You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for ORFADIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for ORFADIN

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
Amadis Chemical ⤷  Get Started Free A800922 ⤷  Get Started Free
AKos Consulting & Solutions ⤷  Get Started Free AKOS015891363 ⤷  Get Started Free
AKos Consulting & Solutions ⤷  Get Started Free AKOS015994590 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for ORFADIN

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Orfadin (nitisinone) is an oral medication primarily prescribed for hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 (HT-1) and other rare conditions involving abnormal tyrosine metabolism. As a crucial drug in managing these lifelong conditions, the quality, reliability, and sourcing of its Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) are fundamental to ensuring efficacy, safety, and regulatory compliance.

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of bulk API sources for Orfadin, highlighting the key manufacturers, supply chain considerations, regulatory landscape, and trends impacting availability.


Understanding Orfadin and Its API: Nitisinone

Nitisinone (C14H15NO2) is a potent, selective inhibitor of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD), which halts the production of toxic metabolites in tyrosine metabolism. Originally developed for herbicidal applications, it was repurposed for medical usage after demonstrating efficacy in HT-1 treatment [1].

The sole commercially approved formulation of nitisinone for medical use is Orfadin, manufactured by Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (Sobi) and approved in various regulatory jurisdictions globally. While multiple sources exist for APIs generally, the specific supply chain for Orfadin’s API involves strict quality and regulatory adherence due to the medication's orphan drug status.


Major API Manufacturers for Nitisinone

1. SJ Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (China)

Overview:

  • One of the earliest Chinese manufacturers producing nitisinone API.
  • Capable of large-scale manufacturing with GMP compliance.
  • Supplies primarily to generic and contract manufacturing organizations.

Strengths:

  • Competitive pricing due to manufacturing scale.
  • Proven track record for non-critical APIs.

Limitations:

  • Regulatory adherence varies; some batches may face regulatory scrutiny.
  • Quality assurance processes require rigorous validation before inclusion in commercial drugs.

2. Zhejiang Huajing Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (China)

Overview:

  • Focuses on specialty APIs, including tyrosine pathway inhibitors.
  • Holds several quality certifications, including ISO 9001 and GMP.

Strengths:

  • Certified manufacturing facilities aligned with international standards.
  • Growing reputation as a supplier of high-quality APIs.

Limitations:

  • Market share limited compared to larger global players.
  • Supply capacity may be constrained by ongoing quality audits.

3. WuXi AppTec (China)

Overview:

  • Global contract research and manufacturing organization.
  • Offers API development, synthesis, and manufacturing services.

Strengths:

  • Extensive quality systems compliant with international standards.
  • Proven capability in complex APIs.

Limitations:

  • Typically serves customized, clinical, and early-phase APIs; bulk supply for commercial scale may involve longer lead times.

4. Private European and North American Suppliers

Overview:

  • A handful of specialty API manufacturers in Europe and North America produce nitisinone API under strict licensing agreements.
  • These suppliers generally serve regulatory-approved drug formulations.

Strengths:

  • Stringent quality control.
  • Better alignment with EU and US regulations.

Limitations:

  • Higher costs and limited capacity.
  • Availability often restricted to authorized distributors.

Supply Chain Considerations for Nitisinone API

Regulatory Compliance & Quality Standards

The API quality is paramount, especially for orphan drugs like Orfadin. Manufacturers must adhere to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and be certified by relevant health authorities such as the US FDA, EMA, or Japan PMDA. Certificates of Analysis (CoA), batch documentation, and process validation are critical components assuring regulatory compliance.

Supply Security & Capacity

API supply stability depends on the manufacturer's manufacturing capacity, geographic distribution, and logistics resilience. Chinese producers dominate the API market due to cost advantages, but geopolitical factors, trade restrictions, and quality audits influence supply chains.

Pricing and Contracting

Cost competitiveness varies considerably among suppliers. While Chinese API producers offer lower prices, regulatory agencies and companies often prefer established suppliers with proven quality and compliance records, justifying premium pricing.

Intellectual Property and Licensing

Only licensed manufacturers with appropriate licensing agreements from Sobi or rights holders supply API for commercial Orfadin formulations. Unauthorized or unlicensed APIs pose serious regulatory and safety risks.


Regulatory Landscape and Future Trends

The global APIs market for Orfadin's nitisinone is shaped by:

  • Regulatory Stringency: Increased enforcement of GMP standards, especially in regions such as North America and Europe.
  • Patent Status & Licensing: Patent expiration or license agreements influence the emergence of generic or biosimilar APIs.
  • Market Dynamics: Growing demand due to increased awareness of hereditary tyrosinemia and advances in diagnostics.
  • Supply Chain Disruptions: COVID-19 pandemic revealed vulnerabilities in global supply chains, leading to calls for diversified sourcing strategies.

Emerging Contract Manufacturing Models and Strategic Sourcing

Contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs) increasingly offer flexible APIs sourcing solutions. They foster collaborations with multiple licensed producers, ensuring supply resilience. Some CMOs specialize in orphan drugs, providing enhanced quality assurance and regulatory navigation.

Developments include:

  • Dual sourcing strategies to mitigate risk.
  • Use of APIs from multiple certified suppliers with cross-validation.
  • Implementation of Integrated Supply Chain Management (ISCM) to enhance transparency and traceability.

Conclusions and Strategic Recommendations

Given the critical role of API quality in the safety and efficacy of Orfadin, pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers should:

  • Prioritize sourcing from GMP-compliant, licensed suppliers.
  • Conduct rigorous qualification and validation processes for new API sources.
  • Explore opportunities for diversified supply chains, including established Chinese API producers and reputable Western suppliers.
  • Maintain continual regulatory surveillance and update sourcing strategies accordingly.
  • Consider partnerships with CMOs offering advanced manufacturing and quality assurance capabilities.

Key Takeaways

  • The primary API source for Orfadin (nitisinone) is licensed, GMP-compliant manufacturers with proven regulatory standing.
  • Chinese API manufacturers dominate the market due to manufacturing scale and cost advantages; however, quality assurance remains vital.
  • European and North American suppliers offer higher compliance assurance but at increased costs and limited capacity.
  • The global supply chain faces ongoing geopolitical and pandemic-related challenges, emphasizing the need for strategic diversification.
  • Regulatory compliance, quality assurance, and supply chain resilience are critical factors influencing API sourcing decisions.

FAQs

1. Who are the leading API manufacturers for nitisinone?
The major API producers include Chinese companies like SJ Pharmaceutical and Zhejiang Huajing, with additional suppliers in Europe and North America, such as WuXi AppTec, offering compliant APIs for regulated markets [1].

2. Is sourcing API from China safe and reliable?
While Chinese API manufacturers are capable of high-volume, cost-effective production, suppliers should possess GMP certificates and regulatory approvals to ensure quality and safety for pharmaceutical use.

3. How does the patent status affect API sourcing for Orfadin?
Patent expirations or licensing agreements influence the ability of generic manufacturers to produce API. Licensed suppliers with proper licensing are required for authorized formulations and regulatory approval.

4. What are the risks associated with API supply chain disruptions?
Risks include geopolitical tensions, manufacturing capacity limitations, quality non-compliance, and logistics delays, which can impact drug availability and patient treatment.

5. How can pharmaceutical companies mitigate API supply risks?
Diversify suppliers, establish dual sourcing agreements, conduct thorough supplier qualification, and monitor regulatory compliance to ensure consistent supply and quality.


References

[1] European Medicines Agency (EMA). Orfadin (nitisinone) Summary of Product Characteristics.
[2] Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (Sobi). Orfadin Product Information.
[3] Market reports on API manufacturing landscape, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.