Last Updated: May 16, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ABREVA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ABREVA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT04893577 ↗ EDTA Eye Drops Compared to Abreva for Herpes Simplex Virus Eruptions Not yet recruiting University of Utah Phase 2 2021-11-01 This will be a randomized, efficacy assessor-blinded, parallel group, pilot study of up to 20 subjects with documented herpes labialis. Patients will be treated with the study drug, EDTA Eye Drops or the active comparator of Abreva. Potential subjects will be assessed during a screening visit that must take place no greater than 2 weeks prior to the Day 1 (Baseline) visit. During the screening period, subjects that meet all other entry criteria will undergo UV susceptibility testing to determine their individual MED (minimal erythemal dose). UV susceptibility testing takes place over two days with exposure to UV light on specified regions on the subject's back followed by an assessment of the exposed areas 24 hours later to identify the MED. Subjects who have a measurable MED will be allowed to enroll in the study. Each subject will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either EED or Comparator. Patients who express a cold sore will track the lesion with a diary card to rate their pain levels, and any unusual symptoms at Day 1, Day 3, Day 5, Day 7, and Day 10. Patients may also take photographs of the lesion throughout the study.
NCT06558838 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Acyclovir-penciclovir Cream Versus an Abreva in the Suppression of Herpes Simplex Virus Eruptions ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION University of Utah PHASE2 2024-08-19 This will be a randomized, efficacy assessor-blinded, parallel group, pilot study of up to 40 subjects with documented herpes labialis. Patients will be treated with the study drug, acyclovir-penciclovir cream, or the active comparator of Abreva. Potential subjects will be assessed during a screening visit that must take place no greater than 2 weeks prior to the Day 1 (Baseline) visit. During the screening period, subjects that meet all other entry criteria will undergo Ultraviolet susceptibility testing to determine the subject's individual minimal erythema dose (MED). Ultraviolet susceptibility testing takes place over two days with exposure to Ultraviolet light on specified regions on the subject's back followed by an assessment of the exposed areas 24 hours later to identify the MED. Subjects who have a measurable MED will be allowed to enroll in the study. Each subject will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either acyclovir-penciclovir cream or Comparator (Abreva). Patients who express a cold sore will track the lesion with a diary card to rate their pain levels, and any unusual symptoms at Day 1, Day 3, Day 5, Day 7, and Day 10. Patients may also take photographs of the lesion throughout the study.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ABREVA

Condition Name

Condition Name for ABREVA
Intervention Trials
Herpes Simplex Oral 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ABREVA
Intervention Trials
Stomatitis, Herpetic 2
Herpes Simplex 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ABREVA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ABREVA
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ABREVA
Location Trials
Utah 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ABREVA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ABREVA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ABREVA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION 1
Not yet recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ABREVA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ABREVA
Sponsor Trials
University of Utah 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ABREVA
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 4, 2026

ABREVA (docosanol) clinical trials update and market projection

What is ABREVA and what products does it cover?

ABREVA is the brand name for docosanol, a topical antiviral for cold sores. In the US it is sold as:

  • ABREVA 10% cream (docosanol topical)

Docosanol is the same active ingredient across markets where the product is marketed under the ABREVA brand.


What clinical-trials evidence updates exist for docosanol/ABREVA?

No new, practice-changing late-stage registrational trials are indicated in the public record for docosanol since the product’s established approval pathway. The available clinical evidence base remains dominated by earlier randomized trials used to support the product’s original labeling and benefit claims.

Evidence pattern

  • Docosanol has an established efficacy dataset concentrated in earlier controlled studies for primary endpoints tied to time to healing and/or time to lesion resolution
  • Post-approval activity is largely limited to formulation use, post-marketing observational work, and routine safety coverage, not new Phase 3 programs intended to expand indications

Practical implication for R&D and investment

  • The clinical “update” for ABREVA is best characterized as incremental/maintenance rather than new indication expansion driven by new Phase 3 readouts.

What does the existing labeling marketize (claims that drive use)?

ABREVA’s US value proposition is tied to the consumer-patient behavior around cold sore onset:

  • Topical self-therapy for herpes labialis (cold sores) at early lesion stages
  • Benefit framing in labeling historically emphasizes:
    • reduced time to healing versus placebo
    • reduced duration parameters tied to lesion resolution endpoints

Market adoption depends on:

  • availability without prescription
  • brand recognition
  • time-to-benefit communication to consumers

Where is the docosanol/ABREVA market today (geography and channel structure)?

Docosanol’s market is primarily:

  • Over-the-counter (OTC)
  • Retail pharmacy, drugstore, and e-commerce
  • Concentrated in markets with established cold sore consumer behavior and OTC antiviral penetration

Because ABREVA is OTC, the “clinical trials update” does not translate into the same investable levers as a prescription product pipeline (no label-driven payer expansion). The market is driven more by:

  • OTC merchandising and availability
  • competitive OTC shelf position
  • consumer substitution dynamics for lesion-duration benefits

Competitive landscape: what substitutes pressure ABREVA?

Key competitive pressure comes from alternative OTC topical options for cold sores, including:

  • other topical antivirals and topical analgesic/skin-protectant products sold OTC
  • combination products and barrier-formulating approaches that compete at the point of use
  • in some markets, prescription antiviral tablets (for recurrent or severe cases) that shift a subset of consumers away from topical self-care

This competition affects ABREVA mostly by:

  • shifting share within OTC cold sore categories
  • reducing incremental conversion if consumer expectations align with alternatives

What is the market outlook for OTC cold sores, and how does that map to docosanol/ABREVA?

Cold sore prevalence is persistent, and the OTC segment stays active due to:

  • chronic recurrence in a subset of the population
  • predictable seasonal and episodic demand patterns
  • ongoing consumer willingness to self-treat

For docosanol/ABREVA, projections hinge on whether category growth outpaces substitution by alternatives. Without a new clinical expansion signal, ABREVA’s revenue growth typically follows:

  • category volume trends
  • pricing and pack mix
  • retention of share in the cold sore OTC shelf category

Market projection for ABREVA: base-case, bull-case, bear-case

Method used

  • Product-level projection is constructed from a category-growth approach rather than a pipeline upside model, given docosanol’s mature indication and lack of late-stage expansion signals in the public record.
  • Projections are expressed as index ranges for directionality, not as guaranteed forecasts.

Projected ABREVA revenue trajectory (index-based)

Scenario OTC cold sore category growth vs. competition ABREVA relative growth vs. category Direction (next 3 years)
Bear case Softer category demand and stronger OTC substitution Below category Low growth or decline
Base case Stable category demand; competition steady In line with category Modest growth
Bull case Category growth with sustained brand retention Above category Outperformance on share/pack mix

What determines which scenario plays out

  • sustained visibility of ABREVA in retail and online
  • price elasticity and promotional intensity
  • consumer substitution to competing OTCs
  • channel mix shifts (e-commerce share tends to intensify price competition)

Key clinical and regulatory constraints that shape ABREVA’s forward outlook

Because docosanol is a mature OTC product:

  • No new Phase 3 evidence pipeline is a prerequisite for maintaining the current indication in most markets
  • Competitive dynamics are more likely to be driven by OTC market behavior than by new clinical advances

This means investment and R&D decisions focus on:

  • product lifecycle management
  • formulation and packaging improvements (for OTC conversion)
  • brand and channel optimization rather than new clinical endpoints

What about patents and exclusivity: how do they affect ABREVA’s economics?

Docosanol’s mature status means:

  • patent exclusivity for the core composition and original development likely is long past in most major jurisdictions
  • competition can be driven by generic or similar topical antivirals where approved and marketed

Economics therefore depend on:

  • brand strength and differentiation
  • formulation-specific product positioning
  • retailer listing strategies and pack economics

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials update for ABREVA/docosanol is incremental: the public evidence base remains anchored in earlier registrational studies for cold sores, with limited indication-expansion signals.
  • Market is OTC and channel-driven: ABREVA’s near-term trajectory depends on retail and e-commerce merchandising, pricing, and share within OTC cold sore categories.
  • Projection is scenario-based: with no new registrational cycle, revenue growth is most sensitive to category demand and competitive substitution rather than pipeline risk-on upside.
  • Patent-driven upside is limited: mature product status implies economics are driven by brand and execution, not fresh exclusivity.

FAQs

1) Is ABREVA expanding into new indications based on recent trials?

No indication expansion is evidenced in the public late-stage trial record in a way that suggests a new registrational pathway.

2) Does the clinical evidence for docosanol support faster healing for cold sores?

Earlier controlled studies support lesion-healing duration benefits compared with placebo, and this is the core basis for its OTC use.

3) What most influences ABREVA sales in the next few years?

OTC category dynamics, competitive OTC substitution, pricing/promotions, and channel mix (retail vs. e-commerce).

4) Are there active late-stage programs that could materially change ABREVA’s profile?

No clear public signal indicates a late-stage program that would materially change the product’s labeled position.

5) How should investors think about ABREVA’s growth versus a pipeline drug?

Expect growth to track OTC category and market share execution more than clinical-cycle milestones.


References (APA)

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). ABREVA (docosanol) topical cream product information and labeling. FDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/
[2] National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov: docosanol (and ABREVA) trials. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[3] World Health Organization. (n.d.). Herpes simplex virus fact sheets and background. WHO. https://www.who.int/
[4] PubMed. (n.d.). Docosanol randomized trials in herpes labialis. PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.