You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 20, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ABSTRAL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ABSTRAL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01158820 ↗ Alternative Sedation During Bronchoscopy Completed Hospira, Inc. Phase 4 2010-06-01 This protocol hopes to determine whether the use of dexmedetomidine-ketamine can reduce the use of standard of care fentanyl-midazolam sedation during bronchoscopy. This may result in less respiratory depression while providing better compliance with the procedure.
NCT01158820 ↗ Alternative Sedation During Bronchoscopy Completed Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 4 2010-06-01 This protocol hopes to determine whether the use of dexmedetomidine-ketamine can reduce the use of standard of care fentanyl-midazolam sedation during bronchoscopy. This may result in less respiratory depression while providing better compliance with the procedure.
NCT01158820 ↗ Alternative Sedation During Bronchoscopy Completed University of Pennsylvania Phase 4 2010-06-01 This protocol hopes to determine whether the use of dexmedetomidine-ketamine can reduce the use of standard of care fentanyl-midazolam sedation during bronchoscopy. This may result in less respiratory depression while providing better compliance with the procedure.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ABSTRAL

Condition Name

Condition Name for ABSTRAL
Intervention Trials
Pain 2
Acute Pain Due to Trauma 2
Diseases of Liver 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ABSTRAL
Intervention Trials
Wounds and Injuries 2
Acute Pain 2
Bile Duct Diseases 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ABSTRAL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ABSTRAL
Location Trials
United States 19
Italy 2
Finland 1
Sweden 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ABSTRAL
Location Trials
Texas 2
Pennsylvania 2
Washington 1
Tennessee 1
Rhode Island 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ABSTRAL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ABSTRAL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ABSTRAL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Recruiting 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ABSTRAL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ABSTRAL
Sponsor Trials
Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige 2
Orexo AB 1
Turku University Hospital 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ABSTRAL
Sponsor Trials
Other 6
Industry 4
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Abstral

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Abstral (fentanyl sublingual tablet) is a potent opioid analgesic developed to manage breakthrough pain in patients with cancer who are already on opioid therapy for persistent pain. Authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2011, Abstral belongs to a class of medications subject to stringent regulatory oversight due to its high abuse potential. This article provides a comprehensive update on its ongoing clinical trials, detailed market analysis, and future projection based on current data and trends.


Clinical Trials Update

Status of Current and Recent Trials

Since its FDA approval, Abstral has been the focus of post-marketing studies aimed at assessing safety profiles, misuse potential, and real-world effectiveness. As of late 2022, several key clinical trials and observational studies are underway or completed:

  • Post-Marketing Safety & Usage Monitoring:
    The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and FDA continue surveillance through pharmacovigilance programs. These studies aim to quantify the risk of misuse, overdose, and accidental exposure, especially given the opioid epidemic.

  • Abstral in Pediatric and Geriatric Populations:
    Limited studies have explored safety and efficacy in children and elderly patients, due in part to heightened safety concerns. Ongoing trials aim to extend inferences for these high-risk groups.

  • Drug-Drug Interaction & Pharmacokinetics Studies:
    Research is ongoing to evaluate Abstral’s pharmacologic behavior when co-administered with other medications commonly used by cancer patients, such as antidepressants or antiemetics.

Recent Clinical Achievements

In 2022, a multicenter observational study published in the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management confirmed Abstral’s rapid onset of pain relief within 15 minutes, aligning with patient-reported outcomes. Further, a real-world evidence (RWE) study indicated that approximately 68% of patients experienced significant pain relief within 30 minutes of administration, supporting its positioning as a fast-acting option for breakthrough pain.

Regulatory Developments

While no recent new approval or expanded indications have occurred, regulatory agencies continue to monitor post-approval data to ensure safety. The FDA has issued reminders for healthcare providers to adhere strictly to dosing guidelines to minimize misuse risks.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global opioid analgesics market was valued at approximately $10.8 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 3.6% through 2030, driven by increasing cancer prevalence and advancements in pain management. Opioid products constitute a significant segment, with drugs like Abstral serving a niche within breakthrough pain management.

Competitive Positioning

Abstral’s primary competitors include:

  • Immediate-release Morphine (e.g., MS Contin): Traditional opioids, less convenient and slower onset.
  • Other Sublingual and Buccal Fentanyl Formulations: Including Actiq (fentanyl citrate), Fentora (fentanyl buccal tablet), and Subsys (fentanyl spray).
    These alternatives vary in administration routes, onset times, and abuse potential.

Market Penetration and Usage Trends

Despite robust efficacy, Abstral's market penetration remains constrained by:

  • Regulatory & Abuse Concerns: Strict prescribing guidelines limit widespread use.
  • Preference for Non-Opioid Pain Management & Multi-Modal Strategies: Closer scrutiny over opioid prescribing limits expansion.
  • Patient and Provider Education: Necessary to prevent misuse and diversion.

In North America, the drug retains a significant share within the breakthrough pain segment, particularly in specialized oncology centers. The Asia-Pacific region shows emerging potential due to increasing cancer cases and improving regulatory frameworks.

Regulatory & Pricing Dynamics

Pricing strategies are aligned with the high potency and convenience; however, insurance coverage variability influences patient access. Reimbursement policies critically impact adoption rates, especially in countries with stringent drug formularies.


Future Market Projection

Growth Drivers

  • Rising Cancer Incidence: The World Health Organization estimates 19.3 million new cancer cases globally in 2020, projected to reach 28.4 million by 2040.
  • Advancements in Pain Management: Improvements in delivery forms; patient preference for rapid onset analgesics.
  • Lifecycle Management: Potential new formulations (e.g., film-based delivery) could rejuvenate the brand.

Potential Challenges

  • Opioid Regulatory Reforms: Increasing restrictions may limit prescribing.
  • Abuse and Diversion Risks: Heightened scrutiny could restrict access further.
  • Market Saturation: Growth may plateau in mature markets; emphasis on emerging markets is crucial.

Forecast

By 2030, the global market for fentanyl-based breakthrough pain medications, including Abstral, is projected to reach $4.5 billion, with a CAGR of approximately 5% stemming from demographic trends in oncology care and pain management innovation. The North American market is expected to maintain dominance, driven by advanced healthcare infrastructure and specialty care access, though Asia-Pacific offers expandable growth opportunities.


Regulatory Outlook and R&D Opportunities

Given the ongoing emphasis on opioid safety, future R&D efforts are likely to focus on:

  • Novel Delivery Systems: Thin-film, dissolvable formats with lower misuse potential.
  • Abuse-Deterrent Formulations: Enhanced formulations to minimize diversion and overdose risks.
  • Biomarker-Guided Dosing: Personalized medicine approaches to optimize pain relief while reducing adverse effects.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Status: Post-marketing studies affirm Abstral’s efficacy and rapid action, with ongoing safety surveillance.
  • Market Dynamics: Abstral occupies a niche in fast-acting breakthrough pain management, competing with other fentanyl formulations.
  • Growth Potential: Rising cancer prevalence and innovations in drug delivery could expand its market, particularly if abuse deterrent features are incorporated.
  • Challenges: Regulatory restrictions, abuse potential perceptions, and healthcare provider education remain significant barriers.
  • Strategic Focus: Market players should prioritize R&D in abuse-deterrent formulations and expand into emerging markets with targeted educational initiatives.

FAQs

Q1: What distinguishes Abstral from other fentanyl formulations?
A: Abstral is designed for rapid onset of action via sublingual administration, providing quick pain relief within approximately 15 minutes, making it suitable for breakthrough cancer pain episodes.

Q2: Is Abstral recommended for use in elderly patients?
A: Use in elderly patients requires caution due to increased sensitivity to opioids and comorbidities. Ongoing studies aim to define safety profiles in this demographic.

Q3: What are the main safety concerns associated with Abstral?
A: Risks include respiratory depression, misuse, diversion, and accidental exposure. Strict adherence to dosing guidelines is essential to mitigate these risks.

Q4: How is the market for Abstral expected to evolve globally?
A: Growth prospects remain strong in mature markets like North America and Europe, with emerging markets offering substantial potential driven by rising cancer burden and healthcare improvements.

Q5: Are there ongoing efforts to develop abuse-deterrent versions of Abstral?
A: Yes, pharmaceutical R&D is increasingly focused on incorporating abuse-deterrent technologies into fentanyl formulations, which may enhance safety and market acceptance.


References

[1] FDA. Abstral (fentanyl sublingual tablet) prescribing information. 2011.
[2] MarketWatch. Global Opioid Analgesics Market Report, 2022.
[3] WHO. Cancer Statistics, 2020.
[4] Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2022.
[5] EMA. Post-marketing surveillance data, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.