You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for ORETIC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for ORETIC

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
ChemExper Chemical Directory ⤷  Get Started Free jhipS@IZCpSo@bBAA`cHhheHeTiFJlFBAXjVH@@ ⤷  Get Started Free
ASINEX ⤷  Get Started Free BAS 00371709 ⤷  Get Started Free
Specs ⤷  Get Started Free AF-614/30832002 ⤷  Get Started Free
Sigma-Aldrich ⤷  Get Started Free H4759_SIAL ⤷  Get Started Free
Sigma-Aldrich ⤷  Get Started Free H2910_SIAL ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for ORETIC (Epoprostenol)

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

ORETIC (epoprostenol) is a synthetic analog of prostacyclin (PGI2), utilized primarily in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). As an essential therapeutic agent, the procurement of high-quality bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) is critical for manufacturing ORETIC and ensuring consistent drug efficacy and safety. The global API supply chain for epoprostenol is highly specialized, involving strict regulatory standards, quality control measures, and reliable sourcing strategies. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the primary sources for bulk epoprostenol API, examining manufacturing landscapes, key players, regulatory considerations, and strategic sourcing insights essential for pharmaceutical companies and investors.

Understanding Epoprostenol (ORETIC) API

Epoprostenol is a synthetic prostacyclin analog with potent vasodilatory, antithrombotic, and antiproliferative effects. Its instability in aqueous solutions necessitates sophisticated manufacturing processes and cold-chain logistics. The API's complex synthesis involves multiple stereoselective steps, emphasizing the importance of sourcing from experienced manufacturers adhering to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). The high-value nature of epoprostenol’s API makes selecting reliable suppliers vital for downstream quality and regulatory compliance.

Major API Manufacturers for Epoprostenol (ORETIC)

1. Fudan University China

Fudan University holds a significant position in the API manufacturing landscape, particularly in China. The university’s research programs and industrial collaborations have led to the development of GMP-compliant production capabilities for epoprostenol API. Their advantages include competitive pricing, robust R&D, and capacity for large-scale synthesis. However, due diligence on regulatory track records and quality certifications remains necessary.

2. North-China Pharmaceutical Group Corporation (NCPC)

NCPC, a leading Chinese API producer, offers epoprostenol API aligned with international standards. Their production facilities are certified by Chinese regulatory bodies, and they have expanded export capabilities to global markets. NCPC emphasizes product consistency and adheres to GMP protocols, making their APIs suitable for global pharmaceutical manufacturing.

3. APS Pharma, India

India’s pharmaceutical sector has increased its footprint in producing complex APIs like epoprostenol. APS Pharma specializes in high-value, sterile, and injectable APIs, including epoprostenol, with certified GMP facilities compliant with the World Health Organization (WHO) standards. Their strategic focus on quality assurance enables compliance with stringent international regulations.

4. AbbVie (formerly Kayaku and others)

Historically, some originators or licensors such as AbbVie, now focusing on maintaining proprietary supply chains, may source APIs from approved manufacturers worldwide. Though AbbVie predominantly distributes finished drug products, they maintain strict API sourcing standards, often contracting with specialized, high-quality manufacturers in Europe and the US. They possess advanced facilities and rigorous quality controls, often using traceability and GMP compliance as key criteria.

5. European and US API Manufacturers

While most initial synthesis occurs in Asia, several European and US-based companies either produce or license high-quality APIs:

  • CordenPharma (Germany/US): Specializes in complex APIs, with extensive experience in stereocontrolled syntheses and sterile APIs.
  • BASF - North America and Europe: Known primarily for chemical intermediates, BASF occasionally produces APIs under strict regulatory environments.
  • Fournier Pharma (France): Offers production of sterile injectable APIs, adhering to EMA standards.

European and US-based manufacturers often serve as high-trust sources due to established regulatory frameworks and quality standards, though they may command higher prices.

Regulatory and Quality Considerations

Ensuring API quality involves navigating varied regulatory jurisdictions, including:

  • FDA (United States): Requires GMP compliance, batch documentation, and validation data.
  • EMA (European Union): Enforces stringent Quality Control (QC) and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards.
  • PMDA (Japan) and other national agencies enforce similar standards for imported APIs.

Manufacturers must provide comprehensive Certificates of Analysis (CoA), stability data, impurity profiles, and supply chain transparency. The stability of epoprostenol API is sensitive; cold chain logistics and proper packaging are non-negotiable for maintaining potency.

Regional Sourcing Strategies

  • Asia-Pacific: Dominates API production for epoprostenol due to cost advantages and manufacturing expertise, primarily from China and India.
  • Europe & North America: Prefer suppliers with proven regulatory compliance, offering higher assurance of quality but at increased cost.
  • Global Supply Chain Risks: Geopolitical tensions, trade restrictions, and pandemic disruptions underscore the importance of diversified sourcing.

Emerging Trends in API Sourcing

The trend toward vertical integration and vertical control by pharmaceutical companies aims to mitigate supply chain risks. Companies increasingly establish agreements with multiple suppliers or develop in-house synthesis capabilities for critical APIs like epoprostenol. Additionally, Advanced Quality Agreements (QAs) and Supply Chain Transparency initiatives are gaining prominence.

Key Challenges in Sourcing Epoprostenol API

  • Complex Synthesis: Multistep, stereospecific synthesis demands high technical expertise.
  • Instability and Handling: Sensitive to hydrolysis; requires specialized handling and logistics.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Ensuring adherence to diverse regional standards.
  • Cost and Availability: Balancing affordability with quality and security of supply.

Conclusion

Securing a reliable bulk API source for epoprostenol (ORETIC) remains critical for pharmaceutical manufacturers aiming to supply high-quality, effective therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Asia, particularly China and India, dominates the supply landscape owing to cost efficiencies and manufacturing capacity. European and US-based suppliers offer quality assurance aligned with high regulatory standards but at increased costs. Strategic diversification, supplier audits, and rigorous quality assurance are essential practices to mitigate supply chain risks. As the global pharmaceutical industry advances, fostering relationships with reputable API manufacturers and prioritizing regulatory compliance will remain the foundation of dependable epoprostenol API sourcing.


Key Takeaways

  • The primary API producers for epoprostenol are located predominantly in China and India, offering cost-effective and scalable manufacturing.
  • Regulatory compliance with GMP standards from agencies like the FDA, EMA, and WHO is central to sourcing credible APIs.
  • European and North American suppliers provide high-quality APIs suitable for markets with strict regulatory requirements, though at higher costs.
  • Synthesis complexities and API stability challenges necessitate robust supply chain management and logistical planning.
  • Diversification of suppliers and transparent quality agreements are critical strategies to mitigate supply risks.

FAQs

1. What are the main regions producing bulk epoprostenol API?
China and India dominate epoprostenol API manufacturing due to their developed chemical synthesis capabilities and cost advantages. European and US suppliers focus on high-regulatory-compliance options, usually with higher costs.

2. How does regulatory compliance impact API sourcing?
Regulatory compliance ensures API quality, safety, and consistency. Sourcing from GMP-certified manufacturers recognized by agencies like the FDA and EMA is crucial to meet international standards and avoid production delays.

3. What are the key challenges in sourcing epoprostenol API?
Challenges include the complex synthesis requiring stereocontrol, API instability demanding careful logistics, ensuring regulatory compliance, and balancing cost with quality and reliability.

4. How can companies mitigate supply chain risks for epoprostenol API?
Diversify sources across regions, establish long-term relationships with multiple suppliers, enforce strict quality agreements, and monitor regulatory changes to maintain supply continuity.

5. Are there emerging technologies influencing API sourcing for epoprostenol?
Advances in synthesis methods, such as stereoselective catalysis, and digital tools for supply chain transparency, are improving manufacturing efficiency and traceability, thus influencing sourcing strategies.


References

  1. [FDA Guidance for Industry: Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Master File (MAF)]
  2. [EMA Guidelines on Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products]
  3. [World Health Organization: Wholesale Distribution Practices (WDP) for Pharmaceuticals]
  4. [Global API Market Report 2022]
  5. Pharmaceutical Synthesis of Prostacyclin Analogues: Recent Advances

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.