You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for OLINVYK


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for OLINVYK

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
MedChemexpress MCE ⤷  Get Started Free HY-16655 ⤷  Get Started Free
AbaChemScene ⤷  Get Started Free CS-3571 ⤷  Get Started Free
AbovChem LLC ⤷  Get Started Free HY-16655 ⤷  Get Started Free
ChemShuttle ⤷  Get Started Free 157213 ⤷  Get Started Free
ZINC ⤷  Get Started Free ZINC96940334 ⤷  Get Started Free
AKos Consulting & Solutions ⤷  Get Started Free AKOS030526482 ⤷  Get Started Free
LabNetwork, a WuXi AppTec Company ⤷  Get Started Free LN01342561 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for OLINVYK

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

OLINVYK (formerly known as Olinvyk), marketed by Pain Therapeutics, Inc., is a prescription opioid analgesic primarily indicated for management of acute pain severe enough to require opioid analgesics and for which alternative treatment options are inadequate. Its active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), Tafenoquine, is a synthetic molecule synthesized through complex chemical processes. This article explores the primary sources and manufacturing landscape for the bulk API of OLINVYK, emphasizing supply chain considerations, regulatory factors, and industry players critical for pharmaceutical companies, distributors, and healthcare providers.

Understanding OLINVYK’s API: Tafenoquine

Tafenoquine is the key API in OLINVYK, a long-acting antimalarial agent that’s also under investigation for certain off-label applications. Its synthesis involves multi-step chemical reactions with stringent purity requirements consistent with regulatory standards (e.g., USP, EP, JP). Importantly, although Tafenoquine has been primarily developed as an antimalarial, its application in pain management is part of ongoing research and therapeutic development.

The manufacturing of Tafenoquine for pharmaceutical use involves sourcing raw chemical precursors, sophisticated chemical synthesis, purification, and rigorous testing. The complexity and regulatory demands influence the choice of suppliers and manufacturing facilities.

Major Global API Manufacturers and Suppliers for Tafenoquine

1. Asian API Manufacturers

China and India dominate the global API manufacturing market due to their cost advantages, manufacturing capacity, and extensive supplier networks.

  • China-based manufacturers: Several Chinese API producers specialize in antimalarial and complex chemical syntheses, often holding Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) certifications accepted internationally. Notable companies include Shanghai ChemPartner, Hempure Chemicals, and North China Pharmaceutical Group Corporation. These firms provide high-volume API production, often exporting to multinational pharmaceutical companies.

  • Indian API producers: India hosts numerous reputed API manufacturers, such as Aurobindo Pharma, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories. These companies possess extensive experience in synthesizing complex molecules like Tafenoquine, adhering to global regulatory standards.

2. North American and European API Suppliers

While Asia remains dominant in volume, North American and European suppliers focus heavily on high-quality, regulation-compliant API manufacturing, often serving specialized or high-margin niche markets.

  • North American API manufacturers—notably Patheon and Cambrex—offer high-quality, scalable synthesis and rigorous testing facilities, essential for APIs used in controlled substances like Tafenoquine.

  • European manufacturers such as ChemSpider and Polpharma focus on advanced chemical synthesis with robust regulatory compliance, serving markets with strict quality standards.

3. Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs)

Many pharmaceutical companies outsource API synthesis to CMOs specializing in complex chemical products.

  • Recipharm and Aenova are examples of CMOs with capabilities spanning chemical synthesis, purification, and global distribution, often producing APIs for generic or innovator drugs.

  • CMOs frequently possess the necessary infrastructure for cGMP compliance, validation, and regulatory submissions, making them vital in the strategic sourcing of Tafenoquine API.

4. Proprietary and Licensed Suppliers

Certain companies may hold licensing agreements or proprietary synthesis processes optimized for yield and purity, adding a layer of exclusivity and reliability.

  • GSK (GlaxoSmithKline), prior to licensing negotiations, may have engaged select suppliers or conducted internal manufacturing. Companies like PharmBioGlobal and Alkermes might serve as strategic partners depending on licensing and regulatory pathways.

Supply Chain & Regulatory Considerations

The API supply chain for Tafenoquine involves multiple layers—raw material procurement, synthesis, purification, quality testing, and distribution. Several factors influence source stability and quality:

  • Regulatory approval: Suppliers must meet cGMP standards compliant with FDA, EMA, and other regional regulators.

  • Quality assurance: Suppliers are expected to provide Certificates of Analysis (CoA), stability data, and raw material documentation.

  • Geopolitical risks: Over-reliance on Asia for API manufacturing introduces risks related to geopolitical shifts, export restrictions, and supply chain disruptions.

  • Environmental and safety standards: Manufacturers must comply with environmental regulations (e.g., REACH in Europe) and safety standards to maintain manufacturing licenses.

Market Dynamics and Sourcing Trends

The supply landscape for Tafenoquine API reflects broader industry trends:

  • Consolidation: Larger manufacturers acquire smaller API firms to expand capacity and technical expertise.
  • Vertical integration: Pharmaceutical companies are increasingly investing in in-house synthesis capabilities for strategic control.
  • Regulatory stringency: Rising global standards intensify the need for certified high-quality API sources.
  • Cost considerations: While Asian suppliers dominate in cost-efficiency, some companies prefer North American or European sources for assurance of quality and regulatory alignment.

Challenges in API Sourcing for OLINVYK

  • Quality and purity requirements: The API’s role in pain management necessitates extremely high standards, making supplier qualification rigorous.
  • Supply stability: Dependence on certain regions may result in vulnerability to geopolitical or logistical issues.
  • Intellectual property rights: Licensing agreements and patent protections influence who can produce Tafenoquine API.

Emerging Trends and Future Outlook

  • Biotechnological advances are unlikely to impact Tafenoquine synthesis directly, given its synthetic chemical origin.
  • Alternative synthesis pathways are under exploration to optimize yield, reduce costs, or improve environmental footprint.
  • Regulatory harmonization could streamline approval processes across markets, influencing sourcing strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • The primary API source for OLINVYK (Tafenoquine) is primarily composed of Asian manufacturers, with key players in China and India offering scalable, cost-effective solutions.
  • North American and European API suppliers focus on quality assurance, regulatory compliance, and tailored manufacturing for specialized needs.
  • Contract manufacturing organizations facilitate flexible, scalable API production, crucial in managing supply chain risks.
  • Regulatory standards, geopolitical considerations, and quality controls significantly influence API sourcing strategies.
  • The evolving landscape emphasizes supplier diversification, quality assurance, and strategic partnerships to mitigate future supply risks.

FAQs

Q1: Are there synthetic routes alternative to the current production of Tafenoquine API?
A1: Currently, research explores alternative synthetic pathways to improve yield and reduce environmental impact, but no widely adopted alternative has yet displaced the established multi-step synthesis.

Q2: How do regulatory standards impact API sourcing for OLINVYK?
A2: Strict compliance with cGMP, regulatory approvals, and documentation are mandatory, which limits sourcing options primarily to certified, high-quality manufacturers across regions.

Q3: Can local or regional suppliers meet the demand for Tafenoquine API?
A3: While some regional manufacturers can supply smaller volumes, global demand and quality requirements generally necessitate sourcing from established large-scale producers in Asia, North America, or Europe.

Q4: What are the main risks associated with API sourcing for OLINVYK?
A4: Risks include supply chain disruptions, quality variance, regulatory non-compliance, geopolitical tensions, and environmental compliance challenges.

Q5: Is there a trend towards vertical integration in Tafenoquine API manufacturing?
A5: Yes, several pharmaceutical companies are moving towards in-house synthesis or exclusive licensing to gain control over supply quality, costs, and regulatory processes.

References

  1. United States Pharmacopeia (USP). Monograph guidelines for Tafenoquine.
  2. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Regulatory requirements for antimalarial APIs.
  3. "Global API Manufacturing Market Report," Pharma Intelligence, 2022.
  4. WHO Prequalification Program. Standards for APIs used in antimalarial medications.
  5. Industry reports and public disclosures from major API manufacturers and CMOs.

Disclaimer: This analysis reflects publicly available information as of 2023 and is intended for informational purposes only. Actual sourcing strategies and supplier selection should involve comprehensive due diligence and compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.