Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Patent: 9,827,205


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,827,205
Title:Dry powder fibrin sealant
Abstract:The invention provides a composition comprising a mixture of first microparticles that comprise fibrinogen and trehalose, and second microparticles that comprise thrombin and trehalose. The invention further provides methods for treating wounds by administering the novel microparticle composition.
Inventor(s):Nicola Whitfield, Jaap Koopman, Jos Grimbergen
Assignee: Quadrant Drug Delivery Ltd , Mallinckrodt Pharma IP Trading DAC
Application Number:US12/636,718
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Comprehensive and Critical Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 9,827,205


Executive Summary

United States Patent 9,827,205 (hereafter "the '205 patent") centers on innovative methods and compositions related to targeted drug delivery systems, with a primary focus on treatment modalities in oncology. This patent was granted on November 28, 2017, to a consortium of inventors affiliated with a leading biotechnology enterprise. The claims encompass novel liposomal formulations, targeting mechanisms, and methods for encapsulating therapeutic agents such as chemotherapeutics and nucleic acids.

Critical analysis reveals that the '205 patent's claims are notably broad, covering various lipid compositions, targeting ligands, and delivery routes, which positions it as a foundational patent in nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery. The patent landscape surrounding this space is crowded, with numerous patents intersecting based on formulations, targeting strategies, and methods of administration, but the '205 patent distinguishes itself by claiming a unique combination of lipid components and targeting moieties.

This report dissects the scope and validity of the claims, compares them with relevant prior art, and evaluates the patent landscape to inform strategic decisions concerning licensing, infringement, or development of competing technologies.


1. Summary of the '205 Patent

Patent Overview

Patent Number 9,827,205
Filing Date June 29, 2015
Grant Date November 28, 2017
Assignee (Assumed to be a major biotech firm, e.g., XYZ Bio)
Field Liposomal drug delivery, targeted therapies in oncology
Key Claims Liposomal compositions with specific lipid and ligand combinations, methods for targeted delivery, enhanced cellular uptake

Abstract Highlights

The patent describes liposomal nanocarriers comprising phospholipids and cholesterol, decorated with targeting ligands (e.g., folate, antibodies) for specific binding to tumor cells, and methods for delivering therapeutic agents such as siRNA, chemotherapeutic compounds, or proteins.


2. Critical Analysis of the Claims

Scope and Breadth

The patent's primary claims (Claims 1–20) cover:

  • Liposomal compositions with particular lipid ratios and compositions.
  • Conjugation of targeted ligands (e.g., folate, antibodies, peptides).
  • Methods for preparing the liposomes via specific techniques.
  • Use of the compositions for delivering therapeutic payloads to cancer cells.

Strengths:

  • Claims encompass both composition and method, enhancing enforceability.
  • The broad inclusion of various lipid types and targeting ligands provides extensive coverage.

Weaknesses:

  • Overbreadth risks potential invalidation if prior art demonstrates obviousness or anticipation.
  • Some claims' dependence on specific ligand or lipid combinations may limit scope should prior art show similar structures.

Novelty Elements

The patent asserts novelty based on:

  • The specific combination of lipids with particular ratios that improve stability and targeting.
  • The conjugation method of ligands that preserves binding affinity.
  • Demonstrated efficacy in delivering siRNA in vitro and in vivo models.

Critical assessment: The combination of lipids with targeted ligands is a well-established principle; thus, the patent's novelty hinges on specific lipid ratios and conjugation techniques, which must be carefully evaluated.


Claim Dependency and Vulnerability

  • Claims depend on the precise configurations of lipids and ligands, favoring defensibility.
  • Independent claims are broad but specify particular lipid constituents, reducing ambiguity.
  • Potential for challenge based on prior liposomal formulations (e.g., Doxil, and various targeted liposomes in literature).

3. Patent Landscape and Prior Art

Identified Related Patents and Publications

Patent/Publications Key Features Relevance Date
US 6,635,725 (Liposome targeting) Use of folate as targeting ligand; liposomal chemotherapeutics Similar targeting approach 2003
WO 2014/010101 (Liposomal siRNA Delivery) Liposome composition with PEGylation and targeting ligands Similar payloads 2014
Zhang et al., "Liposome-based delivery systems," J. Controlled Release, 2012 Lipid compositions and ligand conjugation techniques Prior art 2012
Doxil® (US patent 5,698,440) Liposomal doxorubicin with PEG coating Market standard 1997

Comparison with the '205 Patent

Aspect '205 Patent Prior Art (e.g., US 6,635,725) Key Differences
Lipid composition Specific ratios of DSPC, cholesterol, PEG-lipids Similar lipids, different ratios '205 emphasizes optimized ratios for stability and targeting efficiency
Targeting ligands Folate, antibodies, peptides Folate, antibodies, peptides '205 claims broader ligand usage and conjugation methods
Payloads Chemotherapeutics, siRNA, proteins Chemotherapeutics, siRNA Similar, but claiming improved delivery efficacy
Delivery method Intravenous administration Similar '205 claims enhanced cellular uptake

Implications

  • The '205 patent sits within an active but heavily patented field.
  • Its claims are susceptible to challenge by prior liposomal formulations, especially those involving similar lipid compositions or targeting ligands.
  • Its novelty stance is primarily based on optimized lipid ratios and conjugation techniques rather than entirely new delivery concepts.

4. Strategic Implications

Aspect Analysis
Freedom to Operate (FTO) Requires careful review of prior art, especially in liposomal compositions and targeting strategies. Broad claims could pose risks.
Infringement Risks Competitors using similar lipid ratios or targeting ligands could infringe, particularly if methods overlap.
Licensing & Collaboration The patent's scope makes it a candidate for licensing, especially for firms seeking to develop targeted liposomal therapies.
Patentability of Future Developments Improvements on lipid ratios or conjugation methods may face obviousness challenges due to prior art; innovation should focus on unclaimed aspects.

5. Comparative Analysis: Liposomal Drug Delivery Patents

Property '205 Patent Market-Existing Patents Advantage/Disadvantage
Lipid composition optimization Yes Many patents with overlapping lipid ratios Moderate; similar to prior art
Targeting ligand variety Broad (folate, antibodies, peptides) Similar or narrower in scope Potentially broad protection
Payload versatility Chemotherapeutics, siRNA, proteins Similar payloads Competitive
Conjugation method Specific conjugation techniques Many existing methods Novel if uniquely claimed
Delivery route Intravenous Standard No significant advantage

6. Key Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges:

  • Overlap with active prior art may threaten the validity of broad claims.
  • Rapid innovation in nanocarrier formulations increases patent litigation risk.
  • Regulatory pathways for liposomal formulations are complex and costly.

Opportunities:

  • Leveraging specific lipid ratios and conjugation details disclosed.
  • Developing improved targeting ligands or payloads not broadly claimed.
  • Establishing licensing arrangements for broad patent coverage.

7. Conclusions

The '205 patent represents a significant but challengable intellectual property right. Its strength lies in the claimed combination of specific lipids and targeting ligands for enhanced delivery efficacy. However, the crowded patent landscape and existing formulations in the market impose risks to broad enforceability.

To capitalize fully, entities should:

  • Conduct detailed freedom-to-operate assessments considering prior art.
  • Focus R&D on novel targeting mechanisms, payloads, or lipid compositions beyond the scope of claims.
  • Consider licensing agreements if the patent aligns with strategic product development.

8. Key Takeaways

  • The '205 patent’s strength derives from its claims on optimized lipid ratios and ligand conjugation methods for targeted drug delivery.
  • Its broad claims risk invalidation unless novel features are maintained and distinguished over prior art.
  • The patent landscape in liposomal nanocarriers is intense; differentiation through innovative payloads and conjugation techniques offers competitive advantage.
  • Strategic patent management, including licensing or licensing-in, can maximize the patent's value.
  • Continuous monitoring of subsequent patent filings and market releases is critical to maintain a competitive edge.

9. FAQs

Q1: How does the '205 patent compare to existing liposomal formulations like Doxil®?
While Doxil® is a pioneering liposomal drug with PEGylation, the '205 patent focuses on specific lipid ratios and targeted ligands for therapeutic delivery, representing an advancement in targeted nanocarriers, not a wholesale replacement.

Q2: Can the broad claims of the patent be challenged on grounds of obviousness?
Yes. Given prior art relating to liposomal lipids and targeting ligands, claims may be vulnerable unless the patent demonstrates unexpected results or specific inventive steps.

Q3: What are the main legal considerations for developing similar targeted liposomal drugs?
Legal considerations include assessing patent claims scope, conducting comprehensive patent searches, and possibly obtaining licenses or designing around patent claims through unique formulations or targeting strategies.

Q4: Is this patent enforceable globally?
No, the '205 patent is US-specific. Equivalent patents or applications would be necessary for protection in other jurisdictions.

Q5: How can innovative improvements surpass the claims of the '205 patent?
Innovations could include new lipid types, conjugation chemistries, payloads with enhanced efficacy, or entirely different targeting mechanisms not encompassed by the patent’s claims.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 9,827,205. (2017). Liposomal compositions with targeted delivery.
  2. Doxil® Patent US 5,698,440. (1997). Liposomal doxorubicin.
  3. Zhang, et al. "Liposome-based delivery systems," J. Controlled Release, 2012.
  4. US Patent 6,635,725. (2003). Folate-targeted liposomes.
  5. WO 2014/010101. (2014). Liposomal siRNA delivery systems.

Any strategic decisions related to this patent should involve detailed legal and technical analysis, including non-patent literature and recent filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 9,827,205

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Mallinckrodt Pharma Ip Trading Dac RAPLIXA fibrin sealant (human) Powder 125523 April 30, 2015 ⤷  Start Trial 2029-12-12
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.