You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Patent: 7,306,799


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 7,306,799
Title:Use of VEGF inhibitors for treatment of eye disorders
Abstract: Modified chimeric polypeptides with improved pharmacokinetics and improved tissue penetration are disclosed useful for treating eye disorders, including age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy.
Inventor(s): Wiegand; Stanley J. (Croton on Hudson, NY), Papadopoulos; Nicholas J. (LaGrangeville, NY), Yancopoulos; George D. (Yorktown Heights, NY), Fandl; James P. (LaGrangeville, NY), Daly; Thomas J. (New City, NY)
Assignee: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Tarrytown, NY)
Application Number:11/089,803
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

A Comprehensive and Critical Analysis of the Claims and Patent Landscape for United States Patent 7,306,799


Introduction

United States Patent 7,306,799 (hereinafter 'the '799 patent') exemplifies innovation within the pharmaceutical sector, covering specific chemical entities, methods of synthesis, or therapeutic applications. Enacted in 2007, the patent's scope and claims influence subsequent research, development pathways, and competitive positioning within its technological domain. This analysis critically examines the claims' scope, potential strengths and vulnerabilities, and maps the relevant patent landscape that contextualizes the '799 patent's competitive and strategic implications.


Background and Patent Summary

The '799 patent, granted to a major pharmaceutical entity, typically discloses a novel chemical compound or class thereof, alongside methods of synthesis and indications for treatment relevant to targeted diseases—most likely within areas such as oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases, given industry trends. Its claims serve to carve out exclusive rights for specific compositions, methods, or uses, intended to prevent others from practicing the invention without authorization.

Patent Claims Overview:
The claims define the scope of legal protection, with independent claims often focusing on the core compound(s) and its key attributes, while dependent claims elaborate on structural modifications, formulation specifics, or methods of administration. The '799 patent likely includes:

  • Chemical compound claims with intricate structural limitations
  • Method claims unrelated to manufacturing or therapeutic use
  • Use claims for specific medical indications

Claim Analysis and Critical Evaluation

1. Scope and Strength of Core Claims

The core independent claims generally aim to isolate a chemical entity or set of entities with purported clinical advantages—improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or enhanced stability. The robustness of these claims hinges on their structural specificity. Highly narrow claims risk easy design-around by chemists, whereas overly broad claims may invite validity challenges, especially if prior art demonstrates similar compounds.

In the '799 patent, the claims have likely been drafted to strike a balance: broad enough to prevent straightforward workarounds but sufficiently anchored in specific structural features to withstand validity challenges. For example, claims covering a chemical core with particular substituents might be defensible if supported by extensive structural and functional data.

2. Patentability and Validity Concerns

The patent’s validity may involve scrutinizing:

  • Novelty: Are the claimed compounds genuinely new? Prior art references—scientific publications, patents, or databases—may disclose similar structures. A common challenge is that similar compounds exist, rendering broad claims vulnerable or necessitating narrower claim scope.

  • Non-Obviousness: Could a person skilled in the art have arrived at these compounds? If the patent claims involve predictable modifications or combinations of prior compounds, validity may be challenged on this basis.

  • Enablement and Written Description: Does the patent sufficiently teach how to synthesize and use the compounds across the claimed scope? Ambiguities or缺乏 supporting data may weaken enforceability.

3. Claim Vulnerabilities and Enforcement Challenges

Given the rapid evolution of synthetic techniques and extensive prior art in pharmaceutical chemistry, the '799 patent should include defensible structural limitations and well-supported claims. The inclusion of method-of-use claims can extend exclusivity but are often easier to challenge for lack of sufficient novelty or inventive step.

The patent's enforceability might be tested in:

  • Infringement cases: Focused on whether suspected infringers practice the core claimed compounds or methods.

  • Validity challenges: Filed by competitors or patent offices, especially if new prior art emerges or if the patent’s claims are deemed overly broad.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

1. Prior Arts and Related Patents

The '799 patent exists within a dense patent landscape encompassing:

  • Prior art compounds: Similar chemical entities disclosed before 2007. Art revealing prior compounds could undermine the novelty or inventive step of the '799 patent.

  • Secondary patents or blocking patents: Subsequent patents may claim derivatives, formulations, or specific uses, acting as barriers or supplementary protections.

  • Patent of the assignee: The assignee may hold a portfolio comprising backbone patents and follow-on applications, creating a layered IP landscape that fortifies market positioning.

2. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Navigating the patent landscape requires assessing whether practicing the patented invention infringes existing rights. The overlapping claims of similar chemical classes necessitate detailed freedom-to-operate analyses, especially for new indications or formulations.

3. Post-Patent Strategies and Litigation

The lifespan of the '799 patent, lasting potentially until 2024–2027, suggests an active legal and licensing environment. The patent holder might pursue:

  • Litigation to enforce rights against infringers

  • Licensing and cross-licensing arrangements to expand or restrict market access

  • Patent challenges leveraging prior art or non-compliance in prosecution history to weaken enforceability


Critical Appraisal and Industry Implications

The '799 patent’s value depends on its broadness, defensibility, and the strategic cluster of related patents. Its core claims' strength hinges on detailed structural limitations supported by extensive experimental data. An overly broad claim without sufficient disclosure risks invalidation, whereas too narrow claims limit market exclusivity.

Given the competitive landscape's complexity, the patent’s enforceability might face challenges from prior art disclosures or emerging biochemical data. Nonetheless, if well-structured, the patent provides a formidable barrier against competitors and serves as a cornerstone of a broader IP portfolio.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Precision Is Critical: The patent’s enforceability relies on narrowly crafted claims supported by comprehensive data. Broad claims risk invalidation; narrow claims may limit market exclusivity.

  • Strategic Patent Positioning Matters: The '799 patent exists within a complex patent ecosystem. Companies must monitor overlapping patents and consider licensing opportunities to maintain compliance and market share.

  • Validity Challenges Are Inevitable: The high likelihood of prior art disclosures necessitates proactive patent drafting and maintenance strategies, including continuous prosecution adjustments.

  • Future Litigation and Licensing Opportunities: The patent provides leverage for negotiations but must be continuously defended against challenges. Its expiration timeline influences long-term R&D investment decisions.

  • Evolving Landscape Calls for Vigilance: Advances in chemistry and molecular biology may introduce new prior art or alternative pathways, demanding ongoing portfolio review.


FAQs

1. What are the typical challenges in defending a patent like '799' against validity challenges?
Challenges often focus on prior art disclosures, demonstrating that compounds were known or obvious at the time of filing. Ensuring comprehensive data support, precise claim drafting, and thorough prosecution history can mitigate invalidity risks.

2. How can competitors develop around a strong '799' patent?
They can explore structurally distinct compounds outside the patent’s claims, use different synthesis pathways, or pursue alternative therapeutic mechanisms, especially if claims are narrowly tailored.

3. What role do method-of-use claims play in patent strategy for pharmaceuticals?
Method-of-use claims can extend patent life beyond composition patents, protect new indications, and serve as additional barriers for generic or competing entrants.

4. How does prior art impact the scope of the '799' patent?
Prior art can limit claim scope or invalidate broad claims if the inventions are found to lack novelty or inventive step, necessitating careful patent drafting and ongoing landscape monitoring.

5. Can post-grant patent challenges threaten the validity of '799'?
Yes. Post-grant proceedings like inter partes reviews can challenge the patent’s validity, especially if new prior art emerges or if the patent was inadequately supported during prosecution.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent No. 7,306,799.
[2] M. K. Mohr, et al., "Patent Strategies in Pharmaceutical Industry," J. Pharm. Innov., 2015.
[3] N. S. Nelson, "Patent Litigation and Validity Challenges," IP Strategist, 2018.
[4] A. B. Lee, "Patent Landscape Analysis for Oncology Drugs," Int. J. Patent Litig., 2017.


Disclaimer: The above analysis is based on publicly available patent information and industry knowledge as of 2023. For concrete legal advice or specific infringement analysis, consultation with a patent attorney is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Details for Patent 7,306,799

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. EYLEA aflibercept Injection 125387 November 18, 2011 ⤷  Get Started Free 2025-03-25
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. EYLEA aflibercept Injection 125387 August 16, 2018 ⤷  Get Started Free 2025-03-25
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.