You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for hydrochlorothiazide; methyldopa


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for hydrochlorothiazide; methyldopa

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
Starshine Chemical ⤷  Get Started Free 2023-05-5H02570 ⤷  Get Started Free
RR Scientific ⤷  Get Started Free R6386117 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for Hydrochlorothiazide and Methyldopa

Last updated: December 7, 2025

Executive Summary

Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and Methyldopa are critical APIs used primarily for hypertension management. Sourcing these compounds involves navigating an international supply chain characterized by diverse manufacturers, varying quality standards, and geopolitical considerations. This report outlines current API sources, evaluates market dynamics, compares manufacturing countries, and highlights key procurement considerations.


Overview of Hydrochlorothiazide and Methyldopa

API Usage Typical Dosage Regulatory Status Market Size (2022 estimate)
Hydrochlorothiazide Diuretic, antihypertensive 12.5–25 mg daily Follows USP, EP, JP standards $1.2 billion (global)
Methyldopa Antihypertensive, mainly in pregnancy 250–500 mg TID Approved in FDA, EMA $300 million (global)

(Figures sourced from IQVIA data and USFDA reports.)


Where Are Hydrochlorothiazide and Methyldopa Made?

Major Producing Countries

Country API Production Share (%) Notable Manufacturers Regulatory Equivalents
China ~55% Zhejiang Huahai, Qilu GMP, NMPA-approved
India ~30% Sun Pharma, Cadila WHO-GMP, USFDA, EMA
Europe ~10% Teva, Novartis EMA-approved
Other (South Korea, Japan) ~5% SK Chemicals, Takeda Local GMP standards

Historical Context

  • The 2010s global API manufacturing shift toward Asia, particularly China and India, driven by cost competitiveness and manufacturing capacity.
  • Recent supply chain disruptions prompted by COVID-19 have highlighted risks of overreliance on specific geographies.

Leading API Suppliers: Market Dynamics and Capabilities

Hydrochlorothiazide

Supplier Estimated Capacity (kg/year) Certification Cost Competitiveness Notes
Zhejiang Huahai (China) 1.5 billion kg GMP, NMPA Competitive Largest volume producer, recently faced WHO warnings
Sun Pharma (India) 500 million kg WHO-GMP Moderate Focus on quality, expanding capacities
Teva (Europe) 200 million kg GMP Premium Generally supplies high-grade APIs

Methyldopa

Supplier Estimated Capacity (kg/year) Certification Cost Competitiveness Notes
Dr. Reddy’s Labs (India) 100 million kg WHO, USFDA Competitive Major supplier for global markets
Hexal (Germany) 50 million kg EMA Premium Niche provider, with high regulatory compliance

Regulatory and Quality Considerations

Aspect Hydrochlorothiazide Methyldopa
Regulatory Standards USFDA, EMA, WHO-GMP, Chinese NMPA, Indian GMP USFDA, EMA, WHO-GMP, Indian GMP
Quality Certification ANVISA (Brazil), TGA (Australia), etc. International Pharmacopoeias
Recent Quality Issues Contamination recalls in 2019 (China) Few recent issues, high regulatory oversight

Supply Chain Risks and Diversification Strategies

Risk Type Impact Mitigation Strategies
Geopolitical Tensions Disruption in supply, tariffs Alternate suppliers, geographic diversification
Manufacturing Disruptions Production halts, quality compromises Dual-sourcing, inventory build-up
Regulatory Changes Market access constraints Maintaining regulatory compliance, local manufacturing
Quality Variability Recalls, GMP lapses Stringent supplier qualification, audits

Comparative Analysis: API Specifications and Quality Standards

Specification Parameter Hydrochlorothiazide (USP, EP) Methyldopa (USP, EP)
Purity (%) ≥ 99.0 ≥ 99.0
Particle Size 90% ≤ 80 mesh NLT 98% passing 80 mesh
Moisture Content (%) ≤ 0.5 ≤ 1.0
Impurities (HPLC) ≤ 0.5 (related substances) ≤ 0.2 (related substances)

Key Procurement Factors

Factor Importance for buyers
Regulatory Compliance Ensures market approval and safety standards
Capacity and Lead Time Ensures supply continuity
Cost Balances affordability and quality
Quality Certifications GMP, WHO-GMP, FDA, EMA, NMPA
Documentation and Transparency Traceability, audit readiness

Market Trends and Future Outlook

Trend Impact Outlook
Increased API Regulatory Scrutiny Elevated quality standards, supply chain integrity Stricter audits, higher compliance costs
Supply Chain Diversification Reduced dependency on China and India Growth of regional manufacturing hubs
Technological Innovations Improved API synthesis, green chemistry Adoption of sustainable processes
Pricing and Cost Pressures Reduced margins for manufacturers Consolidation among producers, strategic alliances

Summary of Key API Sources

API Predominant Countries Notable Manufacturers Key Certifications Market Share (%) Notable Supply Chain Notes
Hydrochlorothiazide China, India Zhejiang Huahai, Sun Pharma GMP, NMPA, WHO-GMP 85% (global) Recent quality issues in specific Chinese facilities
Methyldopa India, Europe Reddy’s Labs, Hexal USFDA, EMA, WHO-GMP 95% Strong regulation, niche markets with stable supply

FAQs

Q1: How do regulatory standards impact API sourcing for Hydrochlorothiazide and Methyldopa?
Regulatory standards like USP, EP, and FDA influence API quality, purity, and manufacturing practices. Suppliers compliant with these standards are favored to ensure market acceptance globally, especially in heavily regulated regions.

Q2: What are the risks of sourcing APIs predominantly from China and India?
Dependence on these regions poses risks of supply disruptions, quality variability, and geopolitical trade tensions. Diversification strategies, including sourcing from Europe or North America, can mitigate these risks.

Q3: How does quality certification affect API procurement?
Certifications such as WHO-GMP, USFDA, or EMA signify adherence to international quality standards, reducing regulatory hurdles and ensuring product safety and efficacy.

Q4: Are there sustainable or green chemistry initiatives in API manufacturing?
Yes. The industry is evolving towards greener processes to reduce environmental impact, which is increasingly influencing supplier selection, especially among major multinational firms.

Q5: What emerging trends could influence API sourcing for these compounds?
Automation in manufacturing, improved synthesis technologies, and regional manufacturing hubs are poised to alter supply landscapes, offering potential cost benefits and supply stability.


Key Takeaways

  • Global Dependence: The majority of Hydrochlorothiazide and Methyldopa APIs are sourced from China and India, accounting for over 80% of supply.
  • Regulatory Vigilance: Compliance with GMP, WHO-GMP, and other standards is crucial for seamless market access.
  • Supply Chain Risks: Diversification away from China and India is increasingly vital amidst geopolitical and pandemic-related disruptions.
  • Quality Assurance: Suppliers with rigorous certification and transparent processes are preferred to minimize recalls and compliance issues.
  • Market Dynamics: Technological advancements and sustainability efforts serve both as challenges and opportunities in API sourcing strategies.

References

[1] IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science, 2022. Global API Market Report.
[2] US Food and Drug Administration. Approved Drug Master Files, 2022.
[3] Chinese National Medical Products Administration (NMPA). API Manufacturing Licenses and Standards, 2022.
[4] European Medicines Agency (EMA). API Manufacturing Inspections, 2022.
[5] MarketWatch. Hydrochlorothiazide Market Analysis, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.