You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for CEFOTAXIME AND DEXTROSE 3.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for CEFOTAXIME AND DEXTROSE 3.9% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
Sigma-Aldrich ⤷  Get Started Free C7912_SIGMA ⤷  Get Started Free
Sigma-Aldrich ⤷  Get Started Free C7039_SIGMA ⤷  Get Started Free
NovoSeek ⤷  Get Started Free 10695961 ⤷  Get Started Free
TCI (Tokyo Chemical Industry) ⤷  Get Started Free C2224 ⤷  Get Started Free
MolPort ⤷  Get Started Free MolPort-003-928-040 ⤷  Get Started Free
ABBLIS Chemicals ⤷  Get Started Free AB1009356 ⤷  Get Started Free
ChemMol ⤷  Get Started Free 49424132 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for Cefotaxime and Dextrose 3.9% in Plastic Container

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

The procurement of high-quality Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) remains a core component in pharmaceutical manufacturing, directly influencing product efficacy, safety, and regulatory compliance. Specifically, cefotaxime, a third-generation cephalosporin antibiotic, and dextrose 3.9%, a concentrated glucose solution utilized for various medical indications, are widely used in injectable formulations. Sourcing these APIs reliably in bulk form, particularly for formulations intended for plastic containers, involves navigating a complex global supplier landscape, with considerations including regulatory approvals, manufacturing standards, and supply chain security.

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of potential API sources for cefotaxime and dextrose 3.9%, emphasizing reputable manufacturers, geographic considerations, quality standards, and market dynamics.


Cefotaxime API: Market Overview and Suppliers

1. Major Manufacturers and Suppliers

Cefotaxime API is produced predominantly by reputable pharmaceutical ingredient manufacturers adhering to stringent international quality standards such as cGMP (current Good Manufacturing Practices).

  • Alkaloida Chemical Company (India): Recognized for producing high-purity cephalosporin APIs, Alkaloida supplies cefotaxime globally, often serving markets in Asia, Europe, and the Middle East [1].

  • Aarti Industries (India): A prominent supplier with a strong export record, offering cefotaxime API manufactured under cGMP conditions, approved by multiple regulatory agencies.

  • Hospira (USA/Pfizer): Known for high-quality APIs and contract manufacturing services, Hospira supplies cefotaxime API primarily via licensing agreements, though direct procurement may involve regulatory and facility compliance considerations.

  • Mingxin Pharmaceutical (China): An increasing presence in the cefotaxime API market, supplying large volumes to global manufacturers, with certifications aligning with European and US standards.

  • Jiangxi Yaxin Pharmaceutical (China): Offers cefotaxime API sections with substantial export volumes, emphasizing quality certifications and regulatory compliance.

2. Geographic Considerations

  • India: The largest producer of antibiotics APIs, including cefotaxime, benefiting from established supply chains, competitive pricing, and extensive regulatory compliance frameworks.

  • China: Increasingly dominant in the API market, offering cost-effective manufacturing but with variable quality certification, so qualification and audits are necessary.

  • USA & Europe: Limited direct production; reliance on import from established manufacturers like Hospira and European API suppliers ensures higher regulatory acceptance but often at higher costs.

3. Quality and Regulatory Approvals

  • Suppliers should possess certification such as ISO 9001, ISO 13485, cGMP compliance, and, where applicable, FDA approval, EDQM certification, or EMA’s qualification to ensure API purity, potency, and safety.

  • For injectable cefotaxime API, compliance with Pharmacopoeia standards (USP, BP, EP, JP) is mandatory.


Dextrose 3.9% API: Market Outlook and Suppliers

1. Key Suppliers and Manufacturers

  • Fresenius Kabi (Germany): A leading supplier of pharmaceutical-grade glucose solutions, including dextrose 3.9%, with a reputation for high-quality manufacturing in compliant facilities.

  • Baxter International (USA): Supplies sterile glucose APIs and solutions, emphasizing safety and regulatory adherence.

  • Samsung BioLogics (South Korea): Emerging as a significant producer of pharmaceutical APIs, including glucose derivatives, with strict quality systems.

  • India-based manufacturers:

    • Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals (GSFC): Produces pharmaceutical-grade dextrose in bulk, complying with global standards.
    • Hetero Labs: Supplies dextrose and related APIs with certifications aligned to multiple regulatory jurisdictions.
    • Shandong Lezn Pharmaceutical Co. (China): Offers dextrose API with competitive pricing and quality certifications.

2. Geographic and Regulatory Considerations

  • Germany & USA: Preferable for buyers seeking regulatory assurance, given stringent quality standards and procurement ease for clinical and commercial supply.

  • India & China: Cost-effective options with extensive manufacturing capabilities, but require thorough qualification and validation for compliance with target markets.

3. Quality Standards and Certifications

  • Essential certifications include USP, EP, or BP compliance. Suppliers should demonstrate validation data and stability profiles suitable for parenteral use.

  • Sterility, particulate matter standards, and endotoxin levels (LAL testing) are critical quality parameters.


Supply Chain Dynamics and Qualification Strategies

1. Validation and Qualification

  • Buyers must conduct comprehensive vendor qualification, including site audits, batch validation, and quality documentation review.

  • Ensuring that APIs are supplied with Certificates of Analysis (CoA), stability data, and documentation aligned with International Pharmacopoeias is imperative.

2. Regulatory Harmonization

  • For markets like the U.S. and Europe, APIs must be sourced from suppliers with approved Drug Master Files (DMFs) or Certificates of Suitability (CEP).

  • For emerging markets, suppliers should demonstrate compliance with local Good Manufacturing Practices and regulatory agencies’ certifications.

3. Supply Chain Security

  • Diversification of API sources minimizes risk related to supply disruptions.

  • Engaging with established international suppliers with reliable logistics networks ensures uninterrupted production.


Conclusion

Sourcing cefotaxime and dextrose 3.9% APIs in bulk for plastic container formulations requires a strategic approach centered on supplier reputation, quality assurance, and regulatory compliance. Indian and Chinese manufacturers dominate the cefotaxime API market, offering cost-effective options, provided due diligence is performed. European and North American suppliers of dextrose API deliver high-regulatory assurance that benefits markets with stringent standards.

Ultimately, aligning supplier selection with manufacturing requirements and regulatory expectations ensures product integrity, avoids supply delays, and sustains market competitiveness.


Key Takeaways

  • Prioritize suppliers with robust regulatory approvals and certifications such as cGMP, ISO, FDA, and EDQM compliance.

  • Indian and Chinese producers dominate the cefotaxime API market, offering competitive prices but requiring qualification assessments.

  • European and North American sources excel in dextrose API supply, providing reputational assurance and regulatory ease.

  • Due diligence, supplier qualification, and validation are crucial for consistent quality, especially for parenteral APIs intended for plastic containers.

  • Supply chain diversification mitigates risks of disruption, ensuring reliable access to high-quality APIs for global manufacturing.


FAQs

1. What are the primary considerations when sourcing cefotaxime API for medical formulations?
Regulatory compliance, manufacturing standards, API purity, supplier reputation, and certification quality are vital. Ensuring suppliers hold cGMP, ISO, and relevant pharmacopoeia certifications minimizes risk and ensures product safety.

2. How do Indian API manufacturers compare with Chinese suppliers for cefotaxime?
Indian manufacturers generally have robust regulatory oversight, offering high-quality APIs with extensive certification, making them preferred for highly regulated markets. Chinese suppliers are cost-effective and increasing compliance but require thorough qualification.

3. What quality standards should dextrose 3.9% API suppliers meet?
Suppliers should provide APIs conforming to USP, EP, or BP standards, with documentation for sterility, endotoxin levels, particulate matter, and stability, suitable for sterile, parenteral formulations.

4. How can manufacturers ensure API quality during procurement?
Conduct supplier audits, review Certificates of Analysis, request validation and stability data, perform on-site inspections, and establish qualification protocols aligned with regulatory requirements.

5. Are there logistical issues associated with sourcing APIs from certain regions?
Yes. While Indian and Chinese suppliers offer cost advantages, logistical challenges like customs clearance, transportation delays, and geopolitical factors necessitate thorough planning and supply chain management.


References

[1] Pharmaceutical Technology. "Global Cefotaxime Market Analysis," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.