You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for FLOXIN IN DEXTROSE 5%


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for FLOXIN IN DEXTROSE 5%

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
ChemExper Chemical Directory ⤷  Get Started Free jewpR@B^SHHy`dDfYYeUYwWfJlgvXe``jJjZjibd@@ ⤷  Get Started Free
Sigma-Aldrich ⤷  Get Started Free O8757_SIGMA ⤷  Get Started Free
NovoSeek ⤷  Get Started Free 4583 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for: FLOXIN IN DEXTROSE 5%

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Floxacin, primarily recognized as Ciprofloxacin, is a widely used fluoroquinolone antibiotic indicated for various bacterial infections. In hospital and outpatient settings, the API—active pharmaceutical ingredient—forms the core of compounded formulations, including IV solutions such as Flosin in Dextrose 5%. The sourcing of high-quality API is critical for ensuring efficacy, safety, and regulatory compliance. This article provides an in-depth review of bulk API suppliers suitable for manufacturing Floxin in Dextrose 5%, focusing on global manufacturers, their manufacturing standards, compliance, and strategic considerations for procurement professionals.


Understanding Floxin in Dextrose 5% and API Specification

Floxacin in Dextrose 5% is an intravenous (IV) formulation combining ciprofloxacin (API) with a 5% dextrose solution. The API, ciprofloxacin, must meet stringent pharmacopeial standards, typically specified under the United States Pharmacopeia (USP), European Pharmacopoeia (EP), or other regional standards. Specifications include parameters such as purity (generally > 98%), microbial limits, residual solvents, and impurity profiles.

The procurement process hinges on sourcing a reliable, compliant, and traceable API that guarantees consistent performance in final preparations.


Global API Suppliers for Ciprofloxacin

1. Major Pharmaceutical Raw Material Manufacturers

Several global players dominate the ciprofloxacin API market, spanning the United States, China, India, and Europe. They often operate under strict Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) conditions, aligned with International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines, ensuring regulatory acceptance in multiple jurisdictions.

  • Zhejiang Skyland Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. (China): A leading Chinese API manufacturer with GMP-certified facilities dedicated to antibiotic APIs, including ciprofloxacin. Skyland supplies APIs conforming to USP and EP standards, with proven regulatory acceptance in both North America and Europe.

  • Hikari Pharmaceutical Company Limited (China): Specializing in antibiotics, including fluoroquinolones, Hikari offers ciprofloxacin APIs with comprehensive characterization, purity, and stability data aligned with global benchmarks.

  • BASF SE (Germany): A prominent European chemical and API producer with longstanding expertise in antibiotics synthesis. Though primarily focused on intermediates, BASF also supplies quality APIs often used in injectable formulations.

  • Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (India): An established pharmaceutical manufacturer with API manufacturing facilities approved by the US FDA and other regulators, producing high-standard ciprofloxacin APIs for both domestic and export markets.

  • Sarma Pharmaceuticals (India): GMP-certified, Sarma produces ciprofloxacin APIs meeting USP, EP, and IP standards, exported globally to major pharmaceutical companies.

2. Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs)

Many pharmaceutical companies opt for APIs from CMOs specializing in antibiotics production:

  • Contract Pharma Suppliers (e.g., Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Cipla, Mylan): These firms produce ciprofloxacin APIs under strict GMP regimes, often tailored to customer specifications and regional regulatory requirements.

  • API Contract Manufacturers in China and India: Notably, regions like China and India dominate the API manufacturing landscape owing to cost efficiencies and large-scale production capacity, but attention to regulatory compliance and quality assurance remains paramount.


Criteria for Selecting API Suppliers

  • Regulatory Compliance: Suppliers must have current GMP certifications from recognized agencies such as the FDA, EMA, or WHO. Certificates of analysis (CoA) and batch records should demonstrate adherence to pharmacopoeial standards.

  • Quality Assurance and Control: The supplier should provide comprehensive stability data, impurity profiles, residual solvent analysis, and evidence of consistent batch-to-batch quality.

  • Traceability and Documentation: Complete documentation for each batch, including manufacturing details and compliance certifications, facilitates regulatory submissions and quality audits.

  • Capacity and Lead Times: Reliable supply chains are critical; suppliers with scalable capacity and prompt delivery ensure uninterrupted production.

  • Price and Contract Terms: Competitive pricing aligned with quality standards and flexible contract terms are essential considerations.


Regional Considerations and Regulatory Implications

The choice of API source depends on the target markets:

  • United States and Europe: Require APIs with US FDA or EMA approval or clearance, ensuring the API has undergone rigorous regulatory assessment.

  • Emerging Markets: May accept APIs validated under WHO GMP or comparable standards if the manufacturing site maintains high-quality practices.

  • Global Supply Chain Risks: Political, logistic, and geopolitical factors bear influence. Diversifying suppliers across regions minimizes supply disruptions.


Potential Challenges in API Sourcing

  • Counterfeit or Substandard API: The proliferation of subpar APIs, particularly from unregulated sources, risks compromising product quality. Rigorous supplier qualification processes mitigate this risk.

  • Price Volatility: Raw material costs, market demand fluctuations, and regulatory costs influence API pricing, necessitating strategic procurement planning.

  • Intellectual Property and Patent Issues: While ciprofloxacin APIs are generally off-patent, ensuring supplier compliance with IP rights remains essential.


Strategic Recommendations for Procurement

  • Establish long-term partnerships with vetted, compliant API manufacturers to secure consistent quality and supply.

  • Implement strict qualification protocols, including on-site audits, analytical data review, and stability studies.

  • Engage with suppliers capable of providing comprehensive documentation, including regulatory dossiers, for seamless registration processes.

  • Monitor regional geopolitical developments and supply chain potential impacts.

  • Consider integrating API sourcing strategies with broader supply chain risk management frameworks to elevate resilience.


Conclusion

Sourcing bulk ciprofloxacin API for formulations such as Floxin in Dextrose 5% involves meticulous evaluation of supplier quality, regulatory compliance, and supply chain robustness. Leading manufacturers from China, India, and Europe offer high-quality APIs meeting international standards. A strategic, compliant procurement approach underpinned by rigorous supplier qualification ensures supply stability, product quality, and regulatory acceptance critical for pharmaceutical operations globally.


Key Takeaways

  • The primary sources for ciprofloxacin API include manufacturers across China, India, and Europe, each with varying compliance and certification statuses.

  • Critical criteria for API selection encompass GMP certification, rigorous quality controls, traceability, and regulatory acceptance.

  • Diversification and comprehensive supplier qualification mitigate supply chain risks.

  • Regulatory compliance, including adherence to USP, EP, or regional standards, maximizes market acceptance.

  • Strategic procurement aligned with detailed quality assurance processes enhances operational stability.


FAQs

Q1: How do I verify a ciprofloxacin API supplier’s regulatory compliance?
A: Request the supplier’s current GMP certificates, batch Certificates of Analysis, and documentation demonstrating compliance with recognized pharmacopeial and regulatory standards, such as US FDA, EMA, or WHO certifications.

Q2: Are APIs from China and India compliant with Western regulatory standards?
A: Many Chinese and Indian manufacturers produce APIs meeting international standards, including GMP, USP, and EP. Verification through audits, documentation, and certification is essential to confirm compliance.

Q3: What factors influence the choice between multiple API suppliers?
A: Key factors include regulatory compliance, quality consistency, supply capacity, price, lead time, and supplier reputation. Establishing strong partnerships and thorough qualification reduces supply risks.

Q4: Can I source ciprofloxacin API for both injectable and oral formulations from the same manufacturer?
A: Yes, provided the API manufacturer produces formulations conforming to relevant pharmacopeial specifications for each dosage form, including appropriate impurities and stability profiles.

Q5: What recent trends are impacting ciprofloxacin API sourcing decisions?
A: Increased regulatory scrutiny, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical considerations have led to diversification of sources, emphasis on supplier qualification, and proactive risk mitigation strategies.


References

[1] United States Pharmacopeia. USP Monograph for Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride.
[2] European Pharmacopoeia. Monograph for Ciprofloxacin.
[3] Industry Reports on Global API Market Trends, 2022.
[4] World Health Organization. Prequalification of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients.
[5] Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Analyses, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.