You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for ANEXSIA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Bulk Pharmaceutical API Sources for ANEXSIA

Vendor Vendor Homepage Vendor Sku API Url
ChemExper Chemical Directory ⤷  Get Started Free HmvD@DATf^Uqej@B@@@ ⤷  Get Started Free
Sigma-Aldrich ⤷  Get Started Free A3035_SIAL ⤷  Get Started Free
Sigma-Aldrich ⤷  Get Started Free A5000_SIAL ⤷  Get Started Free
>Vendor >Vendor Homepage >Vendor Sku >API Url

Bulk Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Sources for ANEXSIA

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

Anexsia is a pharmaceutical product formulated for the management of moderate to severe pain, combining acetaminophen with opioids such as hydrocodone or other active ingredients. The core component of Anexsia is the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API), which plays a critical role in its efficacy, safety, and manufacturing process. Ensuring a reliable, high-quality API supply chain is paramount for pharmaceutical companies and regulators, impacting the product’s consistency and patient safety.

This report examines the primary sources of bulk APIs suitable for Anexsia, considering manufacturing standards, regulatory compliance, geographic distribution, and supply chain stability.


Understanding the API Components of Anexsia

Anexsia typically contains the following APIs:

  • Hydrocodone Bitartrate: An opioid analgesic providing pain relief.
  • Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): An analgesic and antipyretic.

The sourcing strategies differ based on the specific API, owing to their distinct production processes, regulatory oversight, and market dynamics.


Bulk API Supply Chain Overview

The API industry has evolved into a global network comprising key manufacturing hubs in India, China, Europe, and the United States. Ensuring compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), regulatory approvals, and quality standards is critical for APIs used in controlled substances like hydrocodone.

Regulatory Considerations

  • Controlled Substance Regulations: Hydrocodone, being a Schedule II controlled substance in the United States, requires API suppliers to possess specific licenses, such as DEA registration.
  • International Standards: ISO certifications, cGMP compliance, and USFDA or EMA approvals influence supplier selection.
  • Traceability and Transparency: Increasing emphasis on supply chain transparency to mitigate risks related to counterfeit or substandard APIs.

Key API Suppliers for Anexsia

1. Hydrocodone Bitartrate

Leading Suppliers

  • Piramal Enterprises Limited (India): A major manufacturer with extensive GMP-certified facilities, supplying API to global markets, including the United States. Piramal's hydrocodone API complies with USFDA standards, and the company holds DEA registration for controlled substance manufacturing.
  • Metropolitan Authority (China): Several Chinese manufacturers, such as Zhejiang Greattime Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., supply hydrocodone APIs with CE certification and ISO standards, though regulatory approval varies.
  • Hikma Pharmaceuticals (Europe): Known for high-quality APIs, including controlled substances, with a focus on compliance with European GMP regulations.

Regulatory and Quality Considerations

  • Suppliers must demonstrate rigorous quality control, stability, and consistency.
  • US-based companies favor suppliers with DEA registration and USFDA approval.
  • Chinese and Indian manufacturers often meet international standards but require thorough validation.

2. Acetaminophen

Leading Suppliers

  • Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation (Japan): One of the pioneers in acetaminophen production, offering pharmaceutical-grade APIs that meet international standards.
  • Ajinomoto Co., Inc. (Japan): Supplies high-purity acetaminophen API, adhering to cGMP and ISO certifications.
  • Zhejiang NHU Co., Ltd. (China): A prominent Chinese manufacturer with significant market share, producing acetaminophen conforming to USP and EP standards.
  • LGM Pharma (USA): A North American supplier offering GMP-compliant APIs, including acetaminophen, with transparent supply chains.

Regulatory and Quality Considerations

  • Suppliers must produce acetaminophen that meets USP, EP, or JP standards.
  • Certifications such as ISO 9001, cGMP, and customer-specific compliance are critical.
  • Supply chain stability is generally robust, given the mature manufacturing process.

Regional API Manufacturing Hubs

India

India remains a dominant API manufacturer, particularly for generic medications and controlled substances. Companies like Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Torrent Pharmaceuticals, and Aurobindo Pharma supply APIs meeting rigorous quality standards. Indian API manufacturers benefit from cost advantages and increasing regulatory clarity.

China

China’s role as a major API exporter is well-established, notably in bulk APIs like acetaminophen and certain controlled substances. Regulatory vigilance is rising due to quality concerns; however, large-scale manufacturing capacity and competitive pricing sustain its importance.

United States and Europe

Manufacturers in these regions typically produce high-purity APIs under strict regulatory oversight. USFDA-registered facilities facilitate seamless integration into the US supply chain, especially for controlled substances requiring DEA licensing.


Supply Chain Risks and Mitigation

  • Regulatory Risks: Changes in drug policies or import/export regulations can disrupt supply. Continuous compliance monitoring is essential.
  • Quality Risks: Substandard APIs pose safety concerns; rigorous vendor qualification processes filter out unreliable sources.
  • Geopolitical Risks: Trade tensions and political stability influence API sourcing strategies, prompting diversification.
  • Manufacturing Disruptions: Natural disasters, pandemics, and logistical issues can impact supply; maintaining multiple accredited vendors mitigates risks.

Emerging Trends and Future Outlook

  • Localized Manufacturing: Countries are investing in domestic API facilities to reduce dependency on imports.
  • Sustainable Production: Environmental considerations are driving adoption of greener manufacturing methodologies.
  • Enhanced Traceability: Blockchain and digital tracking are increasingly adopted to monitor API provenance and ensure authenticity.
  • Regulatory Harmonization: Alignment of international standards simplifies supplier qualification processes.

Conclusion

The supply landscape for APIs used in Anexsia encompasses globally distributed manufacturing hubs with varied regulatory profiles. Key suppliers such as Piramal (India), Mitsubishi Chemical (Japan), Zhejiang NHU (China), and US/EU-based manufacturers provide high-quality, GMP-compliant APIs essential for pharmaceutical integrity.

Maintaining a resilient supply chain for controlled substances like hydrocodone demands rigorous supplier qualification, compliance with regulations, diversified sourcing, and proactive risk management.


Key Takeaways

  • Top API sources for Anexsia include manufacturers in India, China, Japan, Europe, and North America, each with distinct advantages.
  • Regulatory compliance with cGMP, USFDA, EMA, and DEA standards is non-negotiable for controlled substances.
  • Supply chain resilience is achieved through diversification, real-time monitoring, and establishing partnerships with verified, high-quality suppliers.
  • Emerging trends such as localized manufacturing, sustainable practices, and digital traceability are shaping future API sourcing strategies.
  • Due diligence remains essential; regular audits, quality verification, and compliance checks safeguard product quality and patient safety.

FAQs

1. Why is DEA registration important for API suppliers of hydrocodone?
DEA registration is mandatory for manufacturers producing or distributing controlled substances like hydrocodone in the United States. It ensures regulatory oversight, adherence to legal frameworks, and accountability, directly impacting supply chain legality and compliance.

2. How do regulatory standards impact API quality?
Standards such as cGMP, USP, EP, and JP define manufacturing practices, quality control parameters, and documentation. Adherence to these standards ensures API safety, efficacy, and consistency, which is vital for pharmaceutical products like Anexsia.

3. What are the key risks associated with API sourcing from China?
Risks include variable quality levels, regulatory compliance issues, and potential supply disruptions. However, many Chinese manufacturers meet international standards; due diligence and audits mitigate these risks.

4. How can pharmaceutical companies ensure the quality of API suppliers?
Through comprehensive vendor qualification processes, audits, strict qualification criteria, and ongoing monitoring. Certifications, regulatory approvals, and quality control documentation are essential evaluation tools.

5. What trends are influencing the future of API sourcing?
Trends include regional manufacturing initiatives, green chemistry practices, digital traceability solutions, and regulatory harmonization, all aimed at improving supply stability, safety, and sustainability.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). API Quality Standards and Control. FDA Regulations.
[2] International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council. (2021). Global API Manufacturing & Quality. ISO Standards.
[3] European Medicines Agency. (2020). Guidelines on Good Manufacturing Practices. EMA.
[4] U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. (2023). Controlled Substances Act and API Supply. DEA Regulations.
[5] Industry Reports. (2022). Global API Market and Supply Chain Analysis. IQVIA, Evaluate Pharma.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.