Last Updated: August 15, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ACETYLCHOLINE CHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ACETYLCHOLINE CHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00711087 ↗ Botox-A Injection to Improve Bladder Function in Early Spinal Cord Injury (#H-20344) Terminated U.S. Department of Education Phase 2 2007-07-01 The purpose of this study is to see what the effect of Botox has on bladder function for those who have recently suffered spinal cord injury. We also will study bladder tissue levels of NGF (nerve growth factor) that can tell us how the nerves to the bladder are healing after injury. Consenting male and female cervical and high thoracic (T10 and above) SCI patients will be identified within the first 6-7 weeks after SCI and randomized to two external urethral sphincter injection groups. Each group will be injected within 8 weeks after SCI (Day 0) and 3 months later (Day 90). The injection paradigm will consist of: Group 1-100 units of BTX-A (Botox®, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA) on Day 0 and 100 units of BTX-A on Day 90; Group 2-sham saline injections on both Day 0 and Day 90. Injections will be performed under local anesthesia using standard flexible cystoscopic equipment. Use of placebo is justified because: 1. there have been documentation of nerve desensitization with dry needling (i.e. acupuncture) and wet needling (i.e. saline)--therefore, to truly demonstrate benefit of Botox over just the needle insertion into the sphincter muscle or injection of the diluent saline, a sham saline injection group is included, 2. the injection procedure itself is minimally invasive and not expected to result in any complications. Subjects who qualify and have signed the informed consent document will be randomized into two groups, those receiving the BTX-A and those receiving placebo. Blinding will be performed by the TIRR pharmacy department who will provide Botox and placebo in identical syringes so that the treating staff will be blinded. Pharmacists will ensure patients receive the same agent at the time of the second injection. Unblinding will occur at the end of the study or if complications necessitate breaking of the code. Both groups will undergo urodynamic testing to document before and after treatment data. Bladder biopsies will be taken prior to treatment in both groups that will be analyzed for nerve growth factor. Three day voiding diaries will be kept and reviewed with the study coordinator at the follow up visits. Quality of life questionnaires will be completed at each follow up visit. The treatments will take place on Day 0 and Day 90. Follow up visits will occur at Day 120, 16 month, and 28 months.
NCT00711087 ↗ Botox-A Injection to Improve Bladder Function in Early Spinal Cord Injury (#H-20344) Terminated Baylor College of Medicine Phase 2 2007-07-01 The purpose of this study is to see what the effect of Botox has on bladder function for those who have recently suffered spinal cord injury. We also will study bladder tissue levels of NGF (nerve growth factor) that can tell us how the nerves to the bladder are healing after injury. Consenting male and female cervical and high thoracic (T10 and above) SCI patients will be identified within the first 6-7 weeks after SCI and randomized to two external urethral sphincter injection groups. Each group will be injected within 8 weeks after SCI (Day 0) and 3 months later (Day 90). The injection paradigm will consist of: Group 1-100 units of BTX-A (Botox®, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA) on Day 0 and 100 units of BTX-A on Day 90; Group 2-sham saline injections on both Day 0 and Day 90. Injections will be performed under local anesthesia using standard flexible cystoscopic equipment. Use of placebo is justified because: 1. there have been documentation of nerve desensitization with dry needling (i.e. acupuncture) and wet needling (i.e. saline)--therefore, to truly demonstrate benefit of Botox over just the needle insertion into the sphincter muscle or injection of the diluent saline, a sham saline injection group is included, 2. the injection procedure itself is minimally invasive and not expected to result in any complications. Subjects who qualify and have signed the informed consent document will be randomized into two groups, those receiving the BTX-A and those receiving placebo. Blinding will be performed by the TIRR pharmacy department who will provide Botox and placebo in identical syringes so that the treating staff will be blinded. Pharmacists will ensure patients receive the same agent at the time of the second injection. Unblinding will occur at the end of the study or if complications necessitate breaking of the code. Both groups will undergo urodynamic testing to document before and after treatment data. Bladder biopsies will be taken prior to treatment in both groups that will be analyzed for nerve growth factor. Three day voiding diaries will be kept and reviewed with the study coordinator at the follow up visits. Quality of life questionnaires will be completed at each follow up visit. The treatments will take place on Day 0 and Day 90. Follow up visits will occur at Day 120, 16 month, and 28 months.
NCT01387425 ↗ Efficacy And Safety Of Smoking Cessation With Varenicline Tartrate In Diabetic Smokers: (DIASMOKE) Completed Universita degli Studi di Catania N/A 2011-06-01 Objectives This protocol is intended to provide information regarding the efficacy and safety of the nicotine partial agonist varenicline tartrate, at a dose of 1 mg twice daily, for smoking cessation in diabetic subjects who smoke. Given that a better understanding of predictors of smoking cessation can be useful in identifying potential quitters and likely relapsers and that little is known about these predictors in diabetics, the role of different predictors of abstinence at the end of the study will also be examined Study Population The study will enroll 150 type 2 diabetic patients (≤ 75 years) who are regular smokers (≥10 cigs/day) and motivated to stop smoking in each of 2 treatment arms (active drug and placebo) Study Design The study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of varenicline 1 mg BID in comparison to placebo for smoking cessation. The duration of active treatment will be 12 weeks and subjects will be followed in the nontreatment phase for an additional 12 weeks. This clinical study has an optional research component to prolong the follow up in the nontreatment phase for a full year. Predictors of abstinence at the end of the study will also be examined Study Endpoints Primary Endpoint: Success rates at week 24 in the varenicline vs placebo group. Success rates will be defined as the Continuous Quit Rate since last visit. Subjects will be classified as responders if they are able to maintain abstinence from cigarette smoking during this period of time with end-expiratory exhaled CO measurements ≤ 10 ppm. This measure will be obtained through reports of cigarette use by means of the Nicotine Use Inventory confirmed by a measurement of an end-expiratory exhaled carbon monoxide concentration that is ≤ 10 ppm on the study visit at week 24 Co-primary endpoint: Success rates at week 12 in the varenicline vs placebo group. Success rates will be defined as Continuous Quit Rate for Weeks 8 to 12 of treatment. Subjects will be classified as responders if they are able to maintain complete abstinence from cigarette smoking in each of the last four study visits (week 9, week 10, week 11, and week 12) with end-expiratory exhaled CO measurements ≤ 10 ppm. This measure will be obtained through reports of cigarette use by means of the Nicotine Use Inventory during the last four study visits (week 9, week 10, week 11, and week 12) confirmed by a measurement of an end-expiratory exhaled carbon monoxide concentration that is ≤ 10 ppm on each study visit Secondary Endpoint: Success rates at week 52 in the varenicline vs placebo group. Success rates will be defined as the Continuous Quit Rate throughout the last three visits (week 24, week 36, and week 44). Subjects will be classified as responders if they are able to maintain abstinence from cigarette smoking during this period of time with end-expiratory exhaled CO measurements ≤ 10 ppm. This measure will be obtained through reports of cigarette use by means of the Nicotine Use Inventory during the last three study visits (week 24, week 36 and week 44) confirmed by a measurement of an end-expiratory exhaled carbon monoxide concentration that is ≤ 10 ppm on each study visit Additional Measures: Given that a better understanding of predictors of smoking cessation can be useful in identifying potential quitters and likely relapsers and that little is known about these predictors in diabetics, the role of different predictors of abstinence at week 24 and at week 52 will also be examined
NCT01969773 ↗ Intravesical Botulinum Toxin A Injections in Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis Refractory to Conventional Treatment Completed Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital Phase 2 2012-12-01 This study was designed in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial to test the actual therapeutic effects of intravesical BoNTA injection. The results of this study might provide clinical evidence for a better therapeutic regimen in the treatment of IC/PBS.
NCT02213848 ↗ Effect of Calcium Chloride on Recovery From Neuromuscular Blockade Completed Seoul National University Hospital N/A 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of calcium chloride against residual neuromuscular blockade at the end of general anesthesia
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ACETYLCHOLINE CHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for ACETYLCHOLINE CHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Intoxication 2
Cognitive Impairment, Mild 1
Pain 1
Diabetes 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ACETYLCHOLINE CHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Cognitive Dysfunction 2
Psychotic Disorders 1
Spinal Cord Injuries 1
Sepsis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ACETYLCHOLINE CHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ACETYLCHOLINE CHLORIDE
Location Trials
Moldova, Republic of 4
Uzbekistan 4
Ukraine 4
United States 3
Kazakhstan 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ACETYLCHOLINE CHLORIDE
Location Trials
Texas 2
Wisconsin 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ACETYLCHOLINE CHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ACETYLCHOLINE CHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
Phase 4 5
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ACETYLCHOLINE CHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
NOT_YET_RECRUITING 2
Not yet recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ACETYLCHOLINE CHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ACETYLCHOLINE CHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Yuria-Pharm 4
U.S. Department of Education 1
University Medical Center Groningen 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ACETYLCHOLINE CHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Other 10
Industry 5
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Acetylcholine Chloride Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis and Forecast

Last updated: July 26, 2026

Acetylcholine chloride market access and pipeline visibility are constrained by limited public clinical-development disclosure. The drug’s market footprint is typically associated with historical ophthalmic and perioperative use contexts rather than a modern, large-scale global development program. Publicly available trial and approval signals are insufficient to support a robust, date-specific forecast for revenue, launches, or exclusivity-driven generic risk.

What is acetylcholine chloride and where is it used clinically?

Acetylcholine chloride is a choline ester that acts as an agonist at nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, producing parasympathomimetic effects. Clinically, acetylcholine-based products have been used historically in settings such as ophthalmology (for miosis) and perioperative or diagnostic contexts depending on formulation and regulatory jurisdiction.

Which routes and dosage forms exist for acetylcholine chloride?

Public product positioning for acetylcholine chloride is commonly tied to ophthalmic and sterile injectable formats in legacy markets, with product availability varying by country and manufacturer.

What is the mechanism-of-action relevance for modern development?

Because acetylcholine chloride is a direct receptor agonist with rapid pharmacology and short systemic activity, modern development efforts, where present, tend to focus on:

  • local delivery and tolerability
  • stability and formulation for sterile manufacturing
  • dose control to avoid systemic cholinergic effects

What is the latest clinical trials update for acetylcholine chloride?

A current, comprehensive clinical trials update cannot be produced from the information available here without risking inaccurate claims about trial phase, enrollment status, primary completion dates, and locations. Public trial listings for acetylcholine chloride are sparse and inconsistent across registries by formulation and indication.

Which indications have active or recently completed trials for acetylcholine chloride?

A complete indication-level mapping is not supportable from the available information. Acetylcholine chloride has historical uses, but translating that into a present-tense indication list with trial-phase confirmation requires reliable registry-to-product matching that is not available in this context.

How to interpret trial activity for a short-acting direct agonist?

When development occurs for acetylcholine chloride, the differentiator is usually formulation and delivery rather than new biology. Trial activity, when it exists, is often smaller in scale and more dependent on regulatory willingness to accept bridging data.

How big is the acetylcholine chloride market today and who drives demand?

A quantitative market model cannot be built from the information available here without introducing unsupported estimates of TAM/SAM/SOM, current unit sales, pricing, and geography-specific procurement.

What market segments are most likely to matter?

For acetylcholine chloride, demand typically aligns with:

  • ophthalmic procedures requiring miosis or related autonomic effects
  • perioperative or diagnostic settings in countries where legacy products remain marketed
  • hospital procurement patterns rather than patient self-pay retail channels

Which companies sell acetylcholine chloride and what is the competitive landscape?

A company-by-company competitive map cannot be produced without reliable, product-level manufacturer identification and current market authorization status.

How competitive are acetylcholine chloride products on formulation and supply?

Competition, where present, is usually driven by:

  • sterile manufacturing capacity
  • stability and shelf-life
  • regulatory quality dossiers
  • packaging format and dosing convenience for hospital use

When does acetylcholine chloride lose exclusivity and what patent protection exists?

An exclusivity timeline and patent estate review cannot be generated here without specific product identifiers (NDA/ANDA/BLA, Orange Book listings, granted composition and method patents, and expiration schedules). Acetylcholine chloride is often associated with older, legacy product authorizations, which can predate modern patent/Orange Book structures or may be governed by different data exclusivity or market authorization regimes by country.

What is the Orange Book status of acetylcholine chloride?

Orange Book status cannot be provided without knowing the exact FDA application and listed active ingredient(s) and dosage form(s). Generating a status statement without a confirmed FDA record risks factual error.

What formulation patents protect acetylcholine chloride products?

Formulation patent coverage cannot be listed without specific assignee/patent numbers and claim scopes by dosage form (e.g., ophthalmic solution vs injectable). Generating a claim landscape without those anchors is not supportable.

What generic entry risks exist for acetylcholine chloride?

Generic risk assessment requires confirmed FDA application status and current marketed labeling, plus Orange Book expirations or paragraph IV opportunities. None of those anchor data points are available here in a way that supports an accurate entry-risk conclusion.

How does acetylcholine chloride compare with other cholinergic or parasympathomimetic agents?

Competitive comparison cannot be completed without defining the relevant use case (ophthalmic vs perioperative vs diagnostic) and the comparator set with formulation and regulatory basis.

What matters in substitution: onset, route, and tolerability?

For receptor agonists, substitution depends on:

  • route and local vs systemic exposure
  • dosing precision and monitoring burden
  • adverse event profile tied to cholinergic toxicity

What clinical, regulatory, and manufacturing barriers shape timelines?

A concrete barriers-to-timeline model cannot be produced without an identified development program, target geography, route, and current regulatory status.

Sterile manufacturing and stability as key constraints

Any modern development of acetylcholine chloride is likely to face:

  • stability and shelf-life constraints for aqueous and sterile presentations
  • formulation optimization to reduce degradation and maintain pH/osmolality
  • sterility assurance and batch consistency at GMP scale

Market projection for acetylcholine chloride: base case, upside, downside

A forecast cannot be responsibly generated without current unit demand, realized pricing, channel share, and regulatory status by geography. Any numeric projection would be fabricated.

Key takeaways

  • Acetylcholine chloride’s current market and pipeline visibility are limited in public data streams, making a precise clinical-update and forecast infeasible from the information available here.
  • Any future growth thesis would likely be tied to formulation differentiation, supply reliability, and geography where legacy authorizations still sustain demand.
  • Exclusivity, Orange Book status, and generic risk require application-level anchoring that is not available here.

FAQs

  1. What FDA application type (NDA vs ANDA) is acetylcholine chloride linked to for marketed products?
  2. Are there any registered clinical trials for acetylcholine chloride in ophthalmology in 2024 to 2026?
  3. Which countries currently authorize acetylcholine chloride for ophthalmic or injectable use?
  4. Can acetylcholine chloride be substituted with alternative parasympathomimetic agents without protocol changes?
  5. What stability and formulation considerations drive development for short-acting cholinergic agonists?

References

  1. (No citable source data was provided in the prompt.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.