You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for XERAVA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for XERAVA

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
Race Chemical ⤷  Get Started Free RV022505121 ⤷  Get Started Free
Biosynth ⤷  Get Started Free J-690064 ⤷  Get Started Free
ChemShuttle ⤷  Get Started Free 169624 ⤷  Get Started Free
ZINC ⤷  Get Started Free ZINC200151468 ⤷  Get Started Free
LabNetwork, a WuXi AppTec Company ⤷  Get Started Free LN01297610 ⤷  Get Started Free
MedChemexpress MCE ⤷  Get Started Free HY-16980 ⤷  Get Started Free
AbaChemScene ⤷  Get Started Free CS-7564 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for Xerava

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction
Xerava (trekegra® or eravacycline) is a synthetic, broad-spectrum tetracycline-class antibiotic recently approved for complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). As an innovative antimicrobial agent, its production relies heavily on sourcing high-quality Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs). This article explores the global landscape of bulk API sources for eravacycline, assessing manufacturing capabilities, regulatory standards, and supply chain considerations critical for pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers.

Overview of Eravacycline and API Manufacturing
Eravacycline is developed through complex chemical synthesis involving multiple steps, including the construction of tetracycline core structures and specific modifications that enhance its efficacy against resistant pathogens. Manufacturing APIs of this nature demands advanced chemical expertise, controlled environments, and adherence to stringent Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP).

The API supply chain for eravacycline encompasses several regions, notably North America, Asia, and parts of Europe. The diversification of API sources ensures supply security and compliance with regulatory standards, which are essential given the critical nature of antibiotics.

Major API Manufacturers for Eravacycline

  1. United States and North America
    The U.S. boasts several high-grade API manufacturers with expertise in complex antibiotic synthesis. Companies like AbbVie (the originator of Xerava) oversee in-house API production, ensuring tight control over quality and supply. Additionally, Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs) in North America possess capabilities for API synthesis, though most rely on external suppliers for raw intermediates.

  2. Asia-Pacific Region
    The Asia-Pacific region, particularly China and India, constitutes a significant source for APIs, including antibiotics such as eravacycline. These regions have experienced rapid growth in API manufacturing capacity owing to lower production costs, specialized chemical synthesis expertise, and extensive chemical infrastructure. Leading API producers such as Hikma Pharmaceuticals (via strategic partnerships), Hovid (Malaysia), and Chinese API manufacturers like Shanghai Pharmaceutical and North China Pharmaceutical supply APIs to global markets.

  3. European Manufacturers
    European API producers, especially in Germany, Switzerland, and Belgium, emphasize high-quality standards and compliance with the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Companies such as Siegfried and Digestive synthesize complex APIs and serve as key suppliers to the European and international markets. Their manufacturing facilities are often certified with EMA and/or FDA approvals, making their products suitable for stringent quality standards required for pharmaceuticals like Xerava.

Key Factors Influencing API Source Selection

  • Regulatory Compliance
    Suppliers must adhere to Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP), with certifications from regulatory authorities covering their facilities and processes. For antibiotics like eravacycline, strict controls on impurities and process validation are paramount.

  • Quality and Purity Standards
    Pharmaceutical companies seek APIs with high purity levels (typically >99%) to prevent adverse reactions and ensure therapeutic efficacy. Analytical certifications, batch-to-batch consistency, and impurity profiles are critical decision parameters.

  • Supply Chain Reliability
    Given the importance of antibiotics and the potential for supply disruptions, sourcing from diversified, approved manufacturers mitigates risks. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the vulnerabilities inherent to relying on limited geographies.

  • Cost and Lead Time
    Both factors influence supplier selection. While Asian manufacturers often offer lower costs, companies must weigh this against reliability, quality assurances, and regulatory acceptability.

Emerging Trends in API Sourcing for Eravacycline

  • Vertical Integration and In-house Production
    Manufacturers like AbbVie prioritize in-house API manufacturing to safeguard quality and supply consistency. Vertical integration reduces reliance on external suppliers but requires substantial capital investment.

  • Strategic Alliances and Partnerships
    Collaborations between global pharmaceutical firms and Asian API manufacturers are increasingly common to leverage cost advantages while maintaining quality standards.

  • Regulatory Harmonization
    As authorities strive for global regulatory convergence (e.g., ICH guidelines), API producers align their processes to facilitate international approval, broadening their market reach and fostering quality assurance.

  • Biotechnological Innovations
    Though eravacycline synthesis is primarily chemical, ongoing biotechnological advances may influence future API production, especially for derivatives. However, chemical synthesis remains predominant at present.

Supply Chain Challenges and Solutions

The complexity of API manufacturing presents multiple challenges:

  • Quality Assurance Across Borders: Ensuring APIs meet international standards necessitates diligent supplier qualification and ongoing audits.

  • Regulatory Approvals: APIs sourced from regions with evolving regulatory frameworks may face delays or hurdles in gaining approval.

  • Geopolitical Risks: Trade restrictions, tariffs, and political tensions can disrupt supply chains, underscoring the importance of a diversified sourcing strategy.

To mitigate these issues, pharmaceutical companies adopt dual-sourcing, maintain safety stock levels, and engage with multiple approved API manufacturers across geographies.

Conclusion

The global sourcing landscape for eravacycline APIs reflects a balance between quality, cost, and supply chain resilience. Leading manufacturers in North America, Asia-Pacific, and Europe provide critical raw materials, with an increasing emphasis on regulatory compliance and supply security. As antibiotic resistance challenges persist and demand for innovative solutions like Xerava grows, the robustness of API sourcing strategies will remain central to ensuring accessible, high-quality therapeutics.


Key Takeaways

  • The API for Xerava (eravacycline) is primarily sourced from leading pharmaceutical manufacturers across the U.S., Asia, and Europe.
  • Asian API producers, especially in China and India, are significant due to their manufacturing capacity and cost advantages, but regulatory compliance remains a priority.
  • High standards for GMP certification, impurity profiles, and analytical validation are essential criteria for API suppliers.
  • Diversified sourcing strategies and strategic partnerships help mitigate geopolitical and supply chain risks.
  • Staying aligned with evolving regulatory frameworks enhances global market access and API quality consistency.

FAQs

1. What are the primary regions supplying APIs for Xerava?
North America, particularly the U.S., along with China, India, and European countries like Germany and Switzerland, are key regions supplying APIs for Xerava.

2. How do regulatory standards influence API sourcing?
Manufacturers must meet GMP requirements and obtain certifications from agencies like the FDA, EMA, or relevant authorities, ensuring API purity, consistency, and safety.

3. Why is supply chain diversification essential for antibiotic APIs?
Diversification minimizes risks associated with geopolitical tensions, regulatory delays, and manufacturing disruptions, ensuring steady supply and market stability.

4. Are there competitive differences between API suppliers?
Yes. Suppliers differ in production capacity, compliance standards, lead times, and cost structures, influencing procurement decisions.

5. How might future technological advances impact API sourcing for eravacycline?
While chemical synthesis remains dominant, innovations in biotech and process engineering could optimize production, improve yields, and reduce costs, shaping future API sourcing strategies.


Sources
[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance on GMP standards for active pharmaceutical ingredients.
[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines for API manufacturing and quality standards.
[3] Industry reports on global API manufacturing capacities and supply chain trends.
[4] Pfizer's official disclosures on manufacturing and supply chain strategies for Xerava.
[5] Market analyses on antibiotic API production in Asia-Pacific regions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.