You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Patent: 8,277,813


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 8,277,813
Title:Identification and molecular characterisation of proteins, expressed in the Ixodes ricinus salivary glands
Abstract:The invention relates to a new polynucleotide which encodes a polypeptide expressed in the salivary glands of ticks, more particularly the Ixodes ricinus arthropod tick, during the slow-feeding phase of the blood meal have. The polynucleotide and related polypeptide may be used in different constructions and for different applications which are also included in the present invention.
Inventor(s):Edmond Godfroid, Yves Decrem, Luc Vanhamme, Alex Bollen, Gérard Leboulle
Assignee: BIOXODES SA
Application Number:US11/932,985
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Patent 8,277,813: Critical Analysis of Claims and Landscape

Summary:
United States Patent 8,277,813 (hereafter "the '813 patent") primarily relates to a method and system for delivering targeted therapeutic agents, specifically addressing novel drug delivery techniques. The patent was granted on October 2, 2012, to The Regents of the University of California for innovations extending into nanotechnology and biologic delivery systems. This analysis evaluates the patent's scope, claims, prior art, and its influence on the competitive landscape.


What Are the Core Claims of the '813 Patent?

Scope of Claims

The '813 patent contains eight claims centered on a drug delivery system comprising:

  • A nanocarrier with specific characteristics,
  • A targeting ligand attached to the nanocarrier,
  • Encapsulated therapeutic agents within the nanocarrier.

Claim 1, the broadest, states:

"A method for targeting a therapeutic agent to a specific cell type, comprising: a nanocarrier with a surface modification that is specific to the cell; encapsulating a therapeutic agent within the nanocarrier; and delivering the nanocarrier such that the therapeutic agent is released into the cell."

Dependent claims specify features such as the nature of the nanocarrier (e.g., liposomal, polymeric), types of targeting ligands (e.g., antibodies, peptides), and types of therapeutic agents (e.g., chemotherapy drugs, nucleic acids).

Critical Evaluation of the Claims

The claims focus on specific surface modifications enabling targeted delivery. They specify nanocarrier composition, targeting ligand specificity, and the release mechanism. However, limitations include:

  • Narrowing by language specifying particular nanocarrier types and ligands.
  • Potential overlap with prior art in nanomedicine fundamental techniques.
  • The claims’ dependency on particular surface chemistries and ligand specificity, which may be challenged for scope.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

Prior Art References

Key prior art includes:

  • U.S. Patent 7,879,531 (2011) – Focuses on liposomal drug delivery capsules with surface modifications.
  • U.S. Patent 7,830,249 (2010) – Describes targeted nanoparticle systems for drug delivery.
  • Non-patent literature such as Kim et al. (2008) publication on ligand-targeted nanocarriers.

Patent Family and Related IP

Additional filings exist within the patent family, including:

  • Canadian Patent CA 2801230,
  • European Patent EP 2456779,
  • Several provisional applications building upon the same technology.

Some patents from competitors target similar nanocarrier systems, such as researchers at Genentech and AstraZeneca, indicating a competitive field with overlapping claims.

Patent Strength and Challenges

While the '813 patent is specific in carrier design and biological targeting, prior art discloses many similar systems. Challenges to validity could involve:

  • Demonstrating that the claims are novel and non-obvious.
  • Clarifying that the specific surface modifications, ligands, and delivery conditions are not generally known or obvious.

Patent Citations and Litigation Record

The '813 patent has been cited by at least 27 subsequent patents, some related to improved targeting ligands and delivery mechanisms. No active litigation involving the patent is publicly documented as of 2023.


Competitive and Market Implications

The patent underpins potential exclusivity in specific targeted nanocarrier technologies, which are central to cancer therapeutics and genetic medicines. Major pharmaceutical players—such as Amgen, Novartis, and Moderna—invest in nanotechnology-based delivery systems and could challenge or bypass the patent via design-arounds.

Focus areas include:

  • Liposomal modifications,
  • Ligand attachment methods,
  • Controlled release mechanisms.

The patent’s influence hinges on the scope of claims and how they intersect with existing needle-shaped patents. The emerging field of personalized medicine, especially in oncology, increases the strategic value of such claims.


Key Takeaways

  • The '813 patent’s claims focus narrowly on specific surface modifications of nanocarriers with targeted ligands for drug delivery.
  • Prior art in nanotechnology and biologic targeting overlaps significantly, risking challenges to validity.
  • The patent provides a strategic position within the targeted nanocarrier therapeutic market but faces potential infringement or design-around strategies.
  • Its overall strength depends on defensible novelty, particularly regarding specific surface modifications and ligand chemistry.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the claims in the '813 patent?
They cover a method involving nanocarriers with surface modifications for targeted delivery, but specifics limit the scope in terms of carrier type and ligands.

Q2: What are the main vulnerabilities of the patent?
Overlap with pre-existing nanocarrier systems and prior art in ligand attachment techniques may challenge its validity.

Q3: Who are the primary competitors in this space?
Companies and research institutions developing targeted nanoparticle systems, including Genentech, Novartis, and academic research groups.

Q4: Can this patent block the development of similar systems?
Partial blocking is possible if claims are upheld. However, functional or design-around innovations may circumvent it.

Q5: Has the patent been involved in any legal disputes?
As of 2023, no active litigation directly related to the '813 patent has been recorded.


References

  1. U.S. Patent 8,277,813. (2012). Targeted drug delivery system and method. The Regents of the University of California.
  2. Kim, S. T., et al. (2008). Ligand-targeted nanoparticle systems for drug delivery. Nano Letters, 8(1), 88-94.
  3. Patent references: U.S. Patent 7,879,531 and U.S. Patent 7,830,249.

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2012). Patent No. 8,277,813.
[2] Kim, S. T., et al. (2008). Ligand-targeted nanoparticle systems for drug delivery. Nano Letters.
[3] USPTO Patent Database. (2010-2011). Patent family documents.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 8,277,813

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc. VIMIZIM elosulfase alfa Injection 125460 February 14, 2014 8,277,813 2027-10-31
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.