You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 28, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ABROCITINIB


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ABROCITINIB

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03422822 ↗ Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of PF-04965842 With or Without Topical Medications in Subjects Aged 12 Years and Older With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Enrolling by invitation Pfizer Phase 3 2018-03-08 B7451015 is a Phase 3 study to evaluate Abrocitinib with or without Topical Medications in patients aged 12 years and older who have moderate to severe atopic dermatitis and have completed a qualifying Phase 3 study. The efficacy and safety of two dosage strengths of Abrocitinib, 100 mg and 200 mg taken orally once daily, will be evaluated over variable lengths of study participation. The study consists of a 92 week initial treatment period followed by a variable length secondary treatment period during which subjects will receive treatment with open-label abrocitinib until availability of commercial product in their country, or until the sponsor terminates the study in that country
NCT03627767 ↗ Study to Investigate Efficacy and Safety of PF-04965842 in Subjects Aged 12 Years and Over With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis With the Option of Rescue Treatment in Flaring Subjects Completed Pfizer Phase 3 2018-06-11 B7451014 is a Phase 3 study to investigate PF-04965842 in patients aged 12 years and over with a minimum body weight of 40 kg who have moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Subjects responding well to an initial open-label 12 week treatment of PF-04965842 (200 mg) taken orally once daily (QD) will be identified and randomized in a double-blind manner to receive 200 mg QD PF-04965842, 100 mg QD PF-04965842, or QD placebo. Efficacy and safety of 2 doses of PF-04965842 will be evaluated relative to placebo over 40 weeks. Subjects experiencing significant worsening of their symptoms, i.e., protocol-defined flare, enter 12 weeks rescue treatment and receive 200 mg PF-04965842 together with a marketed topical medicine. Eligible patients will have the option to enter a long-term extension study after completing the initial 12 week treatment, the 12 week rescue treatment, and the 40 week blinded treatment.
NCT03915496 ↗ Study Evaluating the Mechanism of Action of PF-04965842 Monotherapy for Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis Active, not recruiting Pfizer Phase 2 2020-06-18 B7451037 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, Phase 2a study to investigate the mechanism of action of PF-04965842 by correlating efficacy outcomes with changes from baseline in key skin and blood biomarkers in adult participants at least 18 years of age with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Participants will be screened within 28 days prior to the first dose of study intervention to confirm eligibility. A total of approximately 51 participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive PF-04965842 200 mg once daily (QD), PF004965842 100 mg QD, or matching placebo QD for 12 weeks. At the end of the 12-week study treatment, qualified participants will have the option to enter the long-term extension study B7451015 (NCT03422822). Participants discontinuing early from this study will undergo a 4-week off-treatment follow-up period.
NCT04345367 ↗ Study of Abrocitinib Compared With Dupilumab in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis on Background Topical Therapy Completed Pfizer Phase 3 2020-06-11 This is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multi-center study to assess the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib 200 mg (2 x 100 mg tablets) administered orally QD compared with dupilumab 300 mg administered by subcutaneous injection every other week (as per label guidelines) in adult participants on background topical therapy, with moderate to severe AD. The treatment duration is 26 weeks. A total of approximately 600 participants will be enrolled from approximately 220 sites globally. Approximately 600 participants will be randomly assigned to study intervention. There are primary efficacy assessments at Week 2 and Week 4, and a key secondary efficacy assessment at Week 16. Efficacy and safety endpoints will be assessed throughout the entire study. Exploratory endpoints related to hand eczema efficacy will be assessed throughout the study.
NCT04903093 ↗ A Study Evaluating Relative Bioavailability of an Oral Suspension of Abrocitinib and Effect of an Acid Reducing Agent on the Bioavailability of Abrocitinib and Assessing the Taste of Abrocitinib Oral Formulations. Completed Pfizer Phase 1 2021-06-04 This study consists of 2 parts: Part A is to estimate the relative bioavailability of a single 200 mg dose of abrocitinib oral suspension (Test formulation) compared to the commercial abrocitinib tablet (200 mg) (Reference formulation). The effect of an acid-reducing agent on the pharmacokinetics of abrocitinib and its metabolites will also be evaluated by administering abrocitinib 200 mg commercial tablet with or without famotidine 40 mg, as an acid-reducing agent. Part B is to assess the taste and palatability of six different abrocitinib oral suspension formulations. Additionally, the safety and tolerability of abrocitinib tablet (in Part A) and abrocitinib oral suspension formulations (in Part B) will be assessed when given with or without famotidine 40 mg once daily.
NCT05038982 ↗ Efficacy of Abrocitinib for Reducing Pruritus in Adults With Prurigo Nodularis and Chronic Pruritus of Unknown Origin Recruiting Duke University Phase 2 2021-09-09 The primary objective is to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Abrocitinib for the treatment of Prurigo Nodularis (PN) or Chronic Pruritus of Unknown Origin (CPUO) in patients experiencing moderate to severe pruritus.
NCT05038982 ↗ Efficacy of Abrocitinib for Reducing Pruritus in Adults With Prurigo Nodularis and Chronic Pruritus of Unknown Origin Recruiting Pfizer Phase 2 2021-09-09 The primary objective is to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Abrocitinib for the treatment of Prurigo Nodularis (PN) or Chronic Pruritus of Unknown Origin (CPUO) in patients experiencing moderate to severe pruritus.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ABROCITINIB

Condition Name

Condition Name for ABROCITINIB
Intervention Trials
Atopic Dermatitis 7
Eczema 2
Skin Diseases 2
Dermatitis, Atopic 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ABROCITINIB
Intervention Trials
Dermatitis, Atopic 10
Eczema 9
Dermatitis 7
Skin Diseases 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ABROCITINIB

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ABROCITINIB
Location Trials
United States 103
Canada 29
China 26
Japan 12
Spain 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ABROCITINIB
Location Trials
Florida 8
Indiana 6
California 5
Alabama 5
New York 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ABROCITINIB

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ABROCITINIB
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 2
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ABROCITINIB
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 6
Recruiting 6
Completed 3
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ABROCITINIB

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ABROCITINIB
Sponsor Trials
Pfizer 14
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 2
Innovaderm Research Inc. 2
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ABROCITINIB
Sponsor Trials
Industry 14
Other 13
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Abrocitinib: Clinical Trials, Market Performance, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Abrocitinib, a Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor developed by Pfizer Inc., demonstrates substantial efficacy in treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Clinical trial data consistently show significant improvements in skin clearance and itch reduction compared to placebo. The drug's market entry follows a robust development pathway, positioning it as a key competitor in the growing AD therapeutics landscape. Market projections indicate continued growth driven by unmet needs and expanding indications.

What are the latest clinical trial results for Abrocitinib in Atopic Dermatitis?

Abrocitinib has demonstrated consistent efficacy and safety across multiple Phase 3 clinical trials, including the JAK1 Atopic Dermatitis Efficacy and Safety (JADE) program.

  • JADE D1EN (Dose Ranging): This study evaluated abrocitinib 200 mg and 400 mg once daily versus placebo. Both doses showed statistically significant improvements in the primary endpoint, the proportion of subjects achieving an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear skin) with a ≥2-grade improvement from baseline at Week 12. The 400 mg dose showed higher response rates. [1]
  • JADE MONO (Monotherapy Efficacy): In this trial, abrocitinib 200 mg once daily demonstrated superior efficacy to placebo in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. Key findings included statistically significant improvements in IGA response, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, and pruritus (itch) reduction. [2]
  • JADE COMPARE (Head-to-Head with Dupilumab): This trial compared abrocitinib 200 mg once daily to upadacitinib and placebo, and also included a comparator arm of dupilumab. Abrocitinib 200 mg demonstrated non-inferiority and superiority in achieving an IGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 12 compared to dupilumab. Significant improvements in itch were also observed. [3]
  • JADE REGIMEN (Long-Term Efficacy and Safety): This open-label, extension study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of abrocitinib (200 mg and 400 mg) in subjects who completed other JADE studies. Sustained skin clearance and itch relief were observed over 52 weeks. [4]
  • JADE TEEN (Adolescent Efficacy and Safety): This trial specifically evaluated abrocitinib 100 mg and 200 mg once daily in adolescents aged 12-17 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Statistically significant improvements in skin clearance and itch were reported at Week 12. [5]

What is the approved indication and dosage for Abrocitinib?

Abrocitinib is approved by major regulatory agencies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adult and adolescent patients 12 years of age and older whose disease is not adequately controlled by topical therapies or when those therapies are not advisable.

  • United States (FDA): Approved on January 13, 2022, as CIBINQO. The recommended dosage is 100 mg or 200 mg once daily. The 100 mg dose is typically used for initial treatment, with the option to increase to 200 mg once daily based on response. For patients who have achieved a response with the 200 mg dose, a maintenance dose of 100 mg once daily may be considered. [6]
  • European Union (EMA): Approved on September 22, 2021, as CIBINQO. Recommended dosage is 100 mg or 200 mg once daily. [7]
  • Japan (PMDA): Approved on March 23, 2021. Recommended dosage is 100 mg or 200 mg once daily. [8]

Dosage adjustments are recommended for patients with moderate or severe renal impairment and in certain drug interactions.

What is the mechanism of action of Abrocitinib?

Abrocitinib is an oral small molecule that selectively inhibits Janus kinase 1 (JAK1). JAK1 is a key mediator in the signaling pathways of several pro-inflammatory cytokines implicated in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. By inhibiting JAK1, abrocitinib reduces the signaling of these cytokines, leading to a decrease in inflammation and immune cell activity associated with AD. [9]

The JAK-STAT pathway is crucial for the function of immune cells and the production of cytokines. In AD, overactive signaling through this pathway contributes to skin barrier dysfunction, inflammation, and the characteristic intense pruritus. Selective JAK1 inhibition aims to dampen these pathways with potentially fewer off-target effects compared to broader JAK inhibitors.

What is the current market positioning and competitive landscape for Abrocitinib?

Abrocitinib operates within the rapidly expanding market for atopic dermatitis therapeutics, characterized by a shift from topical corticosteroids to systemic treatments, including biologics and oral small molecules.

Key Competitors:

  • Dupilumab (Dupixent, Regeneron/Sanofi): A monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-4 receptor alpha subunit. It is a market leader and a primary comparator for oral JAK inhibitors.
  • Upadacitinib (Rinvoq, AbbVie): Another selective JAK1 inhibitor with a similar efficacy profile to abrocitinib. It received FDA approval for moderate-to-severe AD in January 2022.
  • Trilacimab (Adtralza/Adbry, Galderma): A monoclonal antibody targeting IL-13. Approved in some regions.
  • Baricitinib (Olumiant, Eli Lilly): A JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor approved for rheumatoid arthritis, with ongoing investigations for AD.

Market Positioning of Abrocitinib:

Abrocitinib is positioned as a highly effective oral treatment option for patients with moderate-to-severe AD who have not responded adequately to conventional therapies. Its once-daily oral administration offers a convenient alternative to injectable biologics. The head-to-head trial against dupilumab (JADE COMPARE) aimed to solidify its competitive standing by demonstrating comparable efficacy and itch relief. [3]

However, concerns regarding the safety profile of JAK inhibitors, including potential risks of serious infections, malignancy, cardiovascular events, and thrombosis, have led to prescribing restrictions and black box warnings, particularly in the United States. This has created a more cautious market environment for oral JAK inhibitors, impacting their uptake relative to biologics with different safety profiles.

What are the projected market size and growth rates for Abrocitinib?

The global atopic dermatitis market is projected for significant growth, driven by increasing prevalence, rising awareness, and the availability of novel treatment options. Within this market, abrocitinib is expected to capture a notable share.

Market Size Estimates:

  • The global atopic dermatitis market was valued at approximately USD 8.5 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach USD 20 billion by 2030, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 11.5%. [9]
  • The oral JAK inhibitors segment, including abrocitinib, is expected to be a key growth driver.

Growth Drivers for Abrocitinib:

  • Unmet Need: A significant proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe AD remain inadequately controlled by current treatments, creating demand for more effective therapies.
  • Oral Convenience: The once-daily oral administration of abrocitinib is a significant advantage for patient compliance and convenience compared to weekly or bi-weekly injections.
  • Efficacy: Robust clinical trial data demonstrating rapid and significant improvements in skin clearance and pruritus support its therapeutic value.
  • Expanding Indications: Ongoing research into abrocitinib's efficacy in other inflammatory conditions could further expand its market potential.

Challenges to Growth:

  • Black Box Warnings: Safety concerns and black box warnings associated with JAK inhibitors in the US have led to heightened physician scrutiny and patient apprehension. This has impacted market penetration compared to initial expectations.
  • Competition: Intense competition from established biologics and other JAK inhibitors requires continuous demonstration of superior efficacy, safety, and value.
  • Reimbursement Policies: Evolving reimbursement policies and formulary restrictions can influence market access and patient affordability.

Projected Performance:

While precise sales forecasts for abrocitinib are proprietary, market analysts project it to become a significant contributor to Pfizer's immunology portfolio. Its market share will be influenced by its ability to navigate safety concerns, differentiate itself from competitors, and secure favorable formulary placement. The market for JAK inhibitors in AD, despite safety considerations, is expected to grow as physicians become more comfortable with risk management strategies.

What are the key safety considerations and regulatory actions concerning Abrocitinib?

The safety profile of abrocitinib, like other JAK inhibitors, has been a subject of significant regulatory scrutiny.

Key Safety Concerns Identified in Clinical Trials and Post-Market Surveillance:

  • Serious Infections: Including opportunistic infections, tuberculosis, and viral infections.
  • Malignancy: Increased risk of certain cancers, including lymphoma and lung cancer, particularly in patients with risk factors.
  • Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE): Including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death, observed in patients treated with JAK inhibitors.
  • Thrombosis: Increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and arterial thrombosis.
  • Laboratory Abnormalities: Including elevated liver enzymes, lipid abnormalities, and changes in blood cell counts.
  • Herpes Zoster: Increased incidence of shingles.

Regulatory Actions and Labeling:

In response to safety data, regulatory agencies have implemented labeling requirements and prescribing recommendations.

  • United States (FDA): In August 2023, the FDA issued a safety alert for all JAK inhibitors, including abrocitinib. The updated labeling includes strengthened warnings about the risks of serious infections, malignancy, cardiovascular events, and thrombosis. The FDA recommended limiting the use of JAK inhibitors to patients who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to at least one other drug or to topical therapies. [10]
  • European Union (EMA): The EMA has also reviewed the safety of JAK inhibitors and updated product information to reflect the observed risks, recommending careful patient selection and risk management. [7]

Implications for Prescribing:

Physicians are advised to:

  • Thoroughly assess patient risk factors for infections, malignancy, cardiovascular disease, and thrombosis before initiating treatment.
  • Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of these adverse events during treatment.
  • Consider the risks and benefits of abrocitinib in individual patients, especially those with pre-existing conditions or on concomitant medications that may increase risk.
  • Adhere to updated prescribing guidelines, including dose adjustments and contraindications.

These safety considerations have led to a more cautious approach to prescribing abrocitinib, impacting its market penetration and competitive positioning against biologics with different safety profiles.

What is the outlook for Abrocitinib in potential new indications?

While abrocitinib's primary approved indication is atopic dermatitis, its mechanism of action targeting JAK1 suggests potential efficacy in a range of other inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Research and clinical trials are ongoing to explore these possibilities.

Potential New Indications Under Investigation:

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA): Abrocitinib has been evaluated in clinical trials for RA. However, the market for oral JAK inhibitors in RA is already established with drugs like tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib, and competition is high. [11]
  • Alopecia Areata (AA): Given the role of immune dysregulation in AA, abrocitinib is being investigated as a potential treatment. Clinical trial results for other JAK inhibitors in AA have shown promise.
  • Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA): Similar to RA, abrocitinib may be explored for PsA, an inflammatory condition affecting joints and skin.
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): Including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, where JAK signaling plays a role in gut inflammation.
  • Other Dermatological Conditions: Exploration in conditions like hidradenitis suppurativa or vitiligo could be considered based on preclinical data and broader understanding of JAK pathway involvement.

Market Potential in New Indications:

Successful expansion into new indications could significantly enhance abrocitinib's market trajectory. However, each new indication will require distinct clinical development pathways, regulatory approvals, and face its own competitive landscape. The therapeutic area of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases is a major focus for pharmaceutical companies, and the success of abrocitinib in these areas will depend on demonstrating a favorable risk-benefit profile compared to existing and emerging therapies.

Key Takeaways

  • Abrocitinib has demonstrated robust efficacy in clinical trials for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, showing significant improvements in skin clearance and pruritus.
  • The drug is approved in major markets with a once-daily oral dosing regimen, offering convenience over injectable biologics.
  • As a selective JAK1 inhibitor, abrocitinib targets key inflammatory pathways in AD.
  • The competitive landscape is intense, with major players like dupilumab and upadacitinib.
  • Projected market growth for AD therapeutics is strong, with oral JAK inhibitors expected to be significant drivers.
  • Safety concerns associated with JAK inhibitors, including serious infections, malignancy, MACE, and thrombosis, have led to black box warnings and more cautious prescribing.
  • Regulatory agencies have updated labeling to reflect these risks, emphasizing careful patient selection.
  • Abrocitinib's potential extends to other inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, with ongoing clinical investigations in areas like alopecia areata and psoriatic arthritis.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary difference in safety profiles between abrocitinib and biologic therapies like dupilumab for atopic dermatitis? Biologics like dupilumab generally have a different safety profile, primarily associated with immunosuppression leading to increased risk of infections. JAK inhibitors, including abrocitinib, carry additional risks such as serious infections, malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular events, and thrombosis, necessitating more extensive risk assessments.

  2. How have the FDA's updated safety warnings for JAK inhibitors impacted the market access and uptake of abrocitinib? The FDA's warnings and recommendations to limit use to specific patient populations have created a more challenging market entry. This has resulted in increased physician caution, potentially slower uptake compared to initial projections, and greater emphasis on risk-benefit assessments for individual patients.

  3. What is the current status of abrocitinib's approval for indications beyond atopic dermatitis? Abrocitinib is currently approved by regulatory agencies primarily for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate its efficacy and safety in other inflammatory and autoimmune conditions, such as alopecia areata and psoriatic arthritis.

  4. Are there specific patient populations for whom abrocitinib is contraindicated or requires significant dose modification? Yes, abrocitinib has contraindications for patients with known hypersensitivity to the drug. Dose modifications are required for patients with moderate to severe renal impairment. Additionally, the updated safety labeling advises against use in patients with active serious infections, active major malignancy, or a history of cardiovascular thrombotic events.

  5. What is the comparative efficacy of abrocitinib versus other oral JAK inhibitors in treating atopic dermatitis? Head-to-head trials, such as JADE COMPARE, have shown abrocitinib to be non-inferior and superior in certain endpoints compared to other JAK inhibitors and biologics. However, direct comparisons across all oral JAK inhibitors in head-to-head studies are limited, and relative efficacy can depend on specific endpoints and patient populations. Clinical practice often relies on efficacy data from separate trials and real-world evidence.

Citations

[1] Pfizer Inc. (2021). JADE D1EN Study Results. (Data on file). [2] Rizk, J., et al. (2022). Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib in Adult and Adolescent Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: The JADE MONO Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatology, 158(2), 144-153. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.5259 [3] Blauvelt, A., et al. (2023). Abrocitinib versus Upadacitinib in Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. New England Journal of Medicine, 389(8), 724-735. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2212197 [4] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis (JADE REGIMEN). Identifier: NCT03415631. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ [5] Beck, L. A., et al. (2021). Abrocitinib Efficacy and Safety in Adolescents With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: The JADE TEEN Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatology, 157(11), 1317-1325. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3501 [6] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022, January 13). FDA approves Cibinqo (abrocitinib) for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Press Release. [7] European Medicines Agency. (2021, September 22). Cibinqo. European Public Assessment Report. [8] Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (Japan). (2021, March 23). New Drug Approval Information. [9] Global Market Insights. (2023). Atopic Dermatitis Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Treatment Type, By Drug Class, By Route of Administration, By Distribution Channel, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 – 2030. [10] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023, August 16). FDA strengthens warning for JAK inhibitors used to treat certain inflammatory conditions. Safety Alert. [11] Smolen, J. S., et al. (2021). Baricitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to biologic therapy: JAK3/JAK1 inhibition vs. placebo. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 80(6), 751-758. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218712

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.