs, statuses, enrollment, endpoints, dates, registrants, or sponsor statements) are included in the prompt. Without verifiable trial metadata, a complete and accurate update cannot be produced.

What is the current FDA regulatory status of Acular and how does Orange Book listing affect exclusivity?

Acular’s regulatory and exclusivity profile is determined by whether it is listed in FDA’s Orange Book (NDA and related patents and exclusivity codes). Market timing for generics depends on:

  • patent expiration dates
  • listed patent scope (drug substance, formulation, method of use)
  • exclusivity periods (market exclusivity, pediatric exclusivity where applicable)
  • any active patent litigation and settlement-triggered launch dates

Orange Book status: data not provided

No Orange Book listing details (NDA number, patent numbers, expiration dates, exclusivity codes, or listed dosage forms) are provided in the prompt. A complete, accurate exclusivity and generic-entry outlook cannot be produced without those listings.

When does Acular lose exclusivity and what is the projected generic launch risk?

The projected generic launch risk for Acular depends on:

  • the last expiring Orange Book patent covering the marketed dosage form and labeling
  • whether Paragraph IV challenges exist and have triggered litigation and settlements
  • whether competing products use 505(b)(2) or ANDAs and how they map to the reference label

Exclusivity and launch timing: data not provided

The prompt provides no Orange Book patent expiration timeline, litigation docket, or settlement terms. A timeline-driven projection cannot be constructed.

How many patents protect Acular, what claims do they cover, and where are the likely barriers for generics?

Generic entry barriers for ophthalmic ketorolac typically arise from:

  • formulation or particle/solubilization technologies that affect stability or bioavailability
  • method-of-use claims tied to dosing schedules or post-operative regimens
  • device/dosing system features if present (less common for simple solution products)

Patent estate mapping: data not provided

No patent list (publication numbers, assignees, jurisdictions, expiration dates) is included in the prompt. A quantified “how many patents” assessment with actionable filing or litigation implications cannot be produced.

What patent litigation affects Acular and what settlement outcomes exist?

For branded topical ophthalmics, litigation outcomes usually set:

  • launch dates for Paragraph IV generics
  • design-around claim strategies (different concentrations, dosing regimens, excipients)
  • market allocation provisions in settlements
  • triggers for FDA approval vs commercial launch

Litigation status: data not provided

No court cases, dockets, Paragraph IV certifications, or settlement announcements are included. A litigation-driven risk assessment cannot be completed.

How does Acular compare with ketorolac ophthalmic competitors and what is the likely competitive landscape?

Acular competes within ketorolac ophthalmic NSAIDs and adjacent post-surgical pain/inflammation regimens, including other NSAIDs and corticosteroid combinations depending on the prescriber pattern.

Market share outcomes typically follow:

  • channel distribution strength (wholesaler access, contracting)
  • formulary preference in managed care
  • price compression after generic entry
  • substitution rates driven by AB-rated generics

Comparative positioning: data not provided

The prompt provides no current competitor list, market share, pricing, or payer/formulary data. A defensible competitive landscape and projection cannot be generated.

What market size, revenue, and growth projections exist for Acular (ketorolac ophthalmic) by geography and channel?

An investable market projection requires, at minimum, one of:

  • audited sales by strength and dosage form
  • distributor/payer datasets or claims-based estimates
  • credible syndicated sources with defined methodology and time series

Market metrics: data not provided

The prompt includes no revenue, units, prescriptions, pricing, or geography/channel breakdown. A complete market analysis and projection cannot be produced.

What could drive upside or downside for Acular over the next 3 to 5 years?

For an established topical NSAID, the principal drivers are:

  • loss of reference protection and resulting price compression
  • generic supply stability and backorders affecting shelf availability
  • FDA enforcement actions or manufacturing recalls impacting availability
  • label changes that alter prescriber behavior
  • contracting and rebate changes in retail and institutional channels

Upside/downside scenario modeling: data not provided

Scenario inputs like exclusivity/expiration dates, projected generic entry, and current commercial performance are not provided.

Key Takeaways

  • Acular is a marketed ophthalmic NSAID (ketorolac tromethamine), but the prompt does not include the regulatory, Orange Book, patent, litigation, clinical trial, or commercial datasets required to produce a complete, source-backed clinical trials update and market projection.
  • A quantified exclusivity timeline, patent estate size, generic launch risk, and revenue outlook cannot be generated from the provided information.

FAQs

  1. What is the Orange Book patent and exclusivity profile for Acular ketorolac ophthalmic solution?
  2. Are there any Paragraph IV ANDA challenges filed for generic ketorolac ophthalmic products referenced to Acular?
  3. Which patent types (formulation, method-of-use, drug substance) most often restrict generic substitution for ophthalmic ketorolac?
  4. What clinical trial endpoints would most likely affect Acular labeling or differentiation versus AB-rated generics?
  5. How do post-cataract surgery NSAID prescribing patterns influence ketorolac ophthalmic sales and price erosion?

References

No sources were provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.