You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for SPRYCEL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for SPRYCEL

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
Molport ⤷  Get Started Free MolPort-003-846-143 ⤷  Get Started Free
Oakwood Products ⤷  Get Started Free 078952 ⤷  Get Started Free
BioChemPartner ⤷  Get Started Free BCPP000263 ⤷  Get Started Free
AbMole Bioscience ⤷  Get Started Free 1701 ⤷  Get Started Free
BioChemPartner ⤷  Get Started Free BCP9000589 ⤷  Get Started Free
AKos Consulting & Solutions ⤷  Get Started Free AKOS015902363 ⤷  Get Started Free
MedChemexpress MCE ⤷  Get Started Free HY-10181 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for SPRYCEL (Dasatinib)

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

SPRYCEL (dasatinib) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), primarily used for treating Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). As a critical component in the global oncology pharmaceutical supply chain, sourcing high-quality bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) for SPRYCEL is vital to ensure consistent drug availability, regulatory compliance, and cost-efficiency.

This article assesses the global landscape of API suppliers for dasatinib, examining market dynamics, sourcing strategies, regulatory considerations, and key players involved in the bulk production of this high-value pharmaceutical ingredient.

Market Overview of Dasatinib API

The dasatinib API market operates within a limited, highly specialized niche involving active pharmaceutical ingredients for targeted cancer therapies. As patent protections have expired in certain jurisdictions, generic manufacturers have entered the market, increasing competition and diversifying supply sources. However, due to stringent quality standards, regulatory oversight, and complex synthesis pathways, the selection of reliable API suppliers remains a critical decision for pharmaceutical companies.

Synthesis Process and Manufacturing Complexity

Dasatinib's synthesis involves multiple complex chemical steps, including the preparation of specific heterocyclic compounds, purification stages, and strict control of residual impurities. These complexities necessitate advanced manufacturing facilities compliant with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and rigorous quality assurance standards. Such requirements narrow the pool of qualified API producers, favoring established, certified suppliers with proven regulatory track records.

Leading Global API Suppliers for Dasatinib

1. Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) – Innovator Stage

While original innovator companies like Bristol-Myers Squibb initially developed dasatinib, they typically produce the API in-house. For licensed generics or licensed manufacturing, they may partner with select CMOs (Contract Manufacturing Organizations) under licensing or technology transfer agreements.

2. Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs) and Contract Research Organizations (CROs)

The primary external API sources for dasatinib are reputable CMOs specializing in intricate small-molecule synthesis, especially those with experience in oncology APIs:

  • [Elder Pharmaceuticals] (India): A significant player in steroid and complex API synthesis, known for robust GMP standards.
  • [Hetero Labs] (India): Equipped with advanced synthesis capabilities, Hetero supplies bulk APIs for select targeted therapeutic agents, including kinase inhibitors.
  • [Aurisco (Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Ltd.)] (China): Hengrui has expanded its portfolio to include complex oncology APIs, including dasatinib, with compliant manufacturing facilities.
  • [Samsung Biologics] and [LG Chem] (South Korea): While primarily known for biologics, these firms have increasingly diversified into small-molecule APIs with GMP-certified facilities.

3. Generics and Market-Entry Suppliers

Companies leveraging patent expirations or licensing agreements produce generic dasatinib under regulatory compliance:

  • Accord Healthcare (India): Offers certified generics with established supply chain infrastructure.
  • Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceuticals (China): Demonstrating capabilities to produce high-purity dasatinib API aligned with global standards.
  • Sandoz (Novartis): Known for high-quality generics, including oncology APIs, with a focus on global regulatory compliance.

4. Emerging Market Suppliers

Emerging API producers, particularly in India and China, have increased their capacity and quality standards, driven by export opportunities and technological advancements:

  • Lupin Limited (India)
  • Cipla Limited (India)
  • Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Group (China)

These manufacturers have established scalable processes, often supported by licensing, technology transfer, or process validation partnerships with original developers or leading API mastery firms.

Selection Criteria for API Suppliers

Pharmaceutical companies sourcing dasatinib API must assess suppliers based on:

  • Regulatory Compliance: GMP certification (e.g., FDA, EMA, PMDA, WHO pre-qualification)
  • Quality Control: Strict validation of impurities, residual solvents, and bioavailability standards
  • Capacity & Scalability: Ability to meet projected demand for both commercial scale and contingency planning
  • Reproducibility & Stability: Consistent batch-to-batch quality
  • Supply Chain Stability: Proven track record of reliable delivery and logistical efficiency

Regulatory and Quality Challenges

Given the critical therapeutic application, regulatory authorities emphasize rigorous documentation and control of the API quality. Globally, suppliers must navigate complex regulatory landscapes, including filing for approval through the FDA's Drug Master Files (DMFs), EMA's Certificates of Suitability (CEP), or other national authorities' registration pathways.

Counterfeit and substandard APIs pose risks to patient safety and complicate supply chains, making supplier qualification and regular audits mandatory. Additionally, geopolitical factors and trade policies influence the accessibility of certain API sources, prompting manufacturers to diversify their supplier base.

Key Strategic Considerations

  • Vertical Integration: Some pharmaceutical companies prefer integrating API manufacturing within their supply chain to reduce dependency.
  • Technology Transfers: Licensing arrangements often involve transferring synthetic routes and quality control standards from original developers to generic manufacturers.
  • Cost vs. Quality Trade-offs: While emerging markets offer cost advantages, maintaining quality standards aligned with international regulations remains paramount.
  • Geopolitical Risks: Supply chain resilience requires diversification across regions—India, China, South Korea, and other markets.

Conclusion: Outlook for API Sourcing of SPRYCEL

The supply landscape for dasatinib API is characterized by a mix of innovator manufacturers, established CMOs, and emerging suppliers in Asia. Successful sourcing hinges on rigorous supplier qualification, regulatory compliance, and supply chain resilience. As patent protections for dasatinib have begun to expire or face licensing pathways, additional generic manufacturers are poised to increase market competition, potentially decreasing costs and expanding supply options.

Ongoing regulatory scrutiny and quality emphasis will steer manufacturers toward well-established, GMP-certified sources. For pharmaceutical firms, establishing long-term agreements with accredited API suppliers is crucial for maintaining a reliable and compliant pipeline of SPRYCEL.


Key Takeaways

  • The global dasatinib API supply chain involves a limited pool of licensed, GMP-compliant manufacturers, predominantly in India, China, and South Korea.
  • Ensuring API quality involves thorough supplier qualification, regulatory validation, and continuous quality assurance.
  • Market expansion of generics after patent expiry is increasing competition, offering potential cost benefits but elevating the importance of regulatory compliance.
  • Diversification of sources reduces supply chain risk amid geopolitical and logistical uncertainties.
  • Strategic partnerships and licensing facilitate technology transfer and quality standard maintenance for emerging API producers.

FAQs

1. Who are the primary global suppliers of dasatinib API?
Major suppliers include Hetero Labs (India), Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine (China), and emerging companies like Lupin and Cipla (India), all with GMP-certified manufacturing capabilities.

2. What regulatory standards must API suppliers meet for dasatinib?
Suppliers must typically adhere to GMP standards recognized by agencies such as the FDA, EMA, or WHO, with detailed documentation on impurity profiles, residual solvents, and process validation.

3. How does patent expiry influence API sourcing options?
Patent expiry opens markets for generics, encouraging new suppliers in India and China, but also necessitates stringent quality oversight to meet international compliance standards.

4. What are the key challenges in sourcing dasatinib API?
Challenges include complex synthesis, maintaining high purity levels, supply chain disruptions, regulatory approvals, and ensuring consistent quality across batches.

5. What future trends could impact DASATINIB API sourcing?
Increasing regulatory requirements, technological advancements in synthesis, focus on supply chain resilience, and potential new market entrants will shape future sourcing strategies.


Sources:
[1] Bristol-Myers Squibb. SPRYCEL (dasatinib) prescribing information.
[2] GlobalData. “Dasatinib market analysis” (2022).
[3] WHO Prequalification Document on active pharmaceutical ingredients.
[4] Company websites and industry reports on API manufacturing capabilities.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.