You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for ATROPINE SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for ATROPINE SULFATE

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
Sigma-Aldrich ⤷  Get Started Free A0132_SIGMA ⤷  Get Started Free
Sigma-Aldrich ⤷  Get Started Free A2468_SIGMA ⤷  Get Started Free
TCI (Tokyo Chemical Industry) ⤷  Get Started Free A0550 ⤷  Get Started Free
Molport ⤷  Get Started Free MolPort-001-742-593 ⤷  Get Started Free
TimTec ⤷  Get Started Free ST057178 ⤷  Get Started Free
Amadis Chemical ⤷  Get Started Free A833555 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for: Atropine Sulfate

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Atropine sulfate, a cornerstone in ophthalmology and anesthesiology, operates as a competitive muscarinic receptor antagonist. It is primarily utilized for its mydriatic, cycloplegic, and cardiac arrhythmia management properties. The global supply chain for atropine sulfate hinges on reliable, compliant, and quality-assured API manufacturers. For pharmaceutical companies and stakeholders, understanding the landscape of bulk API sources is essential for procurement strategies, quality assurance, and regulatory compliance. This report offers a comprehensive overview of key atropine sulfate API suppliers, evaluating their manufacturing capabilities, geographic distribution, regulatory standing, and market trends.

Manufacturing and Global Sourcing Landscape

1. Major API Manufacturing Countries

The principal sources of atropine sulfate API originate from established pharmaceutical manufacturing hubs in India, China, and, to a lesser extent, Europe and the United States. These regions benefit from advanced chemical synthesis expertise, regulatory support, and scale economies, making them prominent in the global API supply chain.

  • India: Dominates the market with numerous GMP-compliant producers. Indian API manufacturers are known for cost efficiency, extensive export capacity, and adherence to regulatory standards outlined by the World Health Organization (WHO) and local agencies like the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO).

  • China: A significant producer, especially for bulk raw materials, characterized by large-scale chemical facilities and competitive pricing. Chinese companies often serve both domestic and international markets, with varying degrees of regulatory compliance.

  • Europe and the United States: While presence is comparatively limited owing to stringent regulations and higher production costs, select firms maintain high-quality manufacturing facilities that supply niche markets and meet strict regulatory demands like FDA approval.

2. Key API Supplier Profiles

A. Indian Manufacturers

  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: An established leader with a comprehensive portfolio including atropine sulfate, emphasizing GMP compliance and export reach. Their manufacturing complies with USFDA, European EMA, and WHO standards, enabling global distribution.

  • Aarti Drugs Ltd.: Known for high-quality APIs with certifications suitable for both domestic and international markets. They maintain ISO 9001 and GMP certifications, ensuring product integrity and regulatory acceptance.

  • Gujarat Alkali and Chemicals Ltd.: Engaged in the synthesis of atropine sulfate with a focus on affordability and large-volume supply. Their facilities are compliant with domestic regulatory standards, with increasing international recognition.

B. Chinese Manufacturers

  • Shandong Xinglong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Offers atropine sulfate API at competitive prices, with production adhering to GMP standards. Their exports are primarily directed toward Asian, African, and Latin American markets.

  • Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Ltd.: Known for high-quality pharmaceutical intermediates, including atropine sulfate, with robust R&D and compliance certifications such as ISO and GMP.

C. European and U.S. Suppliers

  • BASF SE: Supplies specialty chemicals and APIs with high compliance standards, primarily serving high-end markets. Their products undergo rigorous quality control, often meeting FDA requirements.

  • Siegfried Holding AG: Provides APIs and pharmaceutical ingredients, including atropine sulfate, with a focus on analytical rigor and regulatory clearance for global markets.

3. Regulatory and Quality Considerations

API sourcing from regulatory-compliant manufacturers remains critical. Manufacturers with current Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) certification, ISO standards, and documentation compliant with international regulations like the USFDA, EMA, or WHO prequalification status ensure product safety, efficacy, and marketability.

Asian manufacturers often leverage their cost advantages while achieving compliance through rigorous audits and certifications. However, due diligence on regulatory dossiers and past audit outcomes is vital for procurement.

4. Market Trends and Supply Chain Dynamics

The global atropine sulfate API market exhibits shifts driven by regulatory scrutinies, geopolitical factors, and demand fluctuations. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the importance of diversifying supply sources to mitigate risks associated with dependency on a limited number of suppliers or regions.

In recent years, quality standards have become a primary competitive differentiator, with buyers increasingly favoring suppliers with well-documented compliance and product stability data. Emerging markets in Africa and Southeast Asia have expanded their sourcing footprint, tapping into the cost benefits of Indian and Chinese manufacturing hubs while increasingly prioritizing quality assurance.

Key Challenges

  • Regulatory Divergence: Navigating varying international standards requires thorough due diligence.

  • Supply Disruptions: Political, economic, or logistical disruptions in key manufacturing regions can impair supply.

  • Counterfeit and Substandard APIs: Due to the cost sensitivities, counterfeit or substandard APIs present a significant threat, emphasizing the need for transparent supplier vetting.

5. Future Outlook

Innovations in synthesis processes, increased regulatory harmonization, and the rise of API manufacturing clusters are poised to shape the atropine sulfate supply landscape. Regulatory initiatives such as the FDA's Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA) and European Falsified Medicines Directive (FMD) will influence supplier registration and traceability practices.

Sustainability and environmental considerations are gaining prominence among manufacturers, with a shift toward greener synthesis methods and waste management protocols.

Conclusion

The atropine sulfate API supply chain is characterized by a robust presence of Indian and Chinese manufacturers, supplemented by select European and U.S. producers that meet high regulatory standards. Ensuring quality, compliance, and supply stability requires diligent supplier assessment, ongoing regulatory tracking, and diversification strategies. As global demand persists, market participants must prioritize transparency and adherence to evolving standards to secure reliable API sources.


Key Takeaways

  • India and China are dominant sources of atropine sulfate API, offering a cost-effective and scalable supply with varying levels of regulatory compliance.
  • Selecting GMP-certified manufacturers with recognized certifications (FDA, EMA, WHO) is critical to ensure quality and regulatory acceptance.
  • Diversification and supply chain resilience are essential to mitigate geopolitical and logistical risks.
  • Suppliers with comprehensive documentation, quality control measures, and transparency in manufacturing processes have a competitive advantage.
  • Evolving regulatory frameworks and sustainability considerations will influence future market dynamics and supplier selection criteria.

FAQs

Q1: What are the main considerations when sourcing atropine sulfate API?
A: Prioritize suppliers with GMP certification, regulatory compliance (FDA, EMA, WHO), transparent quality documentation, supply stability, and adherence to environmental and safety standards.

Q2: Which countries dominate the atropine sulfate API market?
A: India and China lead due to their large-scale manufacturing capabilities, cost competitiveness, and growing regulatory compliance. European and U.S. suppliers serve high-end markets with stricter standards.

Q3: How can buyers mitigate supply chain risks for atropine sulfate?
A: Diversify suppliers across regions, establish long-term contracts with GMP-certified manufacturers, perform rigorous supplier audits, and maintain buffer inventories.

Q4: Are there differences in quality between Asian and Western API manufacturers?
A: While many Asian manufacturers produce high-quality APIs compliant with international standards, disparities may exist. Due diligence, certifications, and audit reports are essential for accurate assessment.

Q5: What are future trends impacting atropine sulfate API sourcing?
A: Increasing regulatory harmonization, focus on sustainability, adoption of advanced synthesis technologies, and supply chain resilience strategies will shape the future landscape.


Sources

[1] World Health Organization (WHO). "Prequalification of Medicines Programme." Accessed 2023.

[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). "Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) Regulations." 2023.

[3] Indian Drugs and Cosmetics Act & Rules. Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO). 2022.

[4] European Medicines Agency (EMA). "Guidelines on Good Manufacturing Practices." 2023.

[5] Industry Reports and Market Analysis Publications. Various (2022-2023).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.