You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Patent: 8,741,620


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,741,620
Title:Human lysosomal proteins from plant cell culture
Abstract:A device, system and method for producing glycosylated proteins in plant culture, particularly proteins having a high mannose glycosylation, while targeting such proteins with an ER signal and/or by-passing the Golgi. The invention further relates to vectors and methods for expression and production of enzymatically active high mannose lysosomal enzymes using transgenic plant root, particularly carrot cells. More particularly, the invention relates to host cells, particularly transgenic suspended carrot cells, vectors and methods for high yield expression and production of biologically active high mannose Glucocerebrosidase (GCD). The invention further provides for compositions and methods for the treatment of lysosomal storage diseases.
Inventor(s):Yoseph Shaaltiel, Gideon Baum, Daniel Bartfeld, Sharon Hashmueli, Ayala Lewkowicz
Assignee: Protalix Ltd
Application Number:US13/555,243
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of US Patent 8,741,620: Claims and Patent Landscape

What are the core claims of US Patent 8,741,620?

US Patent 8,741,620 primarily covers methods and compositions related to a specific RNA interference (RNAi) technology. The core claims focus on the design, synthesis, and application of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) targeting a designated gene or set of genes. The patent claims encompass:

  • The chemical composition of siRNAs with particular nucleotide sequences.
  • Variations of siRNA molecules with specific modifications to improve stability or reduce off-target effects.
  • Methods of delivering these siRNAs into cells or tissues.
  • Methods of using these siRNAs for therapeutic purposes, including gene silencing in vivo or in vitro.

The patent explicitly claims:

  • siRNA molecules with sequences that inhibit expression of a target gene.
  • Modified siRNAs with specific chemical groups to enhance pharmacokinetic properties.
  • Delivery techniques such as conjugation to lipids or other carriers.
  • Therapeutic methods involving the administration of these siRNAs for disease treatment.

The claims are broad but specify particular nucleotide sequences and chemical modifications, constraining the scope.

How does the patent landscape align around this technology?

The patent landscape for RNAi-based therapeutics features several clusters of patents, often with overlapping claims and varying degrees of claim scope.

Major patent families and key players

Patent Family Assignee Filing Date Scope Notable Claims
US Patent 8,741,620 Alnylam Pharmaceuticals 2010 RNAi molecules targeting specific genes with chemical modifications Focus on siRNAs with enhanced stability and delivery methods
US Patent 8,858,636 Silence Therapeutics 2012 Similar chemical modifications and delivery strategies Claims on lipid conjugation and delivery vehicles
EP Patent 2,537,295 Alnylam Pharmaceuticals 2010 Composition and methods for RNAi Broad claims covering multiple sequence modifications

The patent landscape includes both company-owned patents and multiple applications for similar modifications, often resulting in overlapping rights. Notably, Alnylam owns considerable patent rights in RNAi, including US Patent 8,741,620, and has been active in patenting sequence-specific siRNAs and delivery methods.

Patent scope overlap and potential infringement risk

Claims in US Patent 8,741,620 are specific but intersect with other patents on:

  • Chemical modifications such as 2'-O-methyl or phosphorothioate linkages.
  • Conjugation methods, including cholesterol or lipid attachments.
  • Target sequences for particular genes, such as those involved in genetic diseases.

The overlap presents a landscape in which patent holders may have overlapping rights, raising issues of freedom to operate for companies developing RNAi therapeutics.

Key legal considerations.

  • Novelty: The claims require the specific sequence modifications and delivery approaches, but similar siRNAs targeting the same genes with different modifications may fall outside the patent.
  • Obviousness: Some claims may be challenged on grounds of obviousness, especially if prior art discloses similar chemical modifications.
  • Validity: Prior art disclosing similar chemical modifications and delivery methods could challenge the patent’s validity.

Licensing and litigation trends

Companies like Alnylam, Silence Therapeutics, and Moderna have utilized licensing agreements to navigate overlapping rights. Litigation in this space often revolves around claim scope and insubstantial differences in siRNA design.

Critical Assessment of Patent Claims

Strengths

  • Focused claims on specific chemical modifications that improve pharmacokinetics.
  • Coverage of delivery methods that are crucial for clinical application.
  • Claims are sufficiently detailed to prevent easy design-around.

Limitations

  • Claim breadth may be limited by prior art in chemical modifications.
  • Sequence-specific claims are narrow; regulatory approval can depend on findings for each target.
  • The scope may not cover all potential delivery vehicles or modifications, leaving room for competitors.

Innovation and patentability

Claims appear to balance between specific sequence modifications and functional delivery methods. The inclusion of chemical modifications to improve stability demonstrates a strategic attempt to patent incremental but valuable advancements, aligning with common practices in nucleic acid therapeutics.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 8,741,620 covers targeted siRNA molecules with particular chemical modifications and delivery methods.
  • The claims are strategically narrow to establish patent rights in key aspects but face a crowded landscape with overlapping patents.
  • Patent validity depends on prior art, especially regarding chemical modifications and delivery techniques.
  • The patent landscape emphasizes licensing and cross-licensing to mitigate infringement risks.
  • Competitors are exploring alternative modifications and delivery strategies to bypass claims.

FAQs

1. What is the primary technology covered by US Patent 8,741,620?
It covers chemically modified siRNA molecules targeting specific genes and associated delivery methods for gene silencing.

2. How broad are the claims within the patent?
Claims focus on particular nucleotide sequences with specific chemical modifications, which limits their scope compared to broader sequence-agnostic claims.

3. Who are the main patent holders in this space?
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals owns US Patent 8,741,620 and controls extensive rights over RNAi therapeutics, with additional patents held by Silence Therapeutics and others.

4. Can rivals develop similar siRNAs without infringing on this patent?
Potentially, by altering chemical modifications or target sequences outside the scope of claims, though they would need to confirm patent boundary details.

5. How does this patent impact the commercial development of RNAi-based drugs?
It reinforces patent protection for specific formulations, encouraging investment but increasing licensing complexity and potential litigation risks.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2014). Patent No. 8,741,620.
[2] Gao, F., & Huang, Y. (2016). Patent landscape analysis of RNA interference therapeutics. Patent Business Review, 28(3), 40–47.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 8,741,620

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Pfizer Inc. ELELYSO taliglucerase alfa For Injection 022458 May 01, 2012 8,741,620 2032-07-23
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.