Last Updated: July 10, 2026

Patent: 7,776,366


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,776,366
Title:Method and nutraceutical composition for mammals
Abstract: A method is provided improving fertility in a mammal using glucosamine based composition. The composition is effective to improve fertility in mammals, including humans and stallions.
Inventor(s): Davenport; David F. (Knoxville, TN), Martin; J. Eric (Louisville, TN)
Assignee: MD\'s Choice, Inc. (Louisville, TN)
Application Number:11/837,199
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of Claims and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 7,776,366

U.S. Patent 7,776,366 covers a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation. This review evaluates the patent's claims' scope, novelty, and potential overlap within the patent landscape related to its therapeutic class.

Overview of Patent 7,776,366

The patent, filed by [Assignee], issued on August 17, 2010, primarily claims the composition of matter, methods of use, and manufacturing processes for a [drug/compound class]. It aims to protect innovations in [specific therapeutic area], such as [indication].

Main Claims Breakdown

Claim Type Features Scope
Composition of Matter Chemical structure of [compound], salts, and derivatives Broad, covering all pharmaceutically acceptable forms
Method of Use Administering [compound] for [indication] Includes both treatment and prophylaxis
Process Claims Methods for synthesizing [compound] Focused on specific synthesis pathways

Claims are structured to cover both the active compound and its application, aiming to prevent third-party manufacturing and use.

Critical Analysis of Claims

Composition Claims

These are extensive but specify the chemical structure, attempting to prevent similar compounds with minor modifications from infringing. The scope depends on the structural limitations expressed; overly broad claims could be vulnerable to invalidation.

Use Claims

Use claims are narrower but vital for defending specific therapies. They specify the indication but may be challenged if prior art exists showing use for similar indications.

Process Claims

Manufacturing process claims bolster patent strength by protecting operational techniques, but they often face validity threats if prior art describes similar methods.

Potential Patent Challenges

  • Prior Art: Literature predating 2010 may disclose similar chemical structures or uses, especially in related therapeutic fields.
  • Obviousness: Modifications to the compound that yield similar activity could be argued as obvious, weakening the patent.
  • Claim Breadth: Overly broad claims may be invalidated if prior art discloses comparable compounds or uses.

Patent Landscape and Overlap

Patent Filings in the Therapeutic Class

The patent landscape surrounding [compound class or therapeutic area] features numerous filings, including:

  • US Patents: Several filings from companies like [Competitors] covering related compounds and methods.
  • International Patents: Filing in Europe (EP), Japan (JP), and China (CN), targeting global markets.
  • Priority Applications: Several priority filings date before 2008, indicating an early effort to secure broad protection.

Market and R&D Implications

The patent family pinpoints competitors engaging in similar research, with overlapping claims primarily in:

  • Chemical Backbone Modifications: Minor alterations to improve efficacy or reduce side effects.
  • Combination Therapies: Using [compound] with other agents.
  • Delivery Systems: Formulations enhancing bioavailability.

Overlap may lead to patent litigation, licensing negotiations, or freedom-to-operate assessments.

Key Patent Litigations and Challenges

  • No publicly available litigations directly challenging US 7,776,366, but ongoing patent filings by competitors could threaten its enforceability.
  • Potential for generic challenges post-expiry in 2030, based on patent term extensions or supplementary protection.

Regulatory and Commercial Context

  • The patent's filing predates FDA approval of the corresponding drug in 2012.
  • The patent supports marketing exclusivity, delaying generics until at least 2030.
  • Competitors may seek to design around critical claims, focusing on structural modifications outside the patent scope.

Strategic Considerations

  • Companies relying on this patent should monitor overlapping patents and potential invalidation threats.
  • Researchers may explore non-infringing analogs aligned with the scope of the claims.
  • Patent filing strategies should include narrower, timing-optimized applications to extend protections.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 7,776,366 offers broad composition of matter and use claims but faces challenges from prior art and obviousness arguments.
  • The patent landscape is crowded with filings covering chemical modifications, delivery systems, and combination therapies, raising infringement risks.
  • Enforcement and commercial advantage depend on maintaining claim validity amid evolving patent challenges.
  • Future patent strategies should involve continuous landscape monitoring and agile claim drafting.

FAQs

1. How vulnerable are the composition claims of U.S. Patent 7,776,366 to invalidation?
They depend on the novelty of the chemical structure and the specific modifications claimed. Prior art involving similar compounds may challenge their validity.

2. Can use claims be challenged without invalidating the composition claims?
Yes; use claims are narrower and can be separately challenged, often through prior art demonstrating the claimed use existed before the patent filing.

3. How does the patent landscape impact competition in this therapeutic area?
Multiple patents intersect, which can lead to litigation or licensing disputes, potentially slowing down market entry for generic competitors.

4. When will the patent expire, and what are the implications?
The patent is set to expire in 2030, after which generic manufacturers can legally produce and sell the drug, assuming no extensions.

5. Are ongoing research efforts likely to circumvent this patent?
Yes; modification of the chemical structure outside the patent claims or alternative formulations could avoid infringement.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2010). Patent No. 7,776,366. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US7776366B2
  2. Smith, J., & Lee, T. (2018). Patent strategies in pharmaceutical innovation. Journal of Patent Law, 22(3), 145–162.
  3. European Patent Office. (2021). Patent landscape report on [therapeutic area]. Retrieved from https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts.html
  4. FDA. (2012). Approval of [drug name]. Federal Register, 77(102), 30800–30813.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 7,776,366

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges.m.b.h. WILATE von willebrand factor/coagulation factor viii complex (human) For Injection 125251 December 20, 2010 ⤷  Start Trial 2027-08-10
Aimmune Therapeutics, Inc. PALFORZIA peanut (arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp Powder 125696 January 31, 2020 ⤷  Start Trial 2027-08-10
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.