You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for XYLOCAINE 1.5% W/ DEXTROSE 7.5%


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for XYLOCAINE 1.5% W/ DEXTROSE 7.5%

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
IS Chemical Technology ⤷  Get Started Free I01-2012 ⤷  Get Started Free
IS Chemical Technology ⤷  Get Started Free I01-4416 ⤷  Get Started Free
MolPort ⤷  Get Started Free MolPort-003-666-319 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for XYLOCAINE 1.5% W/ DEXTROSE 7.5%

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Xylocaine 1.5% with Dextrose 7.5%, a local anesthetic combined with a carbohydrate solution, is used for regional anesthesia procedures. The formulation’s efficacy hinges on the quality and consistency of its active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), primarily lidocaine hydrochloride. Ensuring a reliable supply chain for high-quality APIs is vital for pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors, and healthcare providers. This analysis explores the primary wholesale and manufacturing sources for lidocaine hydrochloride, emphasizing procurement considerations, global manufacturing landscape, regulatory compliance, and strategic sourcing.


Global API Manufacturing Landscape

Lidocaine hydrochloride is a widely manufactured local anesthetic, with key production regions encompassing North America, Europe, and Asia. The global API market is dominated by a few large multinational API producers, complemented by regional manufacturers catering to local markets. The supply chain for lidocaine hydrochloride involves complex manufacturing processes requiring high purification standards to meet pharmaceutical grade specifications—namely, API purity exceeding 99%, stringent control of residual solvents, and compliance with pharmacopeial standards such as USP, EP, or JP.


Major API Manufacturers and Suppliers

1. North American and European Manufacturers

  • AbbVie (formerly Abbott Laboratories): One of the pioneering companies in lidocaine production, AbbVie’s API division supplies pharmaceutical-grade APIs globally, including lidocaine hydrochloride, adhering to stringent cGMP standards, and is widely recognized for quality assurance and regulatory compliance.

  • Fresenius Kabi: Based in Germany, Fresenius produces high-quality APIs, including lidocaine hydrochloride, supporting both sterile and non-sterile pharmaceutical needs, with a focus on North American and European markets.

  • Baxter International: With manufacturing facilities in the U.S., Baxter supplies lidocaine APIs primarily for their anesthetic and injectable formulations, maintaining high standards suitable for pharmaceutical use.

2. Asian API Producers

  • Jiande Lidocaine Industry Co., Ltd. (China): A leading Chinese API manufacturer specializing in lidocaine hydrochloride, with a capacity to supply large volumes at competitive prices. The company complies with international quality standards and has export certifications for Western markets.

  • Hainan Yegao Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (China): An established API and finished dosage manufacturer, Yegao supplies pharmaceutical-grade lidocaine APIs to global clients, emphasizing rigorous quality control and compliance with international standards.

  • SICHANG Chemical (India): An emerging supplier offering APIs including lidocaine hydrochloride, with quality certifications aligned to WHO GMP standards and international export requirements.

3. Other Notable Manufacturers

  • Tianjin Zhongxin Pharmaceutical Group (China): Offers API manufacturing capabilities with a focus on anesthesia-related APIs, including lidocaine hydrochloride.

  • Gujarat Cotex (India): A regional producer with capacity for bulk API production adhering to WHO GMP standards.


Supply Chain and Procurement Considerations

Quality and Regulatory Compliance:
Manufacturers must ensure APIs meet stringent pharmacopeial standards—USP, EP, or JP—alongside adhering to cGMP (current Good Manufacturing Practices). Certification of compliance, detailed Certificates of Analysis (CoA), and batch traceability are essential.

Pricing and Volume:
Chinese and Indian API suppliers typically offer competitive pricing due to lower manufacturing costs, but centralized procurement often requires rigorous validation processes. European and North American producers tend to command premium prices but provide superior regulatory assurance and consistent quality.

Supply Reliability and Lead Times:
Suppliers with large capacity and diversified production sites mitigate risks of shortages. Establishing multiple sourcing channels reduces dependency on single vendors, especially considering geopolitical risks or manufacturing disruptions.

Regulatory and Importation Barriers:
Importing APIs into certain regions involves complex logistics, tariffs, and compliance procedures. Engaging with suppliers experienced in international pharmaceutical trade streamlines approval processes.


Challenges in API Sourcing

  • Regulatory Variation: Different jurisdictions impose specific registration and compliance requirements, necessitating supplier vetting and validation processes.

  • Market Consolidation and Capacity Constraints: Limited capacity at some manufacturers can lead to supply shortages; long-term contracts and strategic stockpiling are advisable.

  • Quality Assurance: Variability in API quality from unvetted sources risks pharmaceutical efficacy and regulatory sanctions.


Strategic Recommendations

  • Partner with WHO-GMP Certified Suppliers: Prioritize suppliers with recognized quality standards to ensure compliance and facilitate regulatory submissions.

  • Engage in Long-Term Supply Agreements: Establish reliable, cost-effective procurement channels with vetted manufacturers—balancing price, quality, and supply stability.

  • Monitor Regulatory Environment: Keep abreast of import/export policies, anti-corruption measures, and QC requirements across supplier regions.

  • Diversify Sources: Avoid over-reliance on a single supplier or region; diversify sourcing to buffer against supply chain disruptions.


Conclusion

The procurement of high-quality lidocaine hydrochloride APIs remains critical for manufacturing XYLOCAINE 1.5% with Dextrose 7.5%. Leading suppliers encompass global players like AbbVie and Fresenius Kabi, as well as regional Chinese and Indian manufacturers such as Jiande Lidocaine Industry Co., Ltd., Hainan Yegao Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and SICHANG Chemical. Vertical integration, supplier validation, and robust quality assurance underpin secure sourcing strategies. Ensuring API quality, regulatory compliance, and consistent supply forms the cornerstone of successful pharmaceutical manufacturing in this segment.


Key Takeaways

  • Top API sources include established multinationals (AbbVie, Fresenius Kabi) and regional Chinese/Indian manufacturers (Jiande, Yegao, SICHANG).

  • Prioritize suppliers with GMP certification and transparent QC processes to mitigate regulatory risk.

  • Balancing cost advantages of Asian suppliers with quality assurance is key for supply chain stability.

  • Diversified sourcing strategies and long-term agreements enhance resilience against geopolitical and supply disruptions.

  • Active monitoring of regulatory landscapes and supply chain metrics sustains continuous access to high-quality APIs.


FAQs

1. What are the primary qualities to look for in an API supplier for lidocaine hydrochloride?
Suppliers should have GMP certification, detailed Certificates of Analysis, proven compliance with pharmacopeial standards, robust QC/QMS protocols, and a track record of reliable supply.

2. How do regional differences impact API sourcing for XYLOCAINE?
Regional factors influence cost, regulatory requirements, importation logistics, and quality assurance. Asian suppliers often offer competitive pricing but may require rigorous validation for Western markets; Western suppliers typically offer higher perceived quality and regulatory comfort.

3. Are there regulatory hurdles in importing APIs from China or India?
Yes. Importing APIs from these regions involves compliance with local and international regulatory standards, including registration, documentation, and quality audits, to satisfy authorities like the FDA, EMA, or local agencies.

4. How can a pharma company mitigate API supply shortages?
Companies should diversify supplier base across regions, maintain safety stock inventories, establish long-term supply agreements, and regularly audit vendor quality and capacity.

5. What future trends may influence API sourcing for local anesthetics like lidocaine?
Increased focus on supply chain transparency, stricter global regulations, potential trade restrictions, and advancements in manufacturing technologies will shape sourcing strategies. Additionally, emerging markets may offer new suppliers with competitive advantages.


Sources

  1. [1] Global Pharmaceutical API Market Analysis, Transparency Market Research, 2022.
  2. [2] USP Monographs for Lidocaine Hydrochloride, 2023.
  3. [3] Regulatory Guidelines for API Importation, U.S. FDA, 2023.
  4. [4] List of GMP-Certified API Manufacturers, WHO Current Good Manufacturing Practices, 2022.
  5. [5] API Supply Chain Best Practices, International Pharmaceutical Regulators Forum, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.