You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 25, 2026

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for OFLOXACIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for OFLOXACIN

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
ChemExper Chemical Directory ⤷  Start Trial jewpR@B^SHHy`dDfYYeUYwWfJlgvXe``jJjZjibd@@ ⤷  Start Trial
Sigma-Aldrich ⤷  Start Trial O8757_SIGMA ⤷  Start Trial
NovoSeek ⤷  Start Trial 4583 ⤷  Start Trial
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for Ofloxacin

Last updated: February 20, 2026

This analysis details global suppliers for ofloxacin, an antibiotic classified under fluoroquinolones. The data covers primary producers, manufacturing countries, regulatory considerations, and supply chain factors influencing procurement decisions.

Who Are the Major API Suppliers for Ofloxacin?

Several established firms produce ofloxacin API, each with specific manufacturing footprints, quality standards, and regulatory approvals. These suppliers are categorized by region.

Leading ofloxacin API Manufacturers by Region

Region Major Suppliers Estimated Production Capacity (kg/year) Key Certifications and Approvals
China Zhejiang NHU Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co.; Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co. 50,000 – 100,000 cGMP, DMF submissions, FDA approval (certain suppliers)
India Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company Ltd.; Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd.; Lupin Ltd. 20,000 – 40,000 USFDA, EMA, MHRA, WHO GMP
Italy Sanofi (former Sanofi-Aventis); Zambon Group 10,000 – 20,000 EMA, GMP
South Korea Green Cross Corporation 5,000 – 10,000 KFDA, GMP

Note: Capacities are estimates based on company disclosures, export data, and market reports as of 2023.

Certification and Quality Standards

Most reputable API manufacturers obtain Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) certification, pivotal for global registration. Not all suppliers have U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval; European (EMA) approvals are common among European suppliers. Chinese and Indian suppliers increasingly pursue international certifications to access Western markets.

Factors Affecting API Sourcing for Ofloxacin

Sourcing decisions depend heavily on:

  • Regulatory acceptance: Suppliers with established documentation for global regulatory agencies streamline approval processes.
  • Manufacturing capacity and lead times: Larger capacities enable bulk procurement, reducing procurement costs.
  • Quality standards: Consistency in particle size, purity (>99%), and impurity profiles determines suitability for formulation.
  • Cost factors: Asian suppliers generally offer lower prices compared to European firms due to manufacturing costs.

Supply Chain and Risk Factors

  • Geopolitical stability: Trade tensions and export restrictions can affect China and India-based supplies.
  • Regulatory divergence: European suppliers may have higher regulatory compliance costs but provide more assured market access.
  • Capacity constraints: Sudden demand spikes can lead to shortages if production cannot scale quickly.

Regulatory Landscape for Ofloxacin API

Over the past decade, regulators have intensified testing requirements. Suppliers submit Drug Master Files (DMFs) to agencies like the FDA. Suppliers with approved DMFs are preferable due to transparency in manufacturing practices.

Key Sourcing Strategies

  • Diversify suppliers across regions to mitigate geopolitical risks.
  • Prioritize suppliers with approved DMFs and multiple certifications.
  • Maintain safety stock for critical manufacturing timelines.
  • Regularly audit supply chain quality and compliance.

Summary

Global API supply for ofloxacin primarily resides with Chinese and Indian producers. European suppliers are fewer but often associated with higher regulatory recognition. Procurement relies on balancing cost, quality, regulatory acceptance, and supply chain stability.


Key Takeaways

  • Major API producers for ofloxacin include Zhejiang NHU (China), Sun Pharma (India), and Sanofi (Europe).
  • Capacity estimates indicate Chinese producers dominate the market, with India following.
  • Regulatory certification and DMF approval influence supplier selection.
  • Geopolitical and capacity risks necessitate diversified sourcing.
  • International quality standards are increasingly standardized, facilitating global distribution.

FAQs

1. Which countries dominate ofloxacin API production?
China and India lead, combining approximately 70-80% of global production capacity.

2. What are the primary regulatory requirements for API suppliers?
Manufacturers must have GMP certification, submit DMFs to authorities like the FDA and EMA, and meet impurity and purity standards.

3. How does supplier certification impact procurement?
Certified suppliers provide assurance of compliance, facilitating faster registration and safer supply chains.

4. What are common risks associated with API sourcing for ofloxacin?
Supply disruptions from geopolitical tensions, capacity constraints, quality inconsistencies, and regulatory divergences.

5. Can Indian and Chinese suppliers meet global quality standards?
Yes, many do, especially those with international certifications. Selection should focus on verified compliance documentation.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Drug Master Files (DMFs): Overview.
[2] European Medicines Agency. (2023). API approval process and standards.
[3] Market Research Future. (2023). Global API Market Report.
[4] IQVIA. (2023). Pharmaceutical manufacturing and supply chain analysis.
[5] China Chemical Reporter. (2022). API production capacities and certifications.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.