You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for chloramphenicol sodium succinate


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for chloramphenicol sodium succinate

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
Molport ⤷  Get Started Free MolPort-006-112-736 ⤷  Get Started Free
Key Organics/BIONET ⤷  Get Started Free KS-5158 ⤷  Get Started Free
AKos Consulting & Solutions ⤷  Get Started Free AKOS016340429 ⤷  Get Started Free
BOC Sciences ⤷  Get Started Free 982-57-0 ⤷  Get Started Free
Glentham Life Sciences Ltd. ⤷  Get Started Free GA0628 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for Chloramphenicol Sodium Succinate

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

Chloramphenicol sodium succinate is a broad-spectrum antibiotic extensively used in clinical settings for treating serious bacterial infections, especially in cases where oral or injectable formulations are required. As a vital API, its sourcing significantly influences pharmaceutical manufacturing, regulatory compliance, and supply chain stability. Ensuring a reliable supply of high-quality chloramphenicol sodium succinate APIs involves understanding global manufacturing hubs, regulatory standards, quality assurance processes, and supply chain risks.

Overview of Chloramphenicol Sodium Succinate

Chloramphenicol sodium succinate is a water-soluble, pro-drug form of chloramphenicol, designed for intravenous or intramuscular administration. Its chemical structure offers improved bioavailability and reduced gastrointestinal irritation compared to chloramphenicol base. It is synthesized via esterification of chloramphenicol with succinic acid derivatives, requiring specific manufacturing expertise and stringent quality controls to meet pharmacopeial standards.

Global API Manufacturing Landscape

Major API Producing Countries

The API manufacturing landscape for chloramphenicol sodium succinate is concentrated in countries with robust pharmaceutical manufacturing infrastructure and strong regulatory oversight. These regions include:

  • India:
    India remains a global leader in bulk active pharmaceutical ingredient synthesis, owing to its large-scale manufacturing capabilities, cost-effective production, and extensive Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) compliance [1]. Indian API manufacturers such as SIPLA, Laurus Labs, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries regularly supply chloramphenicol sodium succinate APIs to international markets.

  • China:
    China's rapidly expanding pharmaceutical API sector offers cost-competitive manufacturing for chloramphenicol sodium succinate, supported by government initiatives aimed at upgrading API quality standards [2]. Key players include Zhejiang Medicine Co., Ltd. and North China Pharmaceutical Group.

  • European Union:
    Europe maintains high-quality standards for APIs, with several companies adhering to stringent EMA regulations. Manufacturers like Kawasaki Pharma and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories (with European facilities) produce APIs meeting rigorous pharmacopeial standards [3].

  • United States:
    While the U.S. API sector for chloramphenicol sodium succinate is limited due to regulatory restrictions on chloramphenicol’s use, some custom synthesis and contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs) cater to specialty markets, often sourcing APIs from trusted foreign suppliers.

Emerging API Suppliers

Emerging suppliers from Southeast Asia and South America are increasingly contributing to the supply chain, driven by competitive pricing and capacity expansion. Companies with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) certification and international quality assurance systems are prioritized.

Quality Standards and Regulatory Compliance

Sourcing APIs requires rigorous adherence to pharmacopeial standards such as United States Pharmacopeia (USP), European Pharmacopoeia (EP), and Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP). Key considerations include:

  • GMP Certification:
    Manufacturers must demonstrate compliance with GMP to ensure consistent quality, potency, and safety of chloramphenicol sodium succinate APIs.

  • Analytical Testing:
    Batch-to-batch consistency verified via HPLC, microbial limits testing, and spectroscopic analyses is critical before procurement.

  • Documentation and Certification:
    Certificates of Analysis (CoA), Certificates of Suitability (CEP), and Regulatory Approval Documentation are vital for regulatory submissions and audit readiness.

Supply Chain Considerations

  • Reliability:
    Securing APIs from reputable, established manufacturers reduces risk of contamination, adulteration, or supply disruptions.

  • Price Stability:
    Cost-effective sourcing from countries like India and China benefits global pharmaceutical companies but necessitates comprehensive quality assurance.

  • Geopolitical and Regulatory Risks:
    Trade policies, tariffs, and export restrictions can impact supply chains, requiring diversification of sources.

  • Environmental and Ethical Standards:
    Manufacturers adhering to environmental sustainability and ethical labor practices are preferred to mitigate reputational and compliance risks.

Key API Suppliers for Chloramphenicol Sodium Succinate

Supplier Country Certifications Notes
SIPLA India GMP, ISO 9001, FDA approved Prominent in chloramphenicol API supply, strong international presence
Laurus Labs India GMP, WHO-GMP, ISO 9001 Offers reliable APIs with high quality standards
Zhejiang Medicine China GMP, ISO 9001 Focused on cost-effective API manufacturing, expanding quality standards
Zhejiang Hisun China GMP, CEP Certified for global distribution, consistent quality control
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories India/International GMP, ISO Provides high-grade APIs, compliant with multiple pharmacopeias

Regulatory and Quality Assurance Challenges

The procurement of chloramphenicol sodium succinate APIs is complicated by regulatory restrictions due to the antibiotic’s safety profile. Despite widespread manufacturing, the use of chloramphenicol is limited in certain regions because of rare but serious side effects like aplastic anemia. Manufacturers and buyers must ensure APIs meet stringent safety and efficacy criteria and adhere to regulatory updates.

Future Trends and Sourcing Strategies

  • Quality-centric sourcing:
    Growing emphasis on GMP-compliant manufacturing and real-time quality monitoring is shaping procurement strategies.

  • Supply chain diversification:
    To mitigate geopolitical and logistical risks, companies are diversifying sources, including leveraging multiple suppliers within different regulatory jurisdictions.

  • Technological advancements:
    Adoption of continuous manufacturing processes and digital quality management systems fosters reliable API supply.

  • Environmental and sustainability focus:
    Manufacturers adhering to environmentally friendly practices gain favor amid rising global sustainability standards.

Conclusion

Sourcing high-quality chloramphenicol sodium succinate APIs requires navigating a complex landscape of geographic, regulatory, and quality considerations. Indian and Chinese manufacturers dominate due to capacity, cost, and improving quality standards, though European suppliers maintain a niche for high-purity, GMP-compliant APIs. Strategic diversification, rigorous quality assurance, and thorough due diligence are vital for pharmaceutical companies to secure a reliable supply chain.


Key Takeaways

  • The bulk API market for chloramphenicol sodium succinate is concentrated mainly in India and China, with European and U.S. suppliers playing niche roles.
  • Regulatory compliance, GMP certification, and robust quality control are prerequisites for sourcing APIs suitable for international markets.
  • Supply chain resilience can be enhanced by diversifying suppliers across different regions and maintaining close regulatory oversight.
  • Emerging suppliers from Southeast Asia and Latin America offer competitive advantages but require thorough validation.
  • Environmental practices and sustainability are increasingly influencing supplier selection.

FAQs

1. What are the primary considerations when sourcing chloramphenicol sodium succinate API?
Manufacturers must ensure GMP compliance, certification, batch consistency, and adherence to pharmacopeial standards, alongside evaluating supply chain reliability and regulatory acceptability.

2. Are there any restrictions on the use of chloramphenicol sodium succinate internationally?
Yes. Due to safety concerns, particularly aplastic anemia, certain regions impose restrictions or guidelines on chloramphenicol use, affecting API procurement and application.

3. How can companies mitigate risks associated with API supply disruptions?
By diversifying suppliers geographically, establishing long-term partnerships with reputable manufacturers, and maintaining safety stock levels.

4. Which regions are emerging as new sources for chloramphenicol sodium succinate API?
Southeast Asia and Latin America are gaining prominence due to capacity expansion and competitive pricing, though supplier verification remains critical.

5. What role do regulatory authorities play in API sourcing?
They set manufacturing standards, conduct inspections, and approve suppliers through certificates like CEPs or FDA registrations, ensuring product safety and efficacy.


References

[1] India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF). Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare Industry in India. 2022.

[2] Chinese Chamber of Commerce for Pharmaceuticals and Chemicals. API Industry Overview. 2021.

[3] European Medicines Agency (EMA). Regulatory Guidelines for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.