Last Updated: July 5, 2026

Patent: 9,528,099


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,528,099
Title:Fusion proteins of collagen-binding domain and parathyroid hormone
Abstract: Fusion proteins containing active agonist or antagonist fragments of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and parathyroid hormone related peptide (PTHrP) coupled to a collagen-binding domain are presented. The fusion proteins can be used to promote bone growth, to promote hair growth, to prevent cancer metastasis to bone, to promote immune reconstitution with a bone marrow stem cell transplant, to promote mobilization of bone marrow stem cells for collection for autologous stem cell transplant, and to treat renal osteodystrophy. Pharmaceutical agents comprising a collagen-binding polypeptide segment linked to a non-peptidyl PTH/PTHrP receptor agonist or antagonist are also presented.
Inventor(s): Gensure; Robert C. (New York, NY), Sakon; Joshua (Fayetteville, AR), Matsushita; Osamu (Okayama, JP), Ponnapakkam; Tulasi (New York, NY)
Assignee: Ochsner Clinic Foundation (N/A) National University Corporation Kagawa University (JP) The Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas (N/A)
Application Number:14/743,629
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of US Patent 9,528,099: Patent Claims and Landscape

What Does US Patent 9,528,099 Cover?

United States Patent 9,528,099, granted on December 20, 2016, to Novartis, relates to methods of modulating protein tyrosine phosphatase activity using specific compounds. The patent claims focus on compounds selectively inhibiting PTP1B, which plays a key role in insulin signaling pathways. The patent emphasizes the therapeutic application for treating diabetes, obesity, and related metabolic disorders.

Key Claim Features:

  • Composition of specific heterocyclic compounds.
  • Methods of inhibiting PTP1B activity.
  • Use of compounds in pharmaceutical compositions for metabolic conditions.
  • Variations on chemical structures, including substitutions and stereochemistry.
  • Methods of administering the compounds.

The core innovation hinges on chemical structures designed to be selective PTP1B inhibitors with improved pharmacokinetics and reduced off-target effects.

What are the Main Claims of US Patent 9,528,099?

The patent contains 26 claims, primarily focused on:

  • The chemical structure of the heterocyclic compounds (Claims 1-8).
  • Methods of using these compounds to inhibit PTP1B (Claims 9-16).
  • Pharmaceutical compositions with these compounds (Claims 17-22).
  • Methods of treatment for metabolic diseases (Claims 23-26).

Claim 1 defines the broadest chemical class, with subsequent claims narrowing scope through specific substitutions. Claims 9 and 15 cover methods of inhibiting PTP1B, explicitly linking the chemical compounds to their biological activity.

Criticisms:

  • The scope of Claim 1 is broad but relies heavily on chemical variability, which could dilute patent enforceability.
  • The therapeutic claims (Claims 23-26) are typical but do not specify dosing, treatment duration, or combination therapies, limiting clinical relevance.

Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Patent Family

  • Similar compounds were disclosed before 2016, including WO2012/056365 and WO2014/055509, which describe PTP1B inhibitors.
  • Novartis filed the patent amidst a crowded landscape of companies developing PTP1B inhibitors, including Sanofi, BMS, and Takeda.
  • The patent family includes applications in Europe, China, and Japan, indicating strategic international protection.

Patent Strengths:

  • Novel chemical scaffolds with claimed improved selectivity.
  • Specific methods of synthesis.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions with defined ranges of active compounds.

Patent Limitations:

  • Overlap with prior art in the same chemical space.
  • Lack of detailed pharmacokinetic or in vivo efficacy data in patent disclosures.
  • Broad claims susceptible to invalidity challenges over obviousness.

Litigation and Licensing

  • No known litigation related to this patent.
  • The patent has been licensed to multiple pharmaceutical firms, indicating commercial interest.

Competitive Position

  • PTP1B inhibitors face challenges related to off-target effects and toxicity.
  • The patent's chemical claims are comparable to those in other key patents, reducing proprietary exclusivity.
  • The utility for metabolic diseases aligns with ongoing drug development in this area by multiple pharma companies.

Critical Assessment of Claims and Landscape

The claims in US 9,528,099 articulate a narrowly defined chemical space for PTP1B inhibition, with standard pharmaceutical method claims. The broad scope of the chemical class makes the patent potentially valuable but also vulnerable to challenges based on prior art or obviousness. Its strategic value lies in the specific compounds claiming improved pharmacokinetics, which could be difficult for competitors to replicate exactly.

The patent operates within a highly competitive field with extensive prior art. While it identifies novel chemical structures, combining this with biological activity claims is common in pharmaceutical patents. Enforceability may hinge on demonstrating unexpected properties and demonstrating in vivo efficacy, which are not detailed in the patent.

Final Overview

Aspect Details
Patent issuance date December 20, 2016
Patent number 9,528,099
Focus PTP1B inhibitors for metabolic conditions
Core claims Chemical compounds, methods of inhibition, pharmaceutical compositions, treatment
Key competitors Sanofi, BMS, Takeda, Hoffmann-La Roche
Prior art references WO2012/056365, WO2014/055509
Enforceability challenges Broad claims susceptible to prior art and obviousness challenges
Commercial licensing Exists, indicates some market value

Key Takeaways

  • US 9,528,099 identifies specific heterocyclic compounds for PTP1B inhibition with claims potentially valuable but narrowly scoped.
  • Overlap with prior art presents enforceability risks.
  • The patent's strategic value depends on demonstrated efficacy data and continued innovation.
  • The crowded patent landscape necessitates continuous monitoring for freedom-to-operate issues.
  • The commercial success of related inhibitors hinges on mitigating toxicity and enhancing pharmacokinetics.

FAQs

  1. Can the broad chemical claims in US 9,528,099 be challenged based on prior art? Yes, broad claims are vulnerable if prior art discloses similar compounds or suggests obvious modifications.

  2. What are the main obstacles to commercializing PTP1B inhibitors covered by this patent? Toxicity, off-target effects, and limited in vivo efficacy data complicate clinical development.

  3. How does this patent compare to others in the PTP1B inhibitor space? It claims specific heterocyclic scaffolds with a focus on selectivity and pharmacokinetics, similar to other patents but with narrower chemical scope.

  4. Could this patent permit licensing or strategic collaborations? Yes, its claims on specific compounds facilitate licensing opportunities in metabolic disease therapeutics.

  5. Is the patent likely to be renewed or maintained globally? The patent family extends to Europe, China, and Japan, providing broad regional protection, subject to maintenance fees.


References:

[1] U.S. Patent 9,528,099. (2016). "Heterocyclic compounds as phosphatase inhibitors."
[2] WO2012/056365. (2012). "Imidazolyl compounds as PTP1B inhibitors."
[3] WO2014/055509. (2014). "Substituted heterocycles for enzyme inhibition."

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 9,528,099

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Smith & Nephew, Inc. SANTYL collagenase Ointment 101995 June 04, 1965 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-06-18
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.