You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for ofev


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for ofev

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
AKos Consulting & Solutions ⤷  Get Started Free AKOS025149444 ⤷  Get Started Free
MedChemexpress MCE ⤷  Get Started Free HY-11106 ⤷  Get Started Free
Finetech Industry Limited ⤷  Get Started Free FT-0696830 ⤷  Get Started Free
AKos Consulting & Solutions ⤷  Get Started Free AKOS025402006 ⤷  Get Started Free
AbaChemScene ⤷  Get Started Free CS-3475 ⤷  Get Started Free
Hangzhou APIChem Technology ⤷  Get Started Free AC-28120 ⤷  Get Started Free
Key Organics/BIONET ⤷  Get Started Free KS-1447 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for Ofev (Nintedanib): Market Overview and Supply Chain Analysis

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

Ofev (Nintedanib) is a highly specialized tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed by Boehringer Ingelheim, primarily prescribed for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), and other fibrotic conditions[1]. The drug’s efficacy derives from its targeted mechanism of action, necessitating rigorous manufacturing standards and reliable sourcing of its active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). This article examines the global supply landscape for Nintedanib API, emphasizing pivotal manufacturers, sourcing strategies, regional supply chain dynamics, and associated regulatory considerations.


Overview of Nintedanib API Manufacturing

The synthesis of Nintedanib API involves complex chemical pathways, primarily through multi-step organic synthesis processes that demand high purity (typically over 99%) and stringent quality control. The API's structure, characterized by a diarylquinoline core, necessitates specific purifications and controlled reaction conditions, often requiring advanced facilities compliant with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP).

Manufacturers capable of producing APIs of this complexity are limited, with only a handful of leading companies validated to meet regulatory standards for pharmaceutical-grade APIs. The supply chain for Nintedanib seeds from these manufacturers, with most supply originating from regions with established chemical manufacturing infrastructure such as Europe, Asia (notably India and China), and North America.


Key API Manufacturers and Suppliers

1. Boehringer Ingelheim

As the originator of Ofev, Boehringer Ingelheim procures the Nintedanib API from in-house manufacturing facilities aligned with global GMP standards. The company’s vertical integration ensures quality control and supply consistency, making it the primary end-user of the API in their formulations. While direct insights into their API sourcing are proprietary, it is understood they blend internal manufacturing with select external suppliers to buffer against supply chain disruptions.

2. Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs)

Several CMOs act as critical suppliers of Nintedanib API, especially for generic manufacturers or regional distribution channels. These organizations often possess the requisite proprietary synthesis routes or licensed technologies. Key players include:

  • Jayu Chemical & Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (China): Known for producing complex APIs, including kinase inhibitors, and potentially capable of synthesizing Nintedanib API pursuant to licensing agreements.

  • Sino Biopharmaceuticals (China): Operates a broad portfolio of APIs, with some capabilities aligned to Nintedanib synthesis.

  • Hikal Ltd. (India): An established CMO with extensive experience in complex organic synthesis, potentially providing Nintedanib API under licensing agreements or custom synthesis modes.

  • Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories (India): As a significant generic API manufacturer, Dr. Reddy’s has the technical capacity to produce Nintedanib API once licensed.

3. API Raw Material and Intermediate Suppliers

While specific raw materials and intermediates for Nintedanib are proprietary, the synthesis relies on high-purity chemicals such as substituted phenyl rings, quinoline derivatives, and specific heterocyclic compounds. Suppliers of these intermediates include:

  • Merck KGaA (Germany): Supplies specific intermediates used in complex APIs.

  • BASF (Germany): Provides key chemical intermediates for pharmaceutical synthesis.

  • Shandong Xinhua Pharmaceutical (China): Offers synthetic intermediates for kinase inhibitors.


Regional Supply Chain Dynamics

Asia (India and China): Dominates the manufacturing of pharmaceutical intermediates and APIs for niche indications. Several Indian and Chinese firms possess the technical capacity to produce Nintedanib API, either domestically or via licensing arrangements. India's pharmaceutical industry, in particular, is renowned for large-scale generic API manufacturing, supported by lower costs and access to advanced chemical synthesis capabilities[2].

Europe: Home to original innovator companies like Boehringer Ingelheim, with manufacturing sites adhering to the most stringent GMP standards. European manufacturers tend to focus on high-value, complex APIs, including Nintedanib, often supplying global markets.

North America: Hosts pharmaceutical companies and CMOs with specialized capabilities, though most manufacturing is centered on research, development, and compliance validation, with production often outsourced or licensed.


Supply Chain Challenges and Risks

Despite the presence of multiple suppliers, sourcing Nintedanib API presents challenges:

  • Complex Synthesis and Quality Control: The intricate chemical synthesis increases the risk of batch variability and contamination, demanding rigorous QC protocols.

  • Regulatory Barriers: COVID-19 and geopolitical tensions have disrupted supply chains. Regulatory hurdles around quality standards, export controls, and licensing further complicate sourcing.

  • Limited Number of Qualified Suppliers: The specialized nature of Nintedanib API restricts the supplier base, heightening vulnerability to supply shortages.

  • Intellectual Property (IP) and Licensing Restrictions: Licensing agreements from Boehringer Ingelheim or patent restrictions influence manufacturing rights and geographic supply capacities, especially for generic producers.


Future Outlook and Supply Chain Trends

The increasing demand for antifibrotic therapies fuels interest in expanding Nintedanib API production. Several regional manufacturers are investing in capacity upgrades, driven by rising IP rights expiration of some kinase inhibitors and the need for biosimilar or generic equivalents. Strategic alliances between originator companies and CMOs are likely to bolster supply resilience.

Advances in continuous manufacturing and process intensification could enhance yields and reduce costs, further stabilizing the supply chain. Regulatory harmonization is expected to facilitate smoother cross-border API manufacturing and distribution.


Key Takeaways

  • The manufacturing and supply of Nintedanib API are concentrated among a handful of high-grade, technologically advanced producers in Europe and Asia.
  • Boehringer Ingelheim manages core API supply internally but also collaborates with licensed CMOs, primarily in China and India.
  • The supply chain faces challenges including complex synthesis, regulatory hurdles, geopolitical risks, and a limited supplier base.
  • The regional landscape increasingly favors Asia as a hub for API manufacturing, although Europe maintains quality and innovation leadership.
  • Future supply stability depends on capacity expansion, process innovation, and regulatory harmonization to mitigate risks associated with sourcing Nintedanib API.

FAQs

1. Who are the primary suppliers of Nintedanib API globally?
The main API manufacturing sources are Boehringer Ingelheim’s internal facilities and select CMOs based in China and India, such as Hikal Ltd. and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, which operate under licensing agreements.

2. What regulates the quality and safety standards of Nintedanib API?
Manufacturers must adhere to GMP standards mandated by agencies such as the FDA, EMA, and PMDA. Validation includes purity testing, stability assessments, and compliance with pharmacopoeial monographs.

3. Are there any alternative sources for Nintedanib API outside traditional markets?
While alternative sources exist, the complex synthesis limits the number of qualified manufacturers. Emerging players in Southeast Asia or Eastern Europe are exploring capacity expansions but are not yet market leaders.

4. How do supply chain disruptions impact the availability of Ofev?
Disruptions in API supply can lead to manufacturing delays, affecting drug availability. Strategic stockpiling, supplier diversification, and process improvements are critical mitigation strategies.

5. What steps are Takings to ensure uninterrupted supply of Nintedanib API?
Bohringer Ingelheim and major manufacturers are investing in capacity expansion, establishing supply agreements, and qualifying multiple manufacturing sites to reduce reliance on single sources.


References

[1] Boehringer Ingelheim. Ofev (Nintedanib) Prescribing Information. 2022.
[2] OECD. The Pharmaceutical Industry in Figures: Key Data. 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.