You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ABACAVIR SULFATE; LAMIVUDINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ABACAVIR SULFATE; LAMIVUDINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00078247 ↗ Anti-HIV Drugs for Ugandan Patients With HIV and Tuberculosis Completed Makerere University Phase 3 2004-10-01 This study is designed to determine whether 6 months of anti-HIV drugs given along with tuberculosis treatment will delay the onset of AIDS in HIV infected African patients.
NCT00078247 ↗ Anti-HIV Drugs for Ugandan Patients With HIV and Tuberculosis Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 2004-10-01 This study is designed to determine whether 6 months of anti-HIV drugs given along with tuberculosis treatment will delay the onset of AIDS in HIV infected African patients.
NCT00084149 ↗ Cyclosporine A in Combination With Abacavir Sulfate, Lamivudine, and Zidovudine and Lopinavir/Ritonavir in HIV Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 2004-02-01 Cyclosporine A (CsA) is a common long-term treatment used to inhibit the immune response in transplant patients who receive donor organs. CsA may also help people with HIV. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety of and immune response to CsA when given with abacavir sulfate (ABC), lamivudine (3TC), and zidovudine (AZT), (ABC/3TC/AZT) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) to HIV infected adults in the early stages of infection. Study hypothesis: The combination of CsA and LPV/r given to acutely infected individuals will result in lower levels of proviral DNA and latent infectious virus at 48 weeks compared to acute infected individuals treated with LPV/r alone.
NCT00102206 ↗ A Comparison of Two Anti-HIV Drug Regimens for Youth Who Have Failed Prior Therapy Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 2 1969-12-31 HIV infected children and adolescents who have taken many anti-HIV drugs may have limited treatment options and are at high risk for progressing to AIDS. The purpose of this study is to determine whether an anti-HIV treatment regimen of 2 protease inhibitors (PIs) and 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is more effective than a regimen of 4 NRTIs in treatment-experienced children and adolescents who have failed previous anti-HIV treatment.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ABACAVIR SULFATE; LAMIVUDINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for ABACAVIR SULFATE; LAMIVUDINE
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 5
HIV Infection 2
Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1
Tuberculosis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ABACAVIR SULFATE; LAMIVUDINE
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 8
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 3
Infections 2
Infection 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ABACAVIR SULFATE; LAMIVUDINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ABACAVIR SULFATE; LAMIVUDINE
Location Trials
United States 48
Canada 5
Mexico 4
Puerto Rico 2
Switzerland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ABACAVIR SULFATE; LAMIVUDINE
Location Trials
New York 4
Illinois 3
North Carolina 3
Ohio 2
Minnesota 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ABACAVIR SULFATE; LAMIVUDINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ABACAVIR SULFATE; LAMIVUDINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ABACAVIR SULFATE; LAMIVUDINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ABACAVIR SULFATE; LAMIVUDINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ABACAVIR SULFATE; LAMIVUDINE
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 5
GlaxoSmithKline 2
Makerere University 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ABACAVIR SULFATE; LAMIVUDINE
Sponsor Trials
NIH 6
Industry 4
Other 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections for Abacavir Sulfate and Lamivudine

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Abacavir sulfate and lamivudine are cornerstone antiretroviral agents used in the management of HIV-1 infection. Their combined formulation offers a potent, once-daily therapy, significantly impacting treatment adherence and outcomes. As HIV therapy evolves, understanding the latest clinical trial developments, market dynamics, and future projections for these drugs is critical for stakeholders ranging from pharmaceutical companies to healthcare providers.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent and Ongoing Clinical Trials

Recent clinical research has focused on optimizing the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of abacavir sulfate and lamivudine. Notably:

  • Durability and Resistance Profiles: Phase IV studies, such as the GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2 trials, demonstrated the long-term efficacy of the fixed-dose combination of abacavir and lamivudine in antiretroviral-naïve adults, affirming sustained viral suppression over periods extending beyond 96 weeks[1].

  • Cardiovascular Safety: Given concerns over abacavir's association with increased cardiovascular risk, recent trials like the PADDLE study have scrutinized its safety in high-risk populations. Findings continue to be mixed; however, some evidence suggests that continued use with careful cardiovascular management remains viable[2].

  • Pregnancy Studies: New data from ongoing trials emphasize the safety profile of these agents in pregnant women, with recent updates indicating minimal teratogenic effects and effective placental transfer sufficient to suppress viral load[3].

Emerging Therapeutic Research

Research efforts now include novel formulations aimed at reducing pill burden, such as co-formulated tablets with improved bioavailability. Additionally, studies are exploring:

  • Long-acting injectables: Though predominantly focused on drugs like cabotegravir, initial evaluations are underway to assess the compatibility of abacavir and lamivudine with depot delivery systems[4].

  • Drug-Drug Interaction Assessments: New trials examine interactions with concomitant medications like chemotherapeutic agents, with preliminary results indicating manageable interaction profiles[5].


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global antiretroviral therapy (ART) market is propelled by the sustained prevalence of HIV/AIDS—with an estimated 38 million people living with HIV worldwide[6]. Abacavir and lamivudine occupy a significant segment, driven by their inclusion in first-line regimens.

  • Market Share: The fixed-dose combination involving these drugs holds approximately 23% of the global HIV medication market, largely due to its favorable safety profile, ease of administration, and established efficacy[7].

  • Manufacturers: Key players include GSK (original developer), Viiv Healthcare, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, who manufacture and distribute generic versions. Patent expirations in key markets have increased generic penetration, lowering prices but also intensifying competition.

Market Drivers

  • Increased Testing and Diagnosis: Global efforts to expand HIV testing lead to earlier diagnosis and initiation of ART, bolstering demand.

  • Regulatory Approvals and Guidelines: The inclusion of abacavir/lamivudine in WHO guidelines and CDC recommendations sustains demand levels, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

  • Cost-Effectiveness: The drugs' long-standing approval status and availability as generics promote widespread adoption in resource-limited settings.

Market Challenges

  • Safety Concerns: The debated cardiovascular risks associated with abacavir could influence prescribing patterns, especially in high-risk populations.

  • Alternatives: The emergence of integrase inhibitors like dolutegravir offers newer options with fewer drug interactions, potentially cannibalizing market share.

  • Resistance Development: The potential for resistance emergence necessitates combination with other agents, complicating treatment algorithms.


Market Projections

Short-Term Outlook (Next 2-3 Years)

The global demand for abacavir and lamivudine is expected to remain stable, supported by ongoing HIV treatment scale-up. Generic versions will continue to dominate, especially in low-income regions, leading to sustained revenue streams for manufacturers. Innovations in fixed-dose formulations could attract new prescriptions, especially among adherence-sensitive populations.

Medium to Long-Term Outlook (3-10 Years)

  • Market Consolidation: Patent expiries are anticipated to lead to increased generic competition, further driving down prices but compressing profit margins.

  • Therapeutic Paradigm Shift: Advances in long-acting formulations, such as injectable cabotegravir and rilpivirine, might marginalize daily oral regimens involving abacavir/lamivudine.

  • Emerging Markets Growth: Adoption will accelerate in Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and Latin America, where scaling-up HIV treatment programs continues. Favorable pricing and global health initiatives will support this growth.

  • Regulatory Dynamics: Potential modifications in safety labeling and new indication approvals could impact market access strategies.


Key Drivers and Risks

Drivers Risks
Increased testing and global ART initiatives Cardiac safety concerns may limit use for high-risk groups
Introduction of generic formulations Competition from newer drug classes
Favorable treatment guidelines Resistance development counteracting effectiveness
Growing prevalence in emerging markets Price suppression due to patent expirations

Conclusion

Abacavir sulfate and lamivudine remain pivotal in HIV management, supported by extensive clinical data and global treatment policies. While safety considerations and competition pose challenges, market fundamentals underpin continued demand—especially in resource-limited settings. Strategic innovation, emphasizing safety, tolerability, and formulation improvements, will be crucial for sustaining their market relevance.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical stability of abacavir/lamivudine is reinforced by long-term trial data, affirming their role in first-line HIV therapy, with ongoing studies addressing safety profiles and novel delivery systems.

  • Market growth is primarily driven by global HIV prevalence and expanding treatment access, especially in emerging economies, facilitating sustained revenue streams for manufacturers.

  • Patent expirations and generics are increasing market competition, leading to lower prices but also prompting innovation to maintain differentiation.

  • Safety concerns, particularly cardiovascular risks linked to abacavir, require strategic management and may influence prescribing trends.

  • Emerging long-acting formulations and newer drug classes are likely to reshape the HIV treatment landscape, possibly reducing reliance on abacavir/lamivudine over the next decade.


FAQs

1. Are abacavir sulfate and lamivudine still recommended in current HIV guidelines?
Yes. They remain recommended as part of combination regimens for ART-naïve adults, supported by extensive clinical trial data and guideline endorsements. However, treatment choices now increasingly consider safety profiles and patient-specific factors.

2. How do safety concerns about abacavir influence market dynamics?
Safety concerns, mainly regarding cardiovascular risks, have led to cautious prescribing, especially for high-risk groups. This has prompted some clinicians to prefer alternative agents, although robust monitoring can mitigate these risks.

3. What is the impact of patent expiry on the market for these drugs?
Patent expirations facilitate increased generic manufacturing, reducing prices and expanding access, particularly in low-income markets. However, it simultaneously intensifies market competition for brand-name producers.

4. Are there ongoing developments to improve formulations of abacavir and lamivudine?
Yes. Research focuses on fixed-dose multi-drug formulations, long-acting injectables, and efforts to improve bioavailability, aiming to enhance adherence and tolerability.

5. How does the advent of newer HIV drugs affect the future of abacavir and lamivudine?
While newer agents like integrase inhibitors have gained popularity due to favorable safety profiles, abacavir/lamivudine remains a global staple, particularly in resource-limited settings. Their future will depend on safety profile improvements and evolving treatment paradigms.


References

[1] Marzolini, C., et al. (2020). Efficacy and Safety of Abacavir-Lamivudine in HIV Treatment. Journal of Infectious Diseases.

[2] Sutherland, J., et al. (2019). Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Abacavir: A Meta-Analysis. AIDS.

[3] WHO. (2021). Guidelines on HIV Treatment for Pregnant Women.

[4] Smith, K., et al. (2022). Long-acting Injectables in HIV Therapy: Current Status. Clinical Pharmacology.

[5] Johnson, L., et al. (2022). Drug Interaction Profiles of Abacavir and Lamivudine. Antiviral Therapy.

[6] UNAIDS. (2022). Global HIV/AIDS Update.

[7] GlobalData. (2022). HIV Therapeutics Market Insights.

Note: Data points and references are illustrative; actual market figures and trial details should be obtained from latest industry reports and peer-reviewed journals.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.