Last Updated: May 3, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ACETAMINOPHEN AND HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ACETAMINOPHEN AND HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00236535 ↗ A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Tramadol HCl/Acetaminophen, Hydrocodone Bitartrate/Acetaminophen and Placebo in Patients With Pain From an Ankle Sprain With a Partial Torn Ligament Completed PriCara, Unit of Ortho-McNeil, Inc. Phase 3 2003-12-01 The purpose of this study is to explore the pain-relieving effects and safety of two analgesic treatment regimens as compared to placebo in patients experiencing acute musculoskeletal pain. Patients who are experiencing at least moderate acute musculoskeletal pain from an ankle sprain severe enough to require prescription pain relief medication will be randomized to receive either tramadol HCl/acetaminophen, hydrocodone bitartrate/acetaminophen or placebo.
NCT00236535 ↗ A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Tramadol HCl/Acetaminophen, Hydrocodone Bitartrate/Acetaminophen and Placebo in Patients With Pain From an Ankle Sprain With a Partial Torn Ligament Completed Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. Phase 3 2003-12-01 The purpose of this study is to explore the pain-relieving effects and safety of two analgesic treatment regimens as compared to placebo in patients experiencing acute musculoskeletal pain. Patients who are experiencing at least moderate acute musculoskeletal pain from an ankle sprain severe enough to require prescription pain relief medication will be randomized to receive either tramadol HCl/acetaminophen, hydrocodone bitartrate/acetaminophen or placebo.
NCT01456520 ↗ Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Vycavert (10 mg Hydrocodone Bitartrate/325 mg Acetaminophen) Compared to the Reference Drug Norco Completed Pfizer Phase 1 2011-10-01 This study aims to determine whether the hydrocodone and acetaminophen exposures following oral dosing of Vycavert are comparable to those following oral dosing of Norco.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ACETAMINOPHEN AND HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for ACETAMINOPHEN AND HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE
Intervention Trials
Opioid-Related Disorders 3
Healthy 2
Pain 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ACETAMINOPHEN AND HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE
Intervention Trials
Opioid-Related Disorders 3
Pain, Postoperative 2
Acute Pain 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ACETAMINOPHEN AND HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ACETAMINOPHEN AND HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE
Location Trials
United States 10
Canada 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ACETAMINOPHEN AND HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE
Location Trials
Utah 3
Kansas 2
Texas 1
Maryland 1
California 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ACETAMINOPHEN AND HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ACETAMINOPHEN AND HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 1
Phase 1 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ACETAMINOPHEN AND HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
Withdrawn 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ACETAMINOPHEN AND HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ACETAMINOPHEN AND HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE
Sponsor Trials
Grünenthal GmbH 2
Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company Limited 1
PriCara, Unit of Ortho-McNeil, Inc. 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ACETAMINOPHEN AND HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 10
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Acetaminophen and Hydrocodone Bitartrate: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections

Last updated: April 27, 2026

What is the current clinical trial and regulatory landscape for acetaminophen and hydrocodone bitartrate?

Acetaminophen and hydrocodone bitartrate is an established combination opioid/analgesic used for the management of pain. Trial activity for this specific fixed-dose combination is dominated by:

  • Label-maintenance and formulation/PK studies
  • Post-marketing safety evaluations
  • Studies that compare pharmacokinetics and/or abuse-deterrence attributes across branded and generic products

Trial signal status (what tends to move the needle)

For established combination products like this, clinical trial “updates” typically do not create new primary endpoints for new disease indications. Market-impacting trials are usually the ones that:

  • Change dosing regimens or maximum daily exposure patterns
  • Add abuse-deterrent properties or modify formulation to reduce extraction/alternative routes
  • Support new labeling (for example, duration of use or patient subset claims)

Evidence of continued clinical study presence

The combination remains in ongoing pharmacokinetic and safety research pipelines, and it continues to show up in clinical trial registries via product-level studies for dosing, bioequivalence, and risk mitigation. Trial volume is typically concentrated in:

  • BE/PK (bioequivalence, pharmacokinetics)
  • Safety (adverse event profiles in real-world-like populations)
  • Switching/usage pattern studies (titration and adherence-related endpoints)

Source context: Clinical trial registries track continued study registration and result updates for hydrocodone/acetaminophen product variants and related formulations. [1]


What is the market size context for hydrocodone/acetaminophen and how do drivers shape demand?

The market is influenced by three overlapping forces: opioid prescribing intensity, regulatory controls around opioid risk, and competitive substitution across other analgesics.

Demand drivers

Key drivers for ongoing sales:

  • Established formulary presence for moderate to moderately severe pain
  • Generic penetration that sustains access and price competition
  • Patient demand for oral opioid combinations when other therapies fail

Supply and access constraints

Key constraints:

  • Regulatory and payer controls tied to opioid stewardship and prior authorization
  • Loss of willingness to prescribe in many settings due to overdose and misuse risk
  • Adverse publicity and risk-management requirements that can suppress volume

Competitive substitution

Hydrocodone/acetaminophen faces substitution from:

  • Other opioid combinations (different actives)
  • Non-opioid analgesics (NSAIDs, acetaminophen monotherapy, adjuvant regimens)
  • Abuse-deterrent and reformulation products within the opioid space

How should a commercial projection be constructed (2019-2024 baseline logic, and 2025-2032 outlook)?

Without a single authoritative “market size” number confined strictly to acetaminophen and hydrocodone bitartrate as a molecule-and-salt-level product category, the practical projection method is to anchor to:

  1. Total hydrocodone combination analgesic category trajectory
  2. Share retention by hydrocodone/acetaminophen versus alternative opioids
  3. Generic price compression and reimbursement friction
  4. Regulatory-driven volume pressure

Projection framework (directional)

Base case: slow decline to flat-volume with continued revenue volatility driven by pricing and mix.
Bear case: faster volume contraction from stricter opioid policies and prescriber behavior shifts.
Bull case: stabilization from improved risk-management programs and tolerability-based retention plus potential limited uptake in specific subpopulations.

What will change revenue more than unit demand

For this class, revenue typically moves more with:

  • Average net price (ANP) after contracting and payer rebates
  • Formulary access (tier placement and step edits)
  • Product mix (immediate release strengths, branded vs generic, and formulation differentiators)

What product and safety policy factors matter most for market trajectory?

Risk management policies that affect volume

  • Opioid stewardship programs
  • PDMP utilization requirements
  • Limits on quantity per prescription and tighter controls in some jurisdictions

These factors tend to reduce new starts and shift treatment duration downward.

Abuse deterrence and formulation strategy

Even when clinical endpoints do not change, formulation can alter:

  • Payer comfort levels
  • Prescriber willingness
  • Pharmacy and wholesaler handling preferences

If a portfolio includes abuse-deterrent attributes, it can support formulary retention.


Which competitive and IP realities shape the near- to mid-term outlook?

Acetaminophen/hydrocodone bitartrate products are largely dominated by:

  • Generic supply
  • Product-level differentiation (strengths, packaging, formulation)

This structure means that:

  • Most incremental clinical trial value is not IP-generating at the molecule level
  • Market growth is constrained; changes usually come from share and contract wins rather than category expansion

Implication for investors/R&D: the most finance-relevant “clinical updates” are those that support payer access, reduce restrictions, or improve product differentiation with measurable abuse-deterrent or safety outcomes, not new indications for broad pain categories.


Clinical trials update (what to watch in upcoming readouts)

For acetaminophen/hydrocodone bitartrate combination products, the next material categories of data typically include:

  1. Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic updates

    • Strength-specific and formulation-specific readouts
    • Interchangeability support for generic and authorized products
  2. Safety and misuse-related monitoring

    • Post-marketing adverse events
    • Risk mitigation program performance measures where reported
  3. Real-world utilization pattern studies

    • Duration of use, discontinuation, switching
    • Identifying segments where prescribing persists

Clinical trial registries are the primary tracker for whether these streams are active in any given quarter. [1]


Market projection: revenue and volume direction by scenario (high-level)

Base case (most likely)

  • Units: modest decline or flat over the medium term
  • Revenue: flat to declining due to price erosion and contract pressure
  • Mix effect: potential partial offset from product differentiation and payer-tier persistence

Bear case (policy tightening + faster substitution)

  • Units: clearer decline
  • Revenue: steeper decline from tighter controls and reduced access
  • Switching: displacement to non-opioid and other opioid classes

Bull case (stabilization + localized access gains)

  • Units: near-flat in selected settings
  • Revenue: stabilized by mix shift and contract stability
  • Formulation: abuse-deterrent positioning supports formulary retention

Key Takeaways

  • Acetaminophen/hydrocodone bitartrate’s clinical trial activity is primarily product-level PK/BE and post-marketing safety, not new indication breakthroughs. [1]
  • Market trajectory is governed by opioid prescribing intensity, payer controls, and generic price compression, which typically produce flat-to-declining revenues absent major differentiation.
  • The most commercially relevant “clinical updates” are those that support formulary access, risk mitigation acceptance, and product differentiation rather than expanding indications.

FAQs

What clinical trial types drive the most market impact for this combination?

Bioequivalence/PK, safety monitoring that supports labeling and risk programs, and real-world utilization studies that influence payer or formulary decisions. [1]

Does acetaminophen/hydrocodone bitartrate have meaningful IP-driven growth from new clinical evidence?

Growth is generally constrained because the category is mature and dominated by generic supply, so trials typically reinforce access and differentiation rather than create new patent-led expansion.

How do payer restrictions typically affect sales volume?

They reduce new starts, shorten duration, and increase barriers such as prior authorization and quantity limits, driving net unit declines even when prescriptions remain in the class.

What competitive products can most directly substitute for hydrocodone/acetaminophen?

Other opioid combinations and non-opioid analgesic regimens, depending on formulary placement, step-therapy requirements, and patient profile.

What is the most important leading indicator to monitor for projections?

Regulatory and payer policy changes that alter prescribing rules (PDMP-related enforcement, quantity limits, step edits), plus observable formulary retention by product strength and formulation category.


References

[1] U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for “hydrocodone bitartrate acetaminophen” and related fixed-dose combination studies. https://clinicaltrials.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.