You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 30, 2026

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for NICOTINE POLACRILEX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for NICOTINE POLACRILEX

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
ChemExper Chemical Directory ⤷  Get Started Free Hcm@@@{IDeCEDUSh@UUECX@ ⤷  Get Started Free
Sigma-Aldrich ⤷  Get Started Free N3876_SIGMA ⤷  Get Started Free
NovoSeek ⤷  Get Started Free 89594 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for: NICOTINE POLACRILEX

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Nicotine Polacrillex is a pharmaceutical formulation combining nicotine with Polacrillex, a proprietary or generic excipient matrix designed to facilitate controlled release or enhance bioavailability. As a critical component in tobacco cessation products such as lozenges and gum, nicotine Polacrillex demands high-quality, reliable bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) sources. Understanding the supply landscape for nicotine APIs is vital for pharmaceutical companies, regulators, and investors aiming to secure compliant, cost-effective, and scalable raw materials.


Chemical Identity and Regulatory Considerations

Nicotine (C₁₀H₁₄N₂) is a naturally occurring alkaloid derived predominantly from tobacco leaves (Nicotiana tabacum) and, increasingly, from bioengineered microbial sources. Regulatory agencies such as the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) and EMA (European Medicines Agency) classify nicotine as an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) for specific therapeutic contexts—most notably in smoking cessation and nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs).

The quality of the API is governed by pharmacopeial standards, including the United States Pharmacopeia (USP), European Pharmacopoeia (EP), and others. Ensuring compliance with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards is essential for pharmaceutical APIs, influencing source selection and supplier qualification.


Global Sources of Nicotine API for Pharmaceutical Use

1. Synthetic Nicotine Manufacturers

Synthetic nicotine has gained prominence amid supply chain disruptions and regulatory scrutiny over tobacco-derived sources. These manufacturers synthesize nicotine via chemical routes involving the catalytic or electrophilic substitution of pyridine derivatives, yielding high-purity nicotine suitable for pharmaceutical applications.

  • Key Suppliers:
    • CM Fine Chemicals: Based in India, offers synthetic nicotine complying with international pharmacopeial standards.
    • Av었습니다 Chemical Industries: Located in China, providing GMP-grade synthetic nicotine APIs.
    • Kremer Pigmente GmbH & Co. KG: German chemical supplier with synthetic nicotine variants for research and pharmaceutical manufacturing.

Synthetic nicotine suppliers provide advantages such as consistent purity, reduced contamination risk, and traceability, aligning with stringent regulatory standards.

2. Tobacco-Derived Nicotine Suppliers

Traditionally, nicotine is extracted from tobacco leaves via solvent extraction and purification processes. This source remains dominant due to established manufacturing pathways and demand in pharmaceutical-grade products.

  • Major Players:
    • Johnson Matthey (JM): A leading supplier with a capacity for large-scale extraction of pharmaceutical-grade nicotine, certified to cGMP standards.
    • Zhengzhou Tobacco Industry Group (Zhengzhou Tobacco): One of China's largest tobacco companies with extraction facilities meeting GMP standards.
    • Yunnan Tobacco (China): Supplies high-purity tobacco-derived nicotine for pharmaceutical applications.

Tobacco-derived nicotine's primary claim to fame stems from robust supply chain infrastructure and existing regulatory frameworks, though concerns around variability and residual contaminants persist.

3. Bioengineered Nicotine

Recent innovations involve microbial biosynthesis of nicotine analogs, promising a sustainable and contamination-controlled alternative. Although still in developmental stages or limited commercial production, bioengineered nicotine may become a future sourcing route.

  • Emerging Entities:
    • Ginkgo Bioworks: Developing microbial fermentation platforms for nicotine-like compounds.
    • Shahidi BioTech: Investing in biotransformation routes to produce pharmaceutical-grade nicotine.

Currently, bio-based production remains niche but represents a strategic avenue for API sources due to environmental considerations and potential regulatory advantages.


Quality and Regulatory Compliance

For pharmaceutical applications, the API source must demonstrate adherence to GMP, pharmacopeial specifications, and possess comprehensive certificates of analysis (CoA). Suppliers should provide detailed documentation including:

  • Purity levels (typically >99.5%)
  • Residual solvents
  • Heavy metals and pesticide residues
  • Microbial contamination limits
  • Certificates of origin and traceability

The choice between tobacco-derived and synthetic nicotine often hinges on regulatory acceptance, purity, and supply stability.


Supply Chain and Logistics Considerations

Reliability and scalability of nicotine API supplies are critical. Suppliers with certified manufacturing plants, high production capacity, and proven track records are preferred. Disruptions due to geopolitical factors, regulatory shifts, or raw material shortages can impact sourcing.

  • Lead times: Can vary from 4 to 12 weeks based on supplier and regulations.
  • Storage requirements: Nicotine APIs require controlled environments to prevent degradation.
  • Shipping regulations: Nicotine is classified as a controlled substance in certain jurisdictions, necessitating special import/export licenses and compliance with narcotics regulations.

Cost Considerations

Cost per kilogram of nicotine API ranges broadly, influenced by:

  • Source type (synthetic vs. tobacco-derived)
  • Purity specifications
  • Volume commitments
  • Regulatory and certification requirements

Synthetic nicotine generally commands a premium but offers regulatory clarity, especially in markets like the U.S. and EU.


Notable Manufacturers and Distributors

Supplier Origin Product Certification Notes
Johnson Matthey UK/Global GMP, USP, EP Large-scale, reliable, regulated supply
Zhengzhou Tobacco China GMP Cost-effective, high-volume
CM Fine Chemicals India GMP Growing presence in API market
Givaudan Switzerland Customized synthesis Focus on bio-acceptable APIs
Creative Compounds USA GMP Custom synthesis, research grade

Emerging Trends in API Sourcing

  • Shift to synthetic nicotine for regulatory and supply chain consistency.
  • Bio-based synthesis routes gaining traction, prioritizing sustainability.
  • Investments in traceability and supply chain transparency, driven by regulatory scrutiny.
  • Adoption of Advanced Quality Control (AQC) methods, including real-time analytical testing.

Conclusion

Securing high-quality API sources for nicotine Polacrillex entails evaluating synthetic, tobacco-derived, and emerging bioengineered options. Key factors include compliance with pharmacopeial standards, GMP certification, supply reliability, cost, and regulatory acceptance. Leading suppliers like Johnson Matthey and Zhengzhou Tobacco offer established sources for large-scale, compliant nicotine APIs, critical for pharmaceutical formulation excellence.


Key Takeaways

  • Synthetic nicotine provides a controlled, consistent, and regulatory-friendly API source, increasingly preferred for pharmaceutical applications.
  • Tobacco-derived nicotine remains the dominant source owing to mature extraction processes and established infrastructure.
  • Regulatory compliance (GMP, pharmacopeial standards) is non-negotiable; thorough supplier qualification is vital.
  • Supply chain stability and geopolitical risks influence sourcing decisions; diversification is prudent.
  • Emerging bioengineering techniques could redefine future API sources, aligning sustainability with quality standards.

FAQs

1. What are the main differences between synthetic and tobacco-derived nicotine for pharmaceutical use?
Synthetic nicotine offers greater consistency and is free from tobacco-related contaminants, facilitating regulatory approval. Tobacco-derived nicotine is more established with existing supply chains but may carry concerns about residual impurities.

2. How does GMP certification impact API sourcing decisions?
GMP certification ensures manufacturing processes meet strict quality standards, vital for pharmaceutical APIs. Suppliers lacking GMP compliance cannot supply APIs intended for active therapeutic use, leading to regulatory hurdles.

3. Are bioengineered nicotine APIs commercially available?
Currently, bioengineered nicotine is at the research and development stage. Limited commercial-scale production exists, primarily for niche applications, with broader adoption anticipated in the future.

4. What regulatory considerations are involved in sourcing nicotine APIs globally?
Nicotine is classified as a controlled substance in many jurisdictions, requiring strict licensing, documentation, and compliance with import/export laws. Suppliers must provide detailed validation and traceability documentation.

5. How can companies ensure the quality of nicotine APIs from international suppliers?
Through rigorous qualification processes, including audits, review of quality certifications, batch testing, and continuous supply chain monitoring. Establishing long-term relationships with reputable, certified suppliers reduces risk.


References

  1. U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) – Nicotine Monograph.
  2. European Pharmacopoeia (EP) – Nicotine Specifications.
  3. Johnson Matthey – API manufacturing capabilities.
  4. Regulatory guidelines on controlled substances – DEA, EMA.
  5. Industry reports on tobacco and synthetic nicotine manufacture.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.